Content deleted Content added
Tina778899 (talk | contribs) Update Research Process and Methodology - SP25 - Sect 202 - Thu assignment details |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 9:
{{WikiProject Linguistics|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Climate change|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Environment|}}
}}
{{American English}}
== Definition ==
The New York Times definition is <i>Silicon Valley has been gripped by a frenzy over start-ups working on “generative” A.I., technologies that can generate text, images and other media in response to short prompts.</i><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/07/technology/generative-ai-chatgpt-investments.html | title=A New Area of A.I. Booms, Even Amid the Tech Gloom | work=The New York Times | date=7 January 2023 | last1=Griffith | first1=Erin | last2=Metz | first2=Cade }}</ref>
The Pinaya et al. definition is <i>Generative AI refers to a set of artificial intelligence techniques and models designed to learn the underlying patterns and structure of a dataset and generate new data points that plausibly could be part of the original dataset.</i><ref>
The NYT definition can be objected to on the grounds that [[Generative adversarial network|GAN]] is generative but does not take prompts as input. NYT was probably conflating the broader category of [[Generative model]] with the specific category of [[Generative pre-trained transformer]] and similar transformer-based architectures, which happened to become popular in 2022. Furthermore the "text, images and other media" part can be objected to on the grounds that a [[Generative model]] can generate outputs such as robot actions and industrial HVAC control<ref>
The Pinaya et al. definition can be objected to on the grounds that it doesn't mean much to a Wikipedia reader who is not an expert in the subject. The common usage of "Generative AI" in 2023, and the reason readers will be looking it up, is to refer to systems like [[ChatGPT]], [[Midjourney]], and so on.
Line 185 ⟶ 186:
==Wiki Education assignment: INFO505 Foundations of Information Science==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Arizona/INFO505_Foundations_of_Information_Science_(Spring_2025) | assignments = [[User:Anonymussy|Anonymussy]] | reviewers = [[User:Acarajé No 1|Acarajé No 1]], [[User:Acxer2647|Acxer2647]], [[User:Grad4you|Grad4you]] | start_date = 2025-01-15 | end_date = 2025-05-06 }}
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:
==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP25 - Sect 202 - Thu==
Line 193 ⟶ 194:
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Tina778899|Tina778899]] ([[User talk:Tina778899|talk]]) 17:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)</span>
==Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Arizona/Linguistics_in_the_Digital_Age_(Spring_2025) | assignments = [[User:Ashaadhikari|Ashaadhikari]] | start_date = 2025-01-15 | end_date = 2025-05-07 }}
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Ashaadhikari|Ashaadhikari]] ([[User talk:Ashaadhikari|talk]]) 04:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)</span>
== Possible Non-Neutral Text in "History Section" / Incorrect Subject Labelling ==
The ''History'' section has an ending paragraph that goes on to talk about how Asia-Pacific countries have higher adoptions of generative artificial intelligence, which seems off-topic considering the information previous, and could be seen as non-neutral, going on to say that Asia-Pacific countries are less sceptical.
"[[Asia–Pacific]] countries are significantly more optimistic than Western societies about generative AI and show higher adoption rates. Despite expressing concerns about privacy and the pace of change, in a 2024 survey, 68% of Asia-Pacific respondents believed that AI was having a positive impact on the world, compared to 57% globally. According to a survey by [[SAS Institute|SAS]] and Coleman Parkes Research, [[China]] in particular has emerged as a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, exceeding both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is further evidenced by China's [[Intellectual property in China|intellectual property]] developments in the field, with a [[UN]] report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI [[Patent|patents]] from 2014 to 2023, substantially surpassing the United States in patent applications. A 2024 survey on the Chinese social app Soul reported that 18% of respondents born after 2000 used generative AI "almost every day", and that over 60% of respondents like or love AI-generated content, while less than 3% dislike or hate it."
The following could be placed into a new section titled something like '''''Global Opinions''','' which would be more accurate. [[User:Arthur T. Grey|Arthur T. Grey]] ([[User talk:Arthur T. Grey|talk]]) 05:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
:Yes, that paragraph is a little off-topic. There may not be enough content to justify a standalone "Global opinions" section. Maybe it would fit better in the "Concerns" section. Or otherwise, I don't mind getting [[Special:Diff/1295617438|my edit]] reverted if it solves the problem. What do you think? [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 17:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
::The "Concerns" section would work, but it would need a subheading "Global Concerns." Ideas? [[User:Arthur T. Grey|Arthur T. Grey]] ([[User talk:Arthur T. Grey|talk]]) 05:18, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
| |||