Content deleted Content added
VulcanSphere (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by 105.232.160.130 (talk) to last revision by Citation bot |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 13:
}}
{{American English}}
== Definition ==
Line 198 ⟶ 199:
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Ashaadhikari|Ashaadhikari]] ([[User talk:Ashaadhikari|talk]]) 04:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)</span>
== Possible Non-Neutral Text in "History Section" / Incorrect Subject Labelling ==
The ''History'' section has an ending paragraph that goes on to talk about how Asia-Pacific countries have higher adoptions of generative artificial intelligence, which seems off-topic considering the information previous, and could be seen as non-neutral, going on to say that Asia-Pacific countries are less sceptical.
"[[Asia–Pacific]] countries are significantly more optimistic than Western societies about generative AI and show higher adoption rates. Despite expressing concerns about privacy and the pace of change, in a 2024 survey, 68% of Asia-Pacific respondents believed that AI was having a positive impact on the world, compared to 57% globally. According to a survey by [[SAS Institute|SAS]] and Coleman Parkes Research, [[China]] in particular has emerged as a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, exceeding both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is further evidenced by China's [[Intellectual property in China|intellectual property]] developments in the field, with a [[UN]] report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI [[Patent|patents]] from 2014 to 2023, substantially surpassing the United States in patent applications. A 2024 survey on the Chinese social app Soul reported that 18% of respondents born after 2000 used generative AI "almost every day", and that over 60% of respondents like or love AI-generated content, while less than 3% dislike or hate it."
The following could be placed into a new section titled something like '''''Global Opinions''','' which would be more accurate. [[User:Arthur T. Grey|Arthur T. Grey]] ([[User talk:Arthur T. Grey|talk]]) 05:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
:Yes, that paragraph is a little off-topic. There may not be enough content to justify a standalone "Global opinions" section. Maybe it would fit better in the "Concerns" section. Or otherwise, I don't mind getting [[Special:Diff/1295617438|my edit]] reverted if it solves the problem. What do you think? [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 17:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
::The "Concerns" section would work, but it would need a subheading "Global Concerns." Ideas? [[User:Arthur T. Grey|Arthur T. Grey]] ([[User talk:Arthur T. Grey|talk]]) 05:18, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
| |||