Darren Almond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wc3 Banlist: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
dob |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
===[[Wc3 Banlist]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
{{#ifeq:Wc3 Banlist|Wc3 Banlist||<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wc3 Banlist}}</ul></div>}}
:{{la|Wc3 Banlist}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wc3 Banlist|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 May 31#{{anchorencode:Wc3 Banlist}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Website is not notable <font face="fixedsys"><span style="color:purple; ">[[user:nummer29|number29]]</span></font><sup>[[User Talk:Nummer29|(Talk)]]</sup> 20:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
*<small>(Moved this comment from the top of the page. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 20:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC))</small> DO NOT DELETE This article is completely valid. How about discussing before throwing out random deletions of well informed articles? {{unsigned|Spikernum1}}
*'''Delete''', this piece of software doesn't have any coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], so it fails Wikipedia's [[WP:N|notability]] criterion. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 20:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', Tens of thousands of users use this software everyday. It is written under the GNU General Public License and if you view Banlist.nl forums, you will have +10000 users who can vouch for the software. [[User:spikernum1]] 20:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' Again, do you have sources to prove this? The number of people using a piece of software does not make it notable. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 21:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Totally non-notable. Creating editor seems to be confusing notability with popularity. [[User:Adrian_M._H.|<font color="#4B0082">'''''Adrian'''''</font>]] [[User_talk:Adrian_M._H.|<font color="#4B0082">'''''M. H.'''''</font>]] 21:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' as I've already done once today. No ascertation of notability, no reliable sources. [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 21:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Delete''' It was speedy deleted earlier for being non-notable, and it is still non-notable. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 22:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - non-notable. <span style="font-family:Georgia"><font style="background:#0000FF;">[[User:WATP|<font style="color:red;font-size:100%">WATP</font>]] </font></span> <sup>([[User talk:WATP|talk]])</sup> • <sub>([[Special:Contributions/WATP|contribs]])</sub> 00:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• '''Keep''' 1. When there is a DotA topic the banlist must be inlcuded. You can delete both but these two things just have to go hand in hand. 2. This tool is used by many thousands. 3. Why are their no reiable sources ? if it is necesarry we can show you some prove how much the banlist is used (but i think your decision is already made; sad but probaby true) 4. btw why do you just delete the topics and don't propper notify the creators? kinda strange (User = Georgschm)
| |||