Polar Medal and Talk:List of Disney theme park attractions: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Former Attractions |
||
Line 1:
{{WP Disney}}
== Toy Story Mania ?!!? ==
Keep an eye on the [[Toy Story Mania]] page, as it may end up moving to [[Toy Story Mania!]]. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:SpikeJones|SpikeJones]] ([[User talk:SpikeJones|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SpikeJones|contribs]]) 19:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
== Years ==
Are we supposed to be adding years to this? I don't like the idea but I'm wondering what others are thinking. Also, can anyone make the Epcot column wider? --[[User:blm07|<span style="background:#000066;color:#66CCCC">blm07</span>]] 18:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
:IF we add years, I would add them to the column itself, not to the attraction name. Ideally, the year info should be on the linked attraction page. Putting the years on this page may make it too cluttered. Perhaps a "for years of operation, please view each attractions page" notice would suffice.[[User:SpikeJones|SpikeJones]] 18:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
::I thought years would be nice, especially for closed attractions. It should be in the "park" cell, because different parks will have different dates. Clearly this list will need clean up, but I think we should first focus on getting the list complete. [[User:Bytebear|Bytebear]] 01:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
== Names ==
This will come up eventually, might as well start the discussion now. Should we have each name change under a new entry or put it all under one. Things like Buzz Lightyear will have four entries instead of a crammed one, but that is the only attraction with so many name changes. Currently some things like "Countdown to Extinction" and "Dinosaur" have two entries, with the old name marked as closed. --[[User:blm07|<span style="background:#000066;color:#66CCCC">blm07</span>]] 19:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
:If there is a separate page for the attraction, then it should have a separate entry in the list, IMHO. Some articles combine past and present attractions, others separate them. [[User:Bytebear|Bytebear]] 01:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
== Former Attractions ==
It would make the list easier to use and clearer if it was seperated into at least ''Current Attractions'' and ''Former Attractions''. It may be worth discussing how we could format or arrange this to be more useful/useable.
[[User:Tiggerjay|Tiggerjay]] 20:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
|