Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NFL Draft Steals and Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Soap opera articles by quality log: Difference between pages

Revision as of 17:06, 15 October 2005

Revision as of 03:23, 3 June 2007

Line 1:

{{WikiProject Soap Operas | class=NA}}

===[[List of NFL Draft Steals]]===

A more-or-less empty list with inherently POV criteria. (Related to this is the ongoing AFD of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NHL Draft Steals|List of NHL Draft Steals]].) - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: bold;"><font color="000000">Black</font></span>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 08:48, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Comment'''. This article needs two things namely criteria for determining who is a steal and verifiable sources for the claims. [[User:Capitalistroadster|Capitalistroadster]] 09:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Someone beat me to the punch, I was going to post this to AfD. Even if the criteria that Capitalistroadster talked about is reached, the barebones content in there doesn't merit an article of its own. [[User:Karmafist|Karmafist]] 14:49, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' It is POV. Then you would have to list current popular NFL stars or Hall of Famers that were drafted past the 1st round which is a lot. Also, what is consider a steal? Is [[Randy Moss]] consider a steal because he dropped around the late 1st round. Where does it stop? --[[User:J. Nguyen|J. Nguyen]] 16:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' This list constitutes sports trivia, and sports trivia list, especially one that relies on arbitrary decisions of which fan's opinion is right, is not an encyclopedia article. [[User:The Literate Engineer|The Literate Engineer]] 17:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' --[[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper]] 17:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)