Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and Turtle: Difference between pages

(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
 
m Undid revision 135473460 by 71.144.84.33 (talk)
 
Line 1:
{{Taxobox
<noinclude>{{pp-move|small=yes}}</noinclude>
| color = pink
<!--{{adminbacklog}}-->
| name = Turtles
<center>'''Do not continue a dispute on this page: Please keep on topic.<br/>Administrators: please do not hesitate to remove disputes to user talk pages.'''</center>
| fossil_range = [[Triassic]] - Recent
{{Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}
| image = Haeckel Chelonia.jpg
<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-3 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive31--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
| image_width = 240px
[[Category:Non-talk pages automatically signed by HagermanBot]]
| image_caption = "Chelonia" from [[Ernst Haeckel]]'s ''[[Kunstformen der Natur]]'', 1904
==Violations==
| regnum = [[Animal]]ia
Please place new reports '''at the bottom'''.
| phylum = [[Chordate|Chordata]]
| classis = [[Reptile|Sauropsida]]
| ordo = '''Testudines'''
| ordo_authority = [[Carolus Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], 1758
| range_map = World.distribution.testudines.1.png
| range_map_width = 250px
| range_map_caption = blue: sea turtles, black: land turtles
| subdivision_ranks = Suborders
| subdivision =
[[Cryptodira]]<br/>
[[Pleurodira]]<br/>
See text for families.
}}
{{Otheruses}}
'''Turtles''', '''[[Tortoises]]''', and '''[[Terrapins]]''' are [[reptile]]s of the order '''Testudines''' (all living turtles belong to the [[crown group]] '''Chelonia'''), most of whose [[body]] is shielded by a special [[bone|bony]] or [[cartilage]]nous [[animal shell|shell]] developed from their [[rib]]s. The [[Order]] Testudines includes both extant (living) and [[extinct]] species, the earliest turtles being known from around 215 [[million]] years ago,<ref>http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/dinos/Archelon.shtml</ref> making turtles one of the oldest [[reptile]] groups, and a much more [[ancient]] [[group]] than the [[lizard]]s and [[snake]]s. About 300 species are alive today; some are highly [[endangered species|endangered]]. Turtles are [[ectothermic]] or ''cold-blooded'', which means that their [[body]] [[temperature]] changes with their [[Natural environment|environment]].
==Anatomy and morphology==
Turtles vary widely in [[size]], although [[marine]] turtles tend to be relatively bigger [[animals]] than their [[land]] and [[freshwater]] [[relatives]].
 
The largest chelonian is a marine turtle, the great [[leatherback sea turtle]], which reaches a shell length of 200&nbsp;[[centimetre|cm]] (80&nbsp;[[inch]]es) and can reach a weight of over 900&nbsp;[[kilogram|kg]] (2,000&nbsp;[[pound (mass)|lb]], or 1 short ton). Freshwater turtles are generally smaller, but with the largest species, the Asian softshell turtle ''Pelochelys cantorii'', a few individuals have been reported to measure up to 200&nbsp;cm or 80&nbsp;in (Das, 1991). This dwarfs even the better-known [[alligator snapping turtle]], the largest chelonian in North America, which attains a shell length of up to 80&nbsp;cm (31½&nbsp;in) and a weight of about 60&nbsp;kg (170&nbsp;lb).
===[[User:72.66.51.129]] and [[User:207.114.16.210]] reported by [[User:Upholder]] (Result:)===
 
Giant tortoises of the genera ''[[Geochelone]]'', ''[[Meiolania]]'', and others were relatively widely distributed around the world into prehistoric times, and are known to have existed in North and South America, Australia, and Africa. They became extinct at the same time as the appearance of Man, and it is assumed that humans hunted them for food. The only surviving [[giant tortoise]]s are on the [[Seychelles]] and [[Galápagos Islands]] and can grow to over 130&nbsp;cm (50&nbsp;in) in length, and weigh about 300&nbsp;kg (670&nbsp;lb).<ref>http://www.tortoise.org/general/wildfaqs.html#largest</ref>
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Illinois Fighting Illini men's basketball}}. {{3RRV|72.66.51.129}}: Time reported: 05:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
The largest ever chelonian was ''[[Archelon|Archelon ischyros]]'', a [[Cretaceous|Late Cretaceous]] sea turtle known to have been up to 4.6&nbsp;m (15&nbsp;ft) long.<ref>http://www.oceansofkansas.com/Turtles.html</ref>
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&oldid=132313185 17:38, May 20, 2007]
 
The smallest turtle is the [[speckled padloper tortoise]] of South Africa. It measures no more than 8&nbsp;cm (3&nbsp;in) in length and weighs about 140&nbsp;[[gram|g]] (5&nbsp;[[ounce|oz]]). Two other species of small turtles are the American [[mud turtle]]s and [[musk turtle]]s that live in an area that ranges from [[Canada]] to [[South America]]. The shell length of many species in this group is less than 13&nbsp;cm (5&nbsp;in) in length.
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
There have now been a total of 9 reverts by this editor on these two IPs:
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=131785018&oldid=131655052 09:52, May 18, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=131817480&oldid=131795307 12:32, May 18, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=131841497&oldid=131832636 14:18, May 18, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=131854956&oldid=131848537 15:20, May 18, 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&curid=9965103&diff=132148640&oldid=131937279 2007-05-19 23:08:55] by [[User:72.66.51.129]] which is another address that [[User:207.114.16.210]] has used in the past. This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=132150318&oldid=131872315 Comment] just before the 5th revert was posted from [[User:72.66.51.129]] but signed as [[User:207.114.16.210]]. Based on the editing history of these two users (focusing on topics related to Illinois or Indiana college basketball) I'm convinced that this the same person on both IP addresses.
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=132220003&oldid=132151790 09:30, May 20, 2007] (made by [[User:72.66.51.129]]).
* 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&curid=9965103&diff=132268518&oldid=132223986 14:00, May 20, 2007] (made by [[User:72.66.51.129]], third by that IP in less than 24 hours).
* 8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=132313185&oldid=132282952 17:38, May 20, 2007] (as [[User:72.66.51.129]], fourth by that IP in less than 24 hours).
* 9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&diff=132430188&oldid=132378901 08:04, May 21, 2007] (as [[User:207.114.16.210]]).
* 10th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_Fighting_Illini_men%27s_basketball&curid=9965103&oldid=132480114 12:49, May 21, 2007] (as [[User:207.114.16.210]]).
 
===Neck folding===
<!--
Turtles are broken down into two groups, according to how they evolved a solution to the problem of withdrawing their neck into their shell (something the ancestral ''[[Proganochelys]]'' could not do): the [[Cryptodira]], which can draw their neck in while folding it under their spine; and the [[Pleurodira]], which fold their neck to the side. [[Image:Snapping turtle 3 md.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Closeup head-on view of a common snapping turtle (''[[Chelydra serpentina]]''), taken near the [[St. Lawrence River]] in northern [[New York State]]]]
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
===Head===
* Diff of 3RR warnings: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:207.114.16.210&diff=131897289&oldid=127151709 19:00, May 18, 2007] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72.66.51.129&diff=132245088&oldid=126798082 11:59, May 20, 2007]
Most
turtles that spend most of their life on land have their eyes looking down at objects in front of them. Some aquatic turtles, such as snapping turtles and soft-shelled turtles, have eyes closer to the top of the head. These species of turtles can hide from predators in shallow water where they lie entirely submerged except for their eyes and nostrils. Sea turtles possess glands near their eyes that produce salty tears that rid their body of excess [[salt]] taken in from the water they drink.
 
Turtles are thought to have exceptional night vision due to the unusually large amount of [[rod cells]] in their retinas. Normal daytime vision is marginal at best due to their color-blindness and poor visual acuity. In addition to daytime vision problems, turtles have very poor [[pursuit movement]] abilities, which are normally reserved for predators that hunt quick moving prey. Carnivorous turtles can move their heads quickly to snap though.
====Response====
 
Turtles have a rigid beak. Turtles use their [[jaw]]s to cut and chew food. Instead of teeth, the upper and lower jaws of the turtle are covered by horny ridges. Carnivorous turtles usually have knife-sharp ridges for slicing through their prey. Herbivourous turtles have serrated edged ridges that help them cut through tough plants. Turtles use their tongues to swallow food, but they can't, unlike most reptiles, stick out their tongues to catch food.
If any action is taken with regard to this alleged violation of the 3RR, I would only ask that all offenders be treated equally. To this extent, I would note that this dispute also involved violations of the three revert rule by [[User:Chiwara]] who twice made 3+ reverts to the [[Illinois Fighting Illini men's basketball]] article within 24 hours:
 
===Shell===
(1) 23:04 17 May 2007
The upper shell of the turtle is called the ''[[carapace]]''. The lower shell that encases the belly is called the ''[[plastron]]''. The carapace and plastron are joined together on the turtle's sides by bony structures called ''bridges''. The inner layer of a turtle's shell is made up of about 60 bones that includes portions of the backbone and the ribs, meaning the turtle cannot crawl out of its shell. In most turtles, the outer layer of the shell is covered by horny scales called [[scute]]s that are part of its outer skin, or [[Epidermis (skin)|epidermis]]. Scutes are made up of a fibrous [[protein]] called [[keratin]] that also makes up the scales of other reptiles. These scutes overlap the seams between the shell bones and add strength to the shell. Some turtles do not have horny scutes. For example, the leatherback sea turtle and the soft-shelled turtles have shells covered with leathery skin instead.
(2) 15:43 18 May 2007
(3) 18:39 18 May 2007
and
(1) 14:55 20 May 2007
(2) 05:44 21 May 2007
(3) 14:29 21 May 2007
 
The shape of the shell gives helpful clues to how the turtle lives. Most tortoises have a large dome-shaped shell that makes it difficult for predators to crush the shell between their jaws. One of the few exceptions is the African [[pancake tortoise]] which has a flat, flexible shell that allows it to hide in rock crevices. Most aquatic turtles have flat, streamlined shells which aid in swimming and diving. American [[snapping turtle]]s and [[musk turtles]] have small, cross-shaped plastrons that give them more efficient leg movement for walking along the bottom of ponds and streams.
The above notwithstanding, I would suggest that current discussions appear to be headed towards resolution and any blocking is unecessary and will simply inflame the situation. [[User:207.114.16.210|207.114.16.210]] 15:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
The color of a turtle's shell may vary. Shells are commonly colored brown, black, or olive green. In some species, shells may have red, orange, yellow, or grey markings and these markings are often spots, lines, or irregular blotches. One of the most colorful turtles is the eastern [[painted turtle]] which includes a yellow plastron and a black or olive shell with red markings around the rim.
===[[User:The way, the truth, and the light]] reported by [[User:Simoes]] (Result: unactionable)===
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&oldid=132137591 20:50, 19 May 2007]
 
Tortoises, being landbased, have rather heavy shells. In contrast aquatic and soft-shelled turtles which have lighter shells that help them avoid sinking in water and swim faster with more agility. These lighter shells have large spaces called [[fontanelle]]s between the shell bones. The shell of a leatherback turtle is extremely light because they lack scutes and contain many fontanelles.
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132149781&oldid=132137591 22:17, 19 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132183627&oldid=132183407 03:19, 20 May 2007]
* 3rd revert:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132365566&oldid=132337438
22:07, 20 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132366890&oldid=132365738 22:16, 20 May 2007]
 
===Skin and Molting===
This report is coming off the heels of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:The_way.2C_the_truth.2C_and_the_light_reported_by_User:Simoes_.28Result:24_hours.29 first report] and block that happened a couple days ago. Like last time, the user is insistent that his preferred version of the article remain in place despite objections from several editors. '''<font color="006400">[[User:Simoes|Simões]]</font>''' (<font size="1"><sup>[[User talk:Simoes|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Simoes|contribs]]</sub></font>) 06:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
As mentioned above, the outer layer of the shell is part of the skin, each scute (or plate) on the shell corresponding to a single modified scale. The remainder of the skin is composed of skin with much smaller scales, similar to the skin of other reptiles. Turtles and terrapins do not moult their skins all in one go, as snakes do, but continuously, in small pieces. When kept in aquaria, small sheets of dead skin can be seen in the water (often appearing to be a thin piece of plastic) when it has been sloughed off, often when the animal deliberately rubs itself against a piece of wood or stone. Tortoises also shed skin, but a lot of dead skin is allowed to accumulate into thick knobs and plates that provide protection to parts of the body outside the shell.
 
The scutes on the shell are never moulted, and, as they accumulate over time, the shell becomes thicker. By counting the rings formed by the stack of smaller, older scutes on top of the larger, newer ones, it is possible to estimate the age of a turtle, if you know how many scutes are produced in a year.<ref>http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/new/gturtle.html</ref> This method is not very accurate, partly because growth rate is not constant, but also because some of the scutes eventually fall away from the shell.
:Three of the diffs are for [[List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts]], the other is for [[Illinois Fighting Illini men's basketball]]. Therefore, no violation has been demonstrated. Please use the example format at the bottom of this page to avoid mistakes like this. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 08:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===Limbs===
:I replaced that one with the one Simoes intended. The explanation is that at least one of these (the 1st or 2nd or both) was not a revert. In any case the article is back at the other version now.
Terrestrial tortoises have short, sturdy feet. Tortoises are famous for moving slowly, in part because of their heavy, cumbersome shell but also because of the relatively inefficient [[Terrestrial locomotion in animals#Stance|sprawling gait]] that they have, with the legs being bent, as with [[lizards]] rather than being straight and directly under the body, as is the case with [[mammals]].
 
The amphibious turtles normally have limbs similar to those of tortoises except that the feet are webbed and often have long [[claws]]. These turtles swim using all four feet in a way similar to the [[dog paddle]], with the feet on the left and right side of the body alternately providing thrust. Large turtles tend to swim less than smaller ones, and the very big species, such as alligator snapping turtles, hardly swim at all, preferring to simply walk along the bottom of the river or lake. As well as webbed feet, turtles also have very long claws, used to help them clamber onto riverbanks and floating logs, upon which they like to [[Cold-blooded#Types of temperature control|bask]]. Male turtles tend to have particularly long claws, and these appear to be used to stimulate the female while mating. While most turtles have webbed feet, a few turtles, such as the [[Carettochelyidae|pig-nose turtles]], have true flippers, with the digits being fused into paddles and the claws being relatively small. These species swim in the same way as sea turtles (see below).
:It is clear that this is just more harassment by Simoes, as he has contributed nothing to the article over the past several days, while I have continued posting to the talk page and madesome edits to the article that have not been reverted. [[User:The way, the truth, and the light|The way, the truth, and the light]] 08:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Sea turtles are almost entirely aquatic and instead of feet they have flippers. Sea turtles "fly" through the water, using the up-and-down motion of the front flippers to generate thrust; the back feet are not used for propulsion but may be used as [[rudder]]s for steering. Compared with freshwater turtles, sea turtles have very limited mobility on land, and apart from the dash from the nest to the sea as hatchlings, male sea turtles normally never leave the sea. Females must come back onto land to lay eggs. They move very slowly and laboriously, dragging themselves forwards with their flippers. The back flippers are used to dig the burrow and then fill it back with sand once the eggs have been deposited.
===[[User:Asgardian]] reported by [[User:Doczilla]] (Result:)===
 
==Ecology and life history==
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
[[Image:BabyMapTurtleInHand.png|thumb|right|300px|An American [[Graptemys|map turtle]] hatchling.]]
{{Article|Vision (comics)}}. {{3RRV|Asgardian}}: Time reported: 06:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Even though many spend large amounts of their lives underwater, all turtles and tortoises are air-breathing reptiles, and must surface at regular intervals to refill their lungs with fresh air. They can also spend a lot of their lives on dry land. Aquatic respiration in Australian freshwater turtles is currently being studied. Some species have large [[cloacal]] cavities that are lined with many finger-like projections. These projections, called "[[papillae]]", have a rich blood supply, and serve to increase the surface area of the cloaca. The turtles can take up dissolved [[oxygen]] from the water using these papillae, in much the same way that fish use [[gill]]s to respire.
 
Turtles lay [[egg (biology)|eggs]], like other reptiles, which are slightly soft and leathery. The eggs of the largest species are spherical, while the eggs of the rest are elongated. Their albumen is white and contains a different protein than do bird eggs, such that it will not coagulate when cooked. Turtle eggs prepared to eat consist mainly of yolk. In some species, temperature determines whether an egg develops into a male or a female: a higher temperature causes a female, a lower temperature causes a male. Large numbers of eggs are deposited in holes dug into mud or sand. They are then covered and left to incubate by themselves. When the turtles hatch they squirm their way to the surface and make for the water. There are no known species wherein the mother cares for the young.
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vision_%28comics%29&oldid=132105778 23:33, 19 May 2007]
 
Sea turtles lay their eggs on dry sandy beaches, and are highly endangered largely as a result of beach development and over hunting. Immature sea turtles are not raised by either parent.
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vision_%28comics%29&diff=132128371&oldid=132105778 01:50, 20 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vision_%28comics%29&diff=132148522&oldid=132128371 04:08, 20 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vision_%28comics%29&diff=132350371&oldid=132148522 02:25, 21 May 2007] The wording of his edit summary "Since the other version is fundamentally flawed for all the previously listed reasons, this is the version that should be addressed as it has been shaped to user comments." sounds like he didn't even glance at the intermediate version but simply reverted because it wasn't his. (I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm saying that's how it looked.)
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vision_%28comics%29&diff=132354023&oldid=132350371 02:48, 21 May 2007] This version isn't a 100% reversion because he edited it this time, but look at the intermediate version he changed. He keeps reverting this from a disambiguation page. Edit summary makes this look like another blind revert without looking at intermediate version: "Address the issues - this version has correct tense, no POV, correct grammar, sourcing and no spacing issues/poor use of images. Other version only suitable for fan site."
 
Turtles can take many years to reach breeding age. Often turtles only breed every few years or more.
Notice that this is 4 reverts in <u>25</u> hours. However, (1) the 3RR guidelines stress that the rule is not a license to make 3 reverts every 24 hours (''"Revert warring is disruptive, and the 3RR is not an entitlement to three 'free' reverts per day."''), (2) this user has been endlessly cautioned about edit warring, (3) this user has gotten into trouble for 3RR before, so making 4 reverts in 25 hours comes across as an attempt to get around the rules without following their actual intent, (4) he has kept the [[Vision (comics)]], [[Vision (Marvel Comics)]], [[Vision (Timely Comics)]] locked in a war (he has kept numerous articles locked in edit wars), (5) he alone has been fighting against [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vision_%28Marvel_Comics%29#Vote:_To_split_or_not_to_split consensus] to split Vision (Marvel Comics) and Vision (Timely Comics) into two separate articles, and (6) he apparently doesn't even know how to move articles correctly from one article name to another because his actions have caused disruption of discussion as talk pages and histories get left behind. I really, really hate to do this, but this edit war must stop.
 
Researchers have recently discovered a turtle’s organs do not gradually break down or become less efficient over time, unlike most other animals. It was found that the liver, lungs and kidneys of a centenarian turtle are virtually indistinguishable from those of its immature counterpart. This has inspired genetic researchers to begin examining the turtle genome for longevity genes.
Previous 3RR warning:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAsgardian&diff=77695414&oldid=77505889 09:56, 25 September 2006 ] (not formal warning, just a caution)
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=117566402 17:52, 26 October 2006]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=90261353 18:39, 26 November 2006.] (caution only? I'm not sure because of how often Asgardian deleted warnings and removed other contributor's comments from his talk page.)
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=100688249#Regarding_reversions.5B4.5D_made_on_January_11.2C_January_11_January_12.2C_January_13_and_January_14.2C_2006_to_Celestial_.28comics.29 17:40, 14 January 2007]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=117566402 18:24, 24 March 2007] (I thought this was just someone pointing out a violation to him, not a formal notice, until I saw comments at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GentlemanGhost#Mjolnir_.28comics.29 User talk:GentlemanGhost].
Notice that he has removed his 3RR block notices from his talk page despite previous warnings not to do that.
 
== Evolutionary history ==
Other block notice:
The first turtles are believed to have existed in the early [[Triassic]] Period of the [[Mesozoic]] era, about 200 million years ago. Their exact ancestry is disputed. It was believed that they are the only surviving branch of the ancient [[clade]] [[Anapsida]], which includes groups such as [[procolophonoid]]s, [[millerettid]]s, [[protorothyrids]] and [[pareiasaur]]s. All anapsid skulls lack a temporal opening, while all other extant [[amniote]]s have temporal openings (although in [[mammal]]s the hole has become the [[zygomatic arch]]). The millerettids, protorothyrids and pareiasaurs became extinct in the late [[Permian]] period, and the procolophonoids during the Triassic.<ref>http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/anapsids/procolophonoidea.html</ref>
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=122429999#Blocked 12:22, 9 April 2007]
 
However, it was recently suggested that the anapsid-like turtle skull may be due to [[reversion]] rather than to anapsid descent. More recent [[phylogenetic]] studies with this in mind placed turtles firmly within [[diapsid]]s, slightly closer to [[Squamata]] than to [[Archosauria]].<ref name="rieppel&debraga1996">Rieppel, O., and DeBraga, M. (1996). "Turtles as diapsid reptiles." ''Nature'', '''384''': 453-455.</ref> All [[molecular]] studies have strongly upheld this new [[phylogeny]], though some place turtles closer to Archosauria.<ref name="zardoya&meyer1998">Zardoya, R., and Meyer, A. (1998). "Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles." ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America'', '''95'''(24): 14226-14231.</ref> Re-analysis of prior phylogenies suggests that they classified turtles as anapsids both because they assumed this classification (most of them studying what sort of anapsid turtles are) and because they did not sample fossil and extant taxa broadly enough for constructing the [[cladogram]]. As of [[2003]], the consensus is that ''Testudines'' diverged from other diapsids between 285 and 270 million years ago.<ref>http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=538573</ref> Future analyses may show the turtles to be relatives of the [[placodont]]s.{{Fact|date=June 2007}}
Notification of recent administrator's noticeboard report:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=132264234#Administrator.27s_noticeboard 01:01, 2 May 2007]
 
A new phylogenetic analysis agrees with prior analyses nesting turtles with pareiasaurs within the much larger clade, [[Lepidosauromorpha]]. The closest pareiasaur to turtles appears to be a rarely-studied form, [[Stephanospondylus]]. Indeed turtles are related to other reptiles without temporal openings.
Notification of an earlier adminstrator's noticeboard report:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asgardian&oldid=93776254 08:29, 12 December 2006]
[[User:Doczilla|Doczilla]] 06:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
The earliest known modern turtle is [[proganochelys]], though this species already had many advanced turtle traits, and thus probably had many millions of years of preceding "turtle" evolution and species in its ancestry. It did lack the ability to pull its head into its shell (and it had a long neck), and had a long, spiked tail ending in a club, implying an ancestry occupying a similar niche to the [[ankylosaurus|ankylosaur]]s (though, presumably, only [[parallel evolution]]).
'''Suggestion:''' The 25 hour timespan might make a block unlikely. Protecting [[Vision (comics)]] in its disambiguation page form might be sufficient action in this case. Protecting the disambiguation page might at least help reduce that aspect of the edit warring at [[Vision (Marvel Comics)]] and [[Vision (Timely Comics)]]. [[User:Doczilla|Doczilla]] 07:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC) To be fair, I must point out that no new reversions have occurred to [[Vision (comics)]]. Given the ongoing feuding[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics#Here_we_go_again...] over the other two Vision (and many other) articles, though, protection for [[Vision (comics)]] might nevertheless help make a point about edit warring and help prompt the same kind of collaborative editing effort that may finally have resolved a different edit war involving some of the same players.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Whizzer#Section_by_section] [[User:Doczilla|Doczilla]] 06:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Unfortunately, despite the hope expressed in my previous sentence, ongoing feuding between Asgardian and others has led to protection of one of the associated Vision articles([[Talk:Vision_%28Marvel_Comics%29#Protected]]), although not the disambiguation page that initiated this 3RR complaint. [[User:Doczilla|Doczilla]] 07:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
== Turtle, Tortoise or Terrapin? ==
===[[User:Good friend100]] reported by [[User:Endroit]] (Result: Blocked 24h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Goguryeo controversies}}. {{3RRV|Good friend100}}: Time reported: 07:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
{{:Differences between turtles, tortoises and terrapins}}
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo_controversies&oldid=131430724 00:39, 17 May 2007] — version right before the disputed text was moved over from another article, [[Goguryeo]]
 
==Taxonomy==
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo_controversies&diff=132144454&oldid=132053881 03:39, 20 May 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo_controversies&diff=132204682&oldid=132164338 12:39, 20 May 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo_controversies&diff=132224460&oldid=132222663 14:58, 20 May 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo_controversies&diff=132226978&oldid=132226057 15:14, 20 May 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo_controversies&diff=132353586&oldid=132263367 02:45, 21 May 2007]
 
{{main|List of Testudines families}}
<!--
[[Image:Unidentified turtle.JPG|thumb|Gulf Coast [[Box Turtle]], ''Terrapene carolina major'']]
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
[[Image:LeatherbackTurtle.jpg|thumb|[[Leatherback Sea Turtle]], ''Dermochelys coriacea'']]
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
[[Image:Chelonia mydas (Hawaiian variety).jpg|thumb|[[Green Sea Turtle]], ''Chelonia mydas'']]
-->
[[Image:Tucacas04012422TortugaCareyEretmochelysImbricata.JPG|thumb|[[Hawksbill turtle]], ''Eretmochelys imbricata'']]
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGood_friend100&diff=132138086&oldid=131620411 02:54, 20 May 2007]
 
'''Suborder [[Paracryptodira]]''' (extinct)
Comment: Repeated removal of the section entitled "==Political connections between Goguryeo and the Chinese Central Plains Dynasties".
--[[User:Endroit|Endroit]] 07:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
'''Suborder [[Cryptodira]]'''
[[User:Good friend100]] blocked 24 hours from last revert --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 08:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
::*Family [[Chelydridae]] ([[Snapping turtle|Snapping Turtles]])
::*Family [[Meiolaniidae]] ([[Meiolania|Horned turtle]], extinct)
:*'''Superfamily [[Chelonioidea]]''' ([[Sea turtle|Sea Turtles]])
::*Family [[Protostegidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Thalassemyidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Toxochelyidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Cheloniidae]] (Green Sea Turtles and relatives)
::*Family [[Leatherback Sea Turtle|Dermochelyidae]] (Leatherback Turtles)
:*'''Superfamily [[Kinosternoidea]]'''
::*Family [[Dermatemydidae]] (River Turtles)
::*Family [[Kinosternidae]] (Mud Turtles)
::*Family [[Platysternidae]] (Big-headed Turtles)
:*'''Superfamily [[Testudinoidea]]'''
::*Family [[Haichemydidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Lindholmemydidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Sinochelyidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Emydidae]] (Pond Turtles/Box and Water Turtles)
::*Family [[Geoemydidae]] (Asian River Turtles, Leaf and Roofed Turtles, Asian Box Turtles)
::*Family [[Testudinidae]] ([[Tortoise]]s)
:*'''Superfamily [[Trionychoidea]]'''
::*Family [[Adocidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Carettochelyidae]] (Pignose Turtles)
::*Family [[Trionychidae]] (Softshell Turtles)
'''Suborder [[Pleurodira]]'''
::*Family [[Araripemydidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Proterochersidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Chelidae]] (Austro-American Sideneck Turtles)
:*'''Superfamily [[Pelomedusoidea]]'''
::*Family [[Bothremydidae]] (extinct)
::*Family [[Pelomedusidae]] (Afro-American Sideneck Turtles)
::*Family [[Podocnemididae]] (Madagascan Big-headed and American Sideneck River Turtles)
 
==See also==
===[[User:DachMaCheh]] reported by [[User:Soman]] (Result: No violation)===
*[[Addyaita]]: a giant turtle of [[Aldabra]]. It was reportedly 250-years old when it died at [[Kolkata]] Zoo on March 24, 2006.
*[[Red-eared slider]]: most common pet turtle
*[[Turtle racing]]
*[[Turtles and tortoises in popular culture]]
*[[Turtles all the way down]]
*[[List of Testudines families]]
*[[Sea Turtles]]
*[[Araripemys arturi]]
*[[Jackson ratio]]
*[[Koopa]]
 
==Further reading==
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
* Iskandar, DT (2000). ''Turtles and Crocodiles of Insular Southeast Asia and New Guinea''. ITB, Bandung.
{{Article|Gail Omvedt}}. {{3RRV|DachMaCheh}}: Time reported: 11:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Pritchard, Pether C H (1979). ''Encyclopedia of Turtles''. T.F.H. Publications.
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gail_Omvedt&oldid=130704054 04:28, 14 May 2007]
 
==Bibliography==
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
==References==
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
{{reflist}}
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gail_Omvedt&oldid=132286593 20:23, 20 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gail_Omvedt&oldid=132394497 08:00, 21 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gail_Omvedt&oldid=132403071 09:20, 21 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
 
== External links ==
<!--
{{sisterlinks|Turtle}}
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
{{Wikispecies|Testudines}}
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
{{Wikibookspar|Dichotomous Key|Testudines}}
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* [http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/anapsids/testudines/testudines.html UC Berkeley Museum of Paleontology]
-->
* [http://nlbif.eti.uva.nl/bis/turtles.php Turtles of the World]: Extensive information on all known turtles, tortoises and terrapins, including key and quiz.
* [http://ffept.org/GEK/Studbook Chelonian studbook] Collection and display of the weights/sizes of captive turtles
* John M. Legler & Arthur Georges, [http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/publications/fauna-of-australia/pubs/volume2a/ar18ind.pdf Biogeography and Phylogeny of the Chelonia] (taxonomy, maps)
 
* [http://www.wordlibs.com/genre/libs/?name=The%20Biology%20of%20Turtles&story=52 Play a Turtle Mad Lib]
No violation has occurred. The [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]] prohibits '''more than''' three reverts within 24 hours. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 13:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
* [http://www.lakejacksonturtles.org Lake Jackson Ecopassage] - Building an ecopassage on the world's worst turtle-killing highway
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6662589.stm Cantor's giant soft-shell turtle found in Mekong Delta]
 
== Types of Turtles ==
:Ok, my bad. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] 14:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
*[[Texas Map Turtle]]
*[[Painted Turtle]]
*[[Madagascar Big Headed Turtle]]
 
{{Pet Species}}
<!-- copy from _below_ this line -->
 
[[Category:Turtles|*]]
===[[User:Beatle Fab Four]] reported by [[User:Staberinde]] (Result: Article protected)===
[[Category:Reptiles]]
 
[[ar:سلحفاة]]
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
[[bg:Костенурки]]
{{Article|Bronze Soldier of Tallinn}}. {{3RRV|Beatle Fab Four}}: Time reported: 14:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[cs:Želvy]]
 
[[cy:Crwban]]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&oldid=132195094 11:12, 20 May 2007]
[[da:Skildpadde]]
 
[[de:Schildkröten]]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
[[es:Tortuga]]
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
[[eo:Testudo]]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132250783&oldid=132196430 17:29, 20 May 2007]
[[fa:لاک‌پشت]]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132263067&oldid=132254203 18:34, 20 May 2007]
[[fr:Testudines]]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132269579&oldid=132268294 19:06, 20 May 2007]
[[ko:거북]]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132419768&oldid=132418843 11:49, 21 May 2007]
[[hr:Kornjače]]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132466722&oldid=132464577 16:27, 21 May 2007]
[[ilo:Pag-ong]]
 
[[it:Testudines]]
User has been blocked for edit warring before[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Beatle_Fab_Four].
[[he:צבים]]
 
[[la:Testudo]]
: I'm a Beatle Fab Four. This Staberinde didn't follow controversy resolving rules. Look at the discussion page Talk:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn (→Advertisement) My reversions were fair, explained at the discussion page, and supported by several neutral users from Belgium and Finland, both in discussions and edits. For instance,
[[lt:Vėžliai]]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132392215&oldid=132360820]
[[li:Sjèldkróddele]]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn&diff=132417801&oldid=132414653]
[[hu:Teknős]]
or "Thanks to Beatle Fab Four for reverting the deletion once more. LHOON 12:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)"
[[mk:Желка]]
[[User:Beatle Fab Four|Beatle Fab Four]] 17:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[ms:Penyu]]
 
[[nl:Schildpadden]]
Fab Four FOUGHT VANDALISM. A few Baltic nationalists try to change the content of the article from what it realy is to what they would like it to be. Fab Four fought vandalism and by that followed this rule http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules when there are a few people vandalizing, and the one who fights vandalism is one, ofcaurse he will have to revert more then 3 times, and by this law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules he's allowed to do so, and i think that every reasnoble man understands that. He was blocked by a user that didn't even learn the case, and who didn't care, he didn't use his logic, for him more then three reverts is enough to block (he is Sandstein). P.S. The administrator who blocked him blocked him and me, but he didn't block those from the other side of the arguments and didn't even give them a warrning, thought they were the once who started this edit war. M.V.E.i. 18:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[ja:カメ]]
 
[[no:Skilpadder]]
P.S. Staberinde is an Estonian who took part in the argument, his complain can't even be taken serioucly. M.V.E.i. 18:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[pl:Żółwie]]
::Ah, so because Staberinde is an Estonian and dared to argue with Beatle Fab Four, so he cannot be taken "serioucly"? That smells like a racism to me, but I'll leave it at that.
[[pt:Tartaruga]]
::User [[User:Beatle Fab Four|Beatle Fab Four]] has constantly tried to reinstate material not suitable to Wikipedia or what goes against Wikipedia rules (links to blogs, hate promotion sites) and done everything to disrupt normal work - edits on [[Bronze Soldier]] have pretty much stopped, because of that. He has been blocked repeatedly before (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sandstein/Archives/2007/May#User:Beatles_Fab_Four]) and has a history of block evasion ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive243#Block_evasion_of_Beatle_Fab_Four Block evasion of Beatle Fab Four]). Both he and M.V.E.i. constantly argue that he is just following rule [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] while fighting vandalism, however, when asked to show evidence of that vandalism, they fail to do so.
[[ru:Черепахи]]
::I don't think blocking BFF for normal duration will have any effect - he is on a dynamic IP and has shown clearly and repeatedly that he will evade the block. Although this is not the place to request this, I think that in addition to the block, semi-protection of the article [[Bronze Soldier of Tallinn]] (and maybe its talk as well) is needed. [[User:DLX|DLX]] 19:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[simple:Turtle]]
:::DLX, Offcourse the article needs protectionm, from you, so you would stop reverting it. You and your friends here are [[trolls]] (in the Wikipedian meaning), now your playing it an honest man who offers protection for the article. You are the one because of who the problems started. M.V.E.i. 20:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[sl:Želve]]
:There has been edit-warring from multiple parties here; I have protected the article for three days. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 19:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[sr:Корњаче]]
::Bingo! Just what i've said, there were a few groups fighting, and Sandstein blocked people only from one group but nevertheless didn't say anything to anyone from any other group. M.V.E.i. 21:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[[su:Kuya]]
 
[[fi:Kilpikonnat]]
===[[User:The way, the truth, and the light]] reported by [[User:Simoes]] (Result: Article protected)===
[[sv:Havssköldpaddor]]
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
[[th:เต่า]]
{{Article|List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts}}. {{3RRV|The way, the truth, and the light}}:15:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[[tr:Kaplumbağa]]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&oldid=132137591 20:50, 19 May 2007]
[[zh-yue:龜]]
 
[[zh:龜]]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132149781&oldid=132137591 22:17, 19 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132183627&oldid=132183407 03:19, 20 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=prev&oldid=132365566 22:07, 20 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=132366890&oldid=132365738 22:16, 20 May 2007]
 
This report is coming off the heels of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:The_way.2C_the_truth.2C_and_the_light_reported_by_User:Simoes_.28Result:24_hours.29 first report] and block that happened a couple days ago. Like last time, the user is insistent that his preferred version of the article (particular the removal of an "[[Apollo moon landing hoax accusations]]" entry, among others) remain in place despite objections from several editors. '''<font color="006400">[[User:Simoes|Simões]]</font>''' (<font size="1"><sup>[[User talk:Simoes|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Simoes|contribs]]</sub></font>) 15:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:The explanation is that at least one of these (the 1st or 2nd or both) was not a revert. In any case the article is at the other version now. The last edit above was 15 hours ago (Simoes is not using GMT, but GMT-6).
 
:Simoes is trying to imply that I was the only editor who objected to the moon landing's inclusion, which is not true.
 
:It is clear that this is just more harassment by Simoes, as he has contributed nothing to the article over the past several days, while I have continued discussion on the talk page, and made some edits to the article that have not been reverted. [[User:The way, the truth, and the light|The way, the truth, and the light]] 08:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Edit-warring from multiple parties here. Thus, I have protected the article. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 19:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- copy from _above_ this line -->
 
===[[User:Bueller]] reported by [[User:Abe.Froman]] (Result: Warning)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Douglas Feith}}. {{3RRV|Bueller}}: Time reported: 16:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith&diff=132463082&oldid=132429936 2007-05-21T11:09:26]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith&diff=132276779&oldid=132269114 2007-05-20T14:40:54]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith&diff=132278479&oldid=132277981 2007-05-20T14:48:45]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith&diff=132284209&oldid=132280629 2007-05-20T15:13:05]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith&diff=132463082&oldid=132429936 2007-05-21T11:09:26]
 
[[WP:3RR]] violation. Review of the recent [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Douglas_J._Feith#Tenet.27s_Memoirs talk-page] topics and narrow [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bueller contribution patterns] will reveal what I believe is a [[WP:POINT]] problem with this user as well. [[User:Abe.Froman|Abe Froman]] 16:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:The user in question has never received a three-revert rule warning and rarely contributes to Wikipedia. Thus, I have warned him/her. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 19:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:84.68.67.13]] reported by [[User:Vintagekits]] (Result: 24 hrs)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Template:British Isles}}. {{3RRV|84.68.67.13}} Time reported: 20:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=132503284&oldid=132209693 19:25, 21 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132505200 19:37, 21 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132507757 19:48, 21 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132508349 19:51, 21 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132509300 19:55, 21 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132510513 20:00, 21 May 2007]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132511744 20:04, 21 May 2007]
* 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132513099 20:11, 21 May 2007]
* 8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132516409 20:33, 21 May 2007]
* 9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=next&oldid=132520377 20:43, 21 May 2007]
 
 
 
[[WP:3RR]] violation. Warned and requested to discussion, then deleted warnings and requests to discuss and then continued to revert despite a number of editors reverting.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] 21:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
* 24 hrs [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 21:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
* Blocked [[User:Padraig3uk]]:
** [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=132507314&oldid=132507151 19:45, 21 May 2007]
** [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=132508349&oldid=132508343 19:49, 21 May 2007]
** [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=132513099&oldid=132511848 20:09, 21 May 2007]
** [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:British_Isles&diff=132520377&oldid=132518410 20:41, 21 May 2007]
for 24 hours also. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 22:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
=== [[Special:Contributions/User:71.99.128.25|User:71.99.128.25]] at [[Talk:Anna Halman]] ===
 
There were more than 3 reverts of this IP user in recent 24 hours. He is still continuing in vandalising, I request to block him immediatly, because he is violating the official policy. Thanks. --[[User:Aktron|Aktron]] ([[User talk:Aktron|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Aktron|c]]) 16:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
User has already been blocked by [[User:Johnleemk|User:Johnleemk]]. Issue resolved. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Urthogie]] reported by [[User:Taharqa]] (Result: No violation)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Race and ancient Egypt}}. {{3RRV|Urthogie}} Time reported: 20:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racial_origins_of_Ancient_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=132297868 21:16, 20 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Race_and_ancient_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=132300409 21:29, 20 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Race_and_ancient_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=132302328 21:39, 20 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Race_and_ancient_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=132302787 21:49, 20 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Race_and_ancient_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=132304186 21:49, 20 May 2007]
 
Continues to remain disruptive and controlling of the article, even though we're in dispute resolution. He still reverts every one's edits and it seems that he will not stop. I recommend that this person be blocked as he has clearly violated the 3 revert rule for about the 3rd time this past month.[[User:Taharqa|Taharqa]] 20:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
:These are five edits in a row with no other edits between them. This notice board is for when a user ''reverts'' an article to a prior version more than 3 times within 24 hours. It is not for when an editor makes more than 3 edits within 24 hours. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 22:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
=== [[User:Pompertown]] reported by [[User:156.34.236.46]] (Result: Blocked 1 week)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Oasis (band)}}. {{3RRV|Pompertown}}: Time reported: 21:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oasis_%28band%29&diff=132280502&oldid=132250805]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oasis_%28band%29&diff=132356091&oldid=132303122]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oasis_%28band%29&diff=132423012&oldid=132369643]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oasis_%28band%29&diff=132456798&oldid=132425866]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oasis_%28band%29&diff=132519225&oldid=132496735]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oasis_%28band%29&diff=132530106&oldid=132528112]
 
'''Comments''':[[User:Pompertown]] is fresh off a 31 hour block for violating 3RR on the same article. He continues to ignore talk page discussion and previous [[WP:CON|concensus]] in favour of personal POV. [[User:156.34.236.46|156.34.236.46]] 21:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
::{{done}} [[User:Pompertown]] blocked 1 week. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 22:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:85.158.34.139]] reported by [[User:Someguy1221]] (Result: Blocked 24h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|7th Muslim Brigade}}. {{3RRV|85.158.34.139}}: Time reported: 22:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Muslim_Brigade&oldid=131059787 8:27, 15 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Muslim_Brigade&diff=132542083&oldid=132541395 13:49, 21 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Muslim_Brigade&diff=132538186&oldid=132537683 13:57, 21 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Muslim_Brigade&diff=132541105&oldid=132539390 14:12, 21 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Muslim_Brigade&diff=132542083&oldid=132541395 14:16, 21 May 2007]
 
Comments: Continuous reversion to version of page with poorly sourced POV and OR. User appears to be turning the page into a POV fork. User is operating from a dynamic IP.
 
: I think this is not fair. I just asked user Someguy1221 to help me improve the article. I sourced all my claims which he asked for. He even didn't read the article, he tricked me this way just to block me. The problem is that no one wants to discuss.
::[[User:85.158.34.139|85.158.34.139]] blocked for 24 hours. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 22:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
 
===[[User:Reddi]] reported by [[User:Reddi]] (Result:No action)===
 
I may have violated 3RR ... please check ... [[User:Reddi|J. D. Redding]] 23:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radio_astronomy&action=history
 
# (cur) (last) 08:14, 21 May 2007 Reddi (Talk | contribs) (16,921 bytes) (Undid POV revision 132431104 by ScienceApologist (talk))
# (cur) (last) 07:13, 21 May 2007 Reddi (Talk | contribs) (16,921 bytes) (Undid POV revision 132420335 by ScienceApologist (talk))
# (cur) (last) 13:12, 20 May 2007 Reddi (Talk | contribs) (16,921 bytes) (→Books)
# (cur) (last) 13:10, 20 May 2007 Reddi (Talk | contribs) (16,917 bytes) (rv removal of references)
 
If so, please tell me. [[User:Reddi|J. D. Redding]] 23:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
:Since you reported yourself, I won't take any action. Next time, just use the talkj page a [[WP:RFPP|request protection]] if necessary. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 05:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:AKliman]] reported by [[User:Watchdog07]] (Result:No violation)===
 
* [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Temporal single-system interpretation}}. {{3RRV|Akliman}}: Time reported [[User:Watchdog07|Watchdog07]] 23:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: 0407, May 21
* 2nd revert: 1718, May 21
* 3rd revert: 2233, May 21
:There are only three reverts here, and the report isn't even formatted correctly. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 05:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:91.120.113.31]] reported by [[User:Tankred]] (Result:48 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Miklós Horthy}}. Time reported: 00:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*1st edit (actually also just revert): 02:05, 21 May 2007[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&oldid=132381586]
*1st revert: 16:10, 21 May 2007[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&oldid=132513187]
*2nd revert: 18:09, 21 May 2007[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&oldid=132540615]
*3rd revert: 19:51, 21 May 2007[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&oldid=132560870]
*4th revert: 19:53, 21 May 2007[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&oldid=132561376]
*5th revert: 20:07, 21 May 2007 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&diff=prev&oldid=132564298]
 
Also, the IP plausibly belongs to a banned user, see [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Urgent_admin_help_needed]].
:IP blocked for 48 hours and article semi-protected for same duration. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 00:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Sarah Goldberg]] reported by [[User:Muntuwandi]] (Result:Incomplete report)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Black people}}. {{3RRV|Sarah Goldberg}}: Time reported: 00:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_people&diff=prev&oldid=132561025 May 21]
:This report only lists one revert. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 05:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Isarig]] reported by [[User:Gamaliel]] (Result:50 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Wolf Blitzer}}. {{3RRV|Isarig}}: Time reported: 00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wolf_Blitzer&oldid=131587079 14:04, 17 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wolf_Blitzer&diff=132492717&oldid=132478947 14:36, 21 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wolf_Blitzer&diff=132557884&oldid=132557506 19:36, 21 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wolf_Blitzer&diff=132559817&oldid=132559427 19:45, 21 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wolf_Blitzer&diff=132561540&oldid=132561301 19:54, 21 May 2007]
 
User has insisted on a large paragraph in the article regarding a supposed "controversy" regarding Wolf Blitzer but has nothing to substantiate it beyond a mention by two columnists. Concerns raised regarding [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:NPOV|undue weight]] have been ignored by this user and attempts to discuss this issue with him have been greeted with hostility, vitrol, threats, and namecalling. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|Orwellian Cyber hell master]])</small> 00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:Blocked 50 hours. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 05:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
 
===[[User:75.45.85.124]] reported by [[User:Musicpvm]] (Result: 31h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Bloomfield Hills, Michigan}}. {{3RRV|75.45.85.124}}: Time reported: 01:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bloomfield_Hills%2C_Michigan&oldid=132559820]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bloomfield_Hills%2C_Michigan&diff=132362122&oldid=131923119 03:42, 21 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bloomfield_Hills%2C_Michigan&diff=132479031&oldid=132373196 17:32, 21 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bloomfield_Hills%2C_Michigan&diff=132494434&oldid=132479330 18:44, 21 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bloomfield_Hills%2C_Michigan&diff=132559820&oldid=132521914 23:45, 21 May 2007]
 
 
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:75.45.85.124&diff=prev&oldid=132524418 20:59, 21 May 2007]
 
:This case is quite obvious. The user was warned, had more than three reverts and included personal attacks/slander in his/her edit summaries. Blocked for 31 hours. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
===[[User:Dontworry]] reported by [[User:Momusufan]] (Result: No block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Berlin}} and {{Article|Frankfurt}}. {{3RRV|Dontworry}}: Time reported: 14:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: Frankfurt [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frankfurt&diff=132681870&oldid=132620795] Berlin [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berlin&diff=132631945&oldid=132620475]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
[[Frankfurt]]
* 1st revert: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frankfurt&diff=130696487&oldid=130694716]
* 2nd revert: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frankfurt&diff=130977422&oldid=130889638]
* 3rd revert: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frankfurt&diff=131226003&oldid=131222560]
* 4th revert: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frankfurt&diff=131718879&oldid=131714998]
 
[[Berlin]]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berlin&diff=131714537&oldid=131582892]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berlin&diff=131798734&oldid=131772192]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berlin&diff=131852609&oldid=131804820]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berlin&diff=132011751&oldid=131972365]
 
User keeps reverting the night shot picture from [[Berlin]] and [[Frankfurt]] to another shot of the city without discussing it. he has done this multiple times in a 24 hour period. he has also edited under 5 IP's [[special:contributions/217.232.234.48|217.232.234.48]], [[special:contributions/217.232.246.168|217.232.246.168]], [[special:contributions/217.232.205.143|217.232.205.143]], [[special:contributions/217.232.206.48|217.232.206.48]], and [[special:contributions/217.232.251.177|217.232.251.177]]
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
[[User:Momusufan|Momusufan]] 14:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
* The diffs are from days past. 3RR blocks are not punitive, rather, these blocks are preventative. If the user persists in reverting, he will be blocked. I'll leave a message in talk. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 15:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Arbustoo]] reported by [[User:JJay]] (Result: Stale)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning
}}. {{3RRV|Arbustoo}}: Time reported: 16:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=119180801&oldid=118931030 01:51, 31 March 2007]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=132560709&oldid=132070597 23:50, 21 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=132594882&oldid=132585176 02:55, 22 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=132601284&oldid=132599560 03:38, 22 May 2007]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=132689160&oldid=132687801 14:37, 22 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=132701046&oldid=132689160 15:41, 22 May 2007]
* Experienced editor has continued to revert despite ongoing talk page discussion involving multiple editors. Three content reversions + immediate reversion of the addition of a disputed tag to the article.--[[User:JJay|JJay]] 16:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:That is not a 3RR, if you 1) notice other editors have engaged in editing/reverting (for example [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=132687801&oldid=132678566 calton reverting JJay's unreference removal]) and 2) removing some's disputed tag when they did not dispute the entire list was explained on the talk. JJay is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJay&diff=prev&oldid=132648457 stalking me] and won't discussion the issues at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JJay]]. I think an admin. needs to step in and warn him on [[WP:STALK]] and [[WP:GAME]]. [[User:Arbustoo|Arbustoo]] 16:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:* You reverted four times. That constitutes a violation. The presence of four other editors in the dispute is irrelevant. None violated 3RR. As for stalking, your accusation is laughable. My first edit to this article dates to April 2006 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning&diff=47133910&oldid=47048816].This is an article that merits close monitoring because of the continual addition of accredited schools to the list. That has been my involvement in this for the last year. [[User:JJay|JJay]] 16:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::*[[User:JJay]] is litigious. Wikipedia isn't built on recriminatory behavior. I have observed that [[User:JJay]] tries to create an unpleasant environment for other editors. That is not conducive to anything with any semblance to a comfortable environment in which editors can build an encyclopedia. I have been at the receiving end of the behavior which I am describing too many times. [[User:JJay]] should do some introspection and stop applying litigiousness where camaraderie is far more called for. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] 16:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::* As you well know, the first step in that is not to violate 3RR. [[User:JJay|JJay]] 16:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::* You are violating [[WP:STALK]], [[WP:GAME]], and have misread [[WP:3RR]]. Stop following my edits to revert me or be disruptive in my AFDs. You don't add content to articles. [[User:Arbustoo|Arbustoo]] 17:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::Interesting litany of accusations. Make them in the proper forum. In the present case, I would point out that I reverted twice. [[User:JJay|JJay]] 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::: My "accusations" were made at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JJay]] and currently with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#JJay my recent ArbCom request]. [[User:Arbustoo|Arbustoo]] 17:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::::And I have had to report [[User:JJay|JJay]] [[User_talk:Aarktica#Response_to_your_comment..._a_hefty_one.2C_at_that.|here]] at an editor's page who offered editor's assistence in an ongoing dispute. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] 19:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::It appears that some of the edits complained of are Arbusto adding sources, which is not a violation of 3RR. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 20:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Adding sources? You must be kidding. Let's see those diffs. --[[User:JJay|JJay]] 00:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::It was not a violation of 3RR. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the policy. [[User:Arbustoo|Arbustoo]] 03:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::Four reverts in under 24 hours = 3RR violation. No misunderstanding. Nothing fundamental. And no matter how many messages you leave here, the diffs above are quite clear. --[[User:JJay|JJay]] 03:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::::No, you don't understand the policy as noted by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=131703872 others] who are impartial. [[User:Arbustoo|Arbustoo]] 03:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::Right. Any more diffs you want to throw up instead of explaining your 3RR vio? --[[User:JJay|JJay]] 03:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Edit war seems to have ended and the reported reverts are too old to require administrative action. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 05:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
:* That's quite true. But given the attacks I was subject to for reporting this, you might want to point out that this was a 3RR vio, so it doesn't happen again. --[[User:JJay|JJay]] 11:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
::*Or you could just [[WP:DEADHORSE|drop the stick and move on]]. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 12:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
::* I have moved on. Since you enjoy essays, you might want to read [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]]. 3RR exists for a very good reason. So does [[WP:V]]. And edit warring to maintain an unsourced entry for an accredited school on a [[List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning]], while smearing other parties as vandals and the like is not particularly cool. [[User:JJay|JJay]]
::* How can you of all people be complaining about ''attacks?'' In my subjective experience I have yet to see anyone on Wikipedia engage in more attacking than you do. You have been attacking me in your every interaction with me. That is just my subjective experience. I think you need to do a bit of introspection concerning your own behavior. Wikipedia isn't about reporting people for 3rr. That is not the primary reason d'être for Wikipedia. Yet judging from your edits one would get that mistaken impression. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] 12:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
::* Judging from your block log, I could argue that your primary "raison d'etre" is violating 3RR. The situation is really quite simple. Don't violate 3RR and you won't get reported, blocked, waste people's time with unblock requests or intervene here with baseless messages.[[User:JJay|JJay]] 13:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Wgungfu]] reported by [[User:76.79.72.82]] (Result: page protected)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Atari 8-bit family}}. {{3RRV|Wgungfu}}: Time reported: 16:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_8-bit_family&oldid=131776687]
:: You need at least '''4''' reverts in the last '''24''' hours to same page to qualify as 3RR. You only have one. Can you please expand a bit on this? [[User:Evilclown93|Evilclown93]] 19:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_8-bit_family&diff=132745647&oldid=132745491]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_8-bit_family&diff=132745224&oldid=132744856]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_8-bit_family&diff=132744668&oldid=132741927]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_8-bit_family&diff=132732649&oldid=132730494]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_8-bit_family&diff=132711734&oldid=132711672]
...
 
*I have fully protected the page. Even if I block Wgungfu, he'll probably come back after the block to keep reverting the dynamic IPs edits, and there seems to be no point to it. Page protection is the best solution here. <font face="georgia"><span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span></font> 21:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:The anonymous user that made this report is using multiple anonymous IP sock puppet accounts to make disruptive edits to these articles: [[Apple IIc Plus]] [[Amiga 1200]] [[Apple II series]] [[Intel Core 2‎]] [[Apple IIGS‎]] [[X86 architecture]] [[Apple IIc]] [[Acorn Atom]] [[ZX Spectrum]]. These kind of changes have been noted [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#More_systematic_changes here]. There is a long history of a user using anonymous proxies to make these disruptive edits to this group of articles relating to computer systems. I have asked if it is feasible to have these pages with this problem semi-protected. Wgungfu has been reverting deliberate attempts to make disruptive edits by the same person who is using multiple anonymous accounts. The user causing the problem here is the user who is using multiple anonymous IPs, not Wgungfu. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 14:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Giovanni33]] reported by [[User:Evilclown93]] (Result: Warning)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Talk:Mao: The Unknown Story}}. {{3RRV|Giovanni33}}: Time reported: 19:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao:_The_Unknown_Story&oldid=132127498]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao:_The_Unknown_Story&oldid=132718294]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao:_The_Unknown_Story&oldid=132727303]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao:_The_Unknown_Story&oldid=132727303]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao:_The_Unknown_Story&oldid=132743453]
 
Please look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Giovanni33#User_notice:_temporary_3RR_block this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Giovanni33 at this massive block log], and that [[User:John Smith's]], also had 4 edits to the same page,of which 3 where reverts. [[User:Evilclown93|Evilclown93]] 19:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:I did indeed make 4 edits. However, the first one was to add my own comment to the original response. [[User:John Smith's|John Smith&#39;s]] 19:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:: But three reverts, that's basically edit warring one step away from a preventative block. I advise to not edit that page for a day or two. [[User:Evilclown93|Evilclown93]] 19:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::No problem. I believed I was reverting vandalism (as it was blanking), so that there wasn't a problem in reverting 3 times. [[User:John Smith's|John Smith&#39;s]] 19:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::::I've posted a little notice on your talkpage to make sure you have the appropriate links and eveything. Also, it should remind you that it's better to discuss that to revert here (you're in a request for mediatiaon). [[User:Evilclown93|Evilclown93]] 19:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:*Comment: What I removed is a POV rant left on the talk page about "murders" that is not relevent to the article, and it is in fact a personal attack against Prof. Bernstein, with a bunch of name-calling. Removing such clutter from the talk page is not vandalism (as Smith is claiming), and important to do, as I've explained to John Smith (the only one who keeps restoring it). But because it's a personal attack against a living person, I believe the 3RR does not apply, and why I insisted that it be removed on sight. If I am wrong about that, and this is not in that category of things that should be removed notwithstanding 3RR, then I'd be happy to self-revert.[[User:Giovanni33|Giovanni33]] 21:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::My comments weren't a rant and you removed them too. Also you are the only person removing them, so why mention that I was the only one reverting? Also it isn't just me that thinks there's been a 3RR vio here, as can be seen by this report. [[User:John Smith's|John Smith&#39;s]] 21:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::What is the point of keeping your response to him, when what your responding to has been removed? And, if you were really interested in keeping your response to him, and not the personal attack on the Professor, then why not only restore your comments? Because they would be meaningless alone. So, your point here is really a non-point, isn't it?[[User:Giovanni33|Giovanni33]] 21:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Because my comment was about more than the source the user in question mentioned (you could have easily mentioned my reply was in reference to a deleted "personal attack"). The reason why I didn't just revert my comments is that I see that user's comments as valid. [[User:John Smith's|John Smith&#39;s]] 22:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::If you wanted to dignify that personal attack with a response, then at least take it to the users talk page. It makes no sense and adds nothing to assiting with editing the article to want a response to a removed "personal attack" that should never have been left there to begin with. In removing the attack, there is nothign to respond to anymore. If you felt that needed a response, the talk page would be the place--not the articles talk page.[[User:Giovanni33|Giovanni33]] 22:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:It's a talk page... not sure why you're edit-warring over that. I'm a bit hesitant to issue a block over a revert-war on a talk page. But please do stop. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 22:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks.[[User:Giovanni33|Giovanni33]] 22:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
<!-- copy from _above_ this line -->
 
<!-- copy from _below_ this line -->
 
===[[User:71.10.169.33]] reported by [[User:Chrisjnelson]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|NCAA Football 08}}. {{3RRV|71.10.169.33}}: Time reported: 20:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NCAA_Football_08&oldid=132753733]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NCAA_Football_08&oldid=132755897]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NCAA_Football_08&oldid=132759546]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NCAA_Football_08&oldid=132760892]
 
IP user keeps advertising his site and has violated 3RR. (I know it is his because he has contacted me via email.) You'll also notice this is all he edits and he consistently ignores policy.
 
:The user has not yet been warned. A warning needs to be placed on his talk page first. Also, please provide diffs not versions. Thank you, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::I warned him. He knows what he's doing, he's vandalizing the page on purpose and that's the only reason he's here. He's familiar with both WP:3RR and WP:EL.[[User:Chrisjnelson|Chris Nelson]] 21:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Okay now he has created a name [[User:Bkaldenberg]] and is editing it again. This is his sixth edit today between hist last IP and his new name, and he's had even more than that. He IS aware of policy, and if you go to www.gamerosters.com you will see that he is the owner of the website and is advertising his product. This should not go unpunished and needs to be stopped.[[User:Chrisjnelson|Chris Nelson]] 21:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::Indeed it's quite obviously the same user and he's spamming the article. Now that he has been warned and is aware of his actions, I have issued a 24 hour block for [[User:Bkaldenberg]] and [[User:71.10.169.33]]. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
:::::Thanks. Can you tell me what my next step would be if (or more likely, when) he comes back and is doing it again? I mean will this ever be enough for any kind of page protection?[[User:Chrisjnelson|Chris Nelson]] 21:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:If he comes back you will need to report him once again, and the next block will likely be longer. If he keeps breaking Wiki policy he may eventually be blocked indefinitely for "exhausting the community's patience." Page protection is usually issued for article that continously fall vicitim to vandalism and spamming by multiple users. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
===[[User:Digwuren]] reported by [[User:Petri Krohn]] (Result: 48 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Jüri Uluots}}. {{3RRV|Digwuren}}: Time reported: 20:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&oldid=128613813 6 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132543011&oldid=132536871] - Reverted to contested version, omitting {{tl|totallydisputed}} tag
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132556307&oldid=132555085] - again
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132577646&oldid=132572090] - again
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132579064&oldid=132578629] - removal of tag and revert to contested version
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Digwuren&diff=prev&oldid=127429073] (2 May 2007)
 
New user with agenda, has systematically been reverting all my edist for the last 3 weeks, often in only two minutes.
 
:Well, I am not specialist in issue but I would like to point out that according to report Petri provided, 1-3 reverts and 4th revert are not connected at all. Just my 2 cents.--[[User:Staberinde|Staberinde]] 21:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*I have blocked the user for 48 hours per [[WP:3RR]] and [[WP:STALKING|stalking]]. <font face="georgia"><span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span></font> 21:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
'''comment:''' Two cases are missed out a bit upper! I moved them here, down under this line --[[User:84.236.89.208|84.236.89.208]] 23:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Chris Bulgin]] reported by [[User:YOUR_NAME]] (Result: Blocked 24h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Phillip Bauer}}. {{3RRV|Chris Bulgin}}: Time reported: 04:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
 
User is ignoring consensus talk on the discussion page. Seems bent on changing the character's status to deceased. Has changed status from unknwon to diseased multiple times
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&oldid=132605441]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&oldid=132603756]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&oldid=132596174]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&oldid=132585058]
 
:This needs [[WP:DIFF|diffs]], not versions. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 05:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
::And I only count 3 reverts by going through the history of the article. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|Woohoo!]]</sup> 06:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:::Nope, first edit is revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132585058&oldid=132580129 here], also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132596174&oldid=132580129 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132603756&oldid=132580129 3], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132605441&oldid=132580129 4]. Blocked 24 hours. Also [[Special:Contribs/66.25.157.129|66.25.157.129]] at:
:::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132584830&oldid=132580129 01:58, 22 May 2007]
:::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132586128&oldid=132585058 02:05, 22 May 2007]
:::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132619039&oldid=132611721 05:54, 22 May 2007]
:::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132743350&oldid=132739958 18:54, 22 May 2007]
:::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillip_Bauer&diff=132853919&oldid=132782099 03:49, 23 May 2007]
:::--'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 06:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Tankred]] reported by [[User:195.56.6.31]] (Result: Blocked see below)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Miklós Horthy}}. {{3RRV|Tankred}}: Time reported: 13:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&oldid=132084798 this]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&diff=132359160&oldid=132230884] 03:23, 21 May 2007
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&diff=132394464&oldid=132381586] 03:23, 21 May 2007
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&diff=132561177&oldid=132560870] 23:52, 21 May 2007
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikl%C3%B3s_Horthy&diff=132563389&oldid=132561376] 00:03, 22 May 2007
 
User is on a crusade against IPs from [[Budapest]], and got into a revetwar with an IP, wich Tankred claims User:VinceB, but VinceB's IP range is pretty similar to mine (195... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/VinceB], wich is also similar to at least that half of Budapest's 2 million population, wich contracted to the same internet provider), so plausibly IP 91 something was just a victim of their debate. Tankred had similar trouble in the past, once, and often goes revertwarring with IPs. --[[User:195.56.6.31|195.56.6.31]] 13:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
:This complaint is now moot because the article has been protected; however, this user should have been blocked when he/she reported {{3RRV|91.120.113.31}} above. Blocked with expiration set to match other blocks on same article at 00:54, 24 May 2007. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 06:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Kulendra]] reported by [[User:Superplaya]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|National sport}}. {{3RRV|Kulendra}}: Time reported: 00:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&oldid=132338173 17:08, May 20, 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&diff=132492169&oldid=132338173]
* 2nd revert: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&diff=132579008&oldid=132545497]
* 3rd revert: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&diff=next&oldid=132586539]
* 4th revert: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&diff=next&oldid=132614830 22:54, May 21, 2007]
* 5th revert: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&diff=132826543&oldid=132666233 17:10, May 22, 2007]
* 6th revert: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=National_sport&diff=132850671&oldid=132843085 19:29, May 22, 2007 ]
* Diff of 3RR warning: [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kulendra&oldid=132611359 20:56, May 21, 2007]
 
:Quite obvious violation of 3RR-24h block to calm things down. Thanks for filing your report "by the books." ;-) Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:71.32.61.142]] reported by [[User:SEWilco]] (Result: 31h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Meteorite}}. {{3RRV|71.32.61.142}}: Time reported: 03:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meteorite&oldid=132698978 Revision as of 15:31, 22 May 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meteorite&diff=132712577&oldid=132698978]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meteorite&diff=132807820&oldid=132771914]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meteorite&diff=132811942&oldid=132809262]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meteorite&diff=132838557&oldid=132830913]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meteorite&diff=132841568&oldid=132840420 02:33, 23 May 2007]
 
Older reversions exist.
 
:Straight forward case of three revert rule violation '''and''' spamming. 31 hour block to calm things down. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Petri Krohn]] reported by [[User:DLX]] (Result: Blocked 24h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Jüri Uluots}}. {{3RRV|Petri Krohn}}: Time reported: 05:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132789847&oldid=132649059 01:07, 23 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132578629&oldid=132577646 04:22, 22 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132571976&oldid=132556307 03:48, 22 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%BCri_Uluots&diff=132554882&oldid=132543011 02:20, 22 May 2007]
 
''Comment''. User keeps inserting <nowiki>{{totallydisputed}}</nowiki> tag without any explanations on talk page, although that has been repeatedly requested. 05:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Blocked 24 hours. Also [[User:Digwuren|Digwuren]]. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 06:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:: Selket, just to inform you. DLX is a typical representative of [[trolls]]. His contributions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DLX] tell everything: constant purges of controversial articles, constant aggressive manner of speech and complaints on others, constant edit warring. [[User:Beatle Fab Four|Beatle Fab Four]] 13:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Eupator]] reported by [[User:Grandmaster]] (Result:24 hours)===
 
* Arbcom parole violation on {{Article|Paytakaran}}. {{3RRV|Eupator}}: Time reported: 07:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
{{User|Eupator}} has been placed on a revert parole by the Arbitration Committee. The final decision in his case is here: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan#Eupator_placed_on_revert_parole]]. He is limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism. However he reverted legitimate edits of other users to [[Paytakaran]] twice in less than 7 days.
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paytakaran&oldid=126355190 13:39, 27 April 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paytakaran&diff=131800762&oldid=127109447 20:11, 18 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paytakaran&diff=132678675&oldid=132643378 17:48, 22 May 2007]
:24 hours (logged at [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan#Blocks for violation of revert parole]]). -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 09:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Johnreed]] reported by [[User:Tvoz]] (Result:24 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Ron Paul}}. {{3RRV|Johnreed}}: Time reported: 09:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&oldid=131946419 01:37, 19 May 2007] by Interpaul
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&diff=prev&oldid=132602690]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&diff=prev&oldid=132769764]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&diff=prev&oldid=132803268]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&diff=prev&oldid=132836605]
 
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJohnreed&diff=132890774&oldid=132785798] (2 warnings)
 
::'''Comment''' No edit summaries, no attempt to discuss this - just repeated blanking of a section of this article, despite warnings and despite the fact that the section has been re-worked several times for balance. No other edits since January - just this series of blanking vandalism. Appears to be a continuation of same repeated reverts that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Interpaul_reported_by_User:Tvoz_.28Result:24h.29 Interpaul] did - removing the same section without discussion on this political candidate's page - so it appears to be a deliberate attempt to promote an agenda, and unclear if it is more than one person or socks. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 09:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
**Clear case; 24 hours for first offence though I think I may be being lenient. [[User:Sam Blacketer|Sam Blacketer]] 09:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::thanks- I think you are, but let's see what happens. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 17:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Samil20]] and [[User:MykeType]] reported by [[User:Foochar]] (Result: Blocked 24h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Nas discography}}. {{3RRV|Samil20}}: Time reported: 12:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&oldid=132830834 01:34, 23 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132763427]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132775322]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132830834]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132911922 12:02, 23 May 2007]
 
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Samil20&diff=prev&oldid=132767885 20:37, 22 May 2007]
 
::'''Comment:''' User is involved in a protracted edit war with MykeType over this page. Report on MykeType also filed. War has spilled over into both user's talk pages with pages being blanked, moved, and redirected.
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Nas discography}}. {{3RRV|MykeType}}: Time reported: 12:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&oldid=132780755]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132763271]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132773163]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132780755]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nas_discography&diff=prev&oldid=132847567 03:10, 23 May 2007]
 
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: Was left at about same time as one above to [[User:Samil20|Samil20]] (20:37, 22 May 2007) however as part of edit war between [[User:Samil20|Samil20]] (who I have filed a report on just above) and [[User:MykeType|MykeType]] talk page was moved to BANNED and subsequently appears to have been deleted.
 
::'''Comment:''' User is involved in a protracted edit war with Samil20 over this page. Report on Samil20 also filed. War has spilled over into both user's talk pages with pages being blanked, moved, and redirected.
 
'''Result'''
Obvious violations. Both users blocked for 24 hours --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 14:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Fnagaton]] reported by [[User:193.93.3.6]] (Result:No Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Apple_IIc_Plus}}. {{3RRV|Fnagaton}}: Time reported: 13:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_IIc_Plus&oldid=125324105]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_IIc_Plus&diff=132811843&oldid=127317477]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_IIc_Plus&diff=132921074&oldid=132903732]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_IIc_Plus&diff=132923844&oldid=132922744]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_IIc_Plus&diff=132926461&oldid=132924972]
 
 
: The anonymous user that made this report is using multiple anonymous IP sock puppet accounts to make disruptive edits to these articles: [[Apple IIc Plus]], [[Amiga 1200]], [[Apple II series]], [[Intel Core 2‎]], [[Apple IIGS‎]], [[X86 architecture]], [[Apple IIc]], [[Acorn Atom]], [[ZX Spectrum]]. These kind of changes have been noted [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#More_systematic_changes here]. There is a long history of a user using anonymous proxies to make these disruptive edits to this group of articles relating to computer systems. I have asked if it is feasible to have these pages with this problem semi-protected. I am reverting deliberate attempts to make disruptive edits by the same person who is using multiple anonymous accounts. The user causing the problem here is the user who is using multiple anonymous IPs, not me. The same anonymous proxy user has also tried to 3RR attack [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wgungfu#Atari_reverts]] [[User:Wgungfu]] who has also been good faith reverting these kinds of disruptive edits. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 14:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:: I've decided to go ahead with a multi-page semi-protection request, at least this way if the request goes through it will stop the anonymous sock puppet edits better than constantly reverting what I see as their vandalism. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=132962954&oldid=132951741] As you can see from the recent history of [[Commodore 64]] there have been open proxies used to make the same kind of changes and this article has been semi-protected more than once to combat this. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 16:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::The user talk page you linked to specifically notes that the kind of behavior you and the anon have been engaging in is an edit war. Both of you are being disruptive. The conflict is over a currently-disputed section of the MOS regarding [[WP:MOSNUM#Binary_prefixes|the use of binary prefixes]]. — [[User:Aluvus|<font style="background: #3371A3" COLOR="#FFFFFF">Aluvus</font>]] [[User talk:Aluvus|<font color="DarkGreen">t</font>]]/[[Special:contributions/Aluvus|<font color="3399FF">c</font>]] 19:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Since I'm reverting deliberate vandalism by an anon user then I do not believe 3RR applies to me? Especially considering the fact I've now been trying to get these pages semi-protected against this vandal. I'm also not the only editor who thinks the anonymous user is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Multiple_page_semi-protect_request_.28I_realise_this_may_be_unusual.29 vandal] so it's not like I'm a lone ranger here. Dealing with anonymous IP proxy vandals is hard. :) [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 20:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::::you are edit-warring you are not dealing with vandals. Edit wars ,even with Anonymous IP ,is not vandalism. 3RR applies to you and [[WP:AGF]] too. [[User:88.84.155.37|88.84.155.37]] 21:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::No. The above post is another example of the user who has been using anonymous proxies to push their edits through to avoid the 3RR rule as shown by the edit history.[[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 23:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::Again, the page you linked specifically reaches the conclusion that revert-warring of this type is not protected as reversion of pure vandalism and is subject to 3RR. The anonymous edits are disruptive, but they are not simple vandalism. On [[Intel Core 2]] for example, binary prefixes were both the established units and the ones used in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intel_Core_2&oldid=52014612 first major contributor's version], yet you persisted in reverting (5 times) the page to use decimal prefixes, in contravention of the current wording of the MOSNUM. In fact, you even did this with edit summaries that falsely claimed the first major contributor used KB and MB; not only did you link to two different version of the page, of which neither is really the "first major contributor", but both version used MiB repeatedly! — [[User:Aluvus|<font style="background: #3371A3" COLOR="#FFFFFF">Aluvus</font>]] [[User talk:Aluvus|<font color="DarkGreen">t</font>]]/[[Special:contributions/Aluvus|<font color="3399FF">c</font>]] 22:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::The page I linked to doesn't reach that conclusion because it's not a simple content dispute, it is about the actions of an anonymous user who is using proxies to vandalise Wikipedia. I've been reverting those edits based on their vandalism, disruptive nature and the fact that they are all the same user sock puppet using anonymous proxies so I still do not think the 3RR rules applies here. If the admin looking at this would check with [[User:Wgungfu]] or [[User:Frecklefoot]] or [[User:Pixel8]] or [[User:Wackymacs]] they will be able to confirm what I've been saying about the vandalism and multiple IPs. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 23:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::::Did you read what you linked to? "I note that this is actually a content dispute, regarding Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Binary prefixes, and not vandalism. You have violated WP:3RR" "I take full responsiblity for being in an "edit war" with a person using dynamic IPs/IP spoofing." "Okay, well in that case, just please don't edit war when you know it's a content dispute and not vandalism." And once again, the IP's edits to [[Intel Core 2]] were absolutely '''not''' vandalism and are in fact consistent with the current wording of MOSNUM. — [[User:Aluvus|<font style="background: #3371A3" COLOR="#FFFFFF">Aluvus</font>]] [[User talk:Aluvus|<font color="DarkGreen">t</font>]]/[[Special:contributions/Aluvus|<font color="3399FF">c</font>]] 23:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::::::I did and I refuted what you wrote. Again it's not a content dispute, it is about reverting the actions of an anonymous user who is using proxies to vandalise Wikipedia and that is the basis for my reverts. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 23:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::::::You will also notice from my edit history that I've not made a revert after I became aware of the anonymous proxy user trying to game the 3RR system by making spurious 3RR reports, this is to make it easier for the admin looking at this to see exactly what has been going on. All my reverts have been in good faith against this anonymous proxy user's vandalism and I still think reverting vandalism is something that doesn't count towards 3RR. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 23:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Since [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] has stated he will not conduct any further reverts that would be in violation of the 3RR, no block is neccessary. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:melonbarmonster]] reported by [[User:Komdori]] (Result: no vio)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Dokdo}}. {{3RRV|melonbarmonster}}: Time reported: 16:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Removed infobox and/or mention of Takeshima from the infobox on the Dokdo article.
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dokdo&oldid=132953884 15:54, 23 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dokdo&diff=132957887&oldid=132957317 16:13, 23 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dokdo&diff=132959596&oldid=132958348 16:22, 23 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dokdo&diff=132961332&oldid=132960711 16:30, 23 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInfobox_Dokdo&diff=132963656&oldid=132959159 16:42, 23 May 2007]
 
* Fresh off a one week block for persistant 3RR violations (blocked three times since 1 March). Even the version reverted to could in itself be considered a revert as he's reverting the inclusion of the infobox, but since it's been there for quite awhile, I did not know if that would count. Still we're up to four. Continued edit warring on the same articles he was blocked for ([[Yoon Bong-Gil]] and [[An Jung-geun]]), immediately using up his three/day "quota", with no attempt at discussion despite multiple editors undoing his deletion of sourced material.
 
—<br>Supplemental evidence: (''These comments were left by Endroit in response to discussion below. They were separated and brought up here as its own section by Endriot to separate them from my response. I've attached my response to this this appropriately[[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 19:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)'')
 
:There's nothing but evasion by Melonbarmonster. He's been blocked before, but is obviously playing around with 3RR rules here, to see how much he can get away with.
:The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd reverts, as well as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dokdo&diff=132953884&oldid=132929184 version being reverted to] are outright vandalism, and removal of content, for which he was warned. The following diff shows his "Last Warning" for content removal (from another revert war):
:* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMelonbarmonster&diff=132960186&oldid=132959272 16:25, 23 May 2007] <nowiki>{{uw-delete4}}</nowiki> "Last Warning" for content removal
:The 3rd revert / content removal is clearly AFTER this "Last Warning".
:Now regarding [[WP:3RR]] rules, there doesn't have to be a 4th revert if the editor is a repeat offender, and shows signs of [[WP:POINT]] (gaming the system).--[[User:Endroit|Endroit]] 17:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Endroit is actually the editor who initated the FIRST revert claiming my edit as "vandalism" as he does above. He has reverted 3 times himself and now wants me to be blocked for my 3 reverts. Komdori picked up on reverting after Endriot's third revert whereas I had to stop at my third. Endroit then informed me where I can go to make edits to the Info Box instead of deleting the entire POV Info box at which point Komdori reported me for 3rr.[[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 17:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
—<br>Comments:<br>
:::Komdori has been shadowing my edits and instigating revert wars and leaving comments in a mocking and sarcastic tone. He mocks my previous [comment][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEndroit&diff=132959121&oldid=132596024] with [this][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMelonbarmonster&diff=132960186&oldid=132959272] and even his notice of this 3rr report contains sarcasm:[here][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMelonbarmonster&diff=132966271&oldid=132965517].
:::As for this report, I honestly didn't know how to edit the info box content and thought the info box being used was a POV version that a POV editor made up. I actually stopped reverting when I found out how to edit the info box. Instead of deleting the info box wholesale and "reverting" I made edits to problematic portions of the info box for the first time.[[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 17:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::: On the top of this page, it describes how it's good form to leave a notice that the report was made here. That's not being sarcastic, it's letting you know to come check this out.
:::: Anyway, it's still a violation, you wanted to remove "Takeshima" from the infobox, and were willing to remove the entire thing if possible. Editing the infobox has the same effect of editing the page (you knew that, you wanted the Japanese name gone and the Korean name remaining). You've been blocked 3 times for this, you know the drill by now. --Cheers, [[User:Komdori|Komdori]] 17:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::Komdori was complaining that the info box was being deleted, not that "Takeshima" was being taken out. He's changing his tune now that he's trying to report me for 3rr violation. 4th edit is actually more of a repair of my previous reverts more than anything else.[[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 17:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Komdori has reverted my last edit again. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInfobox_Dokdo&diff=132964593&oldid=132963656][[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 18:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
: Melon, I don't want to clutter up this place with off topic things, but just to eliminate confusion, as you point out that infobox is part of the Dokdo page. That's why you were reported, your ''fourth'' revert (removing the infobox or parts thereof) happened [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInfobox_Dokdo&diff=132963656&oldid=132959159 there]. Also, keep in mind that while the 3RR stops you at 3 reverts, you are by no means entitled to even that number. Reverting immediately up to your limit on several articles today on undiscussed unilateral changes (and going beyond on the Dokdo one) is not good practice. --Cheers, [[User:Komdori|Komdori]] 18:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Endroit has reshuffled the comments and has catagorized them to favor his POV. I've tried to restore the discussion the way it transpired. To clarify my position, I deleted the info box in entirety because mistakenly because I didn't know that contents of InfoBox could be edited and because it contained POV regarding dispute of the the title of this article. The last resolution on this issue was to title the article "dokdo" and I felt that this naming convention should be applied uniformly throughout the article until future consensus regarding this dispute can be reached. After Endroit and I both reverted three times, Komdori stepped in for Endriot and continued the revert war while leaving mocking comments on my talk page. I stopped reverting due to the 3rr. At this point, Endroit informed me that the Info Box in question was editable. Realizing my ignorance of this feature, I edited the contents of Info Box page rather than making reverts on the Dokdo page. While I acknowlege my 3 reverts and my ignorance on how to edit content of Info boxes I tried to purposefully not violate the 3rr, and this tag teaming between Komdori and Endroit and attempt at manipulating even this 3rr report is illustrative of the problem.[[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 19:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:: Where? I never moved comments, except just now to put the bit from the original report under the supplimental evidence. --Cheers, [[User:Komdori|Komdori]] 19:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::Oh wait, it wasn't you. It was Endroit. Why is Endroit making revisions to your 3rr report above the comments section?[[User:Melonbarmonster|melonbarmonster]] 19:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
'''Result:''' no violation. The 16:42 edit is a ''different article'' and appears to be a move to a compromise version. All parties are strongly encouraged to work out a resolution on the talk page, perhaps copying the template, which is only used in this article, and avoiding two separate edit histories. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 21:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
: Surely the infobox associated with an article is not an article in and of itself? Per the edit summaries he clearly made all four reversions to remove "Takeshima" because he felt it was POV. --Cheers, [[User:Komdori|Komdori]] 21:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:: The first three edits removed the info box in its entirety. The last one preserved most of the content of the infobox but only removed a small part that this user found objectionable. This struck me as an ''attempt'' to move towards compromise, even if it wasn't a great one. I agree that forking part of the article into a template is not good practice. I'm going to put it back and delete the template. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 21:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Wisamzaqoot]] reported by [[User:Brian0918]] (Result: blocked 24 hrs)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Jerusalem}}. {{3RRV|Wisamzaqoot}}: Time reported: 17:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&oldid=132952309 10:46, 23 May 2007]
 
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&diff=132954407&oldid=132953483]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&diff=132973903&oldid=132970958]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&diff=132976115&oldid=132974864]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&diff=132977966&oldid=132976588]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&diff=132978897&oldid=132978350 12:53, 23 May 2007]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerusalem&curid=16043&diff=132980938&oldid=132979447 13:03, 23 May 2007]
 
'''Comment:''' 3RR broken while page was semi-protected for revert war and vandalism. User was warned at [[User_talk:Wisamzaqoot#Jerusalem]]. &mdash; <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font color=black>BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<font color=gray>0918</font>]] &bull; 2007-05-23 17:59Z</small>
*I've blocked him for 24 hours. If anybody decides to lift this block I would ask them at least to wait until the article is off the main page. —<tt class="plainlinks">'''[[Special:Contributions/Freakofnurture|freak]]([{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit&section=new}} talk])'''</tt> 19:16, May. 23, 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Lotlil]] reported by [[User:Sarvagnya]] (Result: 24h block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Tamil_language}}. {{3RRV|Lotlil}}: Time reported: 19:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&oldid=132836648 Revision as of 02:05, May 23, 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=132836648&oldid=132733185 Revision as of 02:05, May 23, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=132840325&oldid=132838017 Revision as of 02:26, May 23, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=132969445&oldid=132953947 Revision as of 17:10, May 23, 2007 ]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=132986032&oldid=132980132 Current revision (18:28, May 23, 2007)]
 
====User was aware of 3RR and some more background====
I added the disputed tags to the article after weeks of discussing various issues on the talk page. All the discussions can be seen on the talk page. Then out of nowhere an ip 143.something([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/143.182.124.1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/143.182.124.4]) came out of nowhere and started reverting me to keep in line with [[User:Praveen pillay]]'s POV. Praveen Pillay asked the ip to create an account which the ip(now Lotlil) did. After creating the account, Praveen told Lotlil to be careful about 3RR. Lotlil after reading about 3RR even enquired with Praveen if he had violated 3RR. Praveen said no. The diffs for all this is below. It is clear that Lotlil knows what 3RR is.
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lotlil&diff=131100048&oldid=131099302 Praveen to Lotlil] <br>
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praveen_pillay&diff=prev&oldid=131118121 Lotlil to Praveen] <br>
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lotlil&diff=prev&oldid=131120274 Praveen to Lotlil]
 
Also, if you see Lotlil's contribs, it is clear that he is not a NEW user. There clearly are less than holy things going on there. For a newbie who has to get clarifications about 3RR, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lotlil/monobook.js&diff=prev&oldid=132096993 he edited his monobook.js page the very second day] to insall handy tools. Tools which he has used to revert war here and nothing else. This is most probably a single purpose account and/or somebody's sock/meat though they're trying very hard to fool people. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 19:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
: As you can see, the ip edits of Lotlil were from Intel [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:143.182.124.4]. Mastering monobook.js might take years for some people, but I am sure it will take less time for people who work in software related industry such as Intel. It is the policies of wikipedia that should take more time for any new user to get acquainted himself. I feel that since user is new, he should be given a warning (as per the norm). BTW: Since Sarvagnya has indulged himself to show some 'background', I would add some 'background' too. If you see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&action=history the history of Tamil language article], you will see revert war between 4 accounts. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sneha_patel07 Unlike the single purpose account] that you will see in the history (which is probably a sock puppet & supports Sarvagnya's POV), Lotlil made constructive contributions. [[User:Sarvagnya]] has a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive238#Disruptive_editing_with_rage history of removing pertinent cited content] when it comes to Tamil related articles. [[User:Praveen pillay|Praveen]] 20:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::Okay. Now he wants to discuss issues related to the article ''here''. They tried this cheap stunt on ANI and found no takers for their rant. Now Praveen is trying the same stunt on the 3RR noticeboard. And that the ip was from Intel is another red herring. No extra special level of technical skill is required to install and operate tools on wiki. But it is extraordinarily impossible to believe that the first thing the newbie discovered on wikipedia, even before he discovered the most basic policies(as PP would have us believe) was [[WP:TWINKLE |TWINKLE]]! Not only that, the user within days has/claims to have read up entire weeks and months of discussion on multiple talk pages.
::And in any case, all this is besides the point. I have shown that the user was specifically aware of the 3RR policy and yet, has violated it. ''Nothing'', I repeat, <u>''nothing''</u> can justify a 3RR vio. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 21:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:::When you discuss about the 'background' about his monobook etc here, showing your '[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_people&diff=127913114&oldid=126887686 history]' here is not 'wrong'. Did you warn him? This is obviously a bad faith trash that you are resorting to since he is sitting on the other side of fence. [[User:Praveen pillay|Praveen]] 21:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Warnings are only required where we are unable to demonstrate that the user was aware of WP:3RR. I provided the 'background' only to demonstrate that a) The user was fully aware of WP:3RR and b) that I had valid reasons to NOT consider him a new user. Even if you write off (b) as speculation, (a) is enough to put your friend in the dock. And if you didnt notice, unlike you, I am not making any attempt to discuss the article here or on ANI because that is the way things work here. The 3RR board is not the place to discuss article issues. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 22:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Do the admins need any clarification? Why is this case not being dealt with yet? I request an admin to please look into this and take action. Thanks. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 23:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Indeed, [[User:Lotlil]] did break the 3RR and seems to have been aware of rule. I have issued a short 24 hour block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Smee]] reported by [[User:Lsi john]] (Result: No Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Mind Dynamics}}. {{3RRV|Smee}}: Time reported: 20:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=prev&oldid=132998821 1]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=next&oldid=133000337 2]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=next&oldid=133001017 3]
* '''4th revert''': [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=next&oldid=133074210 4]
 
{{Article|Lifespring}}. {{3RRV|Smee}}: Time reported: 20:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133005389&oldid=133004881 1]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=next&oldid=133006593 2]
* '''3rd revert''': [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133077629&oldid=133077425 3]
 
This is a very experienced editor who has a contentious edit history who has been blocked 5 times already by this board.
As Smee [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=user%3Asmee blocklog1]
And Smeegolva [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ASmeelgova blocklog2]
 
This editor was recently blocked for warring with the same editor and is now warring again in two articles. The editor knows the rules and is pushing the limit to 3RR. The editor has been asked to stop warring and continues. Given that this is going on in multiple articles, this can be considered a violation even without 4 reverts.
 
I have stopped editing both articles, and am taking a break to keep this out of other articles as well.
 
I would appreciate an administrator to look into this situation. Thank you.
 
[[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 20:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
;Comments by [[User:Smee]]
Please note that there was no 4th revert in this case. Please also note that the ''3rd'' revert, was only ''after'' comment by [[User:Jossi]] on the talk page of [[Talk:Mind Dynamics]], confirming the general policy regarding removal of the "Unbalanced" tag. I only removed the tag a third time ''after'' this comment from [[User:Jossi]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mind_Dynamics&diff=133009669&oldid=133005656 DIFF]. In the other case at [[Lifespring]], there were 2 reverts, and also edit warring from [[User:Lsi john]], however, I restored the version ''back'' to [[User:Lsi john]]'s version, which was a '''''self-revert'''''. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133007756&oldid=133007616 DIFF of Self-Revert back to Lsi john version]. Thank you for your time.
 
*3RR is not an 'entitlement' to revert 3 times and this very experienced editor knows better. Given the contentious edit history and current aggressive reverting there is reason to believe this will continue. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 20:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
**You are correct. 3RR is ''not'' an entitlement. However, I must point out this comment by [[User:Bishonen]], in which he also warns ''this'' editor that 3RR is not an entitlement [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&diff=132059650&oldid=132051769 DIFF]. I apologize for the reverts in this instance, yes, however I sought out neutral opinions from other editors on one article, and did not revert a third time until this was given, even so, I apologize for doing this, I should have let the editor remove the tag himself after the contrary opinion was given. On the other article, as I have stated above, I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133007756&oldid=133007616 voluntarily self reverted]. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 20:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC).
::*And now it is clear that [[User:Smee]] is aware of the ''spirit'' of 3RR and has acknowledged violating it. This demonstrates that there is good reason to believe that the warring will continue across other articles and warrants a preventive block. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 21:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
#I apologize for any inappropriate actions, which have since ceased.
#On the article [[Mind Dynamics]], a third editor, [[User:Jossi]] commented, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mind_Dynamics&diff=133009669&oldid=133005656 DIFF], and only ''after'' this comment did I remove the tag.
#On the article [[Lifespring]], I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133007756&oldid=133007616 voluntarily self reverted], and there will be no edit war.
#As these issues are since resolved, there will be no edit war, and any block would be ''punitive'' in nature only. If [[User:Lsi john]] wishes to reinstate the "Unbalanced" tag on the article [[Mindspring]], I will ''not'' remove it again, but again ask him to provide reputable citations to back this up, as the burden is on the editor adding the tag. If not, I will again allow a reasonable length of time (in the last instance 20 days went by, no citations), and eventually ask him to remove the tag again, if he does not provide citations.
Thank you for your time. Yours, [[User:Smee|Smee]] 21:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC).
 
:*Basically the same excuses, rationalization, justification and promises as last time [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive47#User:Smee_reported_by_User:Lsi_john_.28Result:48_hours.29 here] for the recent 48 hour block, where this editor was sternly warned. (and yet we're back here again) The warring has only stopped, because I have stopped editing, pending the determination here. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 21:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Previous admin's conclusion after similar justification for 3RR:
<blockquote>''No, I'm afraid you're mistaken. It is not necessary to revert to the same version each time; any three reverts count. And all four of the above edits are reverts. You also seem think that because you are discussing your reverts, it's OK to keep reverting. This is also not the case. As for your compromise: Lsi john clearly doesn't consider it as such: [82]. Therefore, I'm forced to conclude the edit war is not concluded, and will therefore block for 48 hours. Given your history of being blocked for 3RR, you ought to know better than to edit war by now, anyway. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 05:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)''</blockquote>
*Both issues have now been resolved. I will not remove the "citecheck" tag at [[Lifespring]], and there will be no edit war there. And now we have ''two'' editors that have provided opinions regarding the "Unbalanced" tag, at [[Talk:Mind Dynamics]]. As both edit wars will not continue, if not from [[User:Lsi john]]'s assurance, than from ''mine'', this is now a discussion of a potential punitive nature, which is not the spirit of 3RR. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 21:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC).
 
*(edit conflict) If I may comment as an uninvolved editor, I would like to highlight the fact that [[User:Smee|Smee]]'s 3rd revert of the [[Mind Dynamics]] article did come after another editor expressed his approval of the action. Per a request on the [[WP:3O|third opinion]] page I chimed in additional support for the removal of the tag in question. While [[User:Smee|Smee]] ''may'' be viewed as in violation of either the letter or spirit of the 3RR rule, I believe these edits were done with the understanding that it was done so with the approval of outside support and consensus. [[User:Arkyan|<b><font color="#0000FF">Ark</font><font color="#6060BF">yan</font></b>]] &#149; [[User_talk:Arkyan|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 22:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:*Your 3O allowed approximately another 10 days before the tag would be removed. Smee immediately reverted. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 22:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::*Only yesterday [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3AScientologyfooter&diff=132695211&oldid=132684788 here]] an editor had this to say to Smee:
::::<blockquote>''Smee, you do not [[WP:OWN]] the templates. You have been edit-warring and reverting any edit that removes links that are precious to you, especially ones that you have created or had a hand in. Your last edit had a misleading summary which didn't mention that you reverted my removal of your unnecessary links yet again. You are monopolizing the templates, and in fact, monopolizing the Wikipedia Scientology articles in general, and it's really starting to affect the quality of the Scientology project. I cannot edit-war with you ''and'' the Scientologists at the same time, and I submit your edits are actually ''helping'' their cause by making these articles and templates a biased, undue-weighted, blatantly unfair ''mess''. This is not a personal attack, it has nothing to do with you personally, it has to do with these tendentious edits and the mass-dispersement of links to articles that you favor. And edits are what we are supposed to be discussing here. [[User:Wikipediatrix|wikipediatrix]] 14:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)''</blockquote> [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 23:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
*It is clear that [[User:Lsi john]] will keep commenting here again and again after anyone else provides comment, so I am just going to say that I will not. I will not object to the current resolution of the issues on both of the talk pages of the articles in question. I will also stop commenting here, and let the neutral editor's comments above, and my previous comments above, speak for themselves. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 23:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC).
 
:I only counted three reverts in 24h in the article's history which is '''not''' in violation of the 3RR. No Block was issued. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Sneha patel07]] reported by [[User:venu62]] (Result: 31h block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Tamil language}}. {{3RRV|Sneha patel07}}: Time reported: 22:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=prev&oldid=132838017 02:12, 23 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=132934333&oldid=132842198 14:20, 23 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=132953947&oldid=132935796 15:54, 23 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=133005336&oldid=132986032 19:58, 23 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=133024500&oldid=133009829 21:19, 23 May 2007]
 
This seems to be a single-purpose account created to assist POV edit warring on the Tamil language article. This account seems to shadow [[User:Sarvagnya]]'s edits. This new user hsa been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sneha_patel07&diff=133028378&oldid=131281941 warned] about the 3RR rule. - [[User:Venu62|Parthi]] <sup><em>[[User_talk:Venu62|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Venu62|contribs]]</em></sup> 22:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
:Warnings are meant to be given before the rule is violated. And this user 'shadowing' my edits is a joke. This user has a grand total of 5 edits on wikipedia, four of which were today. Really makes me wonder if this is a straw man account by someone to make me look poor. And his/her violation coming on the heels of my reporting Lotlil above makes me wonder even more. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 22:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Clear violation of 3RR. I issued a 31 hour block. PS. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]], it doesn't seem as though you have violated any rule. If you feel as though you are being "stalked" please file a report on the incidents notice board so appropriate action can be taken. Thank you, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
::Can you also please take a look at the 3RR vio i have filed above agains User:Lotlil? That is a crytal clear violation of 3RR too. And I never said that I feel I am being stalked. It was Venu who tried to mischievously insinuate that Sneha 'shadows' me. Anyway, just request you to take a look at the 3RR vio which happened ''before'' Sneha's. [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 22:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
===[[User:71.206.43.192]] reported by [[User:SanchiTachi]] (Result: 31h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|St. John's College, U.S.}}. {{3RRV|71.206.43.192}}: Time reported: 01:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133069557 21:03, 23 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133069557]
* 5th to Latest revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133081720]
* 4th to Latest revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133082127]
* 3rd to Latest revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133086748]
* 2nd to Latest revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133087227]
* Latest revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133089561]
The IP Address Editor keeps trying to put in his own personal website in the external links section. He has been warned that it violates SOAP and does not fit in with the rules on External Links. Not sure how to warn him any more, as I believe others have attempted to contact his various IPs before. The Archive has dates of the guy's posts, as he signs his name (but not with an IP) as "PT". Anything that can be done will be appreciated. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 01:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
The recent edit was done by [[Special:Contributions/Carnaptime]]. This edit promoted the link. On the talk page, this was stated [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&diff=prev&oldid=133081336] "Once again: GIVE ME A LEGITIMATE REASON FOR TAKING DOWN MY WEBSITE OR LEAVE THE LINK UP. PT". PT is the signed name of the IP number above. I believe that the two are the same individual. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 02:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
:There are too many reverts to list. They are all the same revert, to add in a link that violates notability and SOAP. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 03:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Indeed, [[User:71.206.43.192]] and [[User:Carnaptime|Carnaptime]] seem to be the same person. I have issued a 31 hour block due to the disruptive nature of his/her edits and a clear violation of the 3RR. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Smee]] reported by [[User:Lsi john]] (Result:self-reverted)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Mind Dynamics}}. {{3RRV|Smee}}: Time reported: [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 02:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=prev&oldid=132998821 1]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=next&oldid=133000337 2]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=next&oldid=133001017 3]
* '''4th revert''': [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=next&oldid=133074210 4]
 
{{Article|Lifespring}}. {{3RRV|Smee}}: Time reported: [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 02:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133005389&oldid=133004881 1]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=next&oldid=133006593 2]
* '''3rd revert''': [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133077629&oldid=133077425 3]
 
This is an additional report from (above)
 
This is a very experienced editor who has a contentious edit history who has been blocked '''5''' times already by this board.
As Smee [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=user%3Asmee blocklog1]
And Smeegolva [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ASmeelgova blocklog2]
 
This editor was recently blocked for warring with the same editor and is now warring again in two articles. The editor knows the rules and is pushing the limit to 3RR. The editor has been asked to stop warring and continues. Given that this is going on in multiple articles, this can be considered a violation even without 4 reverts.
 
'''note to admin:''' This is a followup, with more reverting, from a report above. The previous admin only saw 3 reverts and concluded that 3RR was not violated.
 
'''After''' I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=next&oldid=133078211 updated (01:56, 24 May 2007)] the report (above) the editor quickly self-reverted to avoid being reported here.
 
As I stated, this editor is contentious and has begun reverting again, once more in each article. There is no reason to believe this reverting will stop.
 
I do not know if this new report needed to be filed or if the one above will be reviewed.
 
Please see this contentious editing for what it is. Thank you.
[[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 02:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
;Please see above comment, by [[User:BrendelSignature]]
Please also see that I have Self Reverted on both articles.
#[[Lifespring]] - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lifespring&diff=133080577&oldid=133077629 Self revert], will explain on talk page.
#[[Mind Dynamics]] - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mind_Dynamics&diff=133080511&oldid=133077307 Self revert], will explain on talk page.
I could comment that [[User:Lsi john]] is removing highly sourced information to multiple reputable sources, but I will not go there. Suffice it to say that I have Self reverted here, and asked [[User:Lsi john]] to comment politely on the associated talk pages. He has not yet done so, and yet the highly sourced information continues to have been removed from the articles. Please also note that these two SELF REVERTS of mine were ''before'' this report. Thank you for your time. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 02:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC).
*And [[User:Lsi john]] is still refusing to discuss these issues on the associated talk pages. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 02:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC).
**No block due to self-revert, but for Pete's sake, stop with the edit warring, both of you. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
***Thank you, and I hope that [[User:Lsi john]] will engage in polite discussion on the talk pages. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 04:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC).
 
===[[User:Trotsky17]] reported by [[User:Lahiru_k]] (Result:warned)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam}}. {{3RRV|Trotsky17}}: Time reported: 04:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&oldid=132857479 04:15, May 23, 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133018081&oldid=132857479 20:52, May 23, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133051752&oldid=133035089 23:28, May 23, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133056270&oldid=133052820 23:53, May 23, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133090505&oldid=133077328 03:06, May 24, 2007]
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
*User doesn't seem to have been warned; left warning. Update if he/she continues. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
So here it is;
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&oldid=133095379 03:38, May 24, 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133313664&oldid=133095379 01:41, May 25, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133321544&oldid=133315861 02:28, May 25, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133420775&oldid=133400629 14:19, May 25, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133488159&oldid=133430022 20:02, May 25, 2007] --[[User:Lahiru_k|<font color="blue">'''♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪'''</font>]] [[User talk:Lahiru_k|<font color="blue"><sup>walkie-talkie</font>]]</sup> 20:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Mais oui!]] reported by [[User:Throw]] (Result: Reporter blocked for 31h)===
* *[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Thatcher (disambiguation)}}. Time reported - [[User:Throw|Throw]] 04:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*First revert:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thatcher_%28disambiguation%29&diff=133100313&oldid=133100223]
 
*Second revert:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thatcher_%28disambiguation%29&diff=133102326&oldid=133101587]
 
*Third revert:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thatcher_%28disambiguation%29&diff=133102986&oldid=133102420]
 
:Three reverts do '''not''' constitute a violation of the 3RR. No vio as of now, though I urge both of you to engage each other in a discussion before this erupts into an edit war that requires administrative action. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 05:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
::'''Update''': Mais oui! has just informed me that Throw conducted a fourth revert despite warning. [[User:Throw]], not [[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] has been blocked for 31h. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 05:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Trojani]] reported by [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] (Result:31 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Illyrians}}. {{3RRV|Trojani}}. Time reported: 07:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&oldid=132575129 22 May, 01:04]
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=132980116&oldid=132803661 23 May, 17:59]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=133111566&oldid=133045802 24 May, 05:43]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=133116754&oldid=133113402 24 May, 06:33]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=133117574&oldid=133117147 24 May, 06:41]
 
Further reverts in previous days: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=131879911&oldid=131863829], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=131820858&oldid=131810821], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=129497312&oldid=129440795], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illyrians&diff=129833278&oldid=129506857].
 
Warnings given: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trojani&diff=129851403&oldid=127262615], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trojani&diff=129889509&oldid=129851403]
 
Persistent nationalist edit-warrior, several other edit-wars on related articles; user claims ethnic "ownership" over articles and tries to bite away users of other ethnicities with personal attacks ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Origin_of_the_Albanians&diff=prev&oldid=120442199], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ronz&diff=prev&oldid=133112498], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Illyrians&diff=prev&oldid=132989235]). [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 07:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*31 hours, lengthened due to nationalist insults on talk pages. [[User:Sam Blacketer|Sam Blacketer]] 11:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Wgungfu]] reported by [[User:213.54.176.188|213.54.176.188]] 13:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC) (Result:No block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Atari ST}}. {{3RRV|Wgungfu}}: Time reported: 13:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_ST&oldid=133097876]
 
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_ST&diff=133154616&oldid=133097876]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_ST&diff=133165913&oldid=133165190]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_ST&diff=133166497&oldid=133166095]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_ST&diff=133167399&oldid=133167175]
 
 
:[[User:213.54.176.188|213.54.176.188]] is an editor using multiple IP's that was already banned yesterday. Centrx lifted the editing ban on the [[Atari ST]] page because this user is supposed to be banned. --[[User:Wgungfu|Marty Goldberg]] 13:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
:: There was a protection because of your editwar and ASA the protection was lifted you did it again. [[User:163.13.112.191|163.13.112.191]] 13:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC) (a blocked Tor network open proxy)
:::And yet another IP of his.... --[[User:Wgungfu|Marty Goldberg]] 13:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Wgungfu doesn't deserve to be blocked for his sterling work reverting vandalism caused by this anonymous proxy user. [[User:Fnagaton|Fnagaton]] 14:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:No block: User was reverting edits of banned user made via open proxies. —[[User:Centrx|Centrx]]→[[User talk:Centrx|''talk'']]&nbsp;&bull; 18:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Caligvla]] reported by [[User:Eupator]] (Result: Stale)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Armenia}}. {{3RRV|Caligvla}}: Time reported: 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=133112664 01:54, 24 May 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=132711552 12:29, 22 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=132715241 12:47, 22 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=132722939 13:23, 22 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=132734196 14:13, 22 May 2007]
*Note that this user has been blocked for disrupting the article twice in the past.--<big>''' [[User:Eupator|<font color=#00N510>Ευπάτωρ]] '''</font></big><sup><small>[[User_Talk:Eupator|<font color=#974423>Talk!!]]</sup></small> 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Not within 24 hours, these are different edits, reporting user Eupator has been subjected to more serious discipline, and has been warned on several occasions to stop wikistalking me--[[User:Caligvla|Caligvla]] 19:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
While it looks like some edit-warring is going on, I'm not going to block someone over edits that happened several days ago. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 19:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Dacy69]] reported by [[User:Azerbaijani]] (Result: no action)===
 
*Arbcome parole violation on
{{Article|Armenian-Tatar massacres}}. {{3RRV|Dacy69}}: Time reported: 15:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Dacy69 has been placed on revert parole (see final decision here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan#Dacy69_placed_on_revert_parole). He is only allowed to make one revert per article per week, and he must explain his reverts on the talk page, except for vandalism. However, he reverted a legitimate edit on the [[Armenian-Tatar massacres]] article.
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian-Tatar_massacres&oldid=131990627 12:30 19 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian-Tatar_massacres&diff=133030837&oldid=132979171 21:46 23 May 2007]
 
He left no message on the talk page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Armenian-Tatar_massacres&action=history] (I also reported him on the Arbcom enforcement page (see: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Dacy69]) but I'm not sure if thats the right place, because I never get a response by any admin, so I apologize if this is the wrong place for this report.)[[User:Azerbaijani|Azerbaijani]] 15:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
*I'm going to let this go. He is allowed his one revert per week and this was it. Yes, he should have left a note on the talk page rather than inviting the other editor to do so. I will warn him to that effect. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 16:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:MindHavoc]] reported by [[User:evrik]] (Result: Sockpuppet blocked indef, sockpuppetier block for 48h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Elvira Arellano}}. {{3RRV|MindHavoc}}: Time reported: 16:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvira_Arellano&oldid=132857175 23:13, 22 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvira_Arellano&diff=133039234&oldid=132857466 17:25, 23 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvira_Arellano&diff=next&oldid=133166889 MindHavoc]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvira_Arellano&diff=next&oldid=133181177 10:15, 24 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvira_Arellano&diff=next&oldid=133191374 10:51, 24 May 2007] [[User:129.33.49.251|129.33.49.251]] editing as [[User talk:MindHavoc|MindHavoc]]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MindHavoc&diff=133191703&oldid=133171535 10:42, 24 May 2007]
 
*Please note: [[User:LordPathogen]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:129.33.49.251&diff=131650064&oldid=129234673 warned] and blocked because of edits on the same article. All of a sudden [[User:MindHavoc|MindHavoc]] starts a new account and [[User:129.33.49.251|129.33.49.251]] starts doing the same thing again. A notice was posted at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/LordPathogen]]. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 16:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I have blocked MindHavoc indefinitely as it was a sockpuppet created w/ the intent to win edit wars and "fake" consensus. I have blocked [[User:LordPathogen]] and for 48 hours until things on the page calm down. [[User:129.33.49.251|129.33.49.251]] seems to be a different individual as his edits go back to March 2-he was not blocked as there was no vio of the 3RR on his part. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Nemda]] reported by [[User:Bobblehead]] (Result: 24h block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Khmer Rouge}}. {{3RRV|Nemda}}: Time reported: 17:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khmer_Rouge&oldid=132270773]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khmer_Rouge&diff=133042552&oldid=132975238 15:41, 23 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khmer_Rouge&diff=133058499&oldid=133056913 17:05, 23 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khmer_Rouge&diff=133071583&oldid=133065225 18:13, 23 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khmer_Rouge&diff=133204739&oldid=133174132 09:48, 24 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANemda&diff=133074759&oldid=133070148 18:31, 23 May 2007]
 
:Obvious violation of 3RR, despite warning. Issued a 24 hour block. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Liftarn]] reported by [[User:Humus_sapiens]] (Result: Block 48h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Anti-Zionism}}. {{3RRV|Liftarn}}: Time reported: 20:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Zionism&diff=132907024&oldid=132899921]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Zionism&diff=133121901&oldid=133047086 23:22, 23 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Zionism&diff=133148409&oldid=133146343 03:13, 24 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Zionism&diff=133165691&oldid=133161928 05:17, 24 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Zionism&diff=133217851&oldid=133206695 09:50, 24 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liftarn&diff=133250222&oldid=132875298]
 
:'''Comment.''' For days, Liftarn keeps adding [[:Category:Anti-racism]], which is controversial and therefore by itself is a violation of [[WP:CAT]] - without even bothering to discuss it at talk. Today, he was a little too overzealous. ←[[User:Humus sapiens|Humus sapiens]] <sup>[[User talk:Humus sapiens|ну]][[Special:Contributions/Humus_sapiens|?]]</sup> 20:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
'''Reslut:''' Blocked 48 hours. Has been blocked for 3RR before. Humus Sapiens missed four reverts by 35 minutes and is advised to be careful in the future. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 22:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:142.176.13.178]] reported by [[User:Crockspot]] (Result:31h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|John W. Morgan}}. {{3RRV|142.176.13.178}}: Time reported: 02:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
This user is committing a BLP violation as well as 3RR, and has been warned about both. Block should be harsher than a normal first-time violator. This user does not appear to be as new as their edit history would suggest.
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=133097228&oldid=133067890]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=next&oldid=133099059]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=next&oldid=133099885]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=next&oldid=133100994]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=next&oldid=133102662]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=next&oldid=133103478]
 
*3RR warning after 4th or 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A142.176.13.178&diff=133104431&oldid=128424832]
*BLP warning immediately following: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:142.176.13.178&diff=next&oldid=133104431]
 
:Quite obvious violation of 3RR. 31h block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Same user reverting after two warnings [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:142.176.13.178] {3RRV|142.176.13.178}, I thought I would amend instead of creating a new section. --[[User:Kirkoconnell|Kirkoconnell]] 04:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Ruthluke]] reported by [[User:Viriditas]] (Result: moot)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Organic food}}. {{3RRV|Ruthluke}}: Time reported: 13:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organic_food&diff=133388230&oldid=133387773 of 10:51, 25 May 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organic_food&diff=next&oldid=133388390 11:59, 25 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organic_food&diff=next&oldid=133399365 12:43, 25 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organic_food&diff=next&oldid=133404313 12:49, 25 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organic_food&diff=next&oldid=133404551 12:53, 25 May 2007]
 
* User warned of spamming six times by three different users regarding four different articles:
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=prev&oldid=131713453 05:03, 18 May 2007]
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=next&oldid=131903133 00:35, 19 May 2007]
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=prev&oldid=131923849 02:44, 19 May 2007]
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=prev&oldid=133388408 10:53, 25 May 2007]
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=prev&oldid=133404750 12:51, 25 May 2007]
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=next&oldid=133404750 12:53, 25 May 2007]
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthluke&diff=next&oldid=133405061 13:10, 25 May 2007]
 
*User has been indef blocked by [[User:Waggers|Waggers]]. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 14:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Critikal1]] reported by [[User:Duja]] (Result: Blocked 48h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Montenegrins}}. {{3RRV|Critikal1}}: Time reported: 14:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&oldid=133120607]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133159957 15:26, 24 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133167471 15:45, 24 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133176095 16:43, 24 May 2007]
 
* Partial revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133280390 01:44, 25 May 2007], followed by editing; new reference version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133298888 01:44, 25 May 2007]
 
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133368805 11:49, 25 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montenegrins&diff=next&oldid=133392085 15:53, 25 May 2007]
 
Informally warned [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMontenegrins&diff=133182002&oldid=133180217 at article's talk page], formally at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACritikal1&diff=133401294&oldid=133120297 his talk], before 5th revert.
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
Blocked 48 hours by [[User:Aldux|Aldux]]. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 04:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:84.135.235.92]] reported by [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (Result: Warning)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{article|Template:Germanic languages}}. {{3RRV|84.135.235.92}}: Time reported: 15:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Germanic_languages&oldid=132914940 13:24, May 23, 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AGermanic_languages&diff=133378041&oldid=133206964 10:20, May 25, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AGermanic_languages&diff=133424460&oldid=133391175 15:41, May 25, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AGermanic_languages&diff=133426324&oldid=133425108 15:51, May 25, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AGermanic_languages&diff=133430289&oldid=133427338 16:13, May 25, 2007]
 
* Experienced anonymous user with an IP in Germany, usually edits in relation to the [[Scots language]]; I've come across no evidence that he is a logged out version of an established user. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 15:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I do not see any indication that [[User:84.135.235.92|84.135.235.92]] has been warned. As far as I know he or she may not have been aware of the 3RR. I have, therefore, warned the IP. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Carnaptime]] reported by [[User:SanchiTachi]] '''again with 4RR, editwarring and sockpuppetry immediately after end of previous block'''[[User:Frondelet|Frondelet]] 23:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)(Result:)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|St. John's College, U.S.}}. {{3RRV|Carnaptime}}: Time reported: 16:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133089561 ]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133089561]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133312072]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133439751]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_College%2C_U.S.&oldid=133444876]
 
He was previous blocked for 31 hours on this name and the IP address. There is a new person who joined in the reverting. I don't know if the issue will ever be resolved and the Talk Page is just filling up more and more, without them bothering to join in with the voting process (there are already 2 no votes, and thats it, but all of that is lost in the clutter). [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 16:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
The "new person" is SusyQuine, an obvious sockpuppet account which was created during Carnaptime's lockout, and which the vandal is now using to make his posts on [[Talk:St. John's College, U.S.]]. Carnaptime's first block expired today, and he began deleting [[St. John's College, U.S.]] piece by piece. This user, with sockpuppets, is unresponsive to persuasion -- is a ban inevitable? [[User:Frondelet|Frondelet]] 18:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
An additional sockpuppet, evident on [[Talk:St. John's College, U.S.]], is 71.206.43.192. [[User:Frondelet|Frondelet]] 19:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Someguy0830]] reported by [[User:SanchiTachi]] again (Result:)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Graphic Novels (Warhammer 40,000)}}. {{3RRV|Someguy0830}}: Time reported: 16:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Contributions List [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Someguy0830]
 
* 1st move: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=prev&oldid=133442433]
* 2nd move: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=prev&oldid=133443327]
* 3rd move: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=prev&oldid=133445532]
* 1st revert of text: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=prev&oldid=133442433]
* 2nd revert of text: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=prev&oldid=133443327
* There are others, but its too confusing for me to scroll through them all
 
This user is [[WP:STALK|following]] me from previous pages. The page in question was created as Graphic Novels (Warhammer 40,000) to follow naming convention for the Wikiproject on Warhammer 40,000. Graphic Novels refers to the proper noun title of the section of fictional works made for the game Warhammer 40,000. This follows the naming of other pages like [[Sisters of Battle (Warhammer 40,000)]] and [[Emperor of Mankind (Warhammer 40,000)]]. The individual also edits out important information vital to the page. If you look at my talk page history, you can see a serious of allegations made by that user and constant following me from page to page, especially over at admin [[user:Jossi]]'s page. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 16:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Updated to add [[User:SanchiTachi/Graphic_Novels|this is the page]] that should be the current page, sans the unwarranted edits by [[User:Someguy0830]]. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 17:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Um, is not [[User:SanchiTachi]] also guilty of breaking the 3RR rule in the above case? [[User:Darkson|Darkson - BANG!]] 20:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Actually, I don't think either of them are. The diffs listed above are incorrectly labelled ("2nd move" is not a move) and redundant (1st and 4th diffs are the same, so are 2nd and 5th). If you take a look at the page history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&action=history], you can see that Someguy0830 moved it three times and SanchiTachi moved it back twice prior to the page being protected to prevent further move warring. Naturally, the protected version is the [[m:The wrong version|wrong one]]. --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] 20:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Hmm, maybe I chose the wrong ones. There should have been three moves, and then two deletions (he removed my text before moving the page, I added in parts of stuff to the header, which you can see on my sandbox version). I just counted it totally at five, three for move and two for deletes. But yeah. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 20:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::You're as guilty as I am, and I'm in the right by undoing your violations of [[WP:NAME]].
:::::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=133435387&oldid=133371236 08:41, May 25, 2007]
:::::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=133435540&oldid=133435387 08:42, May 25, 2007]
:::::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=133445276&oldid=133444061 09:35, May 25, 2007]
:::::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=133445445&oldid=133445276 09:36, May 25, 2007]
:::::#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&diff=133457606&oldid=133457130 10:38, May 25, 2007]
:::::Here's a tip. When you're going to try to get another user banned, make sure you cover you ass when doing it. — [[User:Someguy0830|Someguy0830]] ([[User talk:Someguy0830|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Someguy0830|C]]) 22:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
More reverts by [[User:Someguy0830|Someguy0830]]. Not only has he deleted things without a consensus, he reverts back to his version, which is filled with many errors. He does not have any sources for the topic at hand, nor has any sourced information to provide. His edits are solely to [[WP:HARASS]] me. Furthermore,
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Warhammer_40%2C000_graphic_novels&action=history]
 
As you can see, he went to other pages, without asking about the image conventions established by the project, and added pictures. When told that the images are not appropriate for those pages under the conventions established, he refused to do anything but revert. That happened [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leonatos&action=history] here and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sisters_of_Battle_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&action=history] here. Anything that can be done to keep him from editing out things that are sourced, or putting in statements and qualifications that aren't sourced, and let the page develop enough to get rid of the problems it had (it was just created) would be very appreciated. [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 23:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Taharqa]] reported by [[User:Zerida]] (Result: blocked 24h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|User talk:Zerida}}. {{3RRV|Taharqa}}: Time reported: 20:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zerida&diff=133351729&oldid=133341947]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zerida&diff=133477111&oldid=133352136]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zerida&diff=133479394&oldid=133478274]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zerida&diff=133486374&oldid=133479759]
 
The reverts are all the same, so I just provided the links. User recently came back from a five-day block for edit-warring and constant disruption. He removes 3RR warnings and other messages from his talk page, but engages in edit wars on other users' talk pages when they respond in kind (by removing his comments which are either disruptive or not civil). He has been edit warring on just about every article he has visited as his contribution history attests. — [[User:Zerida|Zerida]] 20:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
^Wait a minute, I got no warnings whatsoever about this and thought the 3rr only was in concern to articles, not under talk pages.. Someone kept vandalizing my edits on your page so I restored them in order to make sure that you got it.. How does this violate 3rr? I never thought it did actually.. These were reverts to deal with simple vandalism on a "user talk page"..[[User:Taharqa|Taharqa]] 20:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Not true, you were given a warning [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Taharqa&diff=prev&oldid=133478851] and you erased it. You can't keep erasing messages from your talk page and expect other people to extend the same courtesy to you, especially when you just keep posting accusations and incivilities. [[User:Egyegy|Egyegy]] 20:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
^I erased it because of your vandalism on her page and mine.. It was nothing more than a bad faith removal if that's the case due to what you've been doing, and I even reported you before hand.. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=133483198. I never had any idea that the 3rr applied to User Talk pages or "reverts to deal with simple vandalism"(as I saw it, and not a "content dispute" since no one addressed the content at all), the latter of course isn't a violation. I was dealing with what I felt was your vandalim and there were no disputes over the content..[[User:Taharqa|Taharqa]] 22:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Clear violation with history of previous violations. Editor claimed he/she did not know that 3RR applied to talk pages, so blocking for just 24 hours. Giving benefit of the doubt but other admins likely will not in the future. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 04:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Zerida]] reported by [[User:Taharqa]] (Result: No vio)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Egyptians}}. {{3RRV|Zerida}}: Time reported:20:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=prev&oldid=133259667 21:02, 24 May 2007]
 
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=prev&oldid=133337041 03:58, 25 May 2007]
 
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=prev&oldid=133339438 04:10, 25 May 2007]
 
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=prev&oldid=133352801 05:34, 25 May 2007]
 
^If you'd check the page, it almost seems like the beginnings of an edit war or that I went over myself, but technically I didn't.. As you can see, my last revert/edit at 04:07, 25 May 2007 was only seconds after Egyegy's, and I was simply going back to correct something I missed(edit self) from my previous edit, not knowing that he/she just reverted the last one. So I simply tried to place tags and those got reverted relentlessly, no matter what the tag said(I tried to put up different ones). Zederia has clearly and intentionally violated the 3rr simply in order to maintain her control over the article and deserves a block for her uncompromising behavior imo, she won't even respond to my pleas in the talk page.. I was in no way trying to edit war, this complaint is due to the constant reversions between my edits and lack of response to my concerns in the talk page, all I got was reverts of anything I tried to add, and yes, I gave up on trying to even touch the page for now... Discussion.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Egyptians#Misrepresentation_of_Keita (See the uncompromising tone and lack of response).. [[User:Taharqa|Taharqa]] 20:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:'''No violation''' It is not clear that ''any'' of these edits are reverts. If I'm missing something, please give a diff and a version reverted to for each edit. Or if that doesn't make it obvious, explain ''exactly'' what is being reverted. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 04:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Diluvien]] reported by [[User:Delirium]] (Result:48h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Skinny Puppy}}. {{3RRV|Diluvien}}: Time reported: 21:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133447941&oldid=133408053 16:50, May 25, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133461507&oldid=133451242 17:57, May 25, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133465996&oldid=133465368 18:20, May 25, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133472525&oldid=133470725 18:48, May 25, 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133491206&oldid=133481638 20:16, May 25, 2007]
 
Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Diluvien&diff=133482160&oldid=133461893 19:32, May 25, 2007]
 
:Obvious violation, 2nd time in one month. 48h block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
===[[User:Argyriou]] reported by [[User:RicoCorinth]] (Result: Blocked 24h)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Community Associations Institute}}. {{3RRV|Argyriou}}: Time reported: 23:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Associations_Institute&diff=133503557&oldid=132837459 13:17, May 25, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Associations_Institute&diff=133509375&oldid=133508929 13:46, May 25, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Associations_Institute&diff=133512220&oldid=133511051 14:01, May 25, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Associations_Institute&diff=133516163&oldid=133513931 14:23, May 25, 2007]
 
Clear violation. Blocking 24 hours. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 23:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Mycroft.Holmes]] reported by [[User:172.165.54.172]] (Result: No vio)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Parma, Ohio}}. {{3RRV|Mycroft.Holmes}}: Time reported: 23:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133309691&oldid=132089492 01:19, 25 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133485752&oldid=133446385 19:50, 25 May 2007 ]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133522316&oldid=133492126 22:57, 25 May 2007]
 
Note: This user is ignoring repeated requests to discuss the edits on the talk page and is just blanking others' edits that multiple other editors, including administrators, have compromised on and worked on with each other. This user has a history of periodically coming to this page and removing information without conferring with or ignoring other editors. This user may also be violating the Wikipedia policy of OWN. This user was blocked previously for violating 3RR on the same page: 20:06, 30 October 2006 Majorly (Talk | contribs) blocked "Mycroft.Holmes (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR)
:Note: You must have 4 reverts listed here for a case to be considered by an administrator. [[User:Cool Blue|<b><font color="#000FFF">Cool</font><font color="#000FFF"> Blue</font></b>]][[User talk:Cool Blue|<font color="#800000"><sup>talk to me</sup></font>]] 00:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Excately, 4 not 3 reverts consitutes a violation of the 3RR. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
===[[User:Trotsky17]] reported by [[User:Lahiru_k]] (Result: 31h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam}}. {{3RRV|Trotsky17}}: Time reported: 02:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&oldid=133095379 03:38, May 24, 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133313664&oldid=133095379 01:41, May 25, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133321544&oldid=133315861 02:28, May 25, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133420775&oldid=133400629 14:19, May 25, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133488159&oldid=133430022 20:02, May 25, 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam&diff=133538722&oldid=133492906 00:47, May 26, 2007]
 
Here is the previous case.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Trotsky17_reported_by_User:Lahiru_k_.28Result:warned.29] --[[User:Lahiru_k|<font color="blue">'''♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪'''</font>]] [[User talk:Lahiru_k|<font color="blue"><sup>walkie-talkie</font>]]</sup> 02:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Obvious violation. 31h Block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Mycroft.Holmes]] reported by [[User:172.165.54.172]] (Result: 31h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Parma, Ohio}}. {{3RRV|Mycroft.Holmes}}: Time reported: 23:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133309929&oldid=133309691 01:20, 25 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133485752&oldid=133446385 19:50, 25 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133522316&oldid=133492126 22:57, 25 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parma%2C_Ohio&diff=133556902&oldid=133526496 02:46, 26 May 2007]
 
Note: This user is ignoring repeated requests to discuss the edits on the talk page and is just blanking others' edits that multiple other editors, including administrators, have compromised on and worked on with each other. This user has a history of periodically coming to this page and removing information without conferring with or ignoring other editors. This user may also be violating the Wikipedia policy of OWN. This user was blocked previously for violating 3RR on the same page: 20:06, 30 October 2006 Majorly (Talk | contribs) blocked "Mycroft.Holmes (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR)
 
:Pretty clear cut case. 31h block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
===[[User:Delirium]] reported by [[User:Diluvien]] (Result:no violation)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Skinny Puppy}}. {{3RRV|Delirium}}: Time reported: 21:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133451242&oldid=133447941 17:07, 25 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133465368&oldid=133461507 18:17, 25 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skinny_Puppy&diff=133481638&oldid=133472525 19:30, 25 May 2007]
 
Vandalism and deletion of facts and references. --[[User:Diluvien|Diluvien]] 15:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*An editor has to have more than three reverts to break the rule; Delirium has only three. Meanwhile you have been evading your own correctly-imposed 3RR block and I'm considering whether to extend it; this is not a case of vandalism. [[User:Sam Blacketer|Sam Blacketer]] 18:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Good_friend100]] reported by [[User:Komdori]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Goguryeo}}. {{3RRV|Good_friend100}}: Time reported: 18:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&oldid=133741640 23:25, 26 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=133759860&oldid=133753760 01:20, 27 May 2007] reverted split of countries by % ('''two-thirds of Goguryeo territory'''), removed reference to reference's affiliation (Korea institute)
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=133762459&oldid=133762400 01:37, 27 May 2007] again removed '''Korea institute'''
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=133763525&oldid=133762958 01:43, 27 May 2007] again reverted ('''two-thirds of Goguryeo territory''')
New revisions were made resulting in this version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&oldid=133764086 01:47, 27 May 2007] which were reverted in the fourth revert here:
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=133764773&oldid=133764086 01:52, 27 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=133860607&oldid=133829412 14:52, 27 May 2007] again removed '''Korea institute'''
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=133893211&oldid=133892508 17:58, 27 May 2007] again removed ('''two-thirds of Goguryeo territory''')
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: editor last blocked 24 hours for 3RR on the same article a few days ago, at 08:05, 21 May 2007.
 
Editor has been increasingly becoming hostile and incivil, such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Goguryeo&diff=prev&oldid=133891042 here].
 
Well, he is borderlining the 3RR. He does not revert to the exact same version each time-making this a difficult case. Considering, however, that he keps removing the same sources and his incivil remarks and that he/she has been blocked for a 3RR violation just a week ago, I find his/her edits disruptive enough to warrant a 24h block to clam things down. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
: Yeah I understand it's tough. I guess he makes it a difficult case intentionally (as he mentions on his talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGood_friend100&diff=133900908&oldid=133898829 here] where he seems to imply he's obfuscating the reverts). Anyway, thanks for taking a look at it. --Cheers, [[User:Komdori|Komdori]] 18:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Jackanapes]] reported by SlimVirgin (Result: 36 hours)===
3RR violation on {{article|Holocaust}} by {{3RRV|Jackanapes}}
 
*First edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Holocaust&diff=133740719&oldid=133605875 23:19 May 26], restores a section on rescuers that had earlier been moved to another article.
*1st revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Holocaust&diff=133744857&oldid=133742071 23:46 May 26], ditto
*2nd revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Holocaust&diff=133822110&oldid=133790355 09:43 May 27], ditto
*3rd revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Holocaust&diff=133847962&oldid=133842406 13:25 May 27], ditto
*4th revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Holocaust&diff=133849420&oldid=133848445 13:36 May 27], ditto
 
;Comment
Four reverts in 14 hours against multiple editors to restore the section about rescuers, which was moved to another article some time ago because of length concerns. Jackanapes has been blocked twice before for 3RR on other articles. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AJackanapes] [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 19:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:The editor in question has been blocked for thirty-six hours. I don't think it's necessary to keep increasing the block length for additional three-revert rule violations if the violations are several weeks (and months) apart. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 21:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Thanks. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 21:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Egyegy]] reported by [[User:Taharqa]] (Result: 36h (Egy), 5d (Tah))===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Egyptians}} and {{Article|Fayum mummy portraits}}. {{3RRV|Egyegy}}: Time reported:23:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
[[Egyptians]]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=133895095&oldid=133884051 18:09, 27 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=133919254&oldid=133919114 20:10, 27 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptians&diff=133944421&oldid=133931273 20:33, 27 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zerida&diff=133486374&oldid=133479759 22:21, 27 May 2007]
 
 
[[Fayum mummy portraits]]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fayum_mummy_portraits&diff=133895384&oldid=133885889 18:10, 27 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fayum_mummy_portraits&diff=133919144&oldid=133917944 20:10, 27 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fayum_mummy_portraits&diff=133923998&oldid=133923367 20:34, 27 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fayum_mummy_portraits&diff=133944792&oldid=133933256 22:23, 27 May 2007]
 
The reverts are all the same(except rv 4), just click links and check what's marked in red.. User has engaged in spiteful edit wars and has been personally attacking and making biased accusations to justify his/her disruptive and controlling behavior. He/she is even following others around to different articles and reverting all of their edits. The 4th revert(on both) was a revert of a tag that I placed on the page and he even reverted that to the previous page, clearly violating 3rr (and he/she knows better), he/she won't even allow disputes and is being extremely controlling.[[User:Taharqa|Taharqa]] 23:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I did not violate 3rr on any of these. I have though showed that Taharqa deliberately changes cited quotations [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Egyptians&diff=133949698&oldid=133949006] and keeps edit warring when his misleading changes are reverted to the actual one. Changing a '''quotation''' is a type of vandalism, so if anyone should be blocked it should be you for this and your disruption for months. [[User:Egyegy|Egyegy]] 23:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
I have blocked Taharqa for violating the three-revert rule on two articles and edit-warring at another for a period of five days (this is his fourth 3RR block in a month and second in forty-eight hours). Additionally, I have blocked Egyegy for thirty-six hours for violating the three-revert rule on two different articles (this is his second 3RR block in a month). -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 00:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Someguy0830]] reported by [[User:SanchiTachi]] (Result: Someguy and SanchiTachi violated, SanchiTachi blocked)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000)}}. {{3RRV|Someguy0830}}: Time reported: 22:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Move from Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000) to improper and misleading Black Library gaming without consensus or inquiring why it was titled that way
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133936208&oldid=133933634]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133938782&oldid=133936907]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133943951&oldid=133943270]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133946302&oldid=133945215]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133947571&oldid=133947281]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133955094&oldid=133949059]
 
1 He did moved a previous page of mine which caused an edit war.
2 He moved without seeking a consensus first.
3 He changed the lead and other important parts without consensus.
4 He reverted proper information, reput in broken wiki links, broken references, etc.
5 He was asked by SwatJester to let him (SwatJester) deal with me, not him, which he is refusing to do.
6 He quotes "guidelines" loosely to justify his removing of formatting, even though the justifications do not apply (a game series is not a proper book title, and cannot be italicized like one, so the WikiProject came up with a consensus on how to approach the individual games and projects based on them, which he refuses to accept)
7 He already threatened processing the page for deletion and other such things without seeking a consensus
8 Notice that he "double edit" so that you cannot easily revert the mistaken changes and that he edits constantly so you cannot fix it without running into an edit conflict
9 He insists on putting in "reflist" with 2 columns, even though one citation has 5 authors and keeps it from breaking into two columns
10 Title of game is "Warhammer 40,000" and not "Warhammer 40,000 games" and the insistance of it to be made into a name that is improper even though clear presidence and verifiable links are against him.
 
:Please provide us with diffs not versions. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
::Fixed accordingly [[User:SanchiTachi|SanchiTachi]] 23:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
:::To my defense, note [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133945215&oldid=133943951 the version] Tachi wants to use. Specifically, note the fact that the categories are commented out, which I informed him of and he reverted anyway. Also note the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&action=history page history], where two other editors are assisting me in convincing this user that you're not supposed to bold each and every single term. Finally, note the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29 talk page], where again this user is told why '''''[[Warhammer 40,000]]'' games''' is not changing the title of the work. — [[User:Someguy0830|Someguy0830]] ([[User talk:Someguy0830|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Someguy0830|C]]) 23:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
::::So you admit you violated 3RR, yes? --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(talk)</small>]] 00:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::I probably did, though I have trouble saying for certain. I reverted the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133946302&oldid=133945215 bolding thing] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133947571&oldid=133947281 twice], the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133959538&oldid=133959319 Warhammer title thing] once (not counting the combined bolding revisions), and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133938782&oldid=133936907 lead section once]. I'm not sure how my introduction edits would be counted as they are spread out, but they at least make one or two past that. So yes, I'll admit that I did. However, in admitting this, I expect Sanchi to be blocked as well, as he's just as guilty. He has: the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133936907&oldid=133936208 combined move-lead revert]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133945215&oldid=133943951 first] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133949059&oldid=133947571 second bolding reverts]; and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133957519&oldid=133955094 first], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133959319&oldid=133957831 second], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Library_gaming_%28Warhammer_40%2C000%29&diff=133961864&oldid=133959538 third stand-alone title reverts]. He's been worse than me, because he's warring with multiple editors. — [[User:Someguy0830|Someguy0830]] ([[User talk:Someguy0830|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Someguy0830|C]]) 00:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
::::::<s>Blocking you both would serve no purpose. Ultimately, the verdict is that you both violated 3RR, and that SanchiTachi is wrong with regards to the matter of the formatting of the page. I'll discuss this issue with the user in question. </s>--[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(talk)</small>]] 00:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::::SanchiTachi stated intent to continue reverting the incorrect edits once the page was unprotected, and as such, has been blocked. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(talk)</small>]] 00:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
===[[User:Ned Scott]] reported by [[User:White Cat]] (Result: No block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|User:Cool Cat}}. {{3RRV|Ned Scott}}: Time reported: 01:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: N/A
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=User:Cool_Cat 28/05/2007, 04:19:41]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=User:Cool_Cat 28/05/2007, 04:21:14]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=User:Cool_Cat 28/05/2007, 04:23:13]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=User:Cool_Cat 28/05/2007, 04:25:42]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cool_Cat&oldid=133978002 28/05/2007, 04:30:39]
 
I {{tl|db-self}}'ed my former userpage [[User:Cool Cat]]. User revert warred over the speedy tagging of it and recreated the page twice. These add up to 5 non-new edits. All times are my local time as I have no access to undelete logs. User [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Ned_Scott has been explained 3RR] before according to the block log. --<small> [[User:White Cat|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat|chi?]]</sup> 01:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:The page has been protected by someone else. For what it's worth, I believe Ned Scott's explanation that you were trying to get your page deleted to make your username change more confusing for others and your signature changes validated. Even if that wasn't your motive, the effect would still have been there. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 01:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
::Thats ridiculous. I merely do not want an old userpage. The talk pages still link. Ned Scott has no reason to recreate the deleted page twice and revert war over the speedy tag. He made 5 non-original edits aka 5 reverts. --<small> [[User:White Cat|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat|chi?]]</sup> 10:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:142.176.13.178]] reported by [[User:Crockspot]] (Result: 48h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|John W. Morgan}}. {{3RRV|142.176.13.178}}: Time reported: 05:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=prev&oldid=133964399]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=prev&oldid=133976010]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=prev&oldid=134001144]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=prev&oldid=134005132]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_W._Morgan&diff=prev&oldid=134019340]
 
User is fresh off a 31 hour block for same violation on same article.
 
:Obvious violation, he keps reverting to a version mentioning Mr. Morgan's IQ. 48h, considering his previous 31h block for another 3RR vio just ended. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
===[[User:Rbaish]] reported by [[User:Slp1]] (Result: 72h block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Racism}}. {{3RRV|Rbaish}}: Time reported: 14:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism&oldid=134050633 10:39, 28 May 2007 ]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=134069003&oldid=134053924 13:10, 28 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=next&oldid=134069167 13:12, 28 May 2007 ]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=next&oldid=134073386 13:48, 28 May 2007 ]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=next&oldid=134075908 14:21, 28 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rbaish&diff=prev&oldid=134077487 14:02, 28 May 2007] and has been blocked twice before for 3RR according to his logs/talkpage [[User:Slp1|Slp1]] 14:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=next&oldid=134075908 15:11, 28 May 2007]
 
::Blocked for 72 hours. [[User:Nick|Nick]] 15:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
===[[User:Good_friend100]] reported by [[User:LactoseTI]] (Result: 48 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Goguryeo}}. {{3RRV|Good_friend100}}: Time reported: 20:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&oldid=133893211 17:58, May 27, 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=134142674&oldid=134041345 19:35, May 28, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=134145836&oldid=134144426 19:50, May 28, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=134154449&oldid=134152216 20:29, May 28, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&diff=134156527&oldid=134156202 20:39, May 28, 2007]
 
Less than an hour off a 24h block for 3RR on the same article, immediately resumed edit warring similar reverts to before (removing information about the Korean Institute and distribution of area in modern states). Blocked for 3RR on the same article less than a week before that. —<font face="Verdana" color="#003399">'''[[User:LactoseTI|LactoseTI]]'''</font><sup><small><font color="#009933">[[User_talk:LactoseTI|T]]</font></small></sup> 20:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Just in case anybody asks, the following may be a more accurate one, with respect to the removal of the word "autonomous":
:* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goguryeo&oldid=133860607 14:52, 27 May 2007]
:--[[User:Endroit|Endroit]] 21:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::I don't think those reverts had any malicious thought put into it. I only edited what I thought was the best way to write the sentence. The sentence was confusing until I was clarified on what the "when" part was supposed to mean. The problem is settled now, and I don't understand why it is a problem trying to make the sentence look better. If there was any misunderstanding, I am sorry. [[User:Good friend100|Good friend100]] 21:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::: Don't insist on your version of it four times in about an hour, then, less than an hour off a 24h forced break. As for malice, the recent very incivil comments (see 7 reports up from here for his last reported incident) kind of speak for themselves. —<font face="Verdana" color="#003399">'''[[User:LactoseTI|LactoseTI]]'''</font><sup><small><font color="#009933">[[User_talk:LactoseTI|T]]</font></small></sup> 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
The editor in question has been blocked for forty-eight hours since this is the second block in two days and third in a week. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 21:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:ThuranX]] reported by [[User:Johnsome]] (Result:Johnsome warned; only 2 reverts by ThuranX)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Henry Ford}}. {{3RRV|ThuranX}}: Time reported: 06:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:: Comment &mdash; incomplete report. However, ThuranX has made a good faith effort to engage Johnsome in discussion, both on the article talk page and on the Johnsome's user talk page. Johnsome has made three reverts back to his original edit. 3RR warning issued to [[User:Johnsome]]. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 00:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:DPeterson]] reported by [[User:Nandaba Naota]] (Result:Nandaba Naota blocked indefinately)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Child_sexual_abuse}}. {{3RRV|DPeterson}}: Time reported: 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134163571&oldid=134162633]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134170022&oldid=134168983]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134174312&oldid=134174130]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134178470&oldid=134175411]
 
:IMO it should be Nandaba who should be blocked. He's an obvious sock who is trying to game the system to promote his extreme pedophilia activist beliefs, see [[User:Voice of Britain]] who has been repeatedly blocked for same 3rr violations on this article, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 22:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Please refrain from personal attacks. Thank you. [[User:Nandaba Naota|Nandaba Naota]] 23:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::There's been a lot of reverting going on here. I'm going to request page protection. [[Special:Contributions/Will_Beback| ·:·]][[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] [[User talk:Will Beback|·:·]] 23:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::I already did, before this 3RR filing, which I dispute. <font color="Red">[[user:DPeterson|DPeterson]]</font><sup>[[User talk:DPeterson|talk]]</sup> 23:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Indeed you havent been reverting either, merely trying to defend NPOV from a user whose edits appear to justify the sexual abuse of children, and who may be a sockpuppet based on ther history of the article, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 23:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
I hope this page protection will cool down the edit war, and hopefully a consensus can be reached on the talk page. I don't believe a block will be nessesary in this case, and I hope it won't ever have to come to that. [[User:Yamamoto_Ichiro|Yamamoto Ichiro]] <small>(山本一郎)([[User talk:Yamamoto Ichiro|会話]])</small> 00:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Seems some people here are more equal than others. [[User:Nandaba Naota|Nandaba Naota]] 00:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:SqueakBox]] reported by [[User:Nandaba Naota]] (Result:See above)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Child_sexual_abuse}}. {{3RRV|SqueakBox}}: Time reported: 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134181272&oldid=134181108]
* 2st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134181673&oldid=134181422]
* 3st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=133996312&oldid=133993937]
* 4st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&diff=134184109&oldid=134183637]
 
This isnt 4 reverts, they are all different. And if we were to judge by these standars it is Nanadaba who has been massively edit warring, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 23:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:They are reverts, I checked very carefully. Note that reverts must not be on the same area but it is enough that they are on the same article during a 24 hour period, which is the case here. This is a clear violation of the 3RR rule. [[User:Nandaba Naota|Nandaba Naota]] 23:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
You have massively reverted yourself as these reverts from both Petersen and I are exclusively against yourself, appear to be trying to wikilawyering in order to manipulate the system and are editing from the same POV as Voice of Britain who has been blocked on numerous occasions for edit warring. Do you want to be a serious editor or not? Editors who edit war and then accuse others of doing so are mostly not good faith editors, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 23:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:This is incorrect. Please refrain from personal attacks. Thank you. [[User:Nandaba Naota|Nandaba Naota]] 23:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::No it isnt, as the history shows, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 23:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::There's been a lot of reverting going on here. I'm going to request page protection. [[Special:Contributions/Will_Beback| ·:·]][[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] [[User talk:Will Beback|·:·]] 23:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::Thank you. [[User:Nandaba Naota|Nandaba Naota]] 23:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::::It is obvious that Nandaba is engaged in some sort of edit war here, pushing a specific POV. Each edit by SqueakBox is different and does not qualify for 3RR violation. <font color="Red">[[user:DPeterson|DPeterson]]</font><sup>[[User talk:DPeterson|talk]]</sup> 23:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::::It's still a violation of the 3RR even if the reverts are different. Please read the rules again if you are in doubt. [[User:Nandaba Naota|Nandaba Naota]] 23:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
And your 6 reverts arent I suppose, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 23:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::The page is now protected: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Child_sexual_abuse_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29_2]]. I would suggest a block on Nandaba for 3RR violantion and for [[Personal Attacks]] against SqueakBox. <font color="Red">[[user:DPeterson|DPeterson]]</font><sup>[[User talk:DPeterson|talk]]</sup> 23:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:205.193.82.252]] reported by [[User:JForget]] (Result: Warning)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Conservative Party of Canada}}. {{3RRV|205.193.82.252}}: Time reported: 23:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&oldid=134146134]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&diff=134108475&oldid=133910209]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&oldid=134145332]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&oldid=134158513]
 
But more importantly, this user has a long history of doing the same reverts in this article based on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&action=history article history] and its [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/205.193.82.252 own contributions].
 
:The user has been warned and has not reverted since. Hopefully this will be sufficient. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 03:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 4th revert:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&oldid=134323314
 
===[[User:TJ Spyke]] and [[User:Alfiboy]] reported by [[User:Feba]] (Result: 48h (TJ), 24h (Alf))===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Wii}}. {{3RRV|TJ Spyke}} and {{3RRV|Alfiboy}}: Time reported: 01:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wii&limit=50&action=history Wii - History]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wii&diff=134209500&oldid=134209311 This Diff] shows basically the source of the argument. One user believes it should be included, while another thinks it is link spam. Personally, I find User:Alfiboy at fault in this discussion, but don't believe I can fairly list him here without listing TJ as well. Alfiboy was warned of his edit warring on his talk page by User:Dancter, and TJ Spyke appears to have been around long enough to know better. --<small> [[User:Feba|Phoeba Wright]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Feba|OBJECTION!]]</sup> </small> 01:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
I have blocked TJ for forty-eight hours and someone else has blocked Alfiboy for twenty-four hours. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 01:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:The way, the truth, and the light]] reported by [[User:ZeroZ]] (Result: No violation)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Incest}}. {{3RRV|The way, the truth, and the light}}: Time reported: 02:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134197772]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134065523]
 
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134210312]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134205602]
 
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134217040]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134210312]
 
* Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&action=history Incest-history].
 
Note that [[User:The way, the truth, and the light]] has engaged in 3RR prior to this complaint[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk%3AThe_way%2C_the_truth%2C_and_the_light#Three_revert_rule_block], and that the user's own edits show a lack of interest in consensus building:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=133537687 "enough of this".]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incest&oldid=134210312 "rv - my wording is correct"]; this revert is particularly telling, as the language reverted was specifically written to correctly reflect the sources added (no sources used in the Intro prior to that edit). The revert does NOT correctly reflect the new sources, which themselves remained; this made the Intro misleading and returned it to [[WP:WEASEL]]. I have ceased editing for the time being, so as to make your inquiry less complicated. Thank you.
 
There is no violation of the three-revert rule here. Four reverts are needed for a violation, and taking a look at the history not all of his recent edits have been reverts. The user in question looks as if he's trying to work around your edits. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 03:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
===[[User:Charred Feathers]] reported by [[User:dman727]] (Result:No violation)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|State terrorism by the United States}}. {{3RRV|Charred Feathers}}:
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&oldid=134258368]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
 
* 1st revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&oldid=134268257
* 2nd revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&oldid=134269121
* 3rd revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&oldid=134269796
* 4th revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&oldid=134270158
 
This user has been previous warned about 3rr and edit warring [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charred_Feathers&oldid=133599464]][[User:Dman727|Dman727]] 08:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
:No violation. I only see 3 reverts. And besides, the report is not in the correct format. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|Woohoo!]]</sup> 08:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
lost count...[[User:Charred Feathers|Charred Feathers]] 08:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Eep²]] reported by [[User:Dekimasu]] (Result: 24 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Discover Magazine (TV series)}}. {{3RRV|Eep²}}: Time reported: 12:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=133161732 20:01, May 24, 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=133398506 21:10, May 25, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=133574973 13:52, May 26, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=134051967 19:51, May 28, 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=134112729 02:16, May 29, 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=134277155 17:59, May 29, 2007]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&oldid=134298503 20:57, May 29, 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: User mentions 3RR in own edit summary: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discover_Magazine_%28TV_series%29&diff=134277155&oldid=134115396 17:59, May 29, 2007]
 
*{{user|Eep²}} has been blocked for twenty-four hours for edit-warring at [[Discover Magazine (TV series)]]. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 12:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Eiorgiomugini]] reported by [[User:Ghirlandajo]] (Result:96 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Suyab}}. {{3RRV|Eiorgiomugini}}: Has been blocked for 3RR issues numerous times and is back at it.
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&oldid=134312364 13:54]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134317124&oldid=134312978 13:57]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134320324&oldid=134319464 14:15]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134327403&oldid=134326771 14:54]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134328721&oldid=134328469 15:01]
 
Within thirty minutes, he made four reverts on this very page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=134335359], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=134336431], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=134337596], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=134338766&oldid=134338600]. Whenever I go he would follow me and remove my statements. This is very frustrating. --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 15:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Blocked for 96 hours. He's revert-warred before, and the disruption here was really not on. [[User:Moreschi|Moreschi]] <sup> [[User talk:Moreschi|Talk]]</sup> 16:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Viriditas]] reported by [[User:Arcayne]] (Result: No violation)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article| Children_of_Men}}. {{3RRV|Viriditas}}: Time reported: 1[[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 15:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&oldid=134105556]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134147681&oldid=134105556]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134149055&oldid=134147681]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134150361&oldid=134149274]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134153142&oldid=134150739]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134155344&oldid=134154897]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134168697&oldid=134164839]
* 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_Men&diff=134248025&oldid=134168697]
 
The editor defends the reverts by stating that he is "Adding older edits back in incrementally"; these older edits are in fact his. The editor has also been edit-warring within the article, for which he has received a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Viriditas block] prior to this incident. Prior editors have noted that the editor in question appears to have OWN issues with this article. Suggest that in addition to (or alternative to) blocking, that the editor be enjoined form contributing to the article or limiting their edits within the article. The editor is not new to WP policy, and has skirted the edge of 3RR on three prior occasions.
 
:The editor in question has not violated the three-revert rule. All of these "reverts" are consecutive edits, not alternating between him and another editor. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 15:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Padishah5000]] reported by [[User:Onofre_Bouvila]] (Result: 24h (Pad), 24h (Ono))===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Latino Muslims}}. {{3RRV|Padishah5000}}: Time reported: 15:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=133540431&oldid=133522652 00:58, 26 May 2007 ]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=133878618&oldid=133848407 16:39, 27 May 2007 ]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=134016670&oldid=133958330 05:42, 28 May 2007 ]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=134105771&oldid=134069198 16:41, 28 May 2007 ]
* '''Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APadishah5000&diff=134152320&oldid=134068817 20:19, 28 May 2007]'''
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=134172702&oldid=134145848 21:57, 28 May 2007 ]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=134328677&oldid=134269722 15:01, 29 May 2007 ]
 
As you can see, he has done 5 reverts, and the 3th, 4th, 5th and the 6th were made in less than 24 hours.
 
As you can also see in the comments he made in his edit summaries, first he stated that the reference was "false", then that the reference did not have any external link (he did not see it and he thought that since the reference contained few internal linked words to other articles of this wikipedia, the source itself were these linked articles, when in fact there was a link to an external source), then he claimed it was not in English (according to [[WP:Cite]] references can be given in other languages if needed. In this case, the reeference was talking about the differnet meanings of a Spanish word, therefore the reference contained a link to the [[Real Academia Española]] dictionary. There are lots of references in this Wikipedia linking to that dictionary, which is the official one for Spanish language), etc, etc, etc. All in all, for some reason, he keeps removing that reference. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latino_Muslims&diff=134269722&oldid=134172702 Other users have already reverted him], etc.
 
I also tryed to discuss this with him, but his response was to remove the whole discussion from his talk page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APadishah5000&diff=134172821&oldid=134152320 21:57, 28 May 2007 ]
 
[[User:Onofre Bouvila|Onofre Bouvila]] 15:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I have blocked Padishah and Onofre for twenty-four hours each for violating the three-revert rule. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 15:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Ghirlandajo]] reported by [[User:Eiorgiomugini]] (Result: No violation)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Suyab}}. {{3RRV|Ghirlandajo}}: Has been blocked for 3RR blocked numerous times previously.
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134275440&oldid=134273118 08:42, 29 May 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134276496&oldid=134276407 08:52, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134279581&oldid=134278754 09:21, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134287175&oldid=134287152 10:26, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134287430&oldid=134287259 10:28, 29 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134311321&oldid=134297561 13:22, 29 May 2007]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suyab&diff=134312978&oldid=134312364 13:33, 29 May 2007]
 
'''Comments''' Wholesale of similarly reverting, as well as huge cut-and-paste revert while doing translation. [[User:Eiorgiomugini|Eiorgiomugini]] 15:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Please stop your [[WP:POINT]]. You were revert warring with [[User:Haukurth]], [[User:Berig]], [[User:Dbachmann]], not with me. The edits above are totally different. I was busily working on improving the article which I wrote and slowly translating references as you requested, even in the face of your continuous reverts. --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 15:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
This is no room for you to make excuse, a violate is a violate not something else, if you think that you did not made a 3RR today, let other to judge it. "busily working on improving the article " Since when? You had removed the tag yourself and left the article untranslated. Let's not bring this lengthy debate over to the noticeboard. [[User:Eiorgiomugini|Eiorgiomugini]] 15:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Eio, you are alone in your position and some of the edits mentioned above do not really count as reverts. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 16:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Seems like these so-called reverts are completely different edits. I hope that this report is the result of a misunderstanding of policy and not bad faith, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to assume so. This user seems to have an animosity towards Ghirla, for which this noticeboard is an inappropriate resolution forum. [[User:Briangotts|Briangotts]] [[User talk:Briangotts|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Briangotts|(Contrib)]] 16:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Johnsome]] reported by [[User:ThuranX]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Henry Ford}}. {{3RRV|Johnsome}}: Time reported: 01:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Ford&oldid=133996268 22:14, 27 May 2007. ]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Ford&diff=next&oldid=133997011 12:27, 28 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Ford&diff=next&oldid=134136770 14:42, 28 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Ford&diff=next&oldid=134167013 17:33, 28 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Ford&diff=next&oldid=134203298 13:49, 29 May 2007]
 
Although technically just outside the 24 hour period, The user has shown ZERO willingness to talk, there is NO reason to assume anythign will change unless the user is forced to. Further, please note [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:ThuranX_reported_by_User:Johnsome_.28Result:Johnsome_warned.3B_only_2_reverts_by_ThuranX.29 this], where he tried to violate me for 3RR. His edit has been reverted by two users, and his actions addressed by more. Thank you.[[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] 20:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Edits are disruptive enough to warrant a block despite the 4 reverts lying within a 25h instead of a 24h period. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
===[[User:Ned Scott]] reported by [[User:White Cat]] (Result: Pages protected)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cool Cat}}. {{3RRV|Ned Scott}}: Time reported: 18:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: N/A
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Cool_Cat&diff=prev&oldid=134225841 21:30, 28 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Cool_Cat&diff=prev&oldid=134419188 17:04, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Cool_Cat&diff=prev&oldid=134253108 00:25, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Cool_Cat&diff=prev&oldid=134253795 00:31, 29 May 2007]
 
User has reverted 3 admins closing the MfD. I also request a rereview of [[#User:Ned Scott reported by User:White Cat (Result: No block)]] on this page. User has "recreated" a page deleted bu five different admins. --<small> [[User:White Cat|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat|chi?]]</sup> 01:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:What are you up to, Cat? Do you see why some may find this whole username change obnoxious? You have changed many of your old signatures (albeit to have those changes reverted). You bring this up at [[WP:ANI]]. It went to [[WP:MFD]]. It came here, to [[WP:ANI/3RR]]. I rejected your previous 3RR piece here. And made a note of my rejection at [[WP:ANI]]. The MfD has been closed. And protected. Your old userpage has been deleted. And protected from recreation. And now it's back here, at [[WP:ANI/3RR]] (without you even bothering to modify the timestamps). What more do you want, Cat? Do you want a hand-written apology from Ned? Ned [[Tarring and feathering|tarred and feathered]] in the town square? You seem to have gotten most of what you asked for, save retribution. Shall I give you retribution? No, ''[[WP:BLOCK#Duration of blocks|the purpose of blocking is prevention, not punishment]]''; you will have to suffice with just your victory. As the previous reviewer, I perhaps should ignore this request and let another admin handle it. But I cannot in my good conscience let you waste yet another admin's time with this ordeal. Your username has been changed, your old userpage deleted. [[Wrap (film industry)|That's a wrap]]; time to move on. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 23:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
::Ned Scott has waisted everyones time. I question your objectivity in reviewing the past and this 3rr case since you clearly are an involved party. Ned Scott continued to disrupt due to your last review.
::In order for me to be victorious there should be a war. I am not engaged in millitary warfare.
::--<small> [[User:White Cat/sig|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat/sig|chi?]]</sup> 00:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Zeraeph]] reported by [[User:Psychonaut]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Goebbels children}}. {{3RRV|Zeraeph}}: Time reported: 23:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goebbels_children&oldid=48815444] (partial)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goebbels_children&diff=134411607&oldid=134409950 22:29, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goebbels_children&diff=134417819&oldid=134417220 22:58, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goebbels_children&diff=134422117&oldid=134419429 23:17, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goebbels_children&diff=134423179&oldid=134422415 23:22, 29 May 2007]
 
User is continually removing a cited paragraph, or just the citation.
 
:As he/she removes the citation in each edit, he/she indeed has conducted more than 3 reverts. Considering that he/she has accused another user of "writing ficton" and has an extensive block log for personal attacks and another 3RR vio, I have issued a 24h block to as I see the chance of things getting out of hand. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Sir james paul]] reported by [[User:Not a dog]] (Result: Warning)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Evolution}}. {{3RRV|Sir james paul}}: Time reported: 01:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution&oldid=133957075 19:31, 27 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution&diff=133957675&oldid=133957344 19:34, 27 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution&diff=133960091&oldid=133958702 19:49, 27 May 2007] (personal attack in edit summary)
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution&diff=134223500&oldid=133960601 22:17, 28 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution&diff=134227068&oldid=134225453 22:37, 28 May 2007 ]
 
*User has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Sir_james_paul blocked twice] in the past for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive41#User:Sir_james_paul_reported_by_User:Sam_Blacketer_.28Result:_24_hours.29 3RR violations] of similarly contentious edits on [[Evolution]], and is forcing the issue again. Might not technically be within 24 hours, but he's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Homestarmy&diff=prev&oldid=134230243 knowingly and purposefully] gaming the system to try to force his edits. This can't be acceptable behavior. [[User:Not a dog|Not a dog]] 01:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
:No violation of the three-revert rule, but given the incivility and past history with this article, editor has been warned regarding behavior. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 02:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Sarah777]] reported by [[User:SqueakBox]] (Result: 24h Block) ===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Britain and Ireland}}. Time reported: 01:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_and_Ireland&oldid=117087279] (partial)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_and_Ireland&diff=134431387&oldid=117100079 17:01, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_and_Ireland&curid=4623&action=history 18:10, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_and_Ireland&diff=134449826&oldid=134448813 18:26, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_and_Ireland&diff=134451637&oldid=134451234 18:35, 29 May 2007]
 
She has since revetred 3 times more and knows what she is doing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SqueakBox&curid=2894027&diff=134457741&oldid=134451767], [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 01:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*''Comment'', I reverted it once by mistake. [[User:Sarah777]] corrected my mistake. Thanks [[User:Gold_heart|<FONT FACE="Monotype Corsiva" SIZE="4"><FONT COLOR=" #0066FF">Gold♣heart</FONT></FONT>]] 01:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Can you give a diff for the mistake please? As then I can replace it with one of the 3 other urls, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 01:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
::Hi [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]], this should be the one. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_and_Ireland&diff=134451975&oldid=134451785] [[User:Gold_heart|<FONT FACE="Monotype Corsiva" SIZE="4"><FONT COLOR=" #0066FF">Gold♣heart</FONT></FONT>]] 01:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::It wasnt included in the report, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 01:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::::Please provide diffs to all four reverts, above you only provided three diffs. Yet, I was able to see from the page history that [[User:Sarah777|Sarah]] has egaged in an edit war that warrants administrative action. I have issued a 24h block to calm things down. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Adam1090]] reported by [[User:Scorpion0422]] (Result: Adam1090 commended)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|WWE Championship}}. {{3RRV|Adam1090}}: Time reported: 01:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_Championship&oldid=134385845 19:37, 29 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_Championship&diff=134419840&oldid=134408794 22:07, 29 May 2007 ]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_Championship&diff=134458424&oldid=134454485 01:09, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_Championship&diff=134461789&oldid=134460455 01:26, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_Championship&diff=134462616&oldid=134462022 01:31, 30 May 2007]
 
Copyright issues are not subject to the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], editor was replacing a fair-use image with a free one. However, I will look carefully to see if any of those putting the fair-use image back in, in violation of our [[WP:FUC|fair use policy]], need to be blocked. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 02:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Smee]] reported by [[User:Lsi john]] (Result: Page protected)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Large Group Awareness Training}}. {{3RRV|Smee}} and {{3RRV|Smeelgova}} : Time reported: 03:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=134441398&oldid=134414495 diff1]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134445288 diff2]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134447312 diff3]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134465496 diff4]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134477053 diff5]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=134478223&oldid=134477906 diff6]
* '''7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=134489979&oldid=134489842 diff7]''' ADDED - after initial report.
 
This editor has a contentious edit history and already been blocked for 3RR violations 5 times by this board:
as {{3RRV|Smeelgova}} and {{3RRV|Smee}}
 
The user is edit warring with multiple editors.
 
[[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 03:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
;Not 3RR violation
This user seems to habitually want to get me blocked, and it is inappropriate. A simple review of the DIFFs and a perusal of the article's history itself will see that I have provided context for the citation, and in addition to that I will not revert this information again. I have changed the nature in which the citation is given. These are in fact ''not'' "6" reverts, but if anything 3, which I apologize for, but sourced citations were being removed from the article. In any event, as the context has been given for the citation appropriately, there will be no more reverts for that. Whether or not [[User:Lsi john]] will continue to edit war on that article is irrelevant, for I will not be a party to it. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 03:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
*[[User:Lsi john]] does not seem to understand, I changed his original research tag which was laid over the whole entire article, instead to the one word that he had a problem with "psychological", and by the way, this was not a revert. However, if someone thinks that my changing of his tagging as OR the entire article, to the only word that he has an issue with "psychological" was some kind of revert, I will be more than happy to self-revert that. I will continue to ''not'' revert this user anymore on this article, as I have stated above. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 04:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
**[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=134492673&oldid=134489979 SELF REVERT], As stated above, I do not wish to revert this user on this article at all, and will not in the future. Evidently he feels that my changing his tagging of the entire article as OR, to the one word that he ''thinks'' is OR, was a revert, so I have Self-Reverted here, and will not revert this user. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 04:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
 
::I agree that this is not a [[WP:3RR]] edit war situation, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=prev&oldid=134445288 Diff] This diff shows [[User:Smee|Smee]] is not the only editor who believes the source is valid.
 
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134447312] [[User:Justanother|Justanother's]] rationale doesn't make sense: ''(The idea that we would list where a term is referenced in other books and articles is unencyclopedic, adds nothing, and I will stop just short of saying it is silly.)'' To the contrary mentioning the use of LGAT in textbooks discussing the issue is quite encyclopedic and adds relevance to the term/article.
 
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134476688] [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] doesn't explain how the reference doesn't match either in his edit summary or on the talk page.
 
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=next&oldid=134477053] [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] repeats his last action.
 
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Large_Group_Awareness_Training&diff=134478223&oldid=134477906] [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] appears to have forgotten that the article is about LGATs in general, since he earlier appeared to feel that singling out Landmark in the article was unfair given all the LGATs out there. [[Talk:Large Group Awareness Training#Landmark in LEAD]]
 
::At best this is a misunderstanding of the [[WP:3RR]] rule by [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]], at worst a pattern of [[WP:HARASS]] which could be forming here. [[User:Anynobody|Anynobody]] 04:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
====Page protected====
Since both of you have been having disputes over the page since quite a long time, the only appropriate course of action would be to protect the page while the parties can discuss and resolve dispute on the talk page of the article. The article protection duration is of 48 hours. &mdash; [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black">Nearly Headless Nick</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black" title="Contributions"><sup>'''{C}'''</sup></font>]] 05:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
:This is ''not'' the same article as previous reports. This is a problem with the editor, not the article. Smee followed me to [[Who Is Guru Maharaj Ji? (book)]] as well and is picking at my edits (check the edit logs there). I agree with Anynobody, I'm not sure I understand 3RR at all, when 7RR isn't a violation. I'm not warring, I'm only 2RR there.[[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 05:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
;Pattern of abuse by {{userlinks|Smee}} (formerly {{userlinks|Smeelgova}}.
This is about a long-term pattern of [[WP:DE|abuse]], [[WP:TE|tendentious editing]], and [[WP:OWN|ownership]] of articles. Smee merrily went 3 reverts with me over my thought-out edit that contributed to the article and then merrily continued edit-warring with one, perhaps two, other editors. This is not about the article; this is about one editor that refuses to "get it" despite multiple blocks. When Smee is invested in an article, no-one with an "opposing" POV to her "cult-fighter" persona (or a neutral POV for that matter, or often even a more reasonable editor with views closer to hers, like [[User:Wikipediatrix]] or [[User:BTfromLA]]) is allowed to edit there. This has to be addressed. Please, Mr. Admins, do your job. Page protection will handle nothing. This is about a pattern by one POV-pushing editor, [[User:Smee]]. --[[User:Justanother|Justanother]] 10:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
==== [[User:Smee|Smee]] (formerly [[User:Smeelgova|Smeelgova]]) at work; [[WP:OWN]]; [[WP:BITE]] ====
 
*New user makes a nice [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_God&diff=134514549&oldid=134456551 edit] in an unsourced section.
*[[User:Smee]] (formerly [[User:Smeelgova]]) reverts with edit summary [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_God&diff=next&oldid=134514549 "rvv"] and then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Danieljordani&diff=prev&oldid=134515474 "welcomes"] the newbie with a vandalism warning. --[[User:Justanother|Justanother]] 12:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
**The User has just received a more friendly welcome message from myself. The edit was indeed non-vandalism.
**But. The larger concern here is that mutually reinforcing vendettas and contribution stalking may be developing between Smee and other editors, which has more damage potential than a fourth revert. Should this be taken to another forum? User conduct RfCs are procedurally dreadful, but some mediation appears needed. I would say that the "not an entitlement" aspect of 3RR seems to be lost on Smee. [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 12:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
* There seems to be more evidence of retaliatory behavior against [[User:Jossi]] on [[WP:COIN]]. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 12:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
**Yes, Smee has been edit warring with [[User:Jossi]] on several articles and this latest report to [[WP:COIN]] smacks strongly of retaliation to me. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 12:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
***Smee has been [[WP:BITING]] me since I arrived. But my complaints have been pushed aside in Good-Faith assumptions about this edit warrier. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 12:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
:::I have posted a timeline of the 3RR pattern [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sir_Nicholas_de_Mimsy-Porpington#Good_Faith_Editor here] for anyone who wants the tedious task of observing time stamps and dates and ''seeing'' the pattern. Smee wasn't 4RR. Smee was '''7RR''' and I was '''2RR'''. The only 3RR block that I've ever had, came over 24 hours AFTER I had Stopped editing in an article (clearly punitive). Yet Smee has been blocked 5 times and still continually avoids preventative 3RR blocks. I'm beginning to wonder what the 3RR rule is for. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 12:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::::I have ended the discussion on WP:COIN. This is troubling editing behaviour. [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 12:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Jbolden1517]] reported by [[User:Muchness]] (Result: Page protected)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Lolita (disambiguation)}}. {{3RRV|Jbolden1517}}: Time reported: 03:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&oldid=133579565 22:09, 25 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134464839&oldid=133579565 01:43, 30 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134473021&oldid=134465545 02:27, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134475837&oldid=134473021 02:44, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28non-disambiguation%29&diff=134479249&oldid=134475837 03:04, 30 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jbolden1517&diff=prev&oldid=134477024 02:52, 30 May 2007]
 
*Between the first and second reverts, two interim edits were also made by the reported user ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=prev&oldid=134465108], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=prev&oldid=134465545]). The second, third, and fourth reverts added these edits back in addition to reverting to the previous version from 25 May.
* Between the third and the fourth reverts, the page was moved to a non-standard parenthetical clarifier [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28non-disambiguation%29&diff=134478845&oldid=134476612] with an edit summary that I would characterize as [[WP:POINT|disrupting Wikipedia to make a point]].
 
You'll notice #4 is on a new page and #1 and #2 don't match (aren't the same version of the article (see all the fashion material) [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font></sup> 03:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:A reversion is a reversion, whether it's in whole or in part. And moving a page to a silly title does not make it a different page.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 03:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:: Adding a bunch of new content is not a reversion. [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font></sup> 03:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::: Its borderline so I self reverted as much as I can. [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font></sup> 03:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Page was protected by [[User:After Midnight|After Midnight]]. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 05:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Migospia]] reported by [[User:Rockpocket]] (Result: 24 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Animal testing}}. {{3RRV|Migospia}}: Time reported: 05:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&oldid=134114889 09:26, 28 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134379089&oldid=134331338 11:08, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134383417&oldid=134382448 11:27, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134446481&oldid=134428355 16:09, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134475150&oldid=134469878 18:39, 29 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134492751&oldid=134485353 20:33, 29 May 2007]
 
* User not new, but 3RR warnings were made on edit summaries: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134469878&oldid=134446644][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=134482986&oldid=134475150] [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 05:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
24 hours. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 05:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Cole435]] reported by [[User:ThuranX]] (Result:)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Two-Face}}. {{3RRV|Cole435}}: Time reported: 04:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two-Face&oldid=133935284 16:32, 27 May 2007]
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two-Face&diff=prev&oldid=134243711 23:20, 28 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two-Face&diff=prev&oldid=134482580 22:24, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two-Face&diff=prev&oldid=134487370 22:56, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two-Face&diff=134487972&oldid=134487536 23:00, 29 May 2007]
User refuses to use talk, relies upon OR determinations of popularity, and in his last conflict, offered to 'bust a cap' in the next person who argued with him. I didn't give a 3RR warning, but he's not a newer user, and his stubborn insistence along the [[WP:ILIKEIT]] line makes him unlikely to change. As such, a block's definitely needed. I got so frustrated, I vio'd 3RR myself, but immediately self-reverted. However, he needs to stop. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] 04:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Myanw]] reported by [[User:60.240.255.213]]] (Result:no vio)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|:Category:Aspergian Wikipedians}}. {{3RRV|Myanw}}: Time reported: 12:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Aspergian_Wikipedians&oldid=134532537]
 
Not three, but eight seperate reverts in one 24 hour period. Wheel-warrior extraordinare.
*These reverts were of vandalism. Anon making this report was adding a disparaging message about Asperger syndrome. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 17:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:74.116.118.230]] reported by [[User:Stephan Schulz]] (Result:31 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Timothy F. Ball}}. {{3RRV|74.116.118.230}}: Time reported: 13:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_F._Ball&oldid=134527409 11:38, 30 May 2007] (Removal of longstanding external link to [[SourceWatch]])
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_F._Ball&diff=134542349&oldid=134527409 13:49, 30 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_F._Ball&diff=134543440&oldid=134527409 13:57, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_F._Ball&diff=134544249&oldid=134527409 14:03, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_F._Ball&diff=134551533&oldid=134527409 14:52, 30 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:74.116.118.230&curid=11261404&diff=134549278&oldid=131375916 14:38, 30 May 2007]
 
'''Comment:''' IP user may not actually have seen warning, but also ignores request for discussion on talk via edit summary. Semiprotection might be an option.
*User clearly edit warred; no reason to block out other anons. Blocked for 31 hours. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 17:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:80.250.128.5]] reported by [[User:Makalp]] (Result:24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus}}. {{3RRV|80.250.128.5}}: Time reported: 15:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=134514574 07:41, 30 May 2007]
* Warning to user :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A80.250.128.5&diff=134563011&oldid=121135209 13:55, 30 May 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=134550163&oldid=134514574 12:43, 30 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=134561740&oldid=134557775 13:49, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=134562916&oldid=134562741 13:55, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=134563870&oldid=134563397 14:00, 30 May 2007]
 
:3RR vio - issued 24h block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
===[[User:67.81.154.219]] reported by [[User:Chocolatepizza]] (Result: 31h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Elazar Shach}}. {{3RRV|67.81.154.219}}: Time reported: 15:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elazar_Shach&oldid=113081893 12:01, 6 March 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elazar_Shach&diff=134350926&oldid=133366070 12:56, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elazar_Shach&diff=134561204&oldid=134560931 09:47, 30 May 2007] (This also involved his leaving of a personal attack in the edit summary)
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elazar_Shach&diff=134580579&oldid=134577881 11:26, 30 May 2007 ]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elazar_Shach&diff=next&oldid=134580766 11:31, 30 May 2007]
 
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidCharlesII&diff=70265387&oldid=70229718 13:50, 17 August 2006] (They are the same person, see comments below.
 
This user is removing the sourced paragraph of
<blockquote>
Chabad representatives dismissed the comparisons, noting that whereas the Sabbateans deliberately violated religious laws on the assumption that a "new Torah" would emerge during messianic times, Chabad preached that only strict adherence to tradition would bring the redemption. Chabad also claimed that its veneration of the rebbe was not at odds with Jewish tradition.<ref>[http://www.rickross.com/reference/lubavitch/lubavitch6.html Summer of the Messiah] (''[[Jerusalem Report]]'') [[February 14]], [[2001]].</ref>
</blockquote>
and adding unsourced and pov content.
 
I believe that this ip is [[User:DavidCharlesII]] is the ip based on his blanking of the ip's warnings http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.81.154.219&diff=prev&oldid=118545159 and the ip blanking of his sockpuppeteer tag http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DavidCharlesII&diff=prev&oldid=116798822 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DavidCharlesII&diff=prev&oldid=116783319 which was his first edit. [[User:Chocolatepizza|Chocolatepizza]] 15:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*It should be noted that the reverts are also removing unsourced, anecdotal, probably false, defamatory content regarding R' Shach and the Lubavitch yeshiva, which is not subject to 3RR from what I recall. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 15:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
::However the paragraph quoted above is sourced and not defamatory and should not have been removed. [[User:Chocolatepizza|Chocolatepizza]] 16:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Violation of 3RR and personal comments in edit summary - issued 31h block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:70.109.54.8]] reported by [[User:Gamaliel]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Lee Harvey Oswald}}. {{3RRV|70.109.54.8}}: Time reported: 16:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134436202&oldid=134393414 19:22, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134460492&oldid=134438331 21:19, 29 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134470453&oldid=134463526 22:13, 29 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134484386&oldid=134475580 23:36, 29 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134563491&oldid=134515477 09:58, 30 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.109.54.8&diff=133787912&oldid=133787643 00:25, 27 May 2007] by [[User:Jossi]]
 
Soon after this report was submitted, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=prev&oldid=134598086 another revert] was made by [[User:67.142.130.27]], who is likely the same individual as [[User:70.109.54.8]] based on past edits and talk comments. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|Orwellian Cyber hell master]])</small> 16:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Pretty clear case of 3RR vio. I have issued a 24h block. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 17:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Dacy69]] reported by [[User:Azerbaijani]] (Result:72h Block)===
 
User Dacy69 is on revert parole:
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dacy69#Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FArmenia-Azerbaijan_2
 
He has only one revert per article per week, yet on the Heroes of Azerbaijan article, he revert three times within a two day period.
 
{{Article|Heroes of Azerbaijan}}. {{3RRV|Dacy69}}: Time reported: 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heroes_of_Azerbaijan&diff=133987484&oldid=133882799 2:18 May 28, 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heroes_of_Azerbaijan&diff=134487766&oldid=134372975 3:58 May 30, 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heroes_of_Azerbaijan&diff=134623675&oldid=134599687 18:48 May 30, 2007]
As you can see, on May 28 he reverted once to reinsert ''Babak'' into the article, then on May 30, he again reinsert the person back into the article twice (two other reverts). He has also just personally attacked me, implying that I dont even have a medium intelligence level: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARichfife&diff=134666041&oldid=134662825].[[User:Azerbaijani|Azerbaijani]] 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
I did not make revert - I added information with NEW supplementary references and made minor fixes. And I did not insult - what you implied it is up to you. Diffs can be checked. And speaking frankly you going after me and reporting is close to Wiki harassment. --[[User:Dacy69|Dacy69]] 22:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Thats still a revert. You've been on Wikipedia for a long time, you know the rules. Dacy69 knows the rules, do not let him mislead you. You reverted all three times, it doesnt matter if you added anything, it still a revert. You cant hide reverts by adding information on top of the revert. The historical section was removed three times, along with Babak, and you re-inserted it three times...Thats called a revert. You clearly violated your parole, just admit it.[[User:Azerbaijani|Azerbaijani]] 22:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
::It was not - if text is removed and I am coming to reintroduce it with '''new references''' and new text - it is not revert. That is clear. This is my first series of editing (3) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heroes_of_Azerbaijan&diff=134488607&oldid=134372975] and second (4)[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heroes_of_Azerbaijan&diff=134669525&oldid=134599687]. and compare now initial and final text. In between [[user:Richfife]] came leaving quite insulting comment against the country [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHeroes_of_Azerbaijan&diff=134599302&oldid=134496488]--[[User:Dacy69|Dacy69]] 22:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
::Wikipedia rules clearly state: ''A revert, in this context, means undoing, <u>in whole or '''in part'''</u>, the actions of another editor or of other editors. This can include undoing edits to a page, undoing page moves (sometimes called "move warring"), undoing administrative actions (sometimes called "wheel warring"), or recreating a page.''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Three_revert_rule#What_is_a_revert.3F]. You cant make excuses for clearly violating your parole.[[User:Azerbaijani|Azerbaijani]] 22:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Three reverts in two days do not constitute a violation of the 3RR. Yet, there seems to be a rather slow edit war in progress on this article. I have not issued a block but '''advise both parties to use the talk page''' instead of edit warring-even if it is at a crawling pace. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
This is not a regular 3rr report, its a parole violation report. Please read the case carefully. And I'm not edit warring in that artile, in fact, I havent made a single revert yet on that article.[[User:Azerbaijani|Azerbaijani]] 23:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I see. Sorry for the mistake. I have issued a 72h block for parole vio. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:67.142.130.43 ]] reported by [[User:Gamaliel]] (Result: 24 hrs)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Lee Harvey Oswald}}. {{3RRV|67.142.130.43}}: Time reported: 18:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134610620&oldid=134608484 13:50, 30 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134612895&oldid=134611530 14:00, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134616166&oldid=134615394 14:15, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Harvey_Oswald&diff=134622256&oldid=134616874 14:41, 30 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.142.130.43&diff=134617616&oldid=134610970 14:21, 30 May 2007]
 
[[User:67.142.130.43]] is almost certainly a block-evading sockpuppet of [[User:70.109.54.8]], who was blocked today for reverting the same edits in the same article.
 
This user has now started reverting as [[67.142.130.26]].
 
: [[User:67.142.130.43 ]] - 24 hrs. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 20:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
: [[[[67.142.130.26]] 48 hrs for block avoidance and 3RR [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 20:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Giovanni33]] reported by [[User:MONGO]] (Result: Page protected)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|State terrorism by the United States}}. {{3RRV|Giovanni33}}:
 
While just a bit over 24 hours and only consisting of three precise reverts...3RR is not an entitlement...
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=134376186&oldid=134314638 13:55, 29 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=next&oldid=134486075 02:04, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=next&oldid=134512289 03:16, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=next&oldid=134546617 14:53, 30 May 2007]
 
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Giovanni33 Block log...Giovanni is well aware of the three revert rule] Discussion regarding his edit warring on the same article was most recently on May 26, 2007 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Giovanni33#Edit_warring] based on repeated efforts to force his POV into the article over concensus [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=133690410], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=134107405], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=133671415]--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 20:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:I object to this report because it singles me out when Mongo himself has reverted three times, as well, for his POV in this edit conflict with me and several other editors. Indeed many of us have (which I agree is not a good thing) however, if you look at the talk page, I have been the most active trying for forge a consensus and stop the edit conflicts, asking people to please talk about it instead of just reverting blindly. For Mongo to revert 3 times himself yet try to get me blocked for doing the same thing seems to me to amount to trying to gain an advantage in the edit conflict. That is not what this place is for. I have not violated the 3RR as he admits, and if I should not have reverted 3 times, he should not have either, nor the many other editors in this latest edit conflict. I should not be singled out, esp. since I did not violate the 3RR rule.
Mongo's 4 reverts, just over 24 hours based on repeated efforts to force his POV into the article over concensus (actually consensus is split):
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=133596446&oldid=133595821 07:37, 26 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=133597472&oldid=133596446 07:46, 26 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=133686167&oldid=133684467 18:36, 26 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=133840957&oldid=133840468 12:30, 27 May 2007]
[[User:Giovanni33|Giovanni33]] 21:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:: Page protected for one week. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 21:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
:::That is probably best. I don't like "trying" to get someone blocked for 3RR, but while I stopped my very short lived edit war, which was also with an IP trying to add the same stuff Giovanni was, Giovanni has persisted and he was at 3RR on the same article just a few days ago.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 21:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Smee]] reported by [[User:Lsi john]] (Result: 72 hours)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Holiday Magic}}. {{3RRV|Smee}}: Time reported: [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 20:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
formerly {{3RRV|Smeelgova}}
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holiday_Magic&diff=134645128&oldid=134585086 1]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holiday_Magic&diff=next&oldid=134646657 2]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holiday_Magic&diff=next&oldid=134647756 3]
 
Smee is also 3RR at {{Article|Children of God}} against another editor.
 
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_God&diff=134515367&oldid=134514549 1] <- Newbie BITING.
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_God&diff=next&oldid=134542114 2]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_of_God&diff=next&oldid=134647279 3]
 
We're Back!
 
Earlier today '''7RR''' didn't earn a block. So [[User:Smee|Smee]] has decided that he can revert war in Holiday Magic and Children of God now too.
 
This contentious editor has a LONG HISTORY of edit warring, and seems to love to revert everything I do.
 
He has been blocked by this board '''5 times'' already as {{3RRV|Smeelgova}} and {{3RRV|Smee}}.
 
He's now at 3RR in TWO articles.. which IS a violation, since Smee keeps pushing the limit.
 
The last time, the admistrator assured me that Smee would 'take the warning'.. but that clearly has not happened.
 
'''note to admin: ''' PLEASE scroll up and read the '''7RR''' report above, including the previous 3RR timeline: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sir_Nicholas_de_Mimsy-Porpington#Good_Faith_Editor here]
 
The last block was for 48 hours.
 
It doesn't matter what article I edit, Smee is going to revert everything I do until I hit 2RR and have to stop.
 
[[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 20:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Blocked for three days, less for his most recent reverts and more for a troubling pattern of repeated reverting in general. See Smee's [[User talk:Smee|user talk]] for further explanation. [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 22:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
===[[User:97.99.137.82]] reported by [[User:FateClub]] (Result: 24h Block)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Vicente Fox}}. {{3RRV|97.99.137.82}}: Time reported: 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134691033 13:54, 31 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134475210 16:40, 30 May 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134656403 11:06, 31 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134657048 11:08, 31 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134676312 12:38, 31 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134680281 12:59, 31 May 2007]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134690664 13:53, 31 May 2007]
* 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=prev&oldid=134691033 13:54, 31 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:97.99.137.82&oldid=134680978 13:03, 31 May 2007]
 
:Quite obvious case of a 3RR vio. 24h block to stop edit war. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Raphaelaarchon]] aka [[User: 71.100.1.7]] reported by [[User:R. Baley]] (Result: Incomplete)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Glenn Greenwald}}. {{3RRV|Raphaelaarchon}}: Time reported: 04:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&oldid=134482518 03:24, 30 May 2007]
 
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlenn_Greenwald&diff=134723646&oldid=134715662 at 02:47, 31 May 2007]. 5 Reverts made under the anon IP {{userlinks| 71.100.1.7}}as indicated by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlenn_Greenwald&diff=134715662&oldid=128034846 this difference]. Also request page semi-protection as this user has edited under at least one other anon IP address. [[User:R. Baley|R. Baley]] 04:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Please provide diffs of the reverts. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 04:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[User:melonbarmonster]] reported by [[User:Komdori]] (Result:)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Liancourt_Rocks}}. {{3RRV|melonbarmonster}}: Time reported: 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liancourt_Rocks&oldid=132854741 03:55, 23 May 2007]
 
The article has gone through significant change since this revision due to the recent name change, but the reverts he's pushing were present in that revision, as well as more recent revisions (that was an easy recent one to find since he had made one of the reverts in that revision as well). The changes might seem small, but are especially controversial (especially revert 3 and 4).
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liancourt_Rocks&diff=134518950&oldid=134499585 08:21, 30 May 2007] removed '''by an English speaker'''
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liancourt_Rocks&diff=134605101&oldid=134584897 17:25, 30 May 2007] removed '''by an English speaker'''
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liancourt_Rocks&diff=134647529&oldid=134646725 20:30, 30 May 2007] removed '''and administered'''
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liancourt_Rocks&diff=134714559&oldid=134666182 01:55, 31 May 2007] removed '''and administered'''
 
* 3RR warning: Been blocked for 3RR, incivility, and personal attacks multiple times, 3RR specifically for three times since 1 March. Last time was a week long block for repeated 3RR violations starting on May 15. Since coming off this block, he is evidently still intent on edit warring, blowing right past the 3RR limits as well as continuing the personal attacks (eg [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turtle_ship&diff=prev&oldid=134254895 here]).
 
===[[User:71.100.1.7]] reported by [[User:Astanhope]] (Result:)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Glenn Greenwald}}. {{3RRV|71.100.1.7}}: Time reported: 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&oldid=134715113 20:58, 30 May 2007]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&diff=134715113&oldid=134493636 20:58, 30 May 200]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&diff=next&oldid=134715319 21:05, 30 May 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&diff=next&oldid=134719097 21:30, 30 May 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&diff=next&oldid=134721052 21:38, 30 May 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glenn_Greenwald&diff=134723036&oldid=134722347 21:43, 30 May 2007]
 
=== Example ===
<pre>
 
<!-- copy from _below_ this line -->
 
===[[User:NAME_OF_USER]] reported by [[User:YOUR_NAME]] (Result:)===
 
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|ARTICLE_NAME}}. {{3RRV|NAME_OF_USER}}: Time reported: 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
 
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* 2nd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* 3rd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* 4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
 
<!--
- * Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
-->
 
<!-- copy from _above_ this line -->
 
</pre>