Munitions (TUGS episode) and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Coallen: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
Singularity (talk | contribs) updating count |
|||
Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/coallen|coallen]]===
'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/coallen|action=edit}} Voice your opinion]'''
'''(0/6/0); Scheduled to end 15:40, [[12 June]] [[2007]] (UTC)'''
{{User|coallen}} - this user is me and i believe I can, edit and be trusted with the new authority that mat be given to me [[User:Coallen|Coallen]] 15:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''
<!--The candidate may make an optional statement here-->
====Questions for the candidate====
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following <u>optional</u> questions to provide guidance for participants:
:'''1.''' What admin work do you intend to take part in?
::'''A:''' To patroll in new or editing favored articles like (avatar, naruto, and bleach)
:'''2.''' What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
::'''A:''' The Air Nomad article an avatar.
:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
::'''A:'''Yes with a article with avatar the last airbender and the date was disputed.
====General comments====
<!-- begin editcount box-->
*See [[User:coallen|coallen]]'s edit summary usage with [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=coallen&lang=en mathbot's tool]. For the edit count, see the [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/coallen|talk page]].
<!-- end edit count box -->
{{#ifeq:coallen|coallen||<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">RfAs for this user:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/coallen}}</ul></div>}}
* Links for coallen: {{usercheck-short|coallen}}
*
----
<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "general comments" and "discussion" sections. -->
''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review [[Special:Contributions/coallen]] before commenting.''
====Discussion====
*
'''Support'''
#
'''Oppose'''
#Hi Coallen, sorry, but you haven't got enough edits to show you have the required experience to be an administrator. The community need to be sure you can be trusted. If I was you, I'd comment on some [[WP:AFD|deletion debates]] and get involved in some wikipedia policy matters. Also, editing articles really helps to grasp the [[WP:N|notability]] criteria which is essential for admins when they are deciding whether to delete articles or not. You do a really good job however so keep up the excellent work :-) [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 16:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#Have to agree with the above. It looks like you're genuinely itnerested in helping the project out, but for the duties you've listed above you don't really need the extra admin tools. As mentioned above, get a little more experience under your belt with policy and related tasks, get a little more familiar with the project and try again. But definitely keeup wup the good work. [[User:Arkyan|<b><font color="#0000FF">Ark</font><font color="#6060BF">yan</font></b>]] • [[User_talk:Arkyan|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' per lack of edits, plus the fact that you couldn't even set this up on your own. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FArmedblowfish&diff=136080838&oldid=136078213 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FFvasconcellos&diff=136079495&oldid=136071630 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship&diff=prev&oldid=136081312 3]. I also think that you're the one who signed Frye2387's name under support. According to his contributions he's never commented on an RFA before, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Fyre2387 4]. '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(Talk)]] 16:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#:Fine, if you insist on readding this, have you got something constructive to say to the candidate instead of just [[WP:BITE|biting]] their head off? [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 16:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#::Please explain why I'm newbie biting. Clearly he's been here for 4 more months than I have. And plus, I think the fact that he couldn't set this up right shows he might not be the best person to trust with tools. And he did sign another user's name under support, but someone removed it. '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(Talk)]] 16:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#:::Yeah I removed. A new user does not understand how wikipedia works, they do not understand what is required for adminship, so if somebody comes along with a ''super-wicked oppose'' - it is not helping the candidate whatsoever, and has servere civiity issues attached to it. Offer the candidate some advice, don't lay into them. [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 16:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#::::You know, I've been here six weeks, so who's to say your not [[WP:BITE|Biting]] me for speaking my mind in a discussion. And please do not post on my talk page without reading my rebuttals of your points first. '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(Talk)]] 16:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#:::::With all due respect, if you start biting users then you've got to expect to take what comes with it..... [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 16:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#Sorry coallen, but I have to oppose. What you have done so far looks good, but there are a number of things you need to do to be considered at RfA:A) Edit! Many users will automatically oppose if your edit count is low, so that is likely, nay, ''is'' one of the largest things you need to do. B) Get involved in debates at [[WP:XFD]]. Admin work is mostly about deletion and such vandal fighting, so users need to know that you are committed to this never ending duty. C) Get your edit summary usage up. Though it may not be the most important thing, users who comment here often look at this category. I'd suggest that you go to [[Special:Preferences]] and click the box that forces you to make an edit summary. This will serve as a handy reminder, and it makes your edits look more professional. Best of luck! --[[user:teh tennisman|<font color="SteelBlue" face="verdana">tennis</font>]][[user talk:teh tennisman|<font color="ForestGreen" face="verdana">man</font>]] 16:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
# '''Oppose'''. Really sorry about this, but we need admins who use the edit summary a bit more than you do, so we know what they are doing exactly. Secondly, your edit count is a tad low at the moment, come back when you've got a fair few more, and others may change their vote, cos some people base their vote on edit count alone, which I think is a bit like editcountitis, for the simple reason we need experienced admins who have a lot of experience editing, AND who are more than capable of handling the tools. So, I look for involvement in debates, like RFAs, among a few. Also, being an admin is being given a mop, not an award. This means you will be involved in a lot of maintainance work. Also, you say that you will just patrol new articles, which can be done by any editor. My advice to you would be to withdraw this request, then come back later, when you meet some of these criteria. Any questions can go on my talk page. [[User:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:green">Stwalkerster</span>]] <small>[[User Talk:Stwalkerster|talk]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Stwalkerster|review]]</small> 17:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. I'm going to have to agree with Ryan on this one. You need to have a good enough experience so the community knows that they can trust you. Participate in those particular areas, otherwise, you're doing some good work here. Keep it up! '''[[User:Sr13|Sr]][[User talk:Sr13|13]]''' 17:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
'''Neutral'''
#
|