Talk:Contraceptive patch and Ridolfi plot: Difference between pages

(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
Chooserr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
 
Line 1:
[[Image:Mary-queen-of-scots full.jpg|thumb|200px|The Ridolfi plot was meant to put Mary Stewart on the throne of England.]]
Does anybody know if it's safe to wear the patch 4 of 4 weeks instead of 3 of 4, if only for one cycle? Or if it's safe to only be without a patch for 3 days or so instead of 7? Thank you.
The '''Ridolfi plot''' was a [[Roman Catholic]] plot in [[1570]] to assassinate [[Elizabeth I of England|Queen Elizabeth I of England]] and replace her with [[Mary I of Scotland]]. The plot was hatched and planned by [[Roberto di Ridolfi]], who, an international banker, was able to travel between [[Brussels]], [[Rome]] and [[Madrid]] to gather support without attracting too much suspicion.
 
== Background ==
You oughtn't wear the patch at all. [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]] 06:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
==So basically?==
...[http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-48,GGLG:en&q=%22Alycia+Brown%22 Free Republic] is what passes for a source these days?--[[User:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused|Aolanonawanabe]] 06:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
..Oh, no, see, it's all good now that he's added the [[Drudge Report]] as a source to give it some more balance--[[User:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused|Aolanonawanabe]] 06:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
*and another one, and I quote [http://www.orthoevrahelp.com " ''you may be at risk, contact a Lopez Hodes attorney today''"], I'm sure they can promote their own lawfirm--[[User:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused|Aolanonawanabe]] 06:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 
The Duke of Norfolk, a cousin to the Queen and wealthiest landowner in the country, had been proposed as a possible husband for Mary ever since her imprisonment in 1568. This suited Norfolk who had greater ambitions and felt Elizabeth persistently undervalued him.<ref>Williams, Neville, ''The Life and Times of Elizabeth I'', (Book Club Associates, 1972), pg 91.</ref> In pursuit of this, he agreed to support the [[Northern Rebellion]], though quickly lost his nerve and tried to call it off. However, the rebellion was not under his control and went ahead anyway, with the Northern earls trying to foment rebellion among their Catholic subjects to prepare for a Catholic Spanish invasion by the [[Fernando Álvarez de Toledo, 3rd Duke of Alba|Duke of Alba]], governor of the [[Netherlands]].<ref>Starkey, David, ''Elizabeth I: Apprenticeship'', (Vintage, 2001), pg 322.</ref>
I think that the [http://www.orthoevrahelp.com/] should be re-added because it is a source and it shows the gravity of the situation. [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]] 06:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
*The gravity of what situation? The link you're posting is to a [[law firm]], it is not a source, it's a [http://www.lopezhodes.com/ comercial] for a [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-48,GGLG:en&q=%22lopez+hodes%22 non-notable] law firm--[[User:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused|Aolanonawanabe]] 06:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
*Yes, but if law firms are involved do you think that it's safe...if there is a law firm dedicated to helping women sue these people who put them in danger...do you think is safe. I believe that it accurately depicts the gravity of ''this'' situation! [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]] 06:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 
After the rebellion failed, the leaders were executed and a purge of Catholic sympathisers in the priesthood carried out. Norfolk was imprisoned in the [[Tower of London]] for nine months and only freed under house arrest when he confessed all and begged for mercy.<ref>Williams, ''Life and Times'', pg 101-2.</ref> Pope [[Pius V]] issued [[Regnans in Excelsis]], a [[papal bull]] excommunicating Elizabeth, shortly afterwards, which commanded all faithful Catholics to do all they could to depose her, though the majority of Engish Catholics ignored the bull.<ref>Dures, Alan, ''English Catholicism, 1558-1642'', (Longman, 1983), pg 17.</ref> In response, Elizabeth became much harsher to Catholics and their sympathisers.<ref>Starkey, ''Elizabeth I'', pg 322.</ref>
== Lawsuit ==
 
we love you arsenal we do
A link to the news page of an anti-drug website that doesn't cite it's sources is not a reliable source. Until you can produce a reliable source, it should stay out.--[[User:Sean Black|Sean]]|[[User talk:Sean Black|Bla]]<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|ck]]</font> 06:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 
== LawsuitPlot ==
You personally believe it unreliable...do a websearch if you please...just put the section back. Thanks, [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]] 07:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 
[[Roberto Ridolfi]], a Florentine banker and ardent Catholic, had been involved in the planning of the Northern rebellion, had been plotting to overthrow Elizabeth as early as 1569.<ref>Elton G.R., ''England under the Tudors'', (University Paperback, 1978), pg 297.</ref> Observing the failure of the rebellion, he came to the conclusion that only foreign intervention could restore Catholicism and bring Mary to the throne, and began to contact potential conspirators. Mary's advisor, [[John Lesley]], the [[Bishop of Ross]], gave his assent to the plot as the only way to free Mary.<ref>Williams, ''Life and Times'', pg 102-3.</ref> The plan was to have the Duke of Alba invade from the Netherlands with 10,000 men, foment a rebellion of the northern English nobility, murder Elizabeth, and marry Mary to [[Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk]]. Ridolfi optimistically estimated half of all English peers were Catholic, and could muster in excess of 39,000 men.<ref>Williams, ''Life and Times'', pg 102.</ref> Norfolk gave verbal assurances to Ridolfi that he was Catholic, though as a pupil of [[John Foxe]], he remained a Protestant all his life.<ref>Dures, ''English Catholicism'', pg 17.</ref><ref>Lockyer, Roger, ''Tudor and Stuart Britain, 1417-1714'', (Longman, 1964), pg 186.</ref> Both Mary and Norfolk, desperate to remedy their respective situations, agreed to the plot.<ref>Jenkins, Elizabeth, ''Elizabeth the Great'', (Phoenix Press, 1958), pg 176.</ref> With their blessing, Ridolfi set off to the continent to gain Alba, Pius V and King Philip II's support.
*[http://www.lacrossetribune.com/articles/2005/11/18/news/00lead.txt hometown newspaper] [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]]
 
*[http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/story.html?articleID=5 another page] [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]]
However, the Duke of Alba feared that if the plot should be successful, it would lead to Mary, Queen of Scots, a former Queen of France whose mother was a member of the prominent [[Guise]] family, occupying the throne of England. The consequence of this would be an England wedded to Mary's beloved France, an outcome which the Spanish feared.
*[http://www.njrtl.org/core/newsletter_details.asp?ArticleID=1046 Pro-life site] [[User:Chooserr|Chooserr]]
 
==*[[User_talk:Musical_Linguist#Contraceptive_patch|sigh]]* send in the <s>clow-</s> meatpuppets==
==Discovery==
--[[User:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused|Aolanonawanabe]] 07:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 
In 1571, Elizabeth's intelligence network was sending her information about a plot against her life. She was also sent a private warning by the Grand Duke of Tuscany, who had learned of the plot against her. William Cecil Charles Baillie, Ridolfi's messenger, was arrested at [[Dover, England|Dover]] carrying compromising letters, and revealed the existence of the plot under [[torture]]. The Duke of Norfolk was arrested on [[September 7]], [[1571]] and sent to the tower.<ref>Weir, ''Mary, Queen of Scots'', pg 493.</ref> Guerau de Spes, the Spanish ambassador, was expelled from the country in [[January]], [[1571]].<ref>Jenkins, ''Elizabeth the Great'', pg 179.</ref> Ridolfi was still abroad at the time the plot was discovered, and never returned to England, becoming a Florentine senator in 1600.
 
Mary, when questioned, admitted to having dealings with Ridolfi, but denied any involvement with the plot.<ref>Weir, ''Mary, Queen of Scots'', pg 493.</ref> She was clearly implicated by the evidence, but Elizabeth refused to have her executed and vetoed a bill by Parliament that condemned Mary and removed her from the succession.<ref>Smith, A. G. R., ''The Government of Elizabethan England'', (Edward Arnold, 1967), pg 28.</ref> She feared that by executing a [[Divine Right of Kings|divinely appointed]] monarch, she undermined her own position.<ref>Lockyer, ''Tudor and Stuart Britain'', pg 190.</ref> Instead, she had the Duke of Norfolk executed for treason in [[June]], [[1571]].<ref>T.A.Morris, ''Europe and England in the Sixteenth Century'', (Routledge 1998), p334</ref> However, Mary's status in England was transformed from honoured guest to treasonous pariah, and she was universally condemned by the governing elite:<ref>Morris, ''Europe and England'', p334</ref> her continued conspiring, especially in the [[Babington plot|Babington]] plot, eventually led to her execution on [[February 8]], [[1587]].<ref>Weir, Alison, ''Mary, Queen of Scots and the Murder of Lord Darnley'', (Pimlico, 2004), pg 509.</ref>
 
A very fictionalised version of the Ridolfi plot was featured in the movie ''[[Elizabeth (film)|Elizabeth (1998)]]'' which depicted Thomas Howard, the Duke of Norfolk, as the chief conspirator. However the film omitted the involvement of Ridolfi himself.
 
== See also ==
 
* [[Throckmorton plot]]
* [[Babington plot]]
* [[Francis Walsingham]]
 
== References ==
 
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
<references/></div>
 
== External links ==
 
* [http://www.marie-stuart.co.uk/England.htm Marie Stuart Society's account of the Ridolfi plot].
* [http://www.gunpowder-plot.org/ridolfi.asp The Gunpowder Plot Society's account of the Ridolfi plot].
* [http://www.elizabethi.org/uk/chronology/two.html Timeline of Elizabeth's reign from 1570 to 1603].
 
[[Category:1570]]
[[Category:Tudor rebellions]]
 
[[de:Ridolfi-Verschwörung]]