FRCP11

Revision as of 19:59, 8 June 2006

Revision as of 20:30, 20 June 2007

Line 1:

{{cvgproj|class=start|importance=}}

== Bernie Sanders ==

I love Minsc, but I don't think it's fair to say that only Sarevok surpasses him- Korgan is just as good a fighter, possibly better, and only gets the short shaft from fans because he's tempermentally unsuited to most parties. [[User:Stilgar135|Stilgar135]] 22:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

== Warrior? ==

Thanks for your work on the [[Bernie Sanders]]. Recently the article had become involved in an edit war with serveral less than ideal versions. It's nice to that cycle broken and I feel your contributions have improved the NPOV. --[[User:William Graham|waffle iron]] 20:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

"Minsc is the strongest joinable warrior in both games"

Hello, This is User Straight Info. I'm writing because I've been banned from editing by Admin Heah for adding balance to the Bernie Sanders page. He and Bkwillwm seem to feel any statement which may cause the reader to have a any less than a stellar opinion of Sanders is POV. For an example, read the last edit I made. For instance, I wrote that Sanders criticized Bush for cutting section 8, then I quote the Budget office, showing that no such cut took place or was proposed. Well, if that makes Sanders a liar, then it does. However, I give Sanders side, and his oppositions. waffle iron reported me for 3RR when I'd only edited the page twice that day! Don't trust him. He then proceeded to edit the page 7 times. Read the record. Sorry I can't autosign this, please help.

Isn't Minsc a Ranger?

== as an example of something you thought of, try Ganfyd ==

[[User:Deadhoax|Deadhoax]] ([[User talk:Deadhoax|<small><font style="color:#800080;">Talk</font></small>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Deadhoax|<small><font style="color:#800080;">Contr</font></small>]]) 10:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

With a hamster yes. But with the way he acts, its a mix between Warrion/Fighter, paladin(doing hid own good, a good rebel)and ranger, with abilities.

"the possibility of starting a MediaWiki-based weblog that can double as a specialized reference source." you mentioned considering.

[[User:Pece Kocovski|Pece Kocovski]] 05:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

We did it, complete with a liccence that I'd suspect is suitable as a base for other professions. http://ganfyd.org

A Ranger is a type of warrior. [[User:MidgleyPyromaniac589|MidgleyPyromaniac589]] 2220:3430, 1520 AprilJune 20062007 (UTC)

== PC vs NPC ==

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

Minsc is '''not''' a non-playable character since not only can he join the group but he is also fully under the control of the player. This should be changed in the article. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_character wikipedia's article] [[User:Bragador|Bragador]] 15:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;"

|-

|valign=top|

;Stubs:<!--'''[[Wikipedia:Stub|Stubs]]:'''-->

:[[Association of Trial Lawyers of America]]

:[[Social host liability]]

:[[Settlement (law)]]

:[[Unfair business practices]]

:[[Office of Legal Counsel]]

:[[National Association of Manufacturers]]

:[[Cass Sunstein]]

:[[Trier of fact]]

:[[Party (law)]]

:[[State Bar of Texas]]

:[[Defense contractor]]

:[[David Lat]]

:[[Cross-examination]]

:[[Dallas Bar Association]]

:[[Ron Kind]]

:[[Richard Epstein]]

:[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]

:[[John W. Kern]]

:[[Docket]]

|align=top|

;Cleanup

:[[PR Watch]]

:[[Rescue doctrine]]

:[[Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson]]

;Merge

:[[Columbia University School of Mines]]

:[[Institute on Religion and Democracy]]

:[[Judicial Reorganization Bill]]

;Add Sources

:[[Attractive nuisance doctrine]]

:[[Dorit Beinisch]]

:[[Mel Martinez]]

;Wikify

:[[Caps (drinking game)]]

:[[Mary K. Butler]]

:[[Resurrection Blues]]

;Expand

:[[Election results for mayor of New York]]

:[[Amanda Waller]]

:[[Court]]

|}

== Sarevok spoiler? ==

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

It might be a borderline-case, but shouldn't Sarevoks appearence in Baldur's Gate 2 (and especially that he can join your party) be marked as a spoiler? It's in the "Powers"-section. <blockquote>''Minsc is the strongest joinable warrior in both games (Strength 18/93) until the Baldurs Gate II addon Throne of Bhaal that introduced Sarevok (Strength 18/00) (...)''</blockquote> -- [[User:Anissen|Anissen]] 12:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Thanks from [[User:ForteTuba|ForteTuba]], SuggestBot's caretaker.

== Vin Moosk and Boo ==

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] 14:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

You don't suppose that when there is another episodes of [[Kids Next Door]] featuring Moosk, that Boo may make a Cameo/homage role? After all there Are hamsters in the show and Moosk is very much like Minsc. Even the name is a slight anagram.

==Elections in Cuba==

Vin Moosk

Welcome to the war of liberation to free the Cuba articles from the grip of the Partido Communista de Wikipedia. See also [[Cuba]], [[Human rights in Cuba]] and (awaiting attention) ([[History of Cuba]]. The struggle is long and arduous and the enemy is cunning, but victory will be ours. Please continue to contribute. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 14:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Minsc (C is a K sound)

[[User:Pece Kocovski|Pece Kocovski]] 11:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

==[[David Lat]]==

So, SuggestBot did its dirty business. Thanks for your excellent edits to the David Lat article. It looks a lot better now. I am glad that you lied when you said that you "don't really post here any more." Cheers! - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Crzrussian|contribs]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 15:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for your input on the [[Jim Sensenbrenner]] article. Incidentally, I like your "Entertaining, if false, accusations made about me on Wikipedia"; I've been called a "viscious, greed-driven, megalomaniacal fascist thug" and a "gay male, opera loving, Wisconsin Republican", all of which are mostly untrue. (I'll keep to myself which are actually true. ;^) )--[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 21:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

==Conrad Burns==

Could you please explain why you removed that sentence from the intro? This isn't my opinion, every single thing I've read about Burns makes the very same point. One of many examples: "The rural upbringing of Republican senator Conrad Burns makes him an unlikely spokesman on high-tech issues, but the Montana senator is an outspoken champion of the technology and telecommunications industries. The former cattle auctioneer sometimes embarrasses Montana citizens with his cowpoke ways, but he can be counted on to defend the interests of ranchers and farmers on Capitol Hill." [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 22:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

== Frivolous Litigation ==

Perhaps a new section on frivolous litigation should be added. [[User:Bill Smoot|Bill Smoot]] 00:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

==[[Arlington County, Virginia]]==

Hey FRCP11,

I wanted to let you know that I have nominated [[Arlington County, Virginia]] as a candidate for [[WP:USCOTW|US Collaboration of the Week]]. The article is in need of much help and with a little group effort, it could be brought to Featured Article status! I brought this to your attention as I have seen you have contributed to the article in the recent past. Please cast your vote with your signature at the [[WP:USCOTW|US Collaboration of the Week]] page under [[Arlington County, Virginia]]. --[[User:Caponer|Caponer]] 02:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

== Thanks for providing sources... ==

...on the items you've recently added to the Brandeis alumni list. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 12:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

== [[Henry M. Jackson]] ==

Can I get a second set of eyes to look at a revert war in the Henry M Jackson article? I think I'm being reasonable, but the other editor doesn't agree. -- [[User:FRCP11|FRCP11]] 21:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

: Gave up long ago on trying to talk sense to {{User|8bitJake}}. State politics articles are pretty much on my "avoid" list; the Olympics is so much less stressful a topic ;). Anyway, looks to me like the information that he keeps deleting is relevant, well-cited, and informative. Looks like there's plenty of support for the inclusion on the talk page. I'll restore it. -- [[User:Jonel|Jonel]] | [[User talk:Jonel|Speak]] 23:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

== Varela Project ==

I will try again to understand you. Though I don't know why asking for the names and an accurate number of the imprisoned Varela Project participants qualifies as 'Communist Propaganda'. I have heard of 81, 77, 75 and 25 people. The article currently says both 75 and 25 and both cannot be correct. (By the way, I don't deny that there are people imprisoned for actions related to the Varela Project.) Are not these fair questions? [[User:BruceHallman|BruceHallman]] 01:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

:Bruce Hallman's comment above is utterly disingenuous, and another example of his bad faith towards Wikipedia, since he knows damn well my problem with the article is not his request for the names of the Varela Project participants, which have been provided to him. -- [[User:FRCP11|FRCP11]] 04:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

==Varela Project POV==

I read the article, and I totally agree with your assessment. I'll see what I can do, but I may not make it. That particular editor is one of the most frustrating accounts I've ever encountered on Wikipedia. [[User:172|172]] | [[User talk:172|Talk]] 23:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

== Ongoing war ==

Only because it seems as if you're around and I won't be for a while, if he pulls any stunts that require admin intervention, make sure they check his talkpage history. He's notorious for deleting his talk page, and there's a lot of stuff in there. Scoop isn't the first article he's acted like this on. Hang in there. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 20:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

==Thanks for reverting ==

You (and several others) saved me many keystrokes by reverting the most recent round of trivial/POV H1-B spam.

All I had left to do was leave a message on a talk page: see [[User talk:71.123.40.76|71.123.40.76]]. Much thanks -- [[User:Paleorthid|Paleorthid]] 01:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

==Hey there==

I agree the content should be in Gregoire's article, but could you stop mentioning Jake's conduct (stalking, tagteaming, whatever it is?)? I worked with him before and he was alright; maybe if you focus on the article he'll do the same? If it's a personal battle he'll never budge (no one does) and the article won't go anywhere. Phenry ("phh") is a fair editor that also works on the article. He might not appreciate info that paints Gregoire in a negative light but my guess is he'll agree that the info is fair to mention. [[User:Justforasecond|Justforasecond]] 05:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

:I am kind of shocked that you've had a good situation with him, but I do suggest taking a look at [[Henry M. Jackson]]. It's been a frustrating week with 8BJ and there's a reason why some of us are on our last straw with him. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 10:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

::OK sounds good guys. He does seem to be acting different than he did when I worked with him. Hopefully he'll come back to the light side of the force ;) [[User:Justforasecond|Justforasecond]] 13:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

== User notice: temporary 3RR block ==

<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">

====Regarding reversions[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&action=history] made on [[June 8]] [[2006]] ([[UTC]]) to [[Christine Gregoire]]====

{| class="user-block"

|| [[Image:Octagon-warning.gif|left|30px| ]]

|| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

|}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:FRCP11&action=edit&section=new block] is 12 hours. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)</div>

{{unblock}}

This block is erroneous. I did not violate 3RR. Please show me 4 reversions in 24 hours. I have been very careful to avoid this problem. -- [[User:FRCP11|FRCP11]] 19:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

:From here I see the edits and they do look like basically reverts. May I suggest taking it to the talk page in lieu of revert as edit warring is a bad thing -- [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 19:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

::Some were reverts, but there were not 4 reverts. I even abstained from adding a POV tag that had been improperly removed four times. "Look like reverts" is not "reverts" when several of the edits are attempts at compromise. I was given no warning. -- [[User:FRCP11|FRCP11]] 19:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

:::An admin is reviewing this atm. -- <small> [[User talk:Drini|Drini]]</small> 19:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

::::NB also my frequent use of the [[Talk:Christine Gregoire]] page when 8bitJake simply reverted my edits. -- [[User:FRCP11|FRCP11]] 19:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Having looked again, I still think you have 4R. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57542282&oldid=57540288 1] is rv cos it says so; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57552086&oldid=57551311] adds controversial, as does [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57567110&oldid=57566341 2]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57559128&oldid=57558820] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57565137&oldid=57562909 3] are a pair; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57568119&oldid=57567611 4] re-rms "legal" (and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57571440&oldid=57570407 5] does essentially the same) [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57542282&oldid=57540288 1] is an edit about tobacco, not an edit of the introduction; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57552086&oldid=57551311 2] is a brand new edit of a different section in the article, and not a revert; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Gregoire&diff=57571440&oldid=57570407 5] is a compromise edit moving "controversial" away from "recount". If those are your 4, you prove my point that I haven't violated [[WP:3RR]]. -- [[User:FRCP11|FRCP11]] 19:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

'''DENIED'''

you did make more than 3 reverts. And even if you had only 3, you're edit warring and gaming the system (push your revert limits while carefully trying not to get over 3, in both cases blocking is warranted. So endorse deletion '''for both parties.''' -- <small> [[User talk:Drini|Drini]]</small> 19:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

: Hold on a moment... a block, yes, but deletion seems a bit strong :-) [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)