Idont Havaname

Revision as of 23:49, 20 November 2005

Revision as of 20:56, 21 June 2007

Line 1:

{{Expand|date=January 2007}}

I'm not as strict about this as some other users are, but I do request that you please sign your posts here, including the time stamp, with ''<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>''. That way I know who you are, and it will be easier for me to find your talk page. --[[User:Idont havaname|Idont Havaname]] 02:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

'''Alisal High School''' opened in 1965 and is located on the east side of [[Salinas, California]]. Their school colors are green and black. Their mascot is the Trojan and the current principal is Dan Burns.[[Image:ahspklot.jpg|thumb|right| Alisal High School]]

== ArchivesAttendance ==

Attendance is handled by attendance technicians Alicia Espino, Susan Chacon, and Juanita Garcia, head of the department for over 20 years now. They do their job along side numerous TA's (Teachers Aid) such as Daniel Ibarra, Ileana Madrigal, Jorge Mendoza, Lizett Marquez, Cristian Mercado, and Gilberto Tapia (All graduating seniors this 2007 school year)

For discussion between November 13, 2005, and August 14, 2005, see [[User talk:Idont havaname/Archive 001]].

== ThanksMarch forAgainst the WelcomeViolence ==

On March 27, 2007, Government teacher [[Ruben Pizarro]] led over 300 Alisal High School students on a march from Alisal High School to the [[Cesar Chavez]] Library in an effort to raise awareness of the spike in violence in Salinas since the beginning of 2007. Students were joined by city officials including the city's mayor Dennis Donahue, several city district council members, and the city's Police Chief, Dan Ortega.

== Mata ==

Hello, just popped in to thank you for your kind welcome you left on my Talk page. I will do my best on here to add and contribute as much as I can in regards to helping Wikipedia expand and become more efficient. Thank you also for the helpful information, it is definitely appreciated!

Mr. Mata is "The '''Little''' Puppy!"

[[User:Piecraft|Piecraft]] 03:12, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

== College rules ==

[[Category:High schools in California]]

You had earlier asked about how rules are handled at [[Bob Jones University]]. Since then the topic has come up again, in case you're interested, at [[Talk:Bob Jones University]]. -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 01:27, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

{{California-school-stub}}

== Many thanks ==

Judging my this talk page, you're pretty active at RFA... so I'll add my voice and give another thanks for your vote of support regarding my request for adminship. Having someone assume I'm already an admin is quite flattering. :p [[User:TheCoffee|Coffee]] 06:47, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

== Thanks for your support ==

Hi, just a quick note to thank you for your support on my RfA. Now that I am an administrator I will do my best to please the community’s expectations. Best regards, [[User:Sam Hocevar|Sam Hocevar]] 17:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Deletion reform/Proposals/Speedy delete for pages with no citations]] ==

Thanks for the comments. I've responded in the page. [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]] 20:25, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

== My RFA ==

Thank you very kindly for your support for my nomination. I promise your trust will not be misplaced; I may occasionally be slightly buzzed with power, but never drunk. ;) &middot; [[User:Katefan0|'''Katefan0''']]^{[[User talk:Katefan0|(scribble)]]} 21:58, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

==[[WP:MIND]] 22:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC) ==

[[Image:Mind-Benders1.JPG|thumb|[[WP:MIND|Challenge yourself, and get ready to think!]]]] Hello! Thank you for participating in Round Two of the [[Wikipedia:Mind Benders]]! The round will officially close on Friday, September 16, and round three (which is complete) will be open in the immediate days after that. A notice will be sent to you at least 48 hours before round three is set to open, to insure fairness. Round three offers 11 new exciting questions, this time written by [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck C.]]. Please be sure to join in the fun! Also, congratulations to [[User:Riffsyphon1024|Riffsyphon1024]] for winning our logo competition! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] |<small> [[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color = brown> note? ]]</font color>| [[User:Flcelloguy/Desk|Desk </small>]] 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

<small> Note: This message has been sent by [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] using the [[User:NotificationBot|NotificationBot]] (thanks to [[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion]] for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding [[WP:MIND]], please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert [[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion]]. Thanks! </small>

<small>Automatic notification done by [[User:NotificationBot|NotificationBot]] ([[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]]. Any bugs or errors, please report to [[User:AllyUnion|bot owner]]. --[[User:NotificationBot|NotificationBot]] 22:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)</small>

== Re: Asian fetish POV problems ==

I haven't gotten involved in any request for comment issues in the past, so I'm not sure if the article warrants it or not. It's definitely POV in multiple sections, however. If that's enough for an rfc, then so be it.--[[User:Wasabe3543|Wasabe3543]] 19:27, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Edit: The more I see how divisive this issue seems to be (especially after the last round of comments), yeah, I think a request for comment is in order--[[User:Wasabe3543|Wasabe3543]] 17:29, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

:I think the article is definitely encyclopedic-- and judging from the temperament of other editors on the topic, there is a desperate need to have it written well and objectively. Unfortunately, I don't think that is going to happen without some sort of intervention from wikipedia administration. --[[User:Howrealisreal|Howrealisreal]] 16:50, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

==[[WP:MIND]] 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC) ==

Hello, {{PAGENAME}}! This message is to inform you that round three of [[WP:MIND|Wikipedia Mind Benders]] will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck C.]]. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to [[User:ROYGBIV|ROYGBIV]] for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, [[User:Spondoolicks|Spondoolicks]], only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] |<small> [[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color = brown> note? ]]</font color>| [[User:Flcelloguy/Desk|Desk </small>]] 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

<small> Note: This message has been sent by [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] using the [[User:NotificationBot|NotificationBot]] (thanks to [[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion]] for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding [[WP:MIND]], please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert [[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion]]. Thanks! </small>

<small>Automatic notification done by [[User:NotificationBot|NotificationBot]] ([[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]]. Any bugs or errors, please report to [[User:AllyUnion|bot owner]]. --[[User:NotificationBot|NotificationBot]] 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)</small>

==My RfA==

Thanks for your support in my RfA. I'm glad you felt adminship was long overdue (I was sort of starting to feel that way myself). Now that it's been remedied I'll do my best. -[[User:R. fiend|R. fiend]] 19:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

==Just wanted to let you know...==

Turns out there is a Daniel Hoyt article, except it's under a different name: [[Dan Hoyt]]. I'm going to yank out that bit in the Asian fetish article (yes it came back), since we still don't have proof if he's specifically targetting Asian women. --[[User:Bash|Bash]] 01:20, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

:Heh, so I guess you'll put it up for Afd then? ;) --[[User:Bash|Bash]] 03:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

The article is definetly hard to turn into an NPOV star. To me, it gets ''way'' into it, emphasizing points that would be pretty obscure to me. Some lines I just find myself saying out loud, '''What?''': ''Ironically, white men who exclusively date Asian women are often tagged with the same stereotypical qualities. They are often characterized as nerds and geeks, physically weaker and less socially capable than other white men, who “settle” for Asian women because White women reject them.'' --[[User:Bash|Bash]] 04:24, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

:Maybe because I live in Toronto, but I've actually never encountered anyone who would stereotype white men who like Asian women as somehow "weaker" or "inferior". To me, that is a brand new concept. --[[User:Bash|Bash]] 05:21, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

I was thinking that perhaps the article could benefit from being listed at [[Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive]]. At the very least it might increase the article's visibility and encourage different viewpoints to edit and contribute. What do you think? --[[User:Howrealisreal|Howrealisreal]] 18:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

:Okay I posted it up [[Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive#Asian_fetish_.281_vote.2C_stays_until_October_18.29|here]]. You should get some people to vote for it if you can. As for my talk page, I keep all my previous discussions archived at [[User talk:Howrealisreal/Archive]]. Admittedly, some times I get bored and I over-archive content (like our previous discussion on the article) too quickly. --[[User:Howrealisreal|Howrealisreal]] 04:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

:: You are right, I should be more aware "Not to feed the trolls". In efforts to try to take everyone's POV seriously, inevitably it will sometimes backfire in my face. Anyway, thanks for getting back to me. --[[User:Howrealisreal|Howrealisreal]] 13:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

My RfA succeeded, and I appreciate that you supported it. *hugs* <span style="border: 2px solid #ba0000;">&nbsp;[[User:Denelson83|Denelson]][[User talk:Denelson83|'''83''']]&nbsp;</span> 22:09, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

== Maryville Middle School ==

[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryville Middle School]] appears in danger of being trumped by a conspicuous and concerted effort on the part of deletionists. Please review the nomination and vote at your convenience.--[[User:Nicodemus75|Nicodemus75]] 05:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

== Underoath ==

Yeah, that's fine; I didn't bother checking the Converge link to find out who it was, so your version is more helpful anyways. [[User:Kertrats|Kertrats]] | [[User talk:Kertrats|Talk]] 13:25, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

== Your concern ==

Hello Idont havename (also a nice name by the way) ;). I know you voted in opposition, but I just thought I'd bring to your attention, that my deletion of an unsigned Afd was brought to my attention by [[user:Tony Sidaway]] and I realized that this was a mistake. But of course even I make mistakes. :) I would just like you to know that I searched for the user in the edit summary for about 15 minutes before removing that unsigned vote. But thank you for voting. --[[user:Anonymous editor|<font color="green">'''a.n.o.n.y.m''']] ^{[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]} 17:54, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

== TINSC ==

There isn't a school cabal (really), but if there were, it'd be some users trying to work to replace the shrillness in school AFDs with dialogue, and assert that civility is more important than partisanship. If it existed (and it doesn't, really), it'd be dedicated to getting people to stop sniping and start talking.

There's no school cabal, really, but would you be interested in being a member [[User:A Man In Black/TINSC|if there were]]? - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: bold;"><font color="000000">Black</font></span>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 21:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

== Re: [[Paul Hospenthal]] ==

That's alright, I'll leave it as you did. It wasn't an attack but it was a little ironic POV. I was thinking of starting a category of people who are only known for dating or being married to famous people. That, or people who through no achievement of their own happen to have become really, really lucky. Then I kicked myself and said it's time to put down the wikipedia already... :) ~ [[User:Reaverdrop|Reaverdrop]] 06:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

*Re. your response: thanks for the sage counsel. I'm still getting the hang of the protocols and consensus boards around here. And the consensus you described sounds quite sound - I'll leave it be. ~ [[User:Reaverdrop|Reaverdrop]] 18:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

== RE: [[Shaquille O'Neal]] ==

The Shaq page is on my watchlist and I must have just loaded it right after the vandalism happened. Timing is everything. :) --[[User:Howcheng|<span style="font-family:Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: #33C;">howcheng</span>]] <small>[ [[User talk:Howcheng|t]] &#149; [[Special:Contributions/Howcheng|c]] &#149; [http://www.howcheng.com/ w] &#149; [[WP:ESP|'''''<span style="color:#0C0">e</span>''''']] ]</small> 07:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

<p>

== re: [[Gothic metal]] ==

<p>

Personally, I don't think caving to [[User:Leyasu]]'s edits will solve this. They seem to read much more as dictated personal opinion (and even somewhat rant-like) than something straight-forward and informative, per the design and format of Wikipedia. Thus, I'm going to revert it back to the original version, with a polite request that [[User:Leyasu]] participate in the discussion and go into detail as to why he/she is is making these changes. --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] 02:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

<p>

Idont i am not making personal attacks and i apologise if it comes across that way. I have made no intention of making personal attacks, and also people have freely been commenting that Dante's posts are wrong. I have also explained to Dante several times why the changes are there and he has done nothing but spite and antagonise with poor argument except from, 'Im right coz i say so'. This isnt a personal attack from me, im just trying to clear up common misonception. (Edit): Idont, i will freely admit to having problems with spelling. I also have no spellcheck based word programs on my computer. If you want to spellcheck it, i would be more then gratified. Also, please go to the discussion board on Gothic Metal and note the comments against Dante's version. ~~[[User:Leyasu|Leyasu]]

------

In response to your last post Idont. I do concede to being angry at this point with Dante, and yes my statement was personal. I apologise to both yourself and Dante for that. I have also just corrected most of the spellings and mistakes in it, and im working on toning it to be more accesable for some readers. Again, i apologise for any offence i have caused, and will try to keep my language to a form that suits you best. ~~[[User:Leyasu|Leyasu]]

Hey, Idont. I protected [[Gothic Metal]] for you, on a randomly-chosen version. Lemme know when you need it unprotected. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: bold;"><font color="000000">Black</font></span>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 17:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

<p>

--------

<p>

I am fine with the banning of both me and user Dante until this is sorted, as i have mentioned to Dante to pool our knowledge. I am however offended by the accusation of using Sock Puppets as i have no connection to these users other than user Porkchop who i have worked with on an international basis concerning various projects and have contact with through the program Soulseek. I resent the accusation of using Sock Puppets in all forms and ask for this accusation to be striken. (Also posted this on A Man In Blacks board out of confusion of which to post this on (apologising for any incovnience my confusion causes)) ~~[[Leyasu|Leyasu]]

<p>

:: Ive posted in Gothic Metal's discussion page a revised version of the article. I mentioned on it my intentions for doing so and emplore you to take a look when you have the time. Thank you. ~~[[Leyasu|Leyasu]]

<p>

-----

<p>

Added Evanescence talk page to watch. Working on compiling a list of each song the band stole and who they stole it from. Also trying to get hold of the links to a rumoured site with the court case records on. ~~[[Leyasu|Leyasu]]

<p>

Im not sure if the Metal Mayhem comments that have been left annoumously (spell?) are considered Vandalism or not, but i thought i should mention that there is one still on the page. I dont know wether to remove it or not because i dont know wether its Vandalism or Free Speech. Thought best to mention to you so you can do whats best. ~~[[Leyasu|Leyasu]]

== Re: [[Enforcer (hockey)]] and related pages==

Sorry, I was just trying to be helpful and add the links to enforcer-type players only. I told the webmaster of hockeyfights.com I was doing that and he basically said the same thing to me, that I should stop because it might be seen as spam, so I did. -- 00:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

== Protection update ==

Any progress on [[Gothic metal]]? It's been a week, so I wanted to check in. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Black'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 02:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

: Things are going somewhat better there; we're getting some sort of consensus, but it will still need more work, I'd say. Namely, we're still debating whether to include anything about Nu-Goth and some other things - for example, one of the editors wants to make rather bold claims about/against certain bands but doesn't have any reliable sources, something that the other editors on the talk page are against. I think we should wait a little longer just so that we can get a version that is close to consensus without any one of the parties acting unilaterally in it. Right now, restricted to using the talk page, we're getting pretty good discussion (still some vandalism from anons, though), so I'd like that to continue rather than having overly-[[WP:BOLD]] edits going on in the main article. Thanks for asking about it; you might also want the opinions of [[User:Danteferno]] and [[User:Leyasu]], the others who have been very involved with the article lately. --[[User:Idont havaname|Idont Havaname]] 02:58, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

:Personally, I think there's been only a limited amount of success; one of the editors concluded that a band he mentioned as an "instigator" had no source to show that it is an instigator, so he dropped it. However, that's as far as things go. In order for this discussion to progress further there needs to be more participation in the debate (regardless of who stands for what) because for the past week, I have acted as the sort-of "spokesperson" as to why the original edit should probably remain, and while that (so far) seems to be a "popular opinion", it probably comes off as uncompromising and partisan to this other user. Perhaps there's a language barrier (I don't speak Polski(?)/Dutch(?)) or perhaps just another, more neutral/middle person needs to be involved, but at this point, '''just''' "[[User:Danteferno]] vs. [[User:Leyasu]]" is not going to solve things. [[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] 11:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

:: I dropped in a few posts (if u can call all the edits on myself that). What youve complained about ive edited and changed. Ive added some things about Gothic Doom and what not. The revision is getting there. The issue on what to do with Gothic Doom is pressing now, so i included a paragraph about it and need you to read it through. Dante i would also like your feedback as ive done my best to combine the two versions into something both accurate, and academically written. I was also wondering if the red comments can be edited into a compilation at the bottom of the revised article. ~~[[Leyasu|Leyasu]]

:: Idont i want to know what to do about the issue of updating the article in question with the revised version as the user Dante vs Me argument is wearing thin and argument against updating it is getting tired. There is only old points and POV arguments being made backed up by rumour, more point of view, and fansites that claim speculation and contradict each other. Avoiding another revert war i decided to ask you wether it would be legible to post the revised version now, or if there is anything else on it that you think should be edited (anything confusing, misleading, or needing minor rewording to serve point). ~~[[Leyasu|Leyasu]]