|
[[Image:Flickr_ymimexico_247769858--Jalapeno_poppers.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Jalapeno poppers.]]
{{backlog}}
'''Jalapeño poppers''' are [[jalapeño]] [[chile pepper|pepper]]s that have been hollowed out, stuffed with a mixture of [[cheese]], [[spices]], and sometimes ground meat, and then deep fried. They are served (usually with some kind of dip) as appetizers at some Mexican- or Southwest-themed bars and restaurants.
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|-
|style="padding-left:1em"|'''<span style="font-size:120%">Images missing source or license information may now be "speedied"</span>'''
==External links==
Place either:
*[http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/recipes/recipe/0,1977,FOOD_9936_24509,00.html Emeril Live! Tailgating Recipe Contest Winner]
* '''<nowiki>{{subst:nsd}}</nowiki>''' for [[Template:No source|no source]]
*[http://southernfood.about.com/od/jalapenochilerecipes/r/bl21220b.htm Mexican Recipe]
or
* '''<nowiki>{{subst:nld}}</nowiki>''' for [[Template:No license|no license]]
on the image description page to put the image in the appropriate category. After being tagged for 7 days, the image will be eligible for [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedy deletion]] per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#I4|criterion 4]] for images.
{{Mexico-cuisine-stub}}
Please also notify the uploader so they get a chance to fix the problem(s) (the templates {{[[Template:image source|image source]]|Image:Image name.ext}} and {{[[Template:image copyright|image copyright]]|Image:Image name.ext}} are made for this purpose, but feel free to write a message of your own). It is not nessesary to warn the uploader about ''every'' individual image if they have uploaded several such images, but at least one message telling them that images without source/license will be deleted should be given to each (active) user who risk "losing" images because of this (fairly new) rule.
|}
{{Shortcut|[[WP:PUI]]}}
This page is for listing and discussing images that are used under a '''non-free license''' or have '''disputed source or licensing information'''. Images are listed here for 14 days before they are processed.
[[Category:Mexican cuisine]]
[[ja:Wikipedia:著作権侵害かもしれない記事]]
[[Category:Appetizers]]
==Instructions==
{{deletiontools}}
Before listing, check if the image should be listed at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] (if its source is known and it cannot be used under a free license or [[Wikipedia:fair use|fair use]] doctrine) or at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]] (if it's simply unneeded).
To list an image on this page:
# Place one of the following tags on the image description page:
#*'''{{[[Template:PUIdisputed|PUIdisputed]]}}''' — If the source or copyright status is disputed.
#*'''{{[[Template:PUInonfree|PUInonfree]]}}''' — If the image is only available under a non-free license.
# '''Contact the uploader''' by adding a message to their talk page. You can use <nowiki>{{subst:idw-pui|Image:filename.ext}}</nowiki> (replace filename.ext with the name of the image). If the editor hasn't visited in a while, consider using the "E-mail this user" link.
# Add <nowiki>"{{unverifiedimage}}"</nowiki> to the ''image caption'' on articles the image is on. This is to attract more attention to the deletion debate to see what should be done.
# List the image at the bottom of this page, stating the reasons why the image should be deleted.
Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 14 days.
'''Note:''' Images can be unlisted immediately if they are undisputably in the public ___domain or licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for more on these). Images which claim [[fair use]] must have two people agree to this.
==Holding cell==
: ''These images have been listed for at least 14 days. Images which have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.''
===March 17===
* Everything in [[:Category: Polish government site pictures]], i.e., everything tagged with {{tl|PolandGov}}, which forbids commercial use. At a first glance, it looks like most of the historical images could potentially be used under a "fair use" rationale. --[[User:MarkSweep|MarkSweep]] <small>[[User talk:MarkSweep|(call me collect)]]</small> 16:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
:* In fact the tag itself contain the link to the source of all the pictures, so there's no need to claim the pics are unsourced. They are sourced, just follow the link and go one level up. The page is in English, so you won't have trouble locating the right picture. Other than that, I'm currently negotiating the commercial use of those pics with the Polish ministry. I wonder why is wikipedia interested in doing that as it is not us to use them commercially, but it's another story. [[User:Halibutt|Halibu]][[User talk:Halibutt|tt]] 21:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
:*Jimbo says that noncommercial images aren't to be used on Wikipedia. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 14:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
::*GFDL allows commercial use.[[User:Genidealingwithfairuse|Genidealingwithfairuse]] 18:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
===12 May===
*[[:Image:Warsaw uprising.jpg]]. Photo of the [[Warsaw Uprising]]. Uploader did not leave any information that verifies that this photo was authored by Soviet union citizens or that it was first published in the Soviet Union. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 14:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
**So you have read [http://www.rubricon.com/showbigimg.asp?id=226741152 the linked source page] and are sure there is no such information?--[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]] <sup><font color="green">[[User_talk:Piotrus|Talk]]</font></sup> 15:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
***The page has no information on the photographer and no statement about the rights to the photograph except an ‘All rights reserved’ for the entire page. —[[User:xyzzy_n|xyzzy]]<sub>[[User talk:xyzzy_n|n]]</sub> 15:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
****The image was published in Soviet Union in late '40s and republished in 50's in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. It was not published anywhere else, AFAIK. The publication is PD. I suggest that [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] be more careful. This is not the first time that this very user takes an effort that results in nothing but time wasting for Wikipedians who would rather write content than defend absolutely harmless images. Instead of encouraging contribution to grossly underrepresanted East European topics such activity is a huge discouragement. If there are problem images that may threaten a legal action against the Wiki foundation, this mid-40s image published in now defuncts USSR isn't one of them. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 18:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
*****I know I should have expected a heartbreaking story from Irpen but either choose a more appropriate tag, like [[Template:PD-Poland]] or give the name of the Soviet Union citizen who took the photograph. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 22:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
******Look, your sarcasm is misplaced. I stand by my words that your umpteenth attempt to delete this or that clearly harmless image is disruptive, potentially damaging for Wikiepdia and discouraging for contributors who would like to give the Easter European topics at least some coverage, which is grossly underrepresnted for now. But I am not going to fight over this one any more than I've already explained. I uploaded this image to improve the Poland-related article and this topic is not my primary consern. I mostly contribute to Ukraine and Russia-related articles. I will leave it to Polish colleagues to justify PD-Poland if you view PD-USSR inaplicable. I simply made a case for a PD based on the PD-USSR tag which relates to "All works published in the Soviet Union before May 27, 1973". The image fits this description. You are welcome to join the users who support a more restrictive version of the tag. [[Template_talk:PD-USSR#New_Research|Here]] is the place for it. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 21:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
:Whoever deleted the image, as it turned above to the red link, please elaborate on how the deletion followed from this discussion, who deleted it, based on what and how the deletion was decided as warranted from the discussion above. Please reply here rather than at my talk. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 06:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
::Second.--[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]] <sup><font color="green">[[User_talk:Piotrus|Talk]]</font></sup> 04:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
:I see this removed from here again without being addressed. The user who deleted the images, please care to answer ''here'' how the deletion was derived from the above discussion. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 20:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
===15 May===
*[[:Image:Piuscenter.jpg]] - the copyright says clearly: "They [the images] are not available for commercial purposes without my explicit permission" --[[User:Panairjdde|Panairjdde]] 14:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
:Oh dear, I am silly - I assumed for some reason Wikipedia wasn't commercial :-S Could you help find a GFDL equivalent of this image, otherwise that drastically reduces what I can use on [[Column of Antoninus Pius]]. Molto grazie. [[User:Neddyseagoon|Neddyseagoon]] 16:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)neddyseagoon
**Also by [[User:Neddyseagoon|Neddyseagoon]]: [[:Image:Piuswife.jpg]], [[:Image:Skyphos.jpg]], [[:Image:Antonbase3.jpg]], [[:Image:Antoninusbase.jpg]], [[:Image:Ribchester helmet.JPG]], [[:Image:Female gladiators BM.jpg]], [[:Image:Roman gaul suicide.jpg]], - claimed as PD-art, but are photos of 3d objects such as statues (which therefore are creative works and subject to copyright) [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 19:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
***I agree, though seems a little harsh - is there no category for 'images of ancient sculpture' / images of 2d artworks out of copyright [[User:Neddyseagoon|Neddyseagoon]] 20:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)neddyseagoon
****Unfortunately, there's not much we can do. Consider this: a mountain was not created by anyone (human), and is therefore not copyrighted, but pictures of mountains certainly are copyrighted. The same thing applies here; the age of the sculpture is irrelevant. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 21:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also by [[User:Neddyseagoon|Neddyseagoon]]: [[:Image:Aux1 jpg.jpg]], [[:Image:Archersyrian.gif]], [[:Image:Auxil jpg.jpg]], [[:Image:Middlewich-cavalry.gif]], - claimed as promotional fair use, but are used as generic illustrations of the historical subjects in question rather than to illustrate the specific organization (a historical society) that the images promote. (It is possible that they may grant permission if asked nicely...see [[WP:BRP]].) [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 19:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
***Could do with a hand on that [[User:Neddyseagoon|Neddyseagoon]] 20:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)neddyseagoon
****I've sent an email requesting permission; I'll post here if/when they respond. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 21:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also by same user: [[:Image:Henryhowardtombcoronet.jpg]], [[:Image:Henryhowardtomb.jpg]], [[:Image:Framlingham1church.jpg]], [[:Image:4thDukeWivesTombFramlingham.jpg]], [[:Image:3rdDukeTombFramlingham.jpg]], [[:Image:PLAN2CROMANDOVER.gif]], [[:Image:ROMANHARBOURDOVER.gif]], [[:Image:Img roman dover.gif]] - claimed without evidence as PD [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 19:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also by same user: [[:Image:Doverromanpaintedhouse1.jpg]], [[:Image:Janus quadrifons.jpg]], [[:Image:Caesarion BBC.jpg]], [[:Image:Biber on display.jpg]], [[:Image:Biber at sea.jpg]], [[:Image:Flaxman gallery.jpg]], [[:Image:AH6311.jpg]], [[:Image:Celestahelmet.jpg]], [[:Image:Sallet.jpg]], [[:Image:Capeline.jpg]], [[:Image:Walmeraerial.jpg]], [[:Image:Walmergardens.jpg]], [[:Image:WalmerCaesar.gif]], [[:Image:Cassius.jpg]] - claimed as promotional but used as generic illustrations of the object in question rather than to illustrate the specific organization/product the image is promoting, hence not fair use. (And in many cases are photos that Wikipedians could easily take themselves. A couple are historical images that may qualify as fair use on other grounds.) 19:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also by same user: [[:Image:S giorgio2.jpg]], [[:Image:2c3969a341ca75e7385706f898edd9b105fcd75e.jpg]], [[:Image:Smfirstholland.jpg]], - claimed PD-old, but no evidence of age (no date, no author, ...) [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 19:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also by same user: [[:Image:GuidoOctavius.jpg]], [[:Image:MalvolioGuido.jpg]] - no evidence of copyrightedfreeuse [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 19:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also by same user: [[:Image:MainGuido.jpg]] - claimed promotional, but apparently taken from a photographer's web site and used to illustrate the ''subject'' of the photo (an actor) rather than e.g. the photographer in question. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 19:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
***All entirely justified I can be a klutz sometimes re pictures - please delete them all and notify me what articles each linked to in my talk area, and I'll find a photo that I've taken myself to replace it. Simpler that way than to revise case by case. [[User:Neddyseagoon|Neddyseagoon]] 20:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)neddyseagoon
*[[:Image:Motorway Hungary.jpg]] - Is there any proof that Hungary releases its works into the PD? I think there's a reason we don't have a {{[[Template:PD-HungaryGov|PD-HungaryGov]]}} tag. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 23:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
**The uploader has since clarified: "According to Hungarian Copyright Act No. 76 of 1999, Paragraph 1§(4), laws, other means of regulation of the Hungarian State, etc., standards, made compulsory by law, etc., are not protected." I found [http://www.hpo.hu/jogforras/9976.html this copy] online, but of course it's in Hungarian, so I asked one or two people from [[:Category:User hu]] to stop by and help translate the relevant bits. —[[User:Simetrical|Simetrical]] ([[User talk:Simetrical|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Simetrical|contribs]]) 21:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*** The 4th point of [http://www.hpo.hu/jogforras/shlaw.html?9976:1pC the first paragraph] says (roughly translated) that "Not protected by the [copyright] law are the legislations, other instruments of state control, court and authority decrees, authority or other official notices and files, as wellas legislationally mandatory standards and other related resolutions." Considering the image is a standardized sign, this might apply. Hope that helped. // [[User:Gargaj|Gargaj]] 21:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*** Yes, it does mention "official notices/announcements". As Gargaj said, as a this is a standardized sign this might apply. --[[User:Zoz|Zoz]] ''[[User_talk:Zoz|(t)]]'' 21:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
****Thanks, Simetrical, for your civilised action. Rory096 was a bit rude when adding tags like ''"the image will be deleted seven days after this template was added"'' The present tag looks better. --[[User:KIDB|KIDB]] 06:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
===16 May===
*[[:Image:Pokémon Minun Icon.jpg]] - Derivative of [[:Image:Minun in pokedex.jpg]]. I speedied this once, but the user reupped it, insisting that his/her modifications made it okay. Can someone please clear things up for this user? - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 05:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
**'''Delete''' even if he drew the character from scratch it would still be a copyvio (these characters are all copyrighted, there is a reason people are not simply setting up shop drawing and printing theyr own pokemon trading cards (well not openly anyway)), the fact that this use is unlikely to provoke a legal action is irrelevant since we do not follow the "we are just fan's please don't sue" mode of operation most fan art sites rely on, but actualy try to get this copyright stuff right. --[[User:Sherool|Sherool]] <span style="font-size:75%">[[User talk:Sherool|(talk)]]</span> 18:24, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Wikiaker.jpg]] - Says "I took a digital image of a picture from an old book. The book is protected by copyright, but only states that the INFORMATION within must not be used elsewhere without special permission. It says nothing about the pictures." Come ON! Of course if it says the information is copyrighted the pics are too. Anyway, things are automatically copyrighted even if it doesn't say anything. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 05:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
** More nonfree images by the same uploader: [[:Image:Tommie aaron 1964.jpg]], [[:Image:Wikiallenh.jpg]] [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 21:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:TS portrait 1 150.jpg]] - This looks like a professional portrait (and has "portrait" in the name!), I doubt he created it. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 05:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Nobuo Uematsu Woolen Jumper.jpg]] - Doubtful that it's NoRightsReserved; the source doesn't give any indication of it. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 05:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
**[[:Image:NOAC 2006 Art Work.jpg]] too, if it doesn't get speedied. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 05:50, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
***Err, I meant [[:Image:120px-Nobuo Uematsu.jpg ]] and [[:Image:Seishi Kishimoto.jpg]], though that one is probably a cv too. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/US government portraits}}
===18 May===
*[[:Image:Sun_crusher.GIF]] - Image was on unknown status but is from Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels [[User:Schnauf|Schnauf]] 00:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Beaven.jpg]] - Image claimed as PD self however it looks like it was copied from some website. Also, a comment on the image's discussion page indicates the subject of the picture is a different building than what it claims - no likely a mistake like this would exist if the uploader was the photographer. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 01:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Panorama1.jpg]] - same uploader as above image. I doubt this was self taken since it has an arial view, and this user has a notorious copyright history. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 01:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
**Also [[:Image:Current right.jpg]], claimed PD-self but obviously copied from http://www.gonzaga.org/
*[[:Image:FilipinoEthnicGroups.JPG]] and [[:Image:Phdiversity.JPG]] - a photo collage for which the listed sources are "Wikimedia Uploaded Pictures or Online Forums." Some of these are very likely copyvios. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 05:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
**"Korean (Sandara Park) - from a forum thread - therefore may be considered a free source." Clearly not free. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 07:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jessica Boehrs in Eurotrip.jpg]] and [[:Image:004EUT Jessica Boehrs 017.jpg]] - Fair use rationale is "for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents," BUT they're used on Jessica Böhrs' article. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 05:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Uday hussein.jpg]] - "US Central Command photo , link: http://www.centcom.mil/Operations/Iraqi%20Freedom/playing_cards.pdf ''[doesn't work]''. Photos are not PD just because they were ''published'' be the US government. / [[User:Fred chessplayer|Fred]]-[[User_talk:Fred chessplayer|Chess]] 11:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
**Archived versions of the source PDF is available at the [[Internet Archive]] at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.centcom.mil/Operations/Iraqi%20Freedom/playing_cards.pdf for what that's worth. Doesn't prove that the image is a work of the US government though. --[[User:Sherool|Sherool]] <span style="font-size:75%">[[User talk:Sherool|(talk)]]</span> 21:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Barbara Bush.jpg]], [[:Image:Betty Ford.gif]], [[:Image:Elizabeth Truman.gif]], [[:Image:Hillary WHportrait.jpg]], [[:Image:Lady Bird Johnson.gif]], [[:Image:Mamie eisenhower.gif]], [[:Image:Pat nixon.jpg]] - as noted above, paintings of government officials are unlikely to have been painted by government employees and are therefore ''not'' in the public ___domain (at least, not for paintings since 1923). A fair-use rationale is unclear here, since we can probably find official government photos (which ''are'' in the public ___domain, assuming they were taken by a staff photographer) of the subjects. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 23:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*As I have said previously, these are PD, and I will revert the tags. --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 21:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:0waldo-ceiling-1.jpg]] The copyright notice is pretty unclear on this one, and I am not sure it meets the guidelines for inclusion. The same notice seems to have been addded to all images uploaded by this user [[User:67.99.198.2|67.99.198.2]] 00:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Tray Card BW photo.jpg]] - unlikely that it's {{[[Template:NoRightsReserved|NoRightsReserved]]}} if it's from a press kit. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 04:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
**[[:Image:Tray Card BW Photo.jpg]], [[:Image:ATSpring.jpg]] and [[:Image:Cover only-2.jpg]] too. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 04:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Keenan.jpg]] - Clearly violates [http://www.legendsofhockey.net/html/copyright.htm the source's copyright page], this isn't CC. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 06:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
**Just wanted to report the same thing. Almost all of the uploader's contributions are copyvios so it is natural to assume that this one is. I am watching the user and will block him if he continues. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 15:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Anshan.jpg]] - copyrighted google earth image. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 06:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Childwithdimples.jpg]] Uploader claims GFDL, but did not reply to request made several months ago on his/her user talk page to provide evidence that s/he has the right to do so. Image is easily found with a google image search, so it's rather suspect. --[[User:Icarus3|Icarus]] 07:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
**[[:Image:Village.chapel.1866.jpg]] too. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 07:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
***And [[:Image:Great Neck South High School.jpg]] and maybe even [[:Image:Teddybear.jpg]], as all of his [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=upload&user=Oahc&page= uploads] are suspect. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 07:42, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
===19 May===
*[[:Image:MullaSadra.jpg]] — I placed a "no source" tag on this, and seven days later deleted it. It's now been re-uploaded, with a source that's merely a Web page that uses it with no indication as to copyright status. The up-loader claims that it's out of copyright because it's older than a century, but there's no evidence for this (and it doesn't look anything like that old). --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 11:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:0waldo.zombie.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo-rendering-1.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.selfportrait-1.gif]], [[:Image:0waldo.jimbo-workandwrite.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.screensaver-1.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo-rolling.gif]], [[:Image:0waldo.me.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.Munchovie.jpg]],[[:Image:0waldo.3dt359.offset.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.HOGenerator.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.screensaver-2.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.porsche930-1.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.3dt359.jpg]], [[:Image:0waldo.85slantnose.jpg]] - amateur license terms whose meaning is unclear, especially "Use is not transferable", all uploaded by [[User:0waldo]] [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 16:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*:Delete them all. He's refused to clarify what he means by "use is not transferable". --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 17:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
delete them all? you are too dumbo the clown not to understand "use is not transferable" sso you delee them? it's the same olf sixez and sevens around herre! persecute 0waldo and all he does. refused to clarify what? not transferrable? it's like asking you to clairfy what Carnildo means! some type of carnival/dildhoe or something like that? clarify what? that you don't understand what I mean!? NO THE ANSWER IS "p-e-r-s-e-c-u-t-e W-a-l-d-o" OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER. [[User:0waldo|0waldo]] 19:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
::0waldo, please stop. You're not helping the situation. Nobody is out to get you and the constant point-making that they are, is not helping and is counterproductive. — <font colour="navy"><b>[[User:nathanrdotcom|Natha]][[User:ILovePlankton/My loyalties to my friends|<font color="#336666">n</font>]] <sup>(Got something to say? [[User talk:nathanrdotcom|Say it]].)</sup></b></font> 01:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
::Huh? English please. Also, if the "use is not transferable" then the images can't be used on wikipedia. Images here MUST be transferable to other projects... even commercial for-profit uses. There is a plan to sell a paper dictionary after all. So either releace the photos under GFDL or PD... ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]] ([[User_talk:J.smith|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|c]]) 20:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
:::Or, if you want, you can license the images under an acceptable Creative Commons license. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 21:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:L1912678.jpg]] - claims norightsreserved but I see no evidence of that, and highly doubt it considering its copied from a website. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 02:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
===20 May===
*[[:Image:Eisenhower's Uncle.jpg]] - photograph of a copyrighted newspaper claiming to be pd. This is no more PD because the uploader took the photograph than me being allowed to take photographs of every page of a book and selling it as PD. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 17:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:AcdcAngusyoung.jpg]] - claimed as gfdl-self. I doubt this is the case given the subject, proximity, and quality of the photograph, as well as this users history of neglecting copyright. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 19:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Marbled cat.gif]] tagged as PD without sufficient rationale or source. Tagged subsequently as speedy delete, but not a speedy candidate. Thus, I bring it to you folks. [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 19:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
*All of the images in [[:Category:Soccer-europe images]], except those uploaded by [[User:Soccer-europe.com]]. This user has released the copyright to some of his images, however, other people have uploaded additional images and used the {{tl|SocEur}} tag. He has said that some, but not all, of these additional images fall under the free use license. Per the user's request, the images he identified as copyright violations have been deleted. As it stands, he states that he will "probably" identify more images that are not actually released from copyright. This is not acceptable since he can basically revoke the license to any of the images at any time he wants. I propose that all of the images uploaded by User:Soccer-europe.com be changed to <nowiki>{{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|http://soccer-europe.com is credited}}</nowiki> and the remainder (those uploaded by other users) be deleted. -[[User:SCEhardt|<font color="blue">SCEhard</font>]][[User talk:SCEhardt|<font color="#3D9140"><b>T</b></font>]] 21:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
===21 May===
*[[:Image:RUC-FALLS-ROAD.jpg]] - tv screenshot that does not qualify for fair use. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 02:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
**This is a TV image from BBC TV. The TV image is available online [http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1630000/images/_1630688_300rucfallsroad.jpg here]. Why doesnt it qualify? [[User:Fluffy999|Fluffy999]] 03:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
***See counterexample #5 from [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 03:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
****Thanks, I read the conditions of #5. The article being illustrated is the [[Falls Road]], the base happened to be near the top of it- a feature of the area and skyline. It isnt an iconic image from the area- the bobby sands mural image is most commonly used as a motif for the area. ImageGoogle "Falls Road" and you get a bunch of murals. Its not newsworthy because the base itself no longer exists- it was demolished around 2 years ago. It is low resolution. Are you still going to reject the image? [[User:Fluffy999|Fluffy999]] 03:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
****Hi, left a message on your talk asking if you can set out your reasoning point by point for rejecting it on those counts. Thanks! [[User:Fluffy999|Fluffy999]] 04:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
*****It's an exact example of of what does not qualify as fair use as I stated above. There is no reasoning to spell out. The image will remained listed here for 14 days at which point an administrator will make a decision as to the image's status. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 04:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
******No need to be un[[civil]] about it. Was just hoping for an expansion of your reasoning. I will look for another image of the road in the meantime. Be well. [[User:Fluffy999|Fluffy999]] 04:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
:*The reason a fair use image cannot be used in this article is that a free alternative is avaialble. Any Wikipedia near that ___location can easily photograph it an release it under a free license. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Fm0.jpg]] and [[:Image:Qfm.jpg]] both copied from some website. Claimed as copyrighted-attribution but I see no evidence to support this. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 04:45, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
**See "http://queen.musichall.cz/index_en.php?s=df&topicid=160&idshift=0&st=2" for permission the site owner clearly states he has NO copyrights. (photo page[http://queen.musichall.cz/index_en.php?s=ob&d=freddie]). - [[User:Mtmtmt|Mtmtmt]] 04:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
***The site owner says, "I don't have any copyrights on the photos." Which seems to imply that someone else has the copyright. Who took the original photos? --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 16:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
**** I agree with Hetar. It doesn't say that the author "irrevocably released all rights". Just that he doesn't has any copyrights. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User_talk:Garion96|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
: See also [[:Image:Qjdbmfmrt.jpg]]. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User_talk:Garion96|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 13:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:AIverson.jpg]] - Current copyright tag claims that it is a promotional photo, but it clearly is not. The given source for this is photostore.nba.com. That site says quite explicitly that: ''Copyright 2006 NBA Media Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved. No portion of NBA.com may be duplicated, redistributed or manipulated in any form.'' Images from photostore.nba.com are for sale commercially. They are '''''not''''' promotional photos. User who uploaded has a history of not tagging or mis-tagging images. [[User:Mwelch|Mwelch]] 11:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
==Listings==
:''New images should be listed in this section, under today's date. Please be sure to tag the image with an appropriate PUI tag, and notify the uploader.
===22 May===
*[[:Image:Alfred Spiro Moisiu.jpg]] ([[Alfred Moisiu]]), uploader claims that this 2003 United Nations photo is PD but [http://www.un.org/av/photo/contactus.htm www.un.org] claims that photos can only be used for editorial purposes. No commercial use. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 11:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Clinton.jpg]], [[:Image:Fordportrait.gif]] - As noted [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/US government portraits|here]], official paintings are commissioned works, and since they are not the work of a federal government employee, they are not public ___domain. A fair use rationale is unnecessary as photographs taken by government hired photographers already exist.--[[User:Jiang|Jiang]] 17:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
**'''Disgree''' You're wrong on this issue. Rather than wrecking havoc, why don't you start a new topic at the village pump and get some clarity on the issue. --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 18:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
***There are plenty of PD photos of Clinton and Ford that can be used instead. This topic is discussed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/US government portraits]]. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 14:34, 23 May 2006
***It's quite clear from the text of the Copyright Act that paintings ''commissioned'' by the federal government are not public ___domain, as spelled out in the link Jiang points to above. Evrik continues to dispute this without presenting a coherent and logical argument for his lone position, let alone substantively responding to anyone else's comments. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 13:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
***Evrik, in order for anyone to take you seriously, you have to demonstrate that you ''understand'' and can ''rebut'' the arguments for why commissioned ''paintings'' are ot PD-gov. Thus far, this hasn't happened, and the arguments on the other side are persuasive (I won't repeat them). It looks, unfortunately, like these images need to be deleted (unless we can get permission from the painter). [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 16:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
**Steve -I understand the arguments. The crux of the issue is this - when the paintings are commissioned, it is with the understanding that this is going to be a gift to the American people (and into the public ___domain). The artists know this when they are commissioned to do the work. This understanding is so ingrained in the process, that trying to find something that clearly states this online has been difficult. Sadly, it's much easier to misquote a small section of the law and misapply it to these paintings. I have made some queries about this, but have not received anything concrete yet. It is frustrating that no one who is an expert in the arae has been brought into the debate, just a few armchair attorneys. I am also amazed that two or three users, with limited knowledge of the law are going to try and force such a broad change. Since many of these same issues have been posted to the commons, it would seem to me that we need someone who is an expert and an authority. --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 17:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
***Evrik, ''how'' do you know this? Have you seen it in writing? "Understanding" is not the way copyright law works...copyright law ''requires'' that transfer of copyright be made ''in writing''. (§204: "transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing") You haven't provided ''any'' evidence to back up your arguments—bald assertions are not persuasive. (Can you give an example of someone who has "misquoted" the law?) Wikipedia has to be conservative and assume every image is copyrighted and unusable (except by fair use) unless we have ''explicit'' evidence to the contrary. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 04:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*As I have said elsewhere, I spoke to the curator at the White House. Now please stop your wanton vandalism of all the portraits. --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 21:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Shaqheat.jpg]] - This would appear to be the source: [http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=51103838&cdi=0] The notes at the bottom seem to contradict the claim that this is a released promotional photo. [[User:Mwelch|Mwelch]] 18:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Aquilini.jpg]] - copied from canucks.com and claimed as norightsreserved. I can find nothing on the site that releases this image under said license. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 18:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:20050928000024 00.jpg]] - given this articles subject, i doubt it is gfdl-self as the uploader claims. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 23:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
**Is now changed, please verify <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Matchbow|Matchbow]] ([[User talk:Matchbow|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Matchbow|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- [Template:Unsigned] -->
===23 May===
*[[:Image:Cds5.jpg]] - Claimed as pd-self but obviously contains several copyrighted images. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 00:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
**Everything [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Meero01 here], too. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 06:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Devyani.jpg]] - tagged GFDL-self, but summary indicates "modified by" uploader; evidently taken by someone else (it appears to be a newspaper photograph--see [http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/nepal.htm]). [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 03:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:25 1.jpg]] - image found on ebay. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 03:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Feb12005.gif]] - tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} without explanation of why that might be the case. Nepalese government photographs (or TV broadcasts, in this case) do not I believe have free licenses. [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 03:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jhonen rikki jamaica.jpg]] - uploader admits author is unknown. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 04:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Denis Dyack.jpg]] - Uploader found the picutre on a [http://users.ign.com/about/DenisDyack?boards=ign forum] and claims {{[[Template:NoRightsReserved|NoRightsReserved]]}}, though no evidence of that. It is very likely that the image is copyrighted. [[User:Winhunter|Hunter]] 06:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:IRIX 6.5.6 Desktop.jpg]] - claims GFDL-self, but is a screenshot of copyrighted software, copied from [http://www.irisindigo.com/index.php/Image:Snap6.jpg] - [[User:Qwertyus|Qwertyus]] 11:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Marilyn Manson.jpg]] Claiimed PD-Self, but it is very doubtful. User has been warned for copyright problems and vandalism before. --[[User:PS2pcGAMER|PS2pcGAMER]] ([[User talk:PS2pcGAMER|talk]]) 00:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
===24 May===
*[[:Image:Vista-aerea.jpg]], a photo of [[Universidad del Valle (Colombia)|Universidad del Valle]] from above. Uploader claims "NoRightsReserved" but the university web page [http://www.univalle.edu.co/tour/sld002.html www.univalle.edu.co] claims "©1994-2004". [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 12:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Hooverphonic.jpg]] is tagged [[Template:NoRightsReserved]] but the source is unclear.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 13:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jimmy Blanton.jpg]]. Tagged {{tl|PD}} by uploader. Can't possibly have fallen out of copyright as a pre-1923 image as the subject in the image looks maybe 18 or 20 and was born in 1919. No source provided either. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 14:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Calloways.jpg]]. Tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but looks like a promophoto. Can't find the source, and uploader provided none. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 14:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Ghwbush.jpg]],[[:Image:HRC.jpg]],[[:Image:Lyndon B. Johnson - portrait.gif]],[[:Image:Hhover.gif]],[[:Image:Grace Coolidge.gif]] - as described [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/US government portraits|here]], paintings are not made by US gov. employees and therefore not generally PD. Fair use is dubious since there are probably photos in the public ___domain, and the articles are not about the painting or artist per se. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 21:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
**As I said [[Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/US_government_portraits#Starting_all_over|here]], I spoke to Bill Alman, the White House curator, who said the following. "Generally, the portraits are property of the federal government and are in the public ___domain. In the case of the White House portraits, the photograph of the portrait may have copyright restrictions, but that it should be generally okay to use the images as long as the publisher of the electronic image is credited." These images are in the public ___domain, and have been inappropriately listed. As such, I am going to remove the PUI tags. Is there a copyright attorney in the house? --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 21:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
***Evrik, you do not have authority to unilaterally remove PUI tags while the issue is still under dispute. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 21:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
****The instructions at the top of this page say that PD images can be removed. These are all PD. --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 21:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*****But PD itself is disputed, and you've been reminded of this before. The purpose of this page is not to tag images for deletion; it is for promoting discussion on the status of an image. --[[User:Jiang|Jiang]] 03:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
===25 May===
*[[:Image:GricelMamery1.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|PD-self}} by uploader, but in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gricel mamery|AfD for the article which uses the image]], he stated "the image is a scan from a weekly magazine this current issue is out of regulation and is about 7 years old". I suspect the uploader, who is not a native English speaker, considers the ''scan'' of the magazine photo the work of which he is a creator. The image has been challenged on the AfD page as well. --[[User:MCB|MCB]] 02:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Teen Photo.jpg]], [[:Image:008400 e 1.jpg]] - both photos are improperly tagged, and the first one wouldn't even qualify for fair use if it was tagged as such. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 02:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Anab.JPG]] - after apply the nsd tag several times I was finally able to convince the uploader to provide the source (a screen capture from an A&E biography). With this as the source I don't think we can assume PD, nor does it qualify for fair use. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 04:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Bb5house.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it came from a website. No evidence of rights being released. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:05HMS.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it came from a website. No evidence of rights being released. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Diaryroom.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it came from a website. No evidence of rights being released. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Houseplan bb4.JPG]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it came from a website. No evidence of rights being released. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Housemates.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it came from a website. No evidence of rights being released. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:03houseplan.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it came from a website. No evidence of rights being released. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Bb02.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader said it was press/promo material from a website.. perhaps improperly tagged. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 14:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Sagar1.jpg]] [[:Image:Guntur-sitanagaram.jpg]] [[:Image:Koti1.jpg]] [[:Image:Amaravathi.jpg]] [[:Image:Mangalagiri1.jpg]] [[:Image:Sarovar2.jpg]] [[:Image:Vnagar.jpg]] - all uploaded by the same user with norightsreserved or copyrightedfreeuse. Some of the images even state in the text summmary that all rights are reserved. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 15:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:06gina.jpg]] was tagged {{tl|NoRightsReserved}} but uploader comment was "Forum image from www.behindbigbrother.com - poster unknown" -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 20:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Parokya.jpg]] - no evidence of 'no rights reserved' -[[User:SCEhardt|<font color="blue">SCEhard</font>]][[User talk:SCEhardt|<font color="#3D9140"><b>T</b></font>]] 21:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Dubaimall.jpg]] - uploader is claiming no rights reserved, after being questioned about the source they then claimed that the owner gave permission to use on Wikipedia, however this still doesn't prove no rights reserved, and is insufficient permission for use anyways as all images should be licensed under the GFDL or a simillar free license (not just specific permission granted to WP) --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 22:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
**Uploader has now provided a link to the email giving permission, but the tag does not match the permission given, and we need permission for the picture to be used on other places besides Wikipedia (we do distribute our content to other places btw). --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 23:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
***Email granting permission is relevant --[[User:Jibran1|Jibran1]] 02:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
***A fair-use tag has been added. A fair-use rationale has also been added. --[[User:Jibran1|Jibran1]] 14:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Cyprus Treasure.jpg]] - image copied from [http://www.hp.uab.edu/image_archive/ebyzantine/silver01.jpg], uploader is claiming GFDL although I see no evidence of this. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 23:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
**and [[:Image:Karavas Pente Mili Beach.jpg]] which has been copied from a book/website and which the uploader claims has been released under two separate licenses. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 23:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
===26 May===
*[[:Image:Shapefile.jpg]] - It's a screenshot, unlikely to be PD, as taking a screenshot is not nearly creative enough to gain the copyright. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 04:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Drawball may26.jpg]] - Screenshot of copyrighted website tagged as GFDL, not {{[[Template:web-screenshot|web-screenshot]]}}. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 17:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
:Well fix it then, I don't mind [[User:Comradeash|Comradeash]] 02:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Tabu3.jpg]] - copied from a website, claims no rights reserved but no evidence give to support. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 18:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Eloy Palacios .jpg]] - claims picture is a book cover, which it is obviously not. Uploader has a long history of ignoring copyright. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 20:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Fadlallah2.jpg]] - copied from a geocities website and claiming no rights reserved with no evidence of permission. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 20:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:MAN NL 262 & 263.jpg]] - copied from www.gakei.com and claiming no rights reserved with no evidence of permission. Uploader notified.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 15:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
**See also: [[:Image:Double decker ferry.jpg]], [[:Image:Citybus Cityflyer 1566 A10.JPG]], [[:Image:KMB Dennis Pointer SLF GU719.jpg]] [[:Image:KMB Dennis Jubilant CH7035.jpg]], [[:Image:Long Win Single decker bus no. 908.jpg]], and over 20 other images uploaded by [[User:JulianChan|JulianChan]] --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 18:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
***I just inspected the images uploaded by [[User:JulianChan|JulianChan]]. All of them are claimed to be copyrighted with free use, but there has been no evidence of copyright perimssion from the source web sites. I have reported this uploader to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:JulianChan uploading copyrighted images with false licenses]] for any admin's attention.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 13:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Alqusairchurch.jpg]] - from http://weekly.ahram.org.eg and claiming GFDL but the source web site says "© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved". Uploader notified.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 15:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
**The uploader just removed the dispute template claimed: "I gave this pic to Al Ahram for there article about Christianity in Karbala, and they posteded in (I believe) 2005. I got the pic from a friend in [[Ankawa]]." Is it acceptable or sufficient? I just asked the uploader to explain who exactly took the picture.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 12:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
===27 May===
*[[:Image:CyberKids2.jpg]] - Uploader is not the photographer, which contradicts the info stated in the licensing section. See [http://www.dontstayin.com/uk/leicester/the-emporium/2006/feb/25/photo-1664254] for image source. -- [[User:Mushin|Mushin]][[User talk:Mushin|<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Carl Anderson.jpg]] - Uploader has a history of uploading images where there is no real permission to license them under the GFDL. No good reason to think this is a GFDL image.
[[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 17:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
**Correct tag added. Sorry, I'm new and still learning. [[User:Briancua|Briancua]] 20:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Bryan green.jpg]] - not suitable because use only granted for non commercial purposes. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 18:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jim Bacon.JPG]] - tagged with {{tl|Parliament of Australia}} but uploader said it came from "TAS Parliament Archives" which is not the same thing. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 18:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Christine Milne.jpeg]] - tagged with {{tl|fairuse}} - obsolete tag - image was copied from a website. i've replaced with a better substitute anyway [[:Image:SenatorChristineMilne.jpg]] -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 18:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Douglas engelbart.jpg]] - Reason: i unfortunately can't read Russian, but i don't see a Creative Commons logo anywhere on the source URL, it simply seems to be a collection of collected photos from Google Images. [[Image:Huskyeye.jpg]] <span style="letter-spacing:1px;">[[User:Husky|Husky]]</span> <sup><small>([[User_talk:Husky|talk page]])</small></sup> 21:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
**Their copyright notice states (roughly translated): "This is a non-commercial project, all photos come from open sources." This doesn't help very much ... - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 09:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*** FYI: the uploader has a history of uploading images without much or dubious information. See [[User talk:Thief12]]. [[Image:Huskyeye.jpg]] <span style="letter-spacing:1px;">[[User:Husky|Husky]]</span> <sup><small>([[User_talk:Husky|talk page]])</small></sup> 19:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
===28 May===
*[[:Image:Shawn angela3.jpg]] - uploader tag it with <nowiki>{{PD-self}}</nowiki>, but the image appears to be a screenshot from the TV show [[Boy Meets World]], so that's very unlikely.--[[User:Dp462090|<b><tt><span style="color: blue">''ᎠᏢ''</span></tt></b>]][[user:Dp462090/Esperanza|<span style="color: green"><b><u>4</u></b></span>]][[User_talk:Dp462090|<span style="color: red"><tt><b>62090</b></tt></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dp462090|<span style="color: blue"><sup>Contribs</sup></span>]] 03:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Oldlibrary1.jpg]] and [[:Image:Oldlibrary2.jpg]] - From [http://www.mamaronecklibrary.org/history.html], used in [[Mamaroneck Public Library]]. Marked as {{tl|no rights reserved}}; I was unable to verify that at the site. The photos were taken "circa 1927", so they may be in public ___domain. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 09:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:NurulArtis.jpg]] - Claimed no rights reserved but the [http://www.suria.sg source website] claims "Copyright... All Rights Reserved. Uploader [[User:Coolkid13]] has been notified.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 14:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Shobhana.jpg]] - User tagged it under GFDL, but that claim is dubious. User has a history of uploading unsourced images, and this appears to be a copyrighted news/publicity photo. [[User:Harishmukundan]] has been notified. --[[user:Cholmes75|cholmes75]] ([[User talk:Cholmes75|chit chat]]) 16:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Abynes.jpg]] - Image page claims that the copyright holder has released all rights, but it is unlikely that the source page listed even owns the rights in the first place. [[User:6RUMPY]] has been notified. --[[user:Cholmes75|cholmes75]] ([[User talk:Cholmes75|chit chat]]) 18:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Corey sevier.jpg]] - Tagged as a screenshot, but it looks more like a publicity photo of some sort. [[User:Servebot 1]] has been notified. --[[user:Cholmes75|cholmes75]] ([[User talk:Cholmes75|chit chat]]) 18:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jsimpson.jpg]] - Tagged as a magazine cover but image does not show any part of the magazine and it is violating "It is not acceptable to use images with this tag in the article of the person or persons depicted on the cover, unless used directly in connection with the publication of this image". -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 21:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
===29 May===
*[[:Image:Gsm3.jpg]] - claims it is a personal photo, but then tagged as fair use. Because of the extremely small resoltuion, I doubt the uploader owns the copyright to this. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 06:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Stridsbat90h.jpg]] - not PD.
*[[:Image:MabuiagIsland.jpg]] - no reason given for "no rights reserved" -[[User:SCEhardt|<font color="blue">SCEhard</font>]][[User talk:SCEhardt|<font color="#3D9140"><b>T</b></font>]] 11:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jeffstover2.jpg]] - says that it is taken from sportsattic.com, but gives no indication that permission has been obtained or that the image is public ___domain. -- [[User:Kjkolb|Kjkolb]] 15:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:1st Airborne Brigade jump.jpg]] - Nothing on the site appears to indicate that they have released all rights. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
===30 May===
*[[:Image:Michel Aoun.jpeg]] taken from [http://www.tayyar.org] which is actually a news portal. Claims no rights reserved but no evidence given to support. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 05:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Al Licence.jpg]] - Taken from ''Alabama'' DMV site, not the US government's, so {{[[Template:PD-USGov|PD-USGov]]}} can't apply. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 08:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
**And [[:Image:Ak Licence.JPG]] --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 08:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
***And [[:Image:Ca Licence.JPG]], [[:Image:Ct Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:DC Licence.jpg]], [[:Image:FL Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Ga Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Hi Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Il Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:KS Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Ky Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Mn Drivers License.jpg]], [[:Image:Ms Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Ne Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Nv Driver License.gif]], [[:Image:Nj Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Nm Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:License-censored.jpg]], [[:Image:ND C Front.jpg]], [[:Image:Oh Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Or Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:Ri Driver License.jpg]], [[:Image:WI Driver License.jpg]] and [[:Image:Wy Driver License.jpg]], each from their respective states' DMVs. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 08:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
****'''''Agree But am Willing to Fix''''' Ok, so [[Template:PD-USGov|PD-USGov]] can't be used on state images, but it's still Public Domain as a work of the state. What license do you reccomend? [[User:Jesteranimefan|Steve J]] 15:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*****Works of US states are '''''not''''' automatically public ___domain. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
******Hmmm.... I thought I read somewhere that works of New York are public ___domain.... well all right. I withdraw my objection to my file being deleted as I have run out of ideas for licening. [[User:Jesteranimefan|Steve J]] 01:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:RushmoreLogo.jpg]] - claimed to be all rights released. Doubtful, as logo of a record label est. 2004. --[[User:HarryCane|HarryCane]] 08:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Closeup of an blue-green human eye.jpeg]], not ''allows anyone to use it for any purpose'', but apparently permissive enough for wikipedia. Isn't there a standard policy for [[Stock.xchng]]? --[[User:Marc Lacoste|Marc Lacoste]] 14:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
**That image is on Commons, not Wikipedia. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 17:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jeffschool.jpg]] - copied from a website and claimed as no rights reserved. No evidence given to show rights released as such. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 18:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:1ACX13.jpg]] [[:Image:1ACX08.jpg]] [[:Image:1ACX01 1.jpg]] [[:Image:1ACX01 5.jpg]] [[:Image:1ACX15.jpg]] - They're [[Family Guy]] screenshots, no way are they NoRightsReserved. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
**[[:Image:2ACX01.jpg]] [[:Image:2ACX04.jpg]] [[:Image:2ACX08.jpg]] [[:Image:2ACX10.jpg]] [[:Image:2ACX15.jpg]] [[:Image:2ACX16.jpg]] too. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:1708.jpg]] - Screenshot of [[Yes, Dear]]. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:2f9560312e404fe.jpg]] - Nothing on source website to indicate that all rights are released (indeed the opposite). --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 18:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:36lb-Halibut-Ryan.jpg]] - Nothing on source website to indicate that all rights are released. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
**[[:Image:400px-36lb-Halibut-Ryan.jpg]] - Duplicate of the above. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:384990.jpg]] - Image desc says rights ''are'' reserved. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:611c6d5a.png]] - Most is OK, but contains a copyrighted image, making the whole thing a copyvio. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:8 crazy nights.jpg]] - Film screenshot, can't be free. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:AI001.jpg]] - Only has permission to use on Wikipedia, not {{[[Template:NoRightsReserved|NoRightsReserved]]}}. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:AIR Mirage 4000 Screenshot lg.jpg]] - Just because it's displayed on a website doesn't mean all rights are released! --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:ASILogo.gif]] - Source site says all rights are reserved. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:ASX-Ext.jpg]] - Nothing on source site to indicate that any rights are released. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Ab-ms-star-en.png]] - Nothing on source site to indicate that any rights are released. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Acar.jpg]] - Highly unlikely that NFL.com released the rights to this image. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 19:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Andriy Shevchenko Champions League 2004 flag.jpg]] - by Ukrainian copyright laws, I don't believe that photos are free. "News" section refers to text, not to photo without information about the author. --[[User:Tbonefin|Tbonefin]] 20:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:HMS Vanguard (1909)a.gif]] & [[:Image:HMS Queen.jpg]] say the source says they're public ___domain, but I can't find any such claim on [http://www.gwpda.org/naval/pg000000.htm]; both have a "courtesy X" notice by them. [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 23:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
:*The article states that HMS Vanguard sank in 1917, so as a pre-1923 photograph it has fallen out of copyright. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 03:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
:*HMS Queen, the article states was broken up in 1921. Pre-1923 photograph, too. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]]
::The age of the ''photograph'' doesn't matter, it's the date of ''publication''... which we don't know and have no source for. [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 13:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
:::Right. However, [[:Image:HMS Vanguard (1909)a.gif]] is probably OK. "Rotary Photo, EC" was a British postcard publishing company ([http://www.google.com/search?q=%2B%22Rotary+photo%2C+ec%22], [http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Marina/8163/publ.htm]), and according to [http://www.gwpda.org/naval/pg000000.htm the source] (it's "Vanguard (battleship)") the image shows the ship shortly after completion which would be 1909/1910. We may thus assume that it was published shortly after 1910, and hence {{tl|PD-US}} would be fine. In the UK, the work might be PD if an anonymous photograph; but if the author is known (might be mentioned on the backside), it would be coyprighted until 70 years after the photographer's death. See [http://www.museumscopyright.org.uk/private.pdf]. Also note that the Naval Historical Center has some [http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/uk/uk-name.htm more images] of that ship, stating they were PD to the best of their knowledge. On [[:Image:HMS Queen.jpg]], I have not found any information (but see [http://www.worldwar1.co.uk/pre-dreadnought/hms-queen.html] for info on the ship.) [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] 09:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
===31 May===
*[[:Image:Locationofwitchtrials.JPG]] Uploader states that this is "off of an old paper [he] found." Tagged as {{tl|newspapercover}}. This application of "fair use" does not pull as it isn't the map that is commented on; the map is used to illustrate the article on [[witch trials]]. Desperately needs sourcing. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 02:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*The map is commented on. The map is of witch trials. It has relevance to the article because it gives a popularly scholarly causal link. This is worthless harrassment on the part of Dr Zak, ignore it. There is no problem with this (very good) image.--[[User:MateoP|MateoP]] 03:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
::*The map is used to illustrate the article. It is not the scholarship in the map that is subject to critical commentary. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 03:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
:::*This is absurd. Every DVD cover, every screenshot, and so forth, is used to illustrate a point about the article. None of those are used to discuss the image themselves. -M
*Yes it is, try actually reading the section that sits right next to it. This is a worthless nomination by someone with a vendetta. Please ignore it. --[[User:MateoP|MateoP]] 04:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Jkrishnamurti.jpg]] - yet another image copied from some website and claimed as no rights reserved with nothing to support it. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 03:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
**User has changed the image to a face cropped from a book cover, I'm not sure if it qualifies for fair use or not. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 04:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
***Hetar, according to the book cover template, low resolution book cover images qualify for ''fair use''. Please see image discussion page at [[Image_talk:Jkrishnamurti.jpg]]. Thanks... -[[User:Scottperry|Scott P.]] 04:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:ArundelMillsCola.jpg]] Uploader provided source [http://www.arundelmillsmall.com/] but tagged image with {{tl|pd}}. -- [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 04:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:PyramidLocation.jpg]] - Aerial photograph tagged {{tl|GFDL}}. No source given, unlikely that the uploader took the picture himself. [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 13:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Levent istanbul.jpg]] No supporting summary that this image is free use as tagged. -[[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] [[User_talk:Nv8200p|talk]] 14:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Nagumo.jpg]] No supporting summary or evidence that this image is free use as tagged while I have visited the source website. [[User talk:MRDA|Uploader notified]].--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 15:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Goujian2.jpg]] Claims PD-China (older than 50 years) but also claims to be from a high school textbook, so very doubtful that it is older than fifty years. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] 19:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
===1 June===
*I dispute the copyright status of all images uploaded by [[User:Danielbd]] on 26 May. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Danielbd They] are all taken from various sports websites and tagged GFDL with no rationale. -[[User:SCEhardt|<font color="blue">SCEhard</font>]][[User talk:SCEhardt|<font color="#3D9140"><b>T</b></font>]] 16:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Ustase1.png]] -- no reason given why this would be in the public ___domain. Almost certainly isn't. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 00:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Thecrucifix1.jpg]] same as above. From a 1940s film, apparantly. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 00:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Forcedconversion1.jpg]] same as above. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 00:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Churchandstate1.jpg]] same as above. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 00:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
**The pictures were taken 60 years ago, and all rights have expired during the Tito era (bacially, all nazi photos during WWII) --[[Image:GrbSrbije.PNG|26px]] [[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 01:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
:::Is there any evidence that all sixty-year old Croatian images are in the PD? Or does it just seem to you like this should be true? [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 02:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
::::Have you lived during the Tito era? Ask your parents, if not. --[[Image:GrbSrbije.PNG|26px]] [[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 04:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
:::::That isn't a licensing assertion. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 18:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
:WWII images from Germany and SFRY. In public ___domain. [[User:SavaSarich|SavaSarich]]
From the Croatian Copyright law:
'''TRAJANJE AUTORSKOGA PRAVA
Članak 83.
''Autorsko imovinsko pravo na fotografsko djelo, na djelo proizvedeno slicnim postupkom i na djelo primijenjene umjetnosti prestaje '''nakon isteka dvadeset pet godina od objave djela'''.''
Translation: Copyright law to a photographic work, or work in similar medium or work of applied art expires 25 years after publication.
So, this pretty much closes the issue. [[User:Maayaa|Maayaa]] 13:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
::If this is true, why don't we have [[Template:PD-Croatia]] here and on Commons? Further, when and where were these images first published? [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 18:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
If the photos were taken 60 years ago they are protected by Croatia's copyright law. There is an English translation of Croatia's 2003 copyright law at [http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-URL_ID=15286&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html unesco.org].
*Article 99: "Copyright shall run for the life of the author and for 70 years after his death, irrespective of the date when the work is lawfully disclosed, unless otherwise provided by this Act."
*Article 101: "Copyright in anonymous works shall run for 70 years after the work is lawfully disclosed. If the author discloses his identity during such period, the term of protection set out in Article 99 of this Act shall apply."
[[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 22:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
===2 June===
*[[:Image:Sky Lopez01.jpg]]: I sincerely doubt that this image is released under the GFDL. It smells like a possible copyvio. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Think out loud]]</sup> 03:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
** The same problem exists with [[:Image:Ashton Moore01.jpg]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Think out loud]]</sup> 13:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
** And with [[:Image:Chasey_Lain01.jpg]] [[User:Dr Zak|Dr Zak]] 15:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
**Also, [[:Image:Pamela 010.jpg]] and [[:Image:Pamela 001.jpg]] are basically the same, but the user tagged [[:Image:Pamela 010.jpg]] with GFDL-self when he gives the source of the [[:Image:Pamela 001.jpg]], which is the ''exact'' same image. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Think out loud]]</sup> 16:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
**The user has just uploaded two more blatant copyvios: [[:Image:Ashton Moore04.jpg]] -- this one has a watermark from the copyright holder -- and [[:Image:Briana Banks02.jpg]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Think out loud]]</sup> 21:19, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Two Yemeni girls.jpg]], [[:Image:Sudanese Arabs.jpg]], [[:Image:Majed Abdullah squatting.jpg]] - which have been copied from various websites and all have bogus and unsupported licenses. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 05:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Palme.castro.jpg]]. Tagged PD with the claim that all photos from Cuba from before 1997 are public ___domain. However, according to [[Wikipedia:Copyright situations by country]], Cuba has a life of author + 70 years as copyright. / [[User:Fred chessplayer|Fred]]-[[User_talk:Fred chessplayer|Chess]] 14:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:RHCP-StadiumArcadiumPromotional.JPG]] Tagged as (C) with copyright holder irrevocably released all rights. No source but believed to be from official record company promotion material and therefore very unlikely that licence is corrent. [[User:80.189.210.177|80.189.210.177]] 16:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Farley's.jpg]] originally taged as a logo, but that obviously doesn't apply as there is much more in the photograph then that. Taken from the Associated Press, so it does not qualify for fair use. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 17:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Post02.jpg]] - claimed as a book cover but it doesn't look like one, has an obvioius watermark. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 18:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Chrispic.jpg]] - claims image isn't copyrighted but then tagged it with norightsreserved. Image source is a fan site, and it is more than likely a copyvio. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 19:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
* [[:Image:Xbox360 controller.jpg]], [[:Image:Xbox360 windows controller.jpg]], [[:Image:Sega exodus2.jpg]] - the first two are copyvios from Amazon.com (I don't think amazon releases their images under the GFDL) and the second one has a contradictory license, a false assumption that the image can't be copyrighted, and is a copyvio. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 20:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[Image talk:English Civil war Battle.jpg]] - copyright holder limits use to one page only - but the copyright tag used is Commons 1.0 which has no such limitations. It's clear from the text that the copyright holder isn't giving Commons 1.0 permission . [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] 20:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[Image talk:Roundheads Cavaliers.jpg]] - copyright holder maintains copyright and wants the uploaded image to carry the holder's copyright. See image article for the uploader's explanation. [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] 20:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
===3 June===
*It appears there were none listed on 3 June. — <small>Jun. 4, '06</small><tt> '''[09:51] <<u class=plainlinks>[{{fullurl:user:freakofnurture}} freak]|[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit§ion=new}} talk]</u>>'''</tt>
===4 June===
*[[:Image:GOOD CHARLOTTE (6).jpg]]. If this image is GFDL, I'll [[eat my shorts]]. — <small>Jun. 4, '06</small><tt> '''[09:49] <<u class=plainlinks>[{{fullurl:user:freakofnurture}} freak]|[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit§ion=new}} talk]</u>>'''</tt>
*[[:Image:Mike malloy.jpg]] is claimed as "the author has granted explict permission to reprint" with no rights reserved, but the [[User:IndridCold|uploader]] has not provided substantial evidence of this.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 13:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:GTA-TERROR.jpg]] - Claims to be a work of the NSA and hence public ___domain. However, the link provided is to the [http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/nst/AfpNews/200606041624131149409453.87/afp New Strait Times], who provide no evidence that this is the case, and claim copyright over all of its own material. [[User:GeeJo|<font style="padding : 0px 1px 1px 1px; border : 1px solid #809EF5; background: #FFFFFF ; color: #99B3FF">GeeJo</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:GeeJo|(t)]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/GeeJo|(c)]]</sub> <small>• 08:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)</small>
*[[:Image:279044533 l.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|NoRightsReserved}}, but source makes no such mentioning. [[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 14:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
**Tag changed and rationale added. [[User:Stumason|<font color = "green">'''Stu'''</font>]] [[User talk:Stumason|<font color = "green"><sup>''’Bout ye!''</sup></font>]] 09:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:489868481 l.jpg]] - uploader claims to have created this image, which seems unlikely. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 15:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:BiancaGonzalez.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|NoRightsReserved}}, but source makes no such mentioning. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 15:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Black Sarong.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|NoRightsReserved}}, but source makes no such mentioning. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 15:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:ChxAlcala.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|CopyrightedFreeUse}}, but source makes no such mentioning. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 15:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:1(1).jpg]] - looks more like a promotional headshot than an user-created public ___domain image. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 16:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Patrice Lumumba PM (2).jpg]]: [[User:Raju1]] tagged this photo of [[Patrice Lumumba]], killed in 1961, as GFDL-self. Since the uploader describes himself as an MBA student in Bangalore I find it unlikely that he took the photo of somebody who lived in Kongo and who has been dead for over 40 years. According to the uploader's talk page there have been several issues with images he has uploaded. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 16:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Pres. Joseph Kasa vubu.jpg]]: [[User:Raju1]] tagged this photo of [[Joseph Kasa Vubu]], dead in 1969, as GFDL-self. Since the uploader describes himself as an MBA student in Bangalore I find it unlikely that he took the photo of somebody who lived in Kongo and who has been dead for almost 40 years. According to the uploader's talk page there have been several issues with images he has uploaded. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 16:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Guebuza .png]]: [[User:Raju1]] tagged this photo of [[Armando Guebuza]], president of Mozambique, as GFDL-self. Since the uploader describes himself as an MBA student in Bangalore I find it unlikely that he took this photo. According to the uploader's talk page there have been several issues with images he has uploaded. [[User:Thuresson|Thuresson]] 16:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Starting forth first edition.jpg]] is the uploader really the license-holder of this book cover, or were they just confused by our licensing menu? [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 18:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:A maybury.jpg]]: Tagged as being released into the public ___domain, but there are 2 problems. 1 - The link points to a different image, and 2 - I am unaware of yahoo.com releasing its images into the public ___domain. In fact, they are likely not even the copyright holder in the first place. --[[user:Cholmes75|cholmes75]] ([[User talk:Cholmes75|chit chat]]) 19:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Moroccan boys.jpg]] - Image has two conflicting licenses. Copied from a website that does not indicate what license if any it is released under. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 02:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Kolakowski.jpg]] - unsupported license, attempts to contact the original photographer for release have been unsuccessful. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 02:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:NussbaumMartha1.jpg]] - claimed as no rights reserved but the source gives no such release information. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 02:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
===5 June===
*[[:Image:Spot25fig2.jpeg]]; [[:Image:40105182 040922 volpi retrato300.jpg]]; [[:Image:Skatingbigrideaulake.jpg]]; [[:Image:Fpgroup.jpg]]; [[:Image:Hifar1 m.jpg]] from [[user:Skaterblo]] all lifted from unfree sources--[[User:Petaholmes|Peta]] 04:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Pope Fire Millen.jpg]] and [[:Image:FireMILLENsaddam.JPG]] - Clear copyvios of the well-known AP photos. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 07:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Sheriff Mark Hackel HeadShot.jpg]] - A county government is not the United States government. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 07:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Toronto SWAT Agent.jpg]], [[:Image:Police in Pickering.jpg]] - Noncommercial only [[User:GeeJo|<font style="padding : 0px 1px 1px 1px; border : 1px solid #809EF5; background: #FFFFFF ; color: #99B3FF">GeeJo</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:GeeJo|(t)]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/GeeJo|(c)]]</sub> <small>• 11:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)</small>
*[[:Image:448562215.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|NoRightsReserved}}, but source does not mention anything to that effect. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 13:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:560308390 l.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|NoRightsReserved}}, but source does not mention anything to that effect. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 13:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:579775297 l.jpg]] - uploader claims {{tl|PD-self}}, but gives artist's homepage as source. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 13:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:KathPaint.jpg]] - claims no rights reserved but comes from a website that clearly notes it is copyrighted and does not mention any form of release. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 19:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Trektravel1.jpg]] - It's the logo of a Turkish tour operator. Doubtful that it's PD at all, let alone PD-old. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 22:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Gadamer.jpg]] - uploader uses argument ''can be found many places on the web'' to allow it's use it for any purpose. - [[User:Ilse@|Ilse@]] 22:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Kristeva.jpg]] - uploader claims PD but [http://www.infoamerica.org/teoria/kristeva1.htm source] has © on each page. - [[User:Ilse@|Ilse@]] 23:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
===6 June===
*[[:Image:050827-40 0001.jpg]] - tagged PD but source is given as "Indiana State Newspaper". --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 10:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:206small.JPG]] - tagged PD but source (www.myspace.com/gentlemusic) does not mention anything to that effect. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 10:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:215435879 l.jpg]] - tagged PD but looks like promo picutre, source given is dead link. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 10:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:41301440 fryatt empics 270.jpeg]] - tagged PD but source given does not mention anything to that effect. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 10:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:462835931 m.jpg]] - uploader assumes PD just because "no copyright information or author name is given" --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 10:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:5352.jpg]] - uploader claims PD but all that's given as source is "www.groups.yahoo.com" --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 10:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:47fd362c97.jpg]] - tagged PD, can't verify as source given is direct link to image. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz Saalfeld]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 11:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:R still2.JPG]] - tagged as a screenshot, but no source is given. First they listed youtube.com, then when I tagged it as having no source, they changed the source to http://www.reginemultimedia.com/, which is a message board of some sort. --[[user:Cholmes75|cholmes75]] ([[User talk:Cholmes75|chit chat]]) 14:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Allisonr 1.jpg]] - only licensed for non commercial usage. -- [[User:Barrylb|Barrylb]] 19:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
**Speedied by me as [[WP:CSD]] I3. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 19:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
| 