Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor von Pentz and User talk:Matthew: Difference between pages

Revision as of 18:45, 16 January 2007

Revision as of 11:43, 12 July 2007

Line 1:

{{col-begin}}

===[[Victor von Pentz]]===

{{col-break}}

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}

[[Image:BB61 USS Iowa BB61 broadside USN.jpg|thumb|300px|right|HMS ''Matthew'']]

:{{la|Victor von Pentz}} - <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor von Pentz|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 15#{{anchorencode:Victor von Pentz}}|View log]])</noinclude>

{{col-break}}

Except for a passing mention in an article on a website, there are no independent references establishing this man's notability. What separates this antipope from the hundreds of other kooks claiming to be the pope? [[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] 23:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

<div style="border:1px solid gray;padding:12px;margin:18px 0px 0px 8px;float:right;text-align:center;font:normal small sans-serif;background-color:#FFFFF8">

*'''Weak Delete''' and a '''Probable Merge''' by somone more well versed on the topic. Precious few sources can be found, and the ones that have been used are by no means reliable. I honestly don't know enough on this topic in order to say for sure which way to go. Perhaps leaving it flagged for help would be a better idea. [[User:Wtfunkymonkey|wtfunkymonkey]] 01:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

<br /><span style="font: italic bold large serif;">Matthew</span>

*'''Keep''' Only one passing mention in one article on one web site? Antichrist on a cracker! I found goatloads of references to him through a Google search. He's certainly noted on the Internet (which isn't saying much, I suppose, but here we all are nonetheless), and apparently he's created some stir among various argumentative sorts of Catholics. Let the anti-pope (or True Pope) remain on Wikipedia, that the heretics (or True Catholics) may expand his article for the greater glory of God (or Satan!) [[User:Whyaduck|Whyaduck]] 06:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

**The "one passing mention" I referred to is the only reference given in the article. If you have other multiple, independent sources for which von Pentz is the main subject, by all means add them to the article. I did do a cursory Google search before this nomination; the results seem to be mostly Wikipedia mirrors or passing mentions in antipope articles. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] 12:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Lost items found. Paranormal Investigations.<br />

*'''Comment''' I created this, in part, because I was curious if anyone claimed to be "Pope Linus II." However I'm not sure he has a significant enough following to be notable. Still there are various people in [[:Category:20th century antipopes]] being AfD'd right now so I'd like to give a word of warning on that. Although I consider them all to be nuts some of them did gain minor significant or even a noticeable following. For some examples [[David Bawden]] was part of a chapter in the book [[What's the Matter with Kansas?]], [[Clemente Domínguez y Gómez]] and [[Manuel Corral]] led the [[Palmarian Catholic Church]], [[Jean-Gaston Tremblay]] was in Canadian news for a time, and [[William Kamm]] was covered in the Australian media.--[[User:T. Anthony|T. Anthony]] 18:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Consulting. Advice. Reasonable Rates.<br />

No Love Potions, Endless Purses, or<br />

Other Entertainment.

</div>

{{col-end}}

== Keeping Up Appearances tables ==

Hi Mathew its Edito*Magic (also known as Chris C. Nichols)

I know you were one of the people who agreed with me on the discussion page that one neat table with all the Keeping Up Appearances specials together would look better than several separate tables per episodes, littered all over the page. I’m glad that you can see sense like I can. Hopefully we can make Updown see sense aswell. Please join in the debate further on the [[Wikipedia talk:Television episodes]]. Thanks! [[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] 21:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)