Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
 
Line 1:
{{otheruses|Tudor}}
== '''Welcome to Wikipedia!''' ==
{{House of Tudor}}
Dear {{PAGENAME}}:
The '''Tudor dynasty''' or '''House of Tudor''' ({{lang-cy|Tudur}}) was a series of five [[monarch]]s who ruled [[Kingdom of England|England]] and [[Kingdom of Ireland|Ireland]] from [[1485]] until [[1603]]. Three of them, ([[Henry VII of England|Henry VII]], [[Henry VIII of England|Henry VIII]] and [[Elizabeth I of England|Elizabeth I]]) played important roles in transforming [[England]] from a comparatively weak European backwater into a powerful state that in the coming centuries would dominate much of the world.
[[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome]] to [[Wikipedia]], a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:
 
The House of Tudor began with [[Owen Tudor|Owain ap Meredith ap Tewdur]], a Welsh squire in [[Henry V of England|Henry V]]'s court better known by the Anglicized version of his name, Owen Tudor. Owen Tudor married the King's widow, [[Katherine of Valois]], and had five children with her. Their eldest surviving son, [[Edmund Tudor]], married [[Lady Margaret Beaufort]], a descendant of [[John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster]], who in her own right was at one point a potential heiress to Edmund's half-brother, [[Henry VI of England]]. At the age of thirteen, Margaret bore a son several months after her husband's death. Following the [[Wars of the Roses]] in which the Houses of [[House of Lancaster|Lancaster]] and [[House of York|York]] struggled for control of the English throne, this child would become [[Henry VII of England]].
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|Five Pillars of Wikipedia]]
* [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Portal]]
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ|Frequently Asked Questions]]
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Revert|How to revert to a previous version of a page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Tutorial|Tutorial]]
* [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|Copyrights]]
* [[Wikipedia:Shortcuts|Shortcuts]]
 
During the Tudor period, the dynasty created the [[Church of England]] and also strengthened the [[Royal navy|navy]].
Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click [[Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes|here]] to see how you can avoid making common mistakes. Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|never biting new users]]. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an [[Wikipedia:Administrator|administrator]]. One last bit of advise, please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into you signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to [[Wikipedia:User page|tell us about yourself]] and be [[Wikipedia:Bold|'''BOLD''']]!--[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] 01:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC) (Better late than never, right?)
 
==Feudal circumstances==
== Arbitration Committee election ==
While Tudors made much of their feudal title to [[Richmondshire]], [[Middleham]] and its subsidiary [[Snape, North Yorkshire|Snape]] were [[Neville]] bases. [[Bedale]] Ricardian [[Francis Lovell, Viscount Lovell]] resisted Henry VII. Robert Aske, of the family of Aske Hall in Richmond took complaints to Henry VIII in the [[Pilgrimage of Grace]], objecting to the King's "casting off" of Queen Catherine of Aragon and his daughter Princess Mary. [[Simon Digby]] resisted Elizabeth I, even though Digby's family were installed in the region by Henry VII as a replacement for Lovell. Sir George Bowes complained in defence of Digby's son's innocence, saying further that the rebels had not been able to be quelled by Lord Latimer. This [[Rising of the North]] for Charles Neville of Westmorland resulted in another installment of a dignitary puppet over Bedale by the Queen Elizabeth—Ambrose, Earl of Warwick.
 
Although dynastically [[House of Lancaster|Lancastrian]], the Tudors were politically [[House of York|Yorkist]]. In this sense, they were dual like the Nevilles (dynastically Yorkist, politically Lancastrian) and which was the point of union between both houses, supposedly resolving the [[Wars of the Roses]]. The Tudors, superseded this Neville crossover precedent, effectively balancing rival factions, as the Rising of the North itself ended the [[Percy-Neville feud]]. The Tudor dynasty and its unification of Richmondshire (like Wales, or Brittany to France) into the body politic of the English Royal Domain, thus contributed to the future Stuart succession by dominating foreign influences (e.g. the Castilian intrigue formed by John of Gaunt and pursued by Henry VII). The [[border country]] had become the pivot upon which the monarchy was secured, by subordination of the "Middle Shires"—as they came to be known under King James I.
I notice you've added the word "Yes" to a vote page for [[User:Ajwebb|Ajwebb]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006_Vote/Vote_Ajwebb&diff=prev&oldid=35431170 here]. However the page you edited was a redirect to the actual voting page. Unfortunately, I don't think you have [[suffrage]] in the Arbitration Committee election, because voters have to have registered their account by [[September 30]], [[2005]] and have 150 edits by [[January 9]], [[2006]]. However, if you stick around and make some more edits, you will be entitled to vote in future elections to the Arbitration Committee. [[User:Dbiv|David]] | [[User talk:Dbiv|Talk]] 19:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 
This consolidation of power under the Star Chamber Court and its reliance upon the subordination of palatine agricultural districts (e.g. Council of Wales, Council of the North, etc.) was to resemble the original Lancastrian high court party of Henry VI, instigating once again a Low Country (Burgundian Flanders) mercantile and Estuary opposition in the heirs of [[Mary Tudor (queen consort of France)|Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk]] and their Dudley allies (carrying the notorious Warwick title). These economic and dynastic alliances of the Yorkists would re-emerge in the wake of the beheading of the last Plantagenet, [[Margaret Pole, 8th Countess of Salisbury]]. Religion became intertwined with politics with the declaration of [[cuius regio, eius religio]]. This meant that English society had become divisive once more; even more so than before. Future Stuart succession would attempt to align the high court party with the high church party, in the same manner as the Spanish Habsburg standard.
==[[Democratic peace theory]]==
This is a long-standing controversy. If you want to get involved in it, the questions seem to me to be:
*Is the present text fair to DPT, both for and against?
*Is it accurate as it stands?
*Are any of the individual points listed on the talk page still justified?
 
Jealous heirs to the Yorkists would challenge the stratifying intentions of these Lancastrian heirs, championing "the underdog"—themselves and the mercantile, industrial classes. Feudal structure in which a monarch was held in check by peers of the realm was challenged by nationalism under the monarchy; the Tudors having broken [[bastard feudalism]] upon the support of civil servants who demanded compensation. In the traditions of Simon de Montfort and Richard of York, Parliament became the vehicle for upward mobility by those dispossessed by the Crown. These officers of state decided to do their own kingmaking when the opportunity presented itself, but choosing the rival faction established under the Burgundian and ultimately German alliances of the [[Hundred Years' War]] (against the French peace of [[Margaret of Anjou]]).
I've read Layne, and skimmed Owen - and several other papers.
 
==Marriage==
The chief Wikipedia policies that apply are [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] and [[Wikipedia:No original research]]; neither of which is quite the same as corresponding academic standards, so do read them.
 
Owen and Edmund married Lancastrians, but Henry VII and Henry VIII, including [[Henry FitzRoy, 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset]] wed Yorkists.
 
The first marriage of Henry VIII was Lancastrian and to [[Catherine of Aragon]], strategically poised to court [[Catholic]] (specifically, Spanish and Imperial) powers, a policy seen again in Mary's marriage to [[Philip II of Spain]]. After many attempts, Catherine only succeded in having one child—a girl—Mary. Henry VIII wanted a male heir, however, and the refusal of the Papacy to grant an annullment of the marriage was a key factor in Henry's split from the [[Roman Catholic Church|Church of Rome]].
The dispute (from my perspective) is that Ultramarine has read [[R. J. Rummel]]'s website, and genuinely believes that Rummel has the Grand Unified Theory of Everything. Unfortunately, Ultramarine has a tendency to find that papers agree with what he expected to find.
 
Henry VIII's second marriage was to [[Anne Boleyn]]. She too failed to give Henry any sons, only a daughter, Elizabeth. She was accused of treason to the King and was executed.
I would appreciate such commentary as you still have courage to give.:-} [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 23:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 
The third marriage was to [[Jane Seymour]]. She bore Henry a son, Edward. Unfortunately she died about two weeks after childbirth. Henry was heartbroken—many people think that Jane was the only one of his wives that Henry really loved.
Yes, you understand him precisely. However, technically, his actions are not vandalism, which is defined in [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]]. I have been fighting this lost cause for months; and would prefer not to resort to deletion yet.
 
The fourth marriage of Henry VIII was Yorkist [[Anne of Cleves]], strategically poised to court [[Protestant]] German powers. This idea was later picked up by the marriage between [[William and Mary]].
You are free to edit the article as you see fit. Only Ultramarine and I are bound not to revert. (Do read [[WP:3RR|the three-revert rule]], however.) Removal of redundant tags is also perfectly acceptable.[[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 20:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 
The fifth marriage was to [[Kathryn Howard]]. She was very young and didn't really want to marry Henry. It was later proved that she had been unfaithful to him with his chief Minister. She was accused of treason and was executed.
If you want to go through with this, more is needed to delete an article. See [[WP:AfD#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion|How to delete an article]]. If you go through with those steps, I will support deletion; but I would recommend just re-editing the article: but [[WP:BB|Be bold!]].[[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 20:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 
Henry's last wife was a rich widow, [[Catherine Parr]]. Though she was in love with Thomas Seymour (Jane Seymour's brother) at the time, she was forced to marry him. However, she was loyal to Henry and nursed him well until he died. She soon remarried.
==[[Mike Huckabee]]==
In regards to your comment on my talk page, what you've said about the disparity across the state is correct, but the statement I removed was referring to a loss of jobs in the state overall, which is incorrect. If you would like to ammend it to say what you just did and provide a source for it, I would be fine with that. - [[User:Maximusveritas|Maximusveritas]] 20:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
==Reference wanted==
Do you have access to a journal? Ultramarine, whose understanding of statistics is doubtful, is brandishing a borrowed quote from
DEMOCRACY AND MILITARIZED INTERSTATE CONFLICT, 1816-1965
Author(s): BREMER SA
Source: INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS 18 (3): 231-249 1993
(excuse the full caps; I'm cutting and pasting). He is under the delusion that the statement "even after controlling for a large number of factors...democracy's conflict-reducing effect remains strong" means statistical proof of ''causation''. It will take me a while to get hold of the paper; is it possible for you to see what the paper actually says and put it in the article? [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 20:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 
Tudor marital policy with the Spaniards and Dutch (see [[Dutch Revolt]]) thus reflected the wish for "[[via media]]" as pursued in religious affairs, which was in some ways a continuation of the need to balance the Lancastrian and Yorkist camps.
==JP Political Stance==
I think archive 8, 9b and 10 all have bits on it. I'm mostly just getting fed up with that guy coming on every morning and adding "right wing" into the article. "right wing" is loaded and he knows it. [[User:Kyaa the Catlord|Kyaa the Catlord]] 12:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
:His userpage says he's into left wing theory. I'm not sure if he's adding right wing cause he's intentionally inserting POV or if he is being up-front about it. I'm terribly amused by him though, but I'm not removing right wing again. He'll just add it back and I don't want to engage in silliness. :D [[User:Kyaa the Catlord|Kyaa the Catlord]] 13:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 
The sisters of Henry were wed to the [[Auld Alliance]] dynasties of Scotland and France, but only the Scottish alliance was considered fruitful, with the French alliance lost to Suffolk. The Stuarts would continue this arrangement, through the marriages of [[Mary I of Scotland]] to the [[King Consort]]s [[Francis II of France]] and [[Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley]].
== [[Sigma Nu]] ==
 
==The Tudor Period==
My pleasure. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 15:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The Tudor [[history|historical]] period usually refers to the period 1485–[[1558]], especially in relation to the [[History of England]]. This coincides with the rule of the Tudor dynasty in [[England]], with the exception of Elizabeth I. Occasionally the term is used more broadly to capture Elizabeth's reign as well, though in general 1558–1603 is treated separately as the [[Elizabethan era]].
 
==Monarchs of England==
== [[Sigma Nu]] Copyvio ==
The six Tudor monarchs were:
I think it's great that you are trying to add on to the [[Sigma Nu]] article however after looking at the recent additions I see that they are copy and paste info and thus are not allowed on wiki unless you have permission from Sigma Nu Headquarters. Many articles of fraternities and sororities in the past have had to be deleted because of copyvios. I for one believe that wiki is too copyright paranoid in regards to fraternity/sorority articles but many others don't think so. It would be best to rewrite the recent additions. Also, it's not really a good idea to have seperate articles on the founders of the fraternity. Unless they did something outside the fraternity of historical note, they do not meet [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] guidelines and thus are articles to be merged to the main Sigma Nu article. The same thing happened to founders of [[Delta Tau Delta]] --<font color="0000CC">[[User:Dysepsion|† Ðy§ep§ion †]] <sup> [[User_talk:Dysepsion|<i>Speak your mind</i>]]</sup></font> 16:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 
*[[Henry VII of England|King Henry VII]] ([[1485]]–[[1509]])
:Thanks for the info on the copyright. I've always believed that histories of fraternities can be freely distributed by I've always had a run in with admins and others who think otherwise and actually want to see the e-mail. Keep up the good work --<font color="0000CC">[[User:Dysepsion|† Ðy§ep§ion †]] <sup> [[User_talk:Dysepsion|<i>Speak your mind</i>]]</sup></font> 17:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
*[[Henry VIII of England|King Henry VIII]] ([[1509]]–[[1547]]); son of Henry VII
*[[Edward VI of England|King Edward VI]] ([[1547]]–[[1553]]); son of Henry VIII
*[[Lady Jane Grey]] ([[1553]]); great-granddaughter of Henry VII
*[[Mary I of England|Queen Mary I]] ([[1553]]–[[1558]]); eldest daughter of Henry VIII
*[[Elizabeth I of England|Queen Elizabeth I]] ([[1558]]–[[1603]]); second daughter of Henry VIII
 
Henry VII's great-granddaughter, [[Lady Jane Grey]] also served as Queen for nine days before being deposed by Mary I. Jane was later executed along with her husband [[Guildford Dudley]], son of [[John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland]]. This was a prelude to the [[Puritan]] usurpations of the Stuart era, as the Dudleys were invested in the [[Pilgrims]]' American colonisation.
:As far as the founders are concerned, I admit I'm a bit hazy on it. If you take a look at [[Sigma Chi]] several of the founders have seperate articles while others don't or were deleted. There was a discussion about it and I believe the consensus was they had to do something "outside" the fraternity that affected society. But no other guidelines were given. If the founders of Sigma Nu did do something notable in society other than founding the fraternity, then the articles on them should stand on their own. I just personally like what [[Delta Tau Delta]] did. Having the biographies on the main fraternity page allowed for a more concise history of the fraternity instead of jumping from page to page, but then again that's just me. Beware though that someone might come along and try to merge or redirect the founder's indvidual pages to the main Sigma Nu article without discussion, which has happened in the past. --<font color="0000CC">[[User:Dysepsion|† Ðy§ep§ion †]] <sup> [[User_talk:Dysepsion|<i>Speak your mind</i>]]</sup></font> 17:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 
[[Image:tudors.JPG|thumb|right|200px|''Allegory of the Tudor dynasty'', (detail), attributed to Lucas de Heere, ''ca.'' 1572: left to right, [[Philip II of Spain]], [[Mary I of England|Mary]], [[Henry VIII of England|Henry VIII]], [[Edward VI of England|Edward VI]],
==Dubious Rummel==
[[Elizabeth I of England|Elizabeth]]]]
The tag represented the following question: Is it in fact true that the Correlates of War definitions are widely attributed to Rummel ''personally'', or is this more inflation? [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 00:02, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 
To the Tudor period belongs the elevation of the English-ruled state in [[Ireland]] from a [[Lordship of Ireland|Lordship]] to a [[Kingdom of Ireland|Kingdom]] ([[1541]]).
Out of courtesy to Ultramarine, I think we should try to retain the images in the article. They do give it a more lively appearance. I tried moving them to the History section, so that the are co-located with the introduction of Rummel and his ideas. I think I have my facts straight, and have made a coherent narrative out of three paragraphs that all sought to introduce Rummel for the first time. [[User:Robert A West|Robert A West]] 01:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 
==[[Kings of England family tree|Tudor's Family Tree]]==
== I dunno ==
The diff you provided didn't quite point right.
 
Margaret Beaufort was born in 1443, not 1433 as shown in the table.
You got yelled at LIKE THIS, so I guess that means you win though ;-)
[[Image:England-Tudor.png|700px]]
 
==Further reading==
[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 09:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
*Guy, John (ed). ''The Tudor Monarchy''. St Martin’s Press, 1997.
*Turton, Godfrey. ''The Dragon’s Breed: The Story of the Tudors from Earliest Times to 1603''. Peter Davies, 1970.
 
==External Sigh! links==
* [http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/index.html Tudor Place]
Will Ultramarine ever learn to say, "Please" and "Thank you?" And will Mr. Anderson ever learn not to rise to his bait? And can four Wikipedians live in one article together and find happiness? I have paperwork due to the State of PA by Wednesday, so I really should absent myself from Wikipedia until then. I'll tune back in at the end of the week. Good luck. [[User:Robert A West|Robert A West]] 09:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
* [http://tudorhistory.org/ Tudor History]
:I peeked! I admit it, I have no control. Where is Wikipedians Anonymous? But, the picture is great! ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOheeheeheeheehee. [[User:Robert A West|Robert A West]] 09:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
* [http://www.badley.info/history/House-of-Tudor-England.general.html House of Tudor Chronology]
* [http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page11.asp Official British Royal Site Discussion on the Tudors]
* {{PDFlink|[http://www.royal.gov.uk/files/pdf/stuarts.pdf Tudor and Stuart Family Tree from Official British Royal Site]|13.4&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 13759 bytes -->}}
* [http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/tudor_england.htm Tudor History]
 
==See also==
==This is just funny and I am adding it for my amusement==
*[[England and Wales]]
*[[Wars of the Roses]]
*[[Tudor style]]
*[[Tudor rose]]
*[[Richmond Castle]]
*[[Richmond, London#Richmond_Palace|Richmond Palace]]
*[[Tudor re-conquest of Ireland]]
*[[The Tudors and the Royal Navy]]
 
{{start}}
===Problems? I ain't got no steenkin' problem!===
{{s-hou|House of Tudor|||||name=*[[Royal House]]*}}
{{s-bef|before=[[House of York]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Dynasty|Ruling House]] of the [[Kingdom of England]]|years=[[1485]] &ndash; [[1603]]}}
{{s-aft|after=[[House of Stuart]]}}
{{end}}
 
Hey, good luck on your dissertation. I am falling into the same problems with my thesis as well.
 
[[Category:European royal families|Tudor]]
I am relatively new here, but I am pretty sure that when a discussion thread [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Democratic_peace_theory] has been dead for a week or so it is ok to archive. Do you need consensus for this? Seriously, it probably wouldn't bother me if it was anyone else doing the complaining, but still I would like your advice. --[[User:Scaife|Scaife]] 08:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[Category:Family trees]]
[[Category:House of Tudor|*]]
[[Category:1485 establishments]]
[[Category:1603 disestablishments]]
 
[[ar:بيت تيودر]]
Well, anyway... Cheers! --[[User:Scaife|Scaife]] 09:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[cs:Tudorovci]]
:One example, that Pmanderson refuses to answer the objections to Gowa does not mean that the dispute has disappeared.[[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] 09:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[de:Haus Tudor]]
::Wow I have never had a stalker before.... I feel so '''wanted'''. --[[User:Scaife|Scaife]] 09:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[et:Tudorid]]
::: Hehehe, I think ultramarine was watching this page already, so unfortunately, no stalker ;-) [[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 09:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[es:Casa de Tudor]]
 
[[fr:Maison Tudor]]
=== Civil conduct ===
[[ko:튜더 왕가]]
I have not made any uncivil remarks. However, I have been called a stalker. Please state exactly what you object to. [[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] 09:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[it:Dinastia Tudor]]
: Next to typing in ALL CAPS before, which is considered impolite, you have also not assumed good faith thus getting into an unnescesary childish match with two other people. I take it those were merely brief oversights made in the heat of the moment. [[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 09:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[he:בית טיודור]]
::[[Image:Eyeroll.JPG|thumb|right|200px|Rolling one's eyes can express exasperation <s> or condescension </s>.]] They inserted this picture and you accuse only me? [[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] 09:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[ka:ტიუდორი (დინასტია)]]
::I was accused of being a stalker and you replied "Hehehe, I think ultramarine was watching this page already, '''so unfortunately''', no stalker"? I also see discussions between you and Pmanderson on this page and his, and also direct intervention on his request without informing me or giving me a chance to reply. Unfortunately, I can longer consider you an appropriate mediator.[[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] 10:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[[nl:Tudor (dynastie)]]
[[ja:テューダー朝]]
[[no:Huset Tudor]]
[[pl:Tudorowie]]
[[pt:Casa de Tudor]]
[[ru:Тюдоры]]
[[simple:Tudor dynasty]]
[[sl:Tudorji]]
[[fi:Tudor-suku]]
[[sv:Huset Tudor]]
[[th:ราชวงศ์ทิวดอร์]]
[[tr:Tudor hanedanı]]
[[zh:都铎王朝]]