|
WE WOO WE WOO WE WOO WE WOO WE WOO
{{newpagelinks}}
'''Want to leave a message? Just put it at the bottom of the page.'''
I do archive--see links below (archived on that date):
*[[/archive 1|February 15, 2004]]
*[[/archive 2|March 21, 2004]]
*[[/archive 3|March 29, 2004]]
*[[/archive 4|May 16, 2004]]
*[[/archive 5|July 9, 2004]]
*[[/archive 6|August 2, 2004]]
*[[/archive 7|September 2, 2004]]
*[[/archive 8|March 28, 2005]]
== VfD on Afrophobia ==
Hi!
I just wanted to announce that I've overhauled the [[afrophobia]] article, and we're brainstorming future additions on [[talk:Afrophobia|its talk page]]. Some Wikipedians have changed their votes after seeing the revamped article. [[User:Binadot|Binadot]] 07:48, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
== Images from the U.S. Congressional Biographical dictionary ==
Howdy Meelar. Could I ask that you list these images on [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images]] instead? That way we'll have 30 days to look them up instead of just seven. I believe those images are Public Domain, and that the disclaimer applies to other images, but I'll e-mail the site to ask. Thanks! – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]]) ([[Wikipedia:Image sleuthing|sleuth]])</sup> 12:29, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
== Thanks for the welcome ==
...but I'm hardly new. I used to go by [[User:B Touch]]. But, still, thanks tho! :) --[[User:FuriousFreddy|FuriousFreddy]] 17:00, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
== LBJ ==
I think that the part you added "...since 1964" means something else, since you were writing about the 1964 election. [[User:Mpearl|Morris]] 13:09, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
Hey! My talentless hack article was a legitimate piece of work. How dare you censor me!
==GRider==
He's going to keep deleting his talk page you know. -- [[User:Riffsyphon1024|Riffsyphon1024]] 03:06, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
*You posted on his talk page that he shouldn't edit delete-related pages - according to his contribs log to see he's been doing just that. For instance, see [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mark Wilson]] and [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mark Rosenfelder]]. [[User:Radiant!| ]][[User_talk:Radiant!|Radiant]][[meta:mergist|_*]] 09:07, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
== :-/ ==
I didn't edit the proposed injunction against. I merely added a vote to the list of Opposing people. I think way too many people are being harsh on Grider. [[User:Klonimus|Klonimus]] 04:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Who are you really, Klonimus? You've only been here a few days and you seem to already know everything. -- [[User:Riffsyphon1024|Riffsyphon1024]] 05:09, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
==[[User talk:65.27.80.50|65.27.80.50]]==
User 65.27.80.50 won't quit vandalising, having now taken out [[Pall Mall (cigarette)]] and it's talk page. Can we do something about this user? --[[User:TheGrza|The]][[User Talk:TheGrza|<font color="Green">Grza</font>]] 23:22, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
This user has now gone after my user page. Any help? --[[User:TheGrza|The]][[User Talk:TheGrza|<font color="Green">Grza</font>]] 23:36, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
==The Simpsons: Hit & Run==
Hi Meelar. In the [[The Simpsons Hit & Run|Hit & Run]] article I was just wondering why you restored the Halloween episodes reference? I just don't see it myself, it seems like a fairly normal style game with different levels and stuff, if anything then the fact that it has a theme throughout the game means that it's not like the Halloween episodes (which often have unrelated segments). I know there are Halloween references in that there is a Halloween part at the end and I believe that if you have the date set on your [[playstation 2|PS2]] then it has different themes on different days but I wouldn't really call that mirroring the style and spirit of those episodes.
Anyway I'm not going to delete it because maybe I'm just not seeing it but could you please explain it to me! Thanks. -- [[User:Lochaber|Lochaber]] 12:06, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Wow, you accused me of vandalism? ==
This is from a while ago, but '''thanks for lying about me [http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:SJxcU88E8PsJ:wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress++site:en.wikipedia.org+grick&hl=en&client=firefox-a#User:Grick here]'''. (I have no idea why it's on wikiquote.org).
Let's see, what'd you say about me?
''Has repeatedly edited to say that the United States Constitution was amended 18 times after the bill of rights, not the correct 17. Erased a note left on his talk page. Meelar (talk) 05:17, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)''
[http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=repeatedly&db=* Repeatedly], eh? How many edits do you find by me [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_Constitution&action=history&limit=500&offset=0 here]? Damn, I only see one.
Here, let's see if I was actually factually wrong. As of [[2005]], there are 27 [[Amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution]]. The [[United_States_Bill_of_Rights#Transcription|United States Bill of Rights]] was ratified in 1791.
Now, let's count how many times the Constution was amended.
*the '''1'''st time the Constitution was amended - 1791 (the Bill of Rights)
*the '''2'''nd time the Constitution was amended - the [[Eleventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution|'''11'''th Amendment]]
*the '''3'''rd time the Constitution was amended - the [[Twelfth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution|'''12'''th Amendment]]
*the '''4'''th time the Constitution was amended - the [[Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution|'''13'''th Amendment]]
*...
As you can see, in general, for ''x''>1, the ''x''th time the Constitution was amended corresponds to the ''x''+9th Amendment. Now, the last Amendment was the 27th.
''x''+9=27
That would make ''x'' equal to 18. Hence, the Constitution has been amended 18 times since 1789.
But, moreover, did you even look at '''any of my other edits''' before reporting me a vandal? A vandal in progress, no less.
As a new user (my account was less than 2 months old or so at that point), I didn't know why the hell there was something on my talk page. Plus, I was right.
Try being more careful. '''You're not always right.''' Thanks.
-[[User:Grick|Grick]]([[User_talk:Grick|<sup>talk to me</sup>]]) 05:49, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
:Sorry, that was a bit harsh. I was a new user at the time, so I wasn't quite familiar with talk pages and such (and I thought I may have figured out the math wrong myself). It just surprised me to see myself as a "vandal in progress" upon [[Google|Googling]] my name. I try hard to be a productive Wikipedian, and I really did not appreciate seeing my name among vandals'.
:Don't take this personally; I hope you just take a bit more care, I suppose.
:Cheers. -[[User:Grick|Grick]]([[User_talk:Grick|<sup>talk to me</sup>]]) 06:21, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
== Editing ==
I'm allowed to edit more than 3 times if it is vandalized; which is what you are doing.
What is wrong with what I have posted. It is obvious you don't agree with it but that is not reason for exclusion; especially when I use unbiased facts. --[[User:Nyr14|Nyr14]] 18:03, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
Again, I can revert if I believe the page has been vandalized. Vandalizing being to ''To destroy or deface (public or private property) willfully'' [[http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=vandalize]]. Basically that is what you are doing. --[[User:Nyr14|Nyr14]] 18:06, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
Just because you don't agree with the facts does not mean you can delete them. --[[User:Nyr14|Nyr14]] 18:16, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
John Lott's study was the only one I was aware of but thanks for noting the Brady one.
--[[User:Nyr14|Nyr14]] 23:43, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
== [[John Kerry]] ==
Why did you revert my edit at [[John Kerry]] just now? Please explain.[[User:216.153.214.94|216.153.214.94]] 03:20, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
While editing tonight from my other IP address of 216.153.214.94, shortly after I communicated with you, I found myself blocked: '''"03:23, 7 Apr 2005, Neutrality blocked 216.153.214.94 (expires indefinite) (contribs) (Banned user Rex disruptively editing from a (static) IP address. If he wants to make legit edits, he can edit under his username.)"'''.
Without getting into the details of the many run-ins I've had with Neutrality, I'll just point out that his rationale for blocking me appears to be false. I am not a "banned user".
Also, regardless of whether or not Neutrality thinks I ought to use the "Rex" account of Rex071404, the fact is that the Wiki does not require that I log in. That being the case and since it's clear to various Admins who 216.153.214.94 is, I see no logic of any kind in Neutrality's indefinate block of me.
Earlier this evening, I asked on the [[John Kerry]] talk page this: '''"Will those editors who keep immediately reverting all my edits here kindly exlplain why they think they are entitled to keep John Kerry 100% frozen "as-is"? Thank you"'''.
Please take note that Neutrality did not reply. Frankly of the last edit of mine (which you restored after I commented to you), I'd be interested to know precisely '''what''' it is about that edit (or style of editing) which Neutrality asserts is "disruptive".
Also, Neutrality has shown himself to be rather blind to the ramifications of his block against me - as evidenced by his self-contradictory position. One one hand, he blocks my IP address yet, on the other he says "If he wants to make legit edits, he can edit under his username". This is nonsense. Neutrality certainly knows (or at least ought to know) that if .94 is blocked by IP address, I cannot edit from that address, logged in or not.
Please go take a look at my thoughtful commentary on the talk page at [[Lawrence v. Texas]]. At all times since my 1st edit on this Wiki, I have 100% of the time been willing to dialog and support my edits. It is the bullies such as JameMLane, Gamaliel and Neutrality that have gone out of their way to harry and harrass me since day one. The simple fact is that none of those three like Conservatives. In fact, JameMLane (last time I looked) specifically said on his user page that he is "hostile to the right wing".
For an example of the pro-Liberal bias that is attacking my edits, please see [[Killian documents]] and [[John Kerry]]. The pro-Liberal bias on those two articles is simply smothering and overwhelming.
Take for instance [[John Kerry]]. On the links section of [[John Kerry]], there is a link for the pro-Kerry puff-piece documentary [[Going Upriver]] but the Liberal Cabal simply will not allow a link to [[Stolen Honor]] (a documentary by a Pulitzer prize winner which is critical of Kerry) to stay in.
And they wonder why people get frustrated and lash out occasionally?
They do everything they can to choke off Conservative editors, then when they can no longer goad them to going over 3RR (or otherwise act out), they simply '''tell lies''' and call me a "banned user".
Anyway, just thought you'd like to know. Also, if you respond to me, please do so at 216.153.214.94. My aim is to see that block lifted and resume editing from there. Regards, [[User:216.153.214.93|216.153.214.93]] 04:46, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Vandalism ==
I saw that you had reverted my user-page twice, and I would just like to thank you and I also returned the favour. You might want to block [[User:69.250.136.245]], as he is most likely the same guy who vandalised yesterday (see my user-page history). Hav~e a nice day [[User:Gkhan|Gkhan]] 17:07, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
==admin==
Thanks for supporting my admin nomination Meelar; I appreciate it, and the kind words as well. Happy editing, [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus]] 05:25, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Copyright problems|Copyright problems]] and [[Wikipedia:RC patrol|RC Patrol]]==
Hi Meelar,
I would like to help with maintenance on on the Wikipedia namespace.
*Is there a way for non-admins to help with closing out copyright problems (to help shorten the backlog on that page)?
*When I'm patrolling the RC, how can I avoid duplicating others' work (e.g. both me and someone else reporting a vandal)? That type of situation has happened a few times.
I was going to work on closing out VFDs, but I'm too much of an inclusionist to even handle it. :)
Thanks,
[[User:Rad Racer|Rad Racer]] | [[User talk:Rad Racer|Talk]] 01:10, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Removal of talk==
Please abstain from removing my comments from [[User talk:68.250.71.135|talk page]]s without explication. -- User:Docu
:In response to your question on my talk page:
see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.250.71.135&diff=12102243&oldid=12102221]. Never mind, if it was just a problem when trying to resolve edit conflict due to two trying to edit the page in the same time. -- User:Docu
== [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images]] ==
Hi Meelar, You listed some images that you uploaded as copyvios (from http://bioguide.congress.gov). Bioguide notes that not all images are PD, but I couldn't determine if the images listed were a copyright violation (let me know if I missed something here).
I re-listed them on pui. --[[User:Duk|Duk]] 23:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Maybe someone at pui will know more, also there's probably a fair use rationale, and an email to bioguide might be worthwhile. I've tagged other bioguide images as <nowiki>{{unverified}}</nowiki>. --[[User:Duk|Duk]] 03:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
----
Thanks...Ive been a wikipedia reader for a while, but Ive only recently started writing articles. I'll read over some of that stuff you sent me
== Reply to CSHC ==
Whoops, I focused more on the plot and storyline. I will improve it.
== Reply to CSHC ==
Whoops, I focused more on the plot and storyline. I will improve it. --[[User:SamuraiClinton|TheSamurai]] 21:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Posted Article==
Hey, howcome you deleted my article "Wang's Law"? I mean, no one is seriously ever going to search for Wang's Law, and it isn't offensive, and I'm not vandalizing an actual page.
== Oh My Gods! VFD ==
I am against the deletion on the [[Oh_My_Gods!]]. As an effort against this I have tried to revise the page to remove all first-person references from the original author.
--[[User:Lzygenius|Lzygenius]] 07:14, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== [[David Helvarg]] ==
Thank you very much for your comments; You are absolutely right and I am taking this off FAC and moving it to peer review. --[[User:TheoClarke|Theo ]] [[User_talk:TheoClarke|(Talk)]] 10:42, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Reply==
(Categories) Thanks - I've already added categories to several and will added either stub or a category to the rest. [[User:Brholden|Brholden]] 11:34, 12 April 2005 (UTC)
==What [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Rankings]] project is not==
*This is not suggesting a hierarcal system.
*It will be used only by users who want to use it.
*Only ranking will be assigend to users who want to use it.
*The idea ment to make it like barn stars, but based on regular contribution.
*It is currently a prototype, likely that it is nothing like the final version.
I urge you to reconsider your vote based on this clarification. Thanks --[[User:Coolcat|Cool Cat]] [[User talk:Coolcat|<sup>My Talk</sup>]] 08:41, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Images ==
I will be adding the source information. I am doing stuff one at a time. After I am done with the FL congressional delegation, I will be adding the source information.
== Canadian legislators ==
Hmm...I'm not sure what the general term for both would be. I was thinking "parliamentarians," but Senators aren't really in Parliament. I'm not sure there's a good term for Senators except "useless rich people." You might want to try asking at the [[Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board|Canadian wikipedians' notice board]], a lot of people there work on Canadian government articles. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] 01:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Oops ==
I think that while you were deleting [[Church of judas]] I was flagging it for speedy deletion. Please delete it again. Sorry
[[User:Micahmn|MicahMN]] | [[User talk:Micahmn|Talk]] 05:29, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Thanks==
Thank you so much for your kind words, which, as usual, come when I most have need of them. As far as leaving permanently, I doubt I could ever get escape velocity from this place, but I may go into a larger orbit and get clear of the atmosphere for a few days or weeks. It's frustrating to feel as though anytime you voice an opinion you're brushed aside as a "petty prude". I'd thought I'd earned a little more than that here, but I increasingly see unfamiliar names--the old guard disappears and I haven't had the energy to meet the new folks, so I suppose it's no wonder they think I'm some reactionary from the hills. All my best wishes to you: for your sake (and the sake of a number of other good souls still editing here also), I promise not to disappear for good. But if I make little exits here and there, I trust you will forgive me. All the fatigue and exasperation seems to be hitting me at once; April is the cruelest month. Until later, [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosenzweig]] 21:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Kate Winslet==
Sorry Meelar, I changed it back before I saw your comment. I still feel that we should stick with the original one until the original debate is complete. Maybe the issue of this compromise image could be raised in the main IFD debate, for further discussion. Cheers. [[User:TigerShark|TigerShark]] 00:06, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==KKT==
What I have posted is fact, from the inside. What you do deleted about Cambridge I witnessed and I wish you would return that to the page. You are covering for her. [[WillC]]
==KKT 2==
I was neutral, stating fact! Furthermore, if I want to blank my talk page, it's my page. Something tells me you have a complex if you are a DC college student studying politics. I WAS ON THE CAMPAIGN. I KNOW MORE ABOUT IT THAN YOU.
Perhaps you should "assume good faith" about the information I'm sharing.
If this is how it's going to be on wikipedia I have just edited my last page forever.....dimestore elitists.....
==[[WP:POINT]]==
So nominating someone for adminship now constitutes [[WP:POINT]]? If your concern is my anonymity, that will soon be rectified. [[User:63.173.114.137|63.173.114.137]] 23:03, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== [[Death Cab for Cutie (band)/Temp]] ==
Hi Meelar, You re-wrote this article at temp, but the original cannot be deleted at the moment due to block comression. If you want to copy/past (intstead of move) the article go ahead. It's ok to have copyvios in history. Otherwise it will be a while before the original can be deleted and your article moved. --[[User:Duk|Duk]] 16:04, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:I thought this too until recently, instructions on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] say to revert to pre-copyvio version unless copyright holder askes to have history deleted. There are no instructions for this particular case, but it seems better to copy/past (since you're the only author to the /Temp page) than letting the article sit this way until the main one can be deleted. --[[User:Duk|Duk]] 16:21, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::PS. looks like SPUI found a better way to do this, [[Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems#How_to_proceed_with_undeletable_articles_when_a_rewrite_exists]]. --[[User:Duk|Duk]] 20:41, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== I'm sorry ==
hi everyone, i just want to tell you that i am sorry for everything i did. '''I am not here to vandalize, but to apologize and to say a few things also. ''' i am sorry for everything i did. Rickk, booth443, i apologize for vandalizing articles, being impolite at talk pages, and for getting a little too mad at you, ken. calles loco, sla boy, and tj raza are all my accounts. I am very sorry for the vandalism. please accept my apologies.
but what i am upset about is that all of you admins dont even care about the presence of dangerous sex offenders on wikipedia. the victims get banned, but a '''convicted feloner''' gets treated nicely and doesnt even recieve a warning?
i know ken. he knows me. one night, he broke in and attacked my girl friend scared her and just beat her up bad. he mercilessly and savagely humiliated an innocent life. he didnt just do that for no reason, it had something to do with a complicated matter that i dont want to mention.
but anyways, shouldn't feloners like this receive a warning? shouldnt potential stalkers and criminals be notified or banned on wikipedia? why dont you even care? im not trolling this time, '''I'm serious'''. please deal with ken - he is not just a harmless contributer. a ferocious and savage rapist wont just be ignored on wikipedia. please at lest do something!
[[User:Amigo de compton|Amigo de compton]] 21:31, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Titanic==
Hi, could you explain why you removed an illustration from the awards section in the article on [[Titanic (1997 movie)]]? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 02:56, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Fat Chicks in Party Hats==
Hi Meelar, a page you have worked on, Fat Chicks in Party Hats, is about to be [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Fat_Chicks_in_Party_Hats|deleted]] as "not notable". I just thought I'd let you know since you might have an opinion. --[[User:Aranae|Aranae]] 05:39, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
==[[Poking dogs with sticks]]==
*The redirect seemed like a good idea at the time. Go ahead and delete it if you want. [[User:LevelCheck|LevelCheck]] 00:45, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== You are frighteningly on the ball ==
Especially for 12:33am Monday morning (admittedly CST). [[User:Clarknova|Clarknova]] 05:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==DC trip==
Please list all your available dates in the table at [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip#Date]]. Thanks. --[[User:Brian0918|<font color="#000000">brian0918</font>]][[User talk:Brian0918|<font color="#000000">™</font>]] 18:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Image:MVC-409F.JPG ==
I intended to name this image Image:Aldworth_Church_2000.jpg but accidently left it as the original name. I tried to move it but get a message "This action cannot be performed on this page." and "contact an administrator". Can you advise? Also is it possible for me to replace an image I uploaded?
In some cases I have since located a better picture. Regards [[User:Oldfarm|Oldfarm]] 13:34, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok - Thanks for the advise [[User:Oldfarm|Oldfarm]] 15:50, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== George W. Bush vandalism ==
Thanks for reverting. Either my computer or Wikipedia is going really slowly and vandalism was occurring faster than I could roll it back. — [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker]] [[User talk:Knowledge Seeker|দ]] 18:08, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== PUI March 29 Congree BIO ==
Can you tag or some the congress bio images on that page? Cheers. [[User:Burgundavia|Burgundavia]] 19:59, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
== Re: Senate leader succession boxes ==
Meelar, I saw one of these on [[Harry Reid]]'s page, and figured if he had one, why shouldn't Frist? Also, I'm systematically going through all current senators and giving them the same style succession boxes.
:Writing the party leadership could be good, but it is important for people like Frist to show his power. I don't know, it could be good, but the convention for other leaders around the world on Wikipedia is to write position in political structure, not their party. You decide :P! --[[User:Harro5|Harro5]] 07:29, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
::Take [[Trent Lott]]'s succession boxes for example. I think the way this is done gives a good representation of the timeline of his career, and the balance in the Senate. --[[User:Harro5|Harro5]] 07:40, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
== [[Warren County Canal]] ==
Meelar,<br>SPUI was able to add a map to this article. I wonder if you'd now be willing to support its FAC nomination at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Warren County Canal]]? [[User:PedanticallySpeaking|PedanticallySpeaking]] 15:37, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
== [[Warren County Canal]] ==
Meelar,<br>SPUI was able to add a map to this article. I wonder if you'd now be willing to support its FAC nomination at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Warren County Canal]]? [[User:PedanticallySpeaking|PedanticallySpeaking]] 15:37, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
== [[Warren County Canal]] ==
Meelar,<br>SPUI was able to add a map to this article. I wonder if you'd now be willing to support its FAC nomination at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Warren County Canal]]? [[User:PedanticallySpeaking|PedanticallySpeaking]] 15:37, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
my Job is pretty simple,those Trolls are just like The Simpson's comic book guy, i only correcting im not Vandalizing!
my contribs are just to erase Trollcruft in this website
just a bunch of Fat,idiots with no life and social skills at all
== GNAA ==
my Job is pretty simple,those Trolls are just like The Simpson's comic book guy, i only correcting im not Vandalizing!
my contribs are just to erase Trollcruft in this website
just a bunch of Fat,idiots with no life and social skills at all
==[[User:LevelCheck|LevelCheck]]==
I've certified the RfC, though I had to delete LevelCheck's signature as he'd certified it himself. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 21:27, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
== Barack Obama references ==
That is fine, since I think the most important thing is that as you said they substantiate the facts in the article. Being innacessible to most is a little bit of a problem, but not too big, the key is that they are able to be verified. Ideal there would be some accessible to everyone, but some is better than none and the more the better. Thanks a lot. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 13:25, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
== Removal/deletion of talk (again) ==
I don't mind if you archive your talk page, but I fail to understand why you delete other people's comments on [[User_talk:68.250.71.135]]. Please refrain from this in the future.
Did you already try to clean up after that user? One might think you reviewed all his previous edits. -- User:Docu
== Speedy Deletion ==
Re: [[body liquor]] ... I see I just didn't google-dig deep enough... thanks for catching that! [[User:Pjrich|Pjrich]] 06:52, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip|DC Meetup]] will be May 7/8==
The DC Meetup date has been finalized to May 7/8. Even if you can only come one of the days, that's still fine. Please watch this page for new details, which will be posted in the next couple days: [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip]] --[[User:Brian0918|<font color="#000000">brian0918</font>]][[User talk:Brian0918|<font color="#000000">™</font>]] 16:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Pro-life==
Good edit to the TNR quote. I didn't do a very good job summarizing it earlier. Your version is a lot better. [[User:harry491|Dave]] [[User_talk:harry491|(talk)]]
== LevelCheck ==
I just undid his attempt to nominate [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Templates for deletion]] itself for deletion[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Templates_for_deletion&diff=12810055&oldid=12809445]. Looks like something that should be added to your RfC regarding him. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 21:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RickK]]==
Because you have asked me to comment on this RfC, I have done so, though I still think it's nonsense. [[User:RickK|Rick]][[User talk:RickK|K]] 23:03, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
==Re: personal attack==
I regret calling [[User:Viriditas]] a fascist. I do think his actions were unreasonable but I understand that that statement was a bit over the top. This was done in the midst of a long, drawn-out edit war which involved Viriditas removing much more mildly worded criticisms from his Talk page, which I felt at the time was highly inappropriate. Nonetheless, I realize that this particular comment was a bit much. [[User:LevelCheck|LevelCheck]] 23:47, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Deleting Deletionism? ==
Why did you put the [[Deletionism]] redirect up for deletion? It's a very straightforward redirect. We have page on this exact topic on meta. Why shouldn't there be a redirect to it? - [[User:Pioneer-12|Pioneer-12]] 00:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
| 