Template:Close relationships and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1:
<noinclude>{{pp-move|small=yes}}</noinclude>
{{adminbacklog}}
<center>'''Do not continue a dispute on this page: Please keep on topic.<br/>Administrators: please do not hesitate to remove disputes to user talk pages.'''</center>
{{Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(7d)
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR/Archive%(counter)d
|counter = 51
|maxarchivesize = 250K
}}
[[Category:Non-talk pages automatically signed by HagermanBot]]
==Violations==
Please place new reports '''at the bottom'''.
==== Reply to Benimerin's statement ====
This user avoided on purpose to sign to identify himself as Joanot. He decided to register just because the article was to be semi-protected. He didn't register by his free will untill last time. (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Valencian_Community#Semi-Protection_of_the_article Talk page section on semi-protection of the article]). If it was not able to use his account because of e-mail problems, he could have very well signed without wikilink (i.e. --"Maurice27") --[[User:Maurice27|Maurice27]] 09:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
==== Message to admins ====
May I indicate to admins that [[User:Benimerin]] has erased the reverts described as 5th and 6th, and changed dates & hours reported by me as seen [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=145199051&oldid=145195903 here], '''completely changing my report''' and that he is using the room of the report to answer, making it much less clear to understand.
The revision made by me (before Benimerin changing it), is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&oldid=145195903#User:Benimerin_reported_by_User:Maurice27_.28Result:.29 this one].
In addition to the 3 (with a 4th in another article) 3RR rule breakings made by this user in less than and week, I want to report his, proved here above, modification of my statement and explanations in order to mislead the admins --[[User:Maurice27|Maurice27]] 12:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
: Links aren't changed nor erased, I think it clarifies that it's not about the same version, but several versions made by different users. Are you bored?. May I remember [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=144789196&oldid=144785700 your own suggestion] that there are no 3RR breaking as there aren't more than trhee reversions in 24h and, adding more, there are reversions with a lot of explanations and detailed reasons that you are simply ignoring these?.
: I also would like to suggest admins to remove this request as a [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Catalonia_and_Valencian_Community|arbitration request]] is ongoing, and where he's also implied. There are also a user trying a dispute resolution in [[Talk:Flag of Valencia]]. I think it is not a problem of 3RR, because there are no reasons technically, and because the problem aren't the reversions but an edit-warring of Maurice27 against every Catalonian or Valencian users as me. Cheers. --[[User:Benimerin|Benimerin]] - <b><span style="unicode-bidi: embed;">كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب</span></b> - 12:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC) PD: Please, can you show us [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=145197491 where] I've deleted anything?. Are you here to make me personal war or what?. Your last update is a false report.
===[[User:Stubacca|<font color = "green">'''Stu'''</font>]] [[User talk:Stubacca|<font color = "green"><sup>''’Bout ye!''</sup></font>]] reported by [[User:Domer48]] (Result:12h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Tom Williams (Irish Republican)}}.
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_Williams_%28Irish_Republican%29&diff=144357249&oldid=144355232]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_Williams_%28Irish_Republican%29&diff=144358093&oldid=144357804]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_Williams_%28Irish_Republican%29&diff=144361376&oldid=144358368]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_Williams_%28Irish_Republican%29&diff=144369013&oldid=144368296]
[[User:Domer48]] and [[User:Brixton Busters]] have been changing [[:Category:Northern Irish Roman Catholics]] to [[:Category:Irish Roman Catholics]]. Their contention is that Northern Ireland is not a state, country or nationality. See [[Talk:Tom Williams (Irish Republican)]] for the reason why they are incorrect in doing this. All UK biography articles follow a style for categorisation. I have told them that if they disagree with this then they should go to [[WP:CFD]], which is the correct procedure. However they are ignoring this. [[User:Stubacca|<font color = "green">'''Stu'''</font>]] [[User talk:Stubacca|<font color = "green"><sup>''’Bout ye!''</sup></font>]] 10:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*Regardless, you have edit warred and in doing so, broken 3RR. Standards to do it one way do not give one an exception to the rule. 12 hours. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 11:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Mzaca]] reported by [[User:Ezeu]] (Result:24h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Bantu}}. {{3RRV|Mzaca}}: Time reported: 14:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bantu&oldid=139021076 19:46, 18 June 2007]
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mzaca&oldid=144344850]
**Please provide diffs showing more than three reverts. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 14:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*I've blocked this user for 24 hours. Has been edit warring since the 11th, with his last 4 reverts yesterday at 07:22 and 12:02 and today at 05:58 and 07:48. Four reverts in 24 hours and 26 minutes is close enough for me. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 14:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:David Lyons]] reported by [[User:Sparkzilla]] (Result: Protected (BLP))===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Nick Baker (prisoner in Japan)}}. {{3RRV|David Lyons}}: Time reported: 15:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Baker_%28prisoner_in_Japan%29&diff=144366095&oldid=144365770 22:36, 13 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Baker_%28prisoner_in_Japan%29&diff=144406690&oldid=144403790 23:44, 13 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Baker_%28prisoner_in_Japan%29&diff=144408911&oldid=144407824 23:56, 13 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Baker_%28prisoner_in_Japan%29&diff=144411887&oldid=144409446 00:12, 14 July 2007]
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David_Lyons&diff=144411919&oldid=144403381 00:13, 14 July 2007 User reverted while I was writing warning]
User is an {SPA]] with an undeclared COI as a member of Baker's support group. User is attempting to remove primary source court documents that point to Baker's guilt. -- [[User:Sparkzilla|Sparkzilla]] <small>[[User_talk:Sparkzilla|talk!]]</small> 15:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:This is a bogus 3RR claim to draw away attention from the fact the user [[User:Sparkzilla|Sparkzilla]] is trying to introduce an unreliable source into this BLP. Unreliable sources should be removed immediately, especially in the case of a BLP. Sparkzilla, despite requests, has been unable to show as the above diffs will show that his sources are reliable. He has also been told not to edit this page further due to his CoI.[[User:David Lyons|David Lyons]] 15:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
::Please just look at the diffs and the user's posting history. -- [[User:Sparkzilla|Sparkzilla]] <small>[[User_talk:Sparkzilla|talk!]]</small> 15:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Someone appears to be trying to introduce a third-party personal website as a source, which is a violation of BLP, so I've protected the page until I can work out what's going on. <font color="Purple">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 20:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:::::SV, the document that is being introduced was originally on the justicefornickbaker site (and was linked to that site from the WP article since January). When justicefornickbaker's contents were removed a month or so ago, I copied the court documents to my own homepage. I have opened an RFC for the inclusion of these court documents on the article talk page. If it helps, I will shortly ask the editor of my magazine to add it to the sources for this article, which will give it independent provenance. Thank you for understanding. -- [[User:Sparkzilla|Sparkzilla]] <small>[[User_talk:Sparkzilla|talk!]]</small> 20:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Minutes to Rise]] and [[User:87.167.226.119]] reported by [[User:TheLetterM]] (Result:24hrs for TheLetterM and 87.167.226.119, sprotected)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Post-hardcore}}.
*{{3RRV|Minutes to Rise}} and
*{{3RRV|87.167.226.119}}: Time reported: 17:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=144284814&oldid=144284667 15:03, 12 July 2007]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=144360702&oldid=144284814 01:04, 13 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=144418450&oldid=144413794 07:49, 13 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=144434713&oldid=144427146 09:19, 13 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=144436418&oldid=144435885 09:28, 13 July 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=144437951&oldid=144436601 09:36, 13 July 2007]
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:87.167.226.119&diff=144427482&oldid=144414843 08:38, 13 July 2007] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Minutes_to_Rise&diff=144437564&oldid=144435172 09:34, 13 July 2007].
*User has been disruptive in forcing "Heavy Metal" as a stylistic influence on Post-Hardcore and has refused to comply with anything resembling civil discourse or discussion, opting instead for all-capped, rude comments on my talk page.
*User editing from one Username and an IP, both [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Minutes_to_Rise|suspected sockpuppets]] of a previously banned sockpuppeter, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/AFI-PUNK here.] [[User:TheLetterM|TheLetterM]] 17:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:*There is no clear evidence at this point that I can see of sockpuppetry. In the meanwhile, I have blocked [[User:TheLetterM]] and [[User:87.167.226.119]] for 24 hours for edit warring, and sprotected the entry. [[User:Crum375|Crum375]] 18:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Joie de Vivre]] reported by [[User:Jayjg]] (Result:24hrs)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Circumcision}}. {{3RRV|Joie de Vivre}}: Time reported: 19:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=144432355&oldid=144431293 17:07, 13 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=144445260&oldid=144442959 18:13, 13 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=144446504&oldid=144446060 18:19, 13 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=144447503&oldid=144446708 18:25, 13 July 2007]
*Editor has been continually reverting in the sentence ''The [[frenulum of prepuce of penis|frenulum]] may also be cut away at the same time, in a procedure called a [[Frenectomy#Frenectomy of the penis|frenectomy]].'' in the lead paragraph. Was asked to revert himself by two different editors [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJoie_de_Vivre&diff=144447990&oldid=144447682] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJoie_de_Vivre&diff=144448025&oldid=144447990] but has refused to do so. Not a new editor, has been editing since September 2006. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 19:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:*Blocked for 24 hrs. [[User:Crum375|Crum375]] 20:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Marketingsupport]] reported by [[User:SarekOfVulcan]] (Result:24 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Biscayne Landing}}. {{3RRV|Marketingsupport}}: Time reported: 19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144450874&oldid=144440641 14:42] (EDT) (blanked page)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144451953&oldid=144451171 14:48]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144452083&oldid=144451997 14:48]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144452561&oldid=144452181 14:51]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144452785&oldid=144452596 14:52]
3RR warning given at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marketingsupport&diff=144460549&oldid=144455440 15:28] by [[User:Satori Son]] -- there has been more reverting to different versions after this point.
Note that [[User:NoMoBS|NoMoBS]] seems to be a sockpuppet of this account, and has been making many of the same edits.
He is continuing to revert:
*Initial version: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&oldid=144454863 15:02]
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144462486&oldid=144454863 15:37]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144465277&oldid=144462486 15:51]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144466690&oldid=144465277 15:58]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144470523&oldid=144466690 16:17]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144471654&oldid=144470523 16:23]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biscayne_Landing&diff=144472325&oldid=144471654 16:27]
*{{vandal|Marketingsupport}} blocked for 24 hours. —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 20:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Bennie Noakes]] reported by [[User:Dreadstar]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|What the Bleep Do We Know!?}}. {{3RRV|Bennie Noakes}}: Time reported: 04:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&oldid=143118675 11:36, 7 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=144533480&oldid=144522175 22:13, 13 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=prev&oldid=144520984 20:38, 13 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=prev&oldid=144338323 00:25, 13 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=prev&oldid=144338228 00:24, 13 July 2007]
* Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bennie_Noakes Not a new user] Has been editing since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foundation_for_the_Law_of_Time&oldid=12541477 April 2005]
Note that revert number four is the same information, just moved to a different spot in the same section, separated from it's original, former sentence. (hopefully that's clear!)- [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]] </small> 06:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Also please note that the information User:Bennie Noakes is trying to keep in the article by edit-warring is [[WP:NOR|OR/Synthesis]] and unsourced information. I've clearly outlined the reasons this material should not to be added to the article on the [[Talk:What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F|article's talk page.]] User insists on adding unsourced OR to the article. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]] </small> 04:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
It is a bit concerning that [[User:Bennie Noakes|Bennie Noakes]] seemed to indicate that he may ''continue'' to edit war to keep his OR in the article, although he would "rather not have to". [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=prev&oldid=144533306] [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]] </small> 04:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
As user indicated, he continues to revert war to keep his OR/Synthesis in the article, as well as removing fact/citation request tags:
* Revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=144640465&oldid=144639399 13:23, 14 July 2007] [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]] </small> 18:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
The article has been protected due to the edit-warring, so the warring has stopped for now. I am concerned that it may start again once the article is unprotected. If not a block for this, then at least a strong warning from someone besides myself would be appropriate. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]] </small> 09:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Lear 21]] reported by [[User:Parsecboy]] (Result:No violation)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on:
**{{Article|List of countries and outlying territories by total area}}, and
**{{Article|List of countries by population}}.
**{{3RRV|Lear 21}}: Time reported:13:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[[List of countries and outlying territories by total area]]:
*Revert 1: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=144514919&oldid=144078327 1] 00:48, 14 July 2007
*Revert 2: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=144518607&oldid=144515510 2] 01:18, 14 July 2007
*Revert 3: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=144521205&oldid=144519029 3] 01:40, 14 July 2007
*Revert 4: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=144592990&oldid=144525541 4] 12:32, 14 July 2007
:The edits differ from each other. The second party reverting, [[user:polaron]], could be accused violating 3RRR as well. No need to block this account. [[User:Lear 21|Lear 21]] 13:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
::They are not different; they are continued reverting to include the EU where no consensus exists to do so.[[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] 13:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[[List of countries by population]]:
*Revert 1: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=prev&oldid=144517827 1] 01:11, 14 July 2007
*Revert 2: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=next&oldid=144518726 2] 01:21, 14 July 2007
*Revert 3: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=next&oldid=144521145 3] 01:54, 14 July 2007
*Revert 4: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=next&oldid=144523170 4] 02:10, 14 July 2007
Diff for 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lear_21&diff=prev&oldid=144594065 here]. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] 13:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
:The first edit is not a revert, but the establishment of new content. No sign of 3RRR [[User:Lear 21|Lear 21]] 13:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
::You made the same edit 4 times in less than an hour. If that does not constitute 3RR violation, I don't know what does. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] 13:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
:::The user reverted three times in both cases. He has not violated the 3RR rule. [[User:Perspicacite|Perspicacite]] 10:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Nordic Crusader]] reported by [[User:Muntuwandi]] (Result:Warned)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Negroid}}. {{3RRV|Nordic Crusader}}: Time reported: 06:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Negroid&diff=144738633&oldid=144737840 Revision as of 05:05, 15 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Negroid&diff=144740215&oldid=144739466 Revision as of 05:19, 15 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Negroid&diff=144740780&oldid=144740460 Revision as of 05:24, 15 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Negroid&diff=144742437&oldid=144742267 Revision as of 05:39, 15 July 2007]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANegroid&diff=144742744&oldid=144742453 ]
* Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued _before_ the last reported reversion.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
* Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
[[User:Muntuwandi]] openly participated in an edit war, reverting what I thought were good, helpful edits with no explanation. It wasn't until after ceasefire I was warned, or even made aware of this rule.
If I edit the article again, not sure if I want to after this, I'll seek admin assistance rather than reverting. --[[User:Nordic Crusader|Nordic Crusader]] 09:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:Muntuwandi waited until after NC broke the rule to warn him. NC is a new user. Muntuwandi then reverted NC's edit leaving no recourse for NC to self-revert thus a block would be unfair. [[User:Perspicacite|Perspicacite]] 10:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
NC has reverted again, and his reverts are either vandalism or bordering on vandalism. I am requesting some intervention.[[User:Muntuwandi|Muntuwandi]] 11:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Furthermore though it appears that NC is a new user, the level of experience that is apparent is far too advanced to be a new user. [[User:Muntuwandi|Muntuwandi]] 11:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:88.101.76.122]] reported by [[User:Angr]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Non-native pronunciations of English}}. {{3RRV|88.101.76.122}}: Time reported: 11:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&oldid=144350501 07:20, 13 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&diff=prev&oldid=144662853 20:43, 14 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&diff=prev&oldid=144678413 22:16, 14 July 2007 ]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&diff=prev&oldid=144770143 10:24, 15 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&diff=prev&oldid=144774709 11:10, 15 July 2007]
Note: User has now registered as [[User:Errorneous]].
===[[User:Angr]] reported by [[User:Errorneous]] (Result: No block)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Non-native pronunciations of English}}. {{3RRV|Angr}}: Time reported: 12:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&oldid=144146075]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&oldid=144476264 20:47, 13 July 2007]
*<s>2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&oldid=144667609 21:11, 14 July 2007]</s>
*<s>3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&oldid=144747193 06:24, 15 July 2007]</s>
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-native_pronunciations_of_English&oldid=144773314 10:55, 15 July 2007]
::The second and third of those reverts were made by other users, not me. My two reverts are spaced over 38 hours apart. —[[User talk:Angr|Angr]] 14:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:::They were made by one user with dynamic IP. I bet it was your sockpupeting to lure me to break 3-revert rule.[[User:Errorneous|Errorneous]] 15:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
::::Gee, you're off to a great start at Wikipedia. First you edit war to restore a policy violation into an article, then you accuse an administrator of suckpuppetry. —[[User talk:Angr|Angr]] 16:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:No block - as Angr says, the reverts are too far apart. '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 17:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Maurice27]] reported by [[User:Benimerin]] (formerly: [[User:Joanot]]) (Result: No violation)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Flag of Valencia}}. {{3RRV|Maurice27}}: Time reported: 12:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&oldid=144593308 11:26, 15 July 2007]. No previous version stable, this user reverts and avoids any change made by me in every restoration I make.
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
* Reversions to version of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=next&oldid=144169128 14:38, 12 July 2007]
** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144189314&oldid=144150250 14:38, 12 July 2007] (with edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144189314&oldid=144085920 diff]).
** 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144234449&oldid=144203240 18:47, 12 July 2007]
** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144587075&oldid=144268857 11:38, 14 July 2007]
** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144603473&oldid=144593308 14:00, 14 July 2007]
**: '''Result:''' Two twice reversions within 24 hrs each time.
* Reversions to version of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&oldid=144796246 14:21, 15 July 2007] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144796246&oldid=144689883 diff with prior version used to revert]):
** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144795585&oldid=144776196 14:16, 15 July 2007] (with minor edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144795585&oldid=144689883 diff]).
** 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144888906&oldid=144854533 23:45, 15 July 2007]
** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Valencia&diff=144987712&oldid=144966959 12:37, 16 July 2007]
**: '''Result:''' Three reversions within 24 hrs.
'''NOTE A''': Maurice27 have accused me previously about violating 3RR on the same article ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Benimerin_reported_by_User:Maurice27_.28Result:.29 see]).
'''NOTE B''': Maurice27 have been already blocked several times because violating 3RR ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Maurice27 see]), and he's implied in a request for arbitration ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Catalonia_and_Valencian_Community see]).
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMaurice27&diff=144784575&oldid=144681269 12:48, 15 July 2007]
====Reply by Maurice27====
May this user be reminded by admins that this rule only applies if reverting 4 times in a 24 hour period and not 2 times one day and 2 times 48 hours later? --[[User:Maurice27|Maurice27]] 13:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
: OK, yes [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 21:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
: Do you mean that you will joke us reverting only twice every day? Technically you can avoid 3RR violation, but your objetive here is the same of those persons who violates this rule: to disrupt wikipedia, in this case, because of your very personal and ideological feelings. --[[User:Benimerin|Benimerin]] - <b><span style="unicode-bidi: embed;">كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب</span></b> - 09:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
: Please, recheck this possible violation. There are three reversions within 24 hrs., since 14:16 of 15 July to 12:37 of 16 July made by Maurice27. Thanks. --[[User:Benimerin|Benimerin]] - <b><span style="unicode-bidi: embed;">كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب</span></b> - 17:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
::I don't understand. If you're saying that there are "three reversions within 24 hrs", then ''you're'' saying there is no violation.
::Though, of course, editors are discouraged from "gaming the system" and constantly racking up precisely 3 reverts in an attempt to avoid being blocked, 3 reverts is still, technically, not a violation. If you think a person is persistently edit-warring, ''outside'' of 3RR, then you may wish to consider the administrator's noticeboard ([[WP:AN]]), or specifically their incidents subpage ([[WP:AN/I]]). Of course, I'm sure people here will still be willing to look at cases of precisely 3 reverts, but appealing to them to reconsider in cases where there wasn't a ''technical'' violation isn't likely to succeed. (As that would require one admin overriding the decision of another) [[User:Bladestorm|Bladestorm]] 17:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
::: Ok, thank you for your response. --[[User:Benimerin|Benimerin]] - <b><span style="unicode-bidi: embed;">كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب</span></b> - 17:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Funkynusayri]] reported by [[User:Zerida]] (Result: warned)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Middle East}} {{Article| Demographics of Egypt}} and {{Article|Egyptians}}. {{3RRV|Funkynusayri}}: Time reported: 19:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to (on one of the articles): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&oldid=1447543612 00:35, 15 July 2007]
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=next&oldid=144810264 09:44, 15 July]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=144825699&oldid=144825534 10:37, 15 July]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=144826529&oldid=144826195 10:41, 15 July]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=144827042&oldid=144826893 10:44, 15 July]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=144828171&oldid=144828023 10:51, 15 July]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=144830135&oldid=144829533 11:02, 15 July]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Funkynusayri&diff=prev&oldid=144829137 10:56, 15 July]
'''Comment''': This appears to have all started when [[User:Funkynusayri]] made a deletion on the article [[Middle East]], which was reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_East&diff=144754361&oldid=144432628]. User then went on to make similar edits on other articles, including [[Egyptians]], which s/he contends "shouldn't exist" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Egyptians&diff=prev&oldid=144816837]. It was this comment that made me suspicious due to recent activity on articles of a similar topic by users like [[User:Mariam83|this]] and [[User:Serenesoulnyc|this]]. S/he then suggested that two articles, which are traditionally kept separate for every country, be merged. S/he also accuses me of having a "mute sock puppet" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FayssalF&diff=144831474&oldid=144824331]. My comments to [[User:Funkynusayri]] can be found [[User_talk:Funkynusayri#Stop|here]] and a content comment is [[Talk:Egyptians#Ethnic group?|here]]. I'd like him/her to cool off, refrain from making changes to articles when her/his edits are challenged by multiple users, and be a little more civil. — [[User:Zerida|Zerida]] 19:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:I have warned the user. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 20:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:G2bambino]] reported by [[User:Lonewolf BC]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|British monarchy}}. {{3RRV|G2bambino}}: Time reported: 20:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=next&oldid=144536119 17:04, 14 July]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=next&oldid=144734898 16:59, 15 July]
:and then: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=144821760&oldid=144819512 17:12-17:13]
:(Second revert broken up to show its two-fold character, but is one revert because there were no intervening edits. As regards the second part, compare with older versions, as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=144821760&oldid=91730126 here].)
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=next&oldid=144821957 17:17]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=next&oldid=144823043 17:23]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=next&oldid=144824011 17:34]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_monarchy&diff=next&oldid=144826304 17:43]
The other party to the edit-war, [[User:TharkunColl|TharkunColl]], is likewise in breach of 3rr. See the page history. This is part of a long-raging edit war (or wars) on this article, lately the cause of An/I reports (see "British monarchy edit war", "British monarchy edit war, part II" and "G2bambino" in [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive270|Archive 270]]), and with several recent past violations of 3rr and many warnings on both sides, and a block to G2bambino, though for "Edit warring", not for an actual 3rr violation. (I was myself blocked at the same time, for the same span, and for the same given reason as Gbambino. I mention this so that none can say I've been uncandid, here, but it is really beside the point, I think.) -- [[User:Lonewolf BC|Lonewolf BC]] 20:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:I warned both G2bambino and TharkunColl of 3RR. --[[User:Son|Son]] 21:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
::I also warned G2bambino earlier but he deleted the warning from his talk page. I didn't think I was in breach of 3RR (the edits were to two separate parts of the article and not connected with each other), but I could be wrong I suppose. My purpose was to restore the consensus so recently thrashed out. [[User:TharkunColl|TharkunColl]] 21:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Gaimhreadhan]] reported by [[User:Domer48]] (Result: blocked elsewise)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|Jean McConville}}
Previous version reverted to - 00:26, 15 July [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jean_McConville&oldid=144699259]
1 - 01:04, 15 July [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jean_McConville&diff=144705070&oldid=144704222]
2 - 01:17, 15 July [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jean_McConville&diff=144706941&oldid=144705938]
3 - 20:19, 15 July [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jean_McConville&diff=144853622&oldid=144826337]
4 - 20:33, 15 July [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jean_McConville&diff=144856072&oldid=144854029]
And although blocked for another matter [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jean_McConville&curid=2261977&diff=144864420&oldid=144862027]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
Will warn [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 21:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Theblog]] reported by [[User:William M. Connolley]] (Result:12h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Christopher Landsea}}. {{3RRV|Theblog}}: Time reported: 21:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: all are clearly marked as reverts; but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Landsea&diff=144734394&oldid=144669429] will do if you like
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Landsea&diff=144742135&oldid=144738723 2007-07-15T05:37:01]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Landsea&diff=144815659&oldid=144798274 2007-07-15T16:36:04]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Landsea&diff=144838499&oldid=144837781 2007-07-15T18:51:39]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Landsea&diff=144844132&oldid=144839100 2007-07-15T19:25:14]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: has been warned before and understood: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theblog&diff=142775826&oldid=142734297]
Note that all edits remove the "roger pielke" text with a spurious BLP excuse for whitewashing [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 21:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
====REPLY by theblog====
Please note that I believe it is a [[WP:BLP]] violation, and it is using [[WP:OR]] and a blog post meant to show the article subject in a negative light, as I have discussed on the talk page with anyone who will bother to respond. No whitewashing is taking place. --[[User:Theblog|Theblog]] 01:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
*I've looked and I do not see this as a BLP situation. Are there NPOV concerns? Quite possibly. But this cannot justify a 3RR vio. Therefore, blocked for 12 hours. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 09:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Maniac20]] reported by [[User:Falcon9x5]] (Result: 3h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Assassin's Creed}}. {{3RRV|Maniac20}}: Time reported: 21:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144660772&oldid=144630849 21:30, 14 July 2007]
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144683752&oldid=144672945 23:50, 14 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144686960&oldid=144684219 00:11, 15 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144711552&oldid=144702000 02:51, 15 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144802764&oldid=144773816 16:08, 15 July 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144855330&oldid=144850788 21:29, 15 July 2007]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144861225&oldid=144860663 22:03, 15 July 2007]
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144861937&oldid=144861756 22:03, 15 July 2007]
*8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144861937&oldid=144861756 22:07, 15 July 2007]
*9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144862377&oldid=144862292 22:09, 15 July 2007]
*9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144862504&oldid=144862442 22:10, 15 July 2007]
*10th revert:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144863021&oldid=144862955 22:13, 15 July 2007]
*11th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144863557&oldid=144863427 22:17, 15 July 2007]
*12th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144864146&oldid=144863702 22:20, 15 July 2007]
*13th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed&diff=144864833&oldid=144864541 22:24, 15 July 2007]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maniac20&diff=144863166&oldid=144862364 22:14, 15 July 2007]
:Given quite late, but user continued to make edits afterwards, and was given prior warnings.
I myself broke the 3RR while trying to revert Maniac20's edits. Myself [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maniac20&diff=144774343&oldid=144695994]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maniac20&diff=144862364&oldid=144860481]
and another user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maniac20&diff=144862364&oldid=144860481]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maniac20&diff=144860481&oldid=144803122] have left repeated warnings on the user's talk page, and in edit summaries. User has consistently ignored both.
Also made several[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Def_Jam:_Icon&diff=prev&oldid=144861320] other[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BlackSite:_Area_51&diff=prev&oldid=144861387] disruptive[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuntman:_Ignition&diff=prev&oldid=144855602] edits[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Army_of_Two_%28video_game%29&diff=prev&oldid=144861456]. [[User:Falcon9x5|Fin]][[Special:Contributions/Falcon9x5|©]][[User talk:Falcon9x5|™]] 21:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
3h. Next time, *please* warn earlier and bring here earlier [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 09:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
=== [[User:74.62.149.66]] reported by [[User:Fyslee]] (Result: 8h) ===
* [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Quackwatch}}. {{3RRV|74.62.149.66}}: Time reported: 00:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC) -- <i><b><font color="004000">[[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]]</font></b></i>/<b><font color="990099" size="1">[[User talk:Fyslee|talk]]</font></b>
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quackwatch&diff=144674255&oldid=144657132 23:52, 14 July 2007]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quackwatch&diff=prev&oldid=144739728 07:14, 15 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quackwatch&diff=prev&oldid=144868166 23:42, 15 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quackwatch&diff=prev&oldid=144868633 23:45, 15 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quackwatch&diff=prev&oldid=144871665 00:02, 16 July 2007]
8h [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 08:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:CrystalB4]] reported by [[User:gscshoyru]] (Result: 24h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Wonder Woman}}. {{3RRV|CrystalB4}}: Time reported: 03:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wonder_Woman&oldid=144920777 03:13, 16 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wonder_Woman&diff=144919353&oldid=144918286]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wonder_Woman&diff=next&oldid=144919535]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wonder_Woman&diff=next&oldid=144919860]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wonder_Woman&diff=next&oldid=144920154]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACrystalB4&diff=144919941&oldid=144918486 03:08, 16 July 2007]
24h [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 08:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Complete Truth]] reported by [[User:Pablothegreat85]] (Result: 24h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center}}. {{3RRV|Complete Truth}}: Time reported: 07:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center&diff=144924306&oldid=144815899 03:37, 16 July 2007]
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Steven E. Jones}}. {{3RRV|Complete Truth}}: Time reported: 07:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_E._Jones&diff=144923457&oldid=144816633 03:31, 16 July 2007]
:*This is still going on[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_E._Jones&diff=prev&oldid=144958844][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center&diff=prev&oldid=144957153] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center&diff=prev&oldid=144957153][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center&diff=prev&oldid=144956248][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_E._Jones&diff=prev&oldid=144955661][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center&diff=prev&oldid=144955446]... [[User:Weregerbil|Weregerbil]] 08:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
::*I'd like to note the violations of [[WP:NPA]] in [[User:Complete Truth]]'s edit summaries. [[User:Pablothegreat85|<font color="green">Pablo</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Pablothegreat85|<font color="red">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Pablothegreat85|<font color="blue">Contributions</font>]]</small> 08:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
24h [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 08:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Zephead999]] reported by [[User:Zazaban]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|My Chemical Romance}}. {{3RRV|Zephead999}}: Time reported: 19:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=144742484&oldid=144673292]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=144900823&oldid=144862262]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=144952907&oldid=144901953]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=145041189&oldid=145016861]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=145053644&oldid=145047157]
*5th revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=145056709&oldid=145056279]
*6th revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&curid=931216&diff=145061122&oldid=145058077]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Chemical_Romance&diff=145054911&oldid=145053726]
*'''Comment''' - Has also violated 3RR on [[Rush (band)]], [[John Bonham]], and [[Led Zeppelin]] all today, but there are just too many diffs to include, check the history for proof. I also warned him on his talk page at 19:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC) which was during his edits to [[My Chemical Romance]] and Led Zeppelin <font style="background:#E13A3E;">[[User:Bsroiaadn|'''<font style="color:#231F20;">Bsroiaadn</font>''']][[User talk:Bsroiaadn|<sup><small><font style="color:#fff;">Talk</font></small></sup>]]</font> 20:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - Editor is now indefinitely blocked. --<font color="#3333FF">健次</font>([[User:Derumi|derumi]])<sup>[[User_talk:Derumi|talk]]</sup> 20:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Eurocopter tigre]] reported by [[User:Polaron]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|List of countries and territories by total area}}. {{3RRV|Eurocopter tigre}}: Time reported: 20:21, 16 July 2007
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&oldid=144989543]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=144989543&oldid=144988090]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=144992855&oldid=144991003]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=145033213&oldid=145032417]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=145037134&oldid=145033802]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area&diff=145067346&oldid=145065822]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eurocopter_tigre&diff=145069839&oldid=145066023]
*User's reply to warning trying to argue that, because the reverts were not exactly the same, he did not revert more than three times: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Polaron&diff=145070517&oldid=144873262]
After the third revert, I tried to rewrite the sentence so that would be acceptable for the other users. I insisted on that because they refused to discuss the subject on the talk page. The 4th and 5th edits were not reverts. Best regards, --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 20:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
::I suggest you all to continue discussing this for 1 hour at the talk page. Eurocopter tiger, I don't mean to take sides, but I think they have a point there with "controlling territory" and "having soveregnty". Maybe an additional remark after the list, or something like that can be made about EU.
::Polaron, again, I don't mean to take sides, but I think you have a prity strong case in the talk page. You can do better than blocking Eurocopter tiger, you can convince him. Strictly speaking, Eurocopter, did not do always the same edit. But that's detail, b/c again, I think you can convice him, you have a stong case. Leave me a message if you need help convincing.
::(obviously this is just my personal impression, feel free to just quarel if you like that more :P ):[[User:Dc76|Dc76]] 21:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
:::However, they are still reverts, according to [[WP:3RR#What_is_a_revert.3F]], whether they be exactly the same or with minor differences, they are still reverts made in an edit conflict. My goal is not to get Eurocopter blocked, but rules are rules, and if we don't enforce them, what good are they? [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] 01:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::::Again Parsecboy, rewritting a sentence is not a revert. Dc76 also confirmed that. --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 05:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:DIREKTOR]] reported by [User:151.33.88.197]===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|foibe massacres}}. {{3RRV|DIREKTOR}}: Time reported: 20:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: -17:24, 14 July 2007 151.33.91.112 (Talk) (22,437 bytes) (→Video) (undo)-
*1st revert: -18:03, 14 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Stop vandalising the article, you cannot speak english and aren't even registered fascist!) (undo)-
*2nd revert: -22:46, 14 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144656344 by 151.33.91.112 (talk)) (undo)-
*3rd revert: -08:35, 15 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144759834 by 87.8.235.141 (talk)) (undo)-
*4th revert: -08:45, 15 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144760730 by 87.8.235.141 (talk)) (undo)-
*5th revert: -13:08, 15 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144781469 by 151.33.91.166 (talk)) (undo)-
:::::You're missing the point. A revert in partial or in whole is still counted as a revert. You may have included more text with what was the point of contention (the inclusion of the EU in the table), but it's still a revert. On a related note, I ask that you look at the proposal put forward by Polaron (an edit on the article itself, not on the talk) and see if you'll agree to that. That is, of course, if you're around. I think you said something about a short vacation. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] 20:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:DreamGuy]] reported by [[User:Anubis3]] (Result:page protected)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{article|Transylvanian hypothesis}} and {{article|werewolf}}. {{3RRV|DreamGuy}}: Time reported: 01:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transylvanian_hypothesis&diff=145115813&oldid=145095885]
::'''this is not a previous version reverted to, this is a later version (Revision as of 17:59, July 16, 2007), extremely deceptive claim'''[[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transylvanian_hypothesis&diff=145085176&oldid=145083557 21:13 16 July 2007]
::'''not a revert at all, this was my first edit, not reverting in any way, shape or form''' [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Werewolf&diff=145085520&oldid=145083855 21:15 16 July 2007]
::'''Different article entirely''' [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transylvanian_hypothesis&diff=145115813&oldid=145100555 23:59 16 July 2007]
::'''first actual revert''' -- this is the edit the guy listed above falsely as "previous version reverted to", so he's listed it twice [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Werewolf&diff=145115917&oldid=145096675 00:00 17 July 2007]
::'''different article''' [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transylvanian_hypothesis&diff=145199733&oldid=145192215 11:07 17 July 2007]
:: '''second actual revert'''' [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Werewolf&diff=145199781&oldid=145193305 11:07 17 July 2007]
::'''different article''' [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transylvanian_hypothesis&diff=prev&oldid=145209464 12:24 17 July 2007]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADreamGuy&diff=145131885&oldid=145082670 1:42 17 July 2007]
* [[User:DreamGuy]] has reverted [[User:Anubis3]]'s edits at least 3 or 4 times each in two separate article as cited above within a few hours. [[User:DreamGuy]] is well aware of the 3RR and has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:DreamGuy blocked] several times in the past for violating the rule including a block this month. I avoided reverting back my edits more than twice even though the user deleted the content of an entire article on their own (ignoring the [[WP:Deletion process]]). Articles remain reverted by [[User:DreamGuy]] to avoid edit war. - [[User:Anubis3|Anubis3]] 01:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 12:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:This is a completely false report filed by someone acting in bad faith. The person combined preliminary edits (not reverts) as well as reverts from more than one article to try to come up with as many "reverts" as possible, and he left a false warning on my talk page that I had already violated 3RR after '''only one revert'''. The guy is extremely aggressive editor using bullying tactics and multiple false warnings to try to scare me off from edits he doesn't like. He created a fork file that pushes a POV on a topic of which we already have another, better article and refuses to accept that the article he created cannot stay. Furthermore, he tries to claim that his content cannot be removed and that it MUST be merged but that he wasn't going to do it so the fork article has to say. And the "remain reverted ... to avoid edit war" is just false, because he had gone in and reverted to his version yet again, and he IS the guy who made the edit war. The way things are going he'll violate 3RR before I would, not that I will. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 12:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::Furthermore the "including a block this month" is also false, as the block this month had nothing to do with 3RR and was not even a proper block, as other admins came in and undid it and gave the admin in question warnings not to make such bad decisions in the future. This '''Anubis3''' who filed this report is either incredibly ignorant about 3RR and other policies here while aggressively claiming people violated them while they didn't or else he is knowingly lying in the hopes that he can trick people into blocking me for things I never did. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 12:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::Unfortunately, the "history" of these edits will prove otherwise. I have been nothing but NPOV and kind when it has comes to our discussions ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADreamGuy&diff=145209181&oldid=145205386 here]), even though you insist of blanking your talk page. '''Please do not try to compromise the entry of this noticeboard. This above information is for administrators to consider.''' [[User:Anubis3|Anubis3]] 12:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Funny, you made that claim while at the same time removing my labels on the report above proving that you were lying about the edits and portraying them as reverts when they weren't. I put the information back. Assuming good faith might mean that you were just clueless about what reverts mean when you filed the report (as I see you filed it after revert number 1), but removing the information showing that you are wrong is clear bad faith attempt to mislead admins. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I have protected the page. If there is no further disruption elsewhere that should be all that is needed. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 13:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks. It would help also if you explained to Anubis3 that either (if you still think there's room for good faith) he needs to actually read the 3RR policy before filing reports or (if the evidence is enough to show his bad faith) give him a block to not pull this kind of false report in the future. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::Please note: this was a legitimate entry and violation of the 3RR. I really don't know where the bad faith came from. Are you saying that every entry in AN3RR made in bad faith??? Furthermore, your history also suggests that this is not your first time violating this rule. Please be open to constructive criticism and do not try to compromise the integrity of other people's entries. I hope the situation will be resolved peacefully. [[User:Anubis3|Anubis3]] 13:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:61.231.8.50]] reported by [[User:MichaelLinnear]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Allegations of state terrorism by the United States}}. {{3RRV|61.231.8.50}}: Time reported: 04:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&oldid=145153682 04:07, 17 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145154939&oldid=145153996 2007-07-17 04:16:38]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145155982&oldid=145155384 2007-07-17 04:24:35]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145156445&oldid=145156267 2007-07-17 04:28:08]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145156936&oldid=145156688 2007-07-17 04:31:54]
*5th revert:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145157477&oldid=145157206 2007-07-17 04:36:11]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145158439&oldid=145158213 04:44, 17 July 2007]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:61.231.8.50&oldid=145157004 04:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)]
*Editor has reverted 5 times, is clearly an experienced user as this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=145157477&oldid=145157206 diff] shows, warning me about 3RR when they have exceeded the rule themselves. --[[User:MichaelLinnear|MichaelLinnear]] 04:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*And now he has hopped ips to [[Special:Contributions/125.232.196.232|125.232.196.232]] to make two further reverts, inserting the same pov content, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=145164214 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=145164700 2]. Both of these ips locate back to Taipei, [http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=125.232.196.232&email=on 125.232.196.232] and [http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=61.231.8.50&email=on 61.231.8.50]. --[[User:MichaelLinnear|MichaelLinnear]] 06:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*This is probably {{User|Stone put to sky}}, one of the pages he focused on, similar ideological bent, and from the same ___location. --[[User:MichaelLinnear|MichaelLinnear]] 08:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User: 70.189.74.49]] reported by [[User:Ursasapien]] (Result: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:70.189.74.49_reported_by_User:Qwerty7412369_.28Result:Article_semi-protected_and_user_blocked_24hr.29 this case])===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Thematic motifs of Lost}}. {{3RRV|70.189.74.49}}: Time reported: 05:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&oldid=144877811 18:39, July 15, 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=144877811&oldid=143377002 18:39, July 15, 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=144896958 00:04, July 16, 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=144938171 03:40, July 16, 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=144967783 12:53, July 16, 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=145030009 12:54, July 16, 2007]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=145030273 13:06, July 16, 2007]
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=145034896 13:39, July 16, 2007]
*8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145261219 13:38, July 17, 2007]
*9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145269814 14:26, July 17, 2007]
*10th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145291633 16:20, July 17, 2007]
*11th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145302260 17:16, July 17, 2007]
*12th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145401420 04:39, July 18, 2007]
*13th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&curid=6844657&diff=145403301&oldid=145402094 05:03, July 18, 2007]
*14th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&curid=6844657&diff=145413703&oldid=145412055 06:49, July 18, 2007]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.189.74.49&oldid=144965155 05:11, July 16, 2007]
'''Comment:''' This editor has edited this article [[Special:Contributions/70.189.74.49|almost exclusively]]. This seems to be a [[WP:SPA|SPA]]. [[User:Ursasapien|Ursasapien]] <small>[[User talk:Ursasapien|(talk)]]</small> 05:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:I realize this has turned into a [[WP:LEW|major edit war]], of which I have been an active part. However, I see no remediation outside of admin intervention. This anon user flatly refuses to participate in discussion. If there is a better forum to solve this, please let me know. [[User:Ursasapien|Ursasapien]] <small>[[User talk:Ursasapien|(talk)]]</small> 09:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Blnguyen]] reported by [[User:Rambutan]] (Result:no action taken per [[WP:BAN]])===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. {{3RRV|Blnguyen}}: Time reported: 06:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=145170204 07:21]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=145170395&oldid=145170204]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=145170870&oldid=145170665]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=145173026&oldid=145172922]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=145173308&oldid=145173177]
[[User:Kuntan]] is banned. Those IPs are TOR proxies being used by Kuntan. Banned users are not allowed to edit, and reverting them is not a violation of [[WP:3RR]]. This includes, removing content posted by banned users.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="gold">竜龍</font>]]) 06:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:But you '''have no proof'''. Sorry. Until you get proof, let another admin who sees the thread at the noticeboard deal with it.--[[User:Rambutan|Rambutan]] ([[User talk:Rambutan|talk]]) 06:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::Declined. You're both edit-warring over this. You both should know better. Knock it off and go talk about it on his talk page or something.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|T]] 07:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:::I endorse this no-action, as noted by the fact that Rambutan has been blocked for proxying for a banned user. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 07:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::::not for nothing that you got mail from Blnguyen, Danny.{{unsigned|61.121.24.68|15:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)}}
===[[User:Kwork]] reported by [[User:PinchasC]] (Result:24h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Chabad}}. {{3RRV|Kwork}}: Time reported: 13:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&oldid=144983249k 08:02, 16 July 2007]
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=145003778&oldid=144994896 10:25, 16 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=next&oldid=145029881 13:04, 16 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=next&oldid=145151712 07:09, 17 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=next&oldid=145211764 09:34, 17 July 2007] (Based on Ip's edits, it is the same person as Kwork)
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=145230794&oldid=145221457 10:48, 17 July 2007]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=next&oldid=145232934 11:05, 17 July 2007] (using IP)
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad&diff=145236019&oldid=145234604 11:17, 17 July 2007]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKwork&diff=145211515&oldid=145041886 08:40, 17 July 2007]
:This user is adding a npov template to the [[Chabad]] article, despite being reverted by 3 different editors. --[[User:PinchasC|PinchasC]] | [[User_talk:PinchasC|<small>£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€</small>]] 13:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Blocked for 24 hours. It's a first violation, so I would have blocked for a shorter period, but that's a lot of reverts. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 15:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Giovanni33]] reported by [[User:MONGO]] (Result:No block)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki}}. {{3RRV|Giovanni33}}: Time reported: 14:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145179204&oldid=145136431] 07:45, July 17, 2007
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=next&oldid=145179811] 07:56, July 17, 2007
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=next&oldid=145181590] 08:11, July 17, 2007
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=next&oldid=145182556] 08:20, July 17, 2007 changes to using my name to "with one editor who insists on being unamed here"
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=next&oldid=145186099] 08:56, July 17, 2007 again to "with one editor who insists on being unamed here"
Giovanni33 knows that 3RR isn't an entitlement so I didn't bother to warn him. I asked him four times ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145179811&oldid=145179204 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145181590&oldid=145181020 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145182021&oldid=145181877 here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145186192&oldid=145186099 here]) to not put my name in the talkpage discussion heading and he repeatedly put it back and then added the silly "with one editor who insists on being unamed here" just to be childish. This guy edit wars constantly all the way up to 3RR and has been blocked by more than a dozen administrators including one as recently as June 29th, albeit he was soon unblocked since the page was protected. He was almost blocked again on July 12th and was given a reprieve since he self reverted.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGiovanni33&diff=144100462&oldid=143923431]. I feel that I had a right to not have him post my name repeatedly in the heading, especially after I had asked him numerous times (ie...argue about the message, not the messenger) to not put my name there. He is also currently sitting on the line on the [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki]] article with an initial installment and three reverts again.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145130221&oldid=145128244], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145178195&oldid=145173161], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145182932&oldid=145182736], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145199192&oldid=145197416]. This is par for the course. Giovanni33 sees the 3RR rule as an entitlement, he has been blocked and counseled repeatedly yet he doesn't seem to get it.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 14:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:Perhaps a 24 hour block for both of them would do, MONGO seems to be doing his fair share of reverting as well, which I wouldn't be surprised is disrupting the talk page there. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145179811&oldid=145179204][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145181590&oldid=145181020][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145182021&oldid=145181877][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145183270&oldid=145182778]--[[User:SevenOfDiamonds|SevenOfDiamonds]] 18:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
::And article edits: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145173161&oldid=145134203][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145178916&oldid=145178751][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&diff=145182736&oldid=145180889] Geez. Talk about throwing stones in glass houses. --[[User:SevenOfDiamonds|SevenOfDiamonds]] 18:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
:There may or may not be violations here by one or both parties, but I am not blocking anyone for this. It's a childish situation that has gotten way out of hand and I suggest you both take it somewhere else. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 12:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
=== [[User:Green108]] reported by [[User:Bksimonb]] 24h ===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University}}. {{3RRV|Green108}}: Time reported: 15:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*1st revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&diff=145079584&oldid=145077290 20:49, 16 July 2007]
*2nd revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&diff=145204586&oldid=145187761 11:45, 17 July 2007]
*3rd revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&diff=145211434&oldid=145210828 12:39, 17 July 2007]
*4th revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&diff=145224824&oldid=145216883 14:11, 17 July 2007]
*5th revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&diff=145359964&oldid=145298439 03:02, 18 July 2007]
*6th revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&curid=3060479&diff=145440809&oldid=145409773 14:28, 18 July 2007]
*Diff of 3RR notification: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Green108&diff=145261308&oldid=145215819 17:39, 17 July 2007]
===[[User:Sam ov the blue sand]] reported by [[User:BlueShrek]]===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
[[Deidara]]. {{3RRV|Sam ov the blue sand}}: Time reported: 15:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*1st revert: [http://22:12, 16 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://00:30, 17 July 2007 ]
*3rd revert: [http://# 00:42, 17 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://00:54, 17 July 2007]
*note: he was in a edit war as well
===[[User:Pascack]] reported by [[User:Mghabmw]] no vio===
[[Joe Girardi]]<br>
Pascack has a history of anti-Yankee biased. I've tried to use the discussion page.
I've changed the page to neutral colors.
He is using suspected sockpuppet [[User:joeidaho]] as well.
I realize I'm guilty of violating the 3RR as well.
:no specific vio. [[User:GDonato|GDonato]] ('''[[User talk:GDonato|talk]]''') 12:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Mghabmw]] reported by [[User:Jpers36]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Joe Girardi}}. {{3RRV|Mghabmw}}: Time reported: 19:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&oldid=145021193 11:05, July 16, 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&diff=next&oldid=145053926 Revision as of 17:42, July 16, 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&diff=next&oldid=145144054 Revision as of 22:03, July 16, 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&diff=next&oldid=145233913 Revision as of 10:55, July 17, 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&diff=next&oldid=145251049 Revision as of 14:10, July 17, 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&diff=145283083&oldid=145281167 Current revision (14:36, July 17, 2007)] (after a warning, instead of full-reverting to the older version, the user removed the colors altogether, as well as reverted some added text)
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMghabmw&diff=145281171&oldid=145150022 Revision as of 14:26, July 17, 2007]
*:Both of these users ([[User:Pascack]] and [[User:Mghabmw]]) have engaged in an edit war, along with IP 192.234.99.1 (which may or may not be one of the above) and IP 208.168.252.236 (which is user:Mghabmw). The situation may be settled now, and I would recommend holding off on any blocks for the time being, but I'll leave it to another admin to make the final decision. [[User:Citicat|<b><font color="#FF0000">Citi</font><font color="#151B8D">Cat</font></b>]]<small><font color="#000000"><sup>[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]</sup></font></small> 23:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Update - while [[User:Pascack]] appears to have stopped, [[User:Mghabmw]] reverted once more[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Girardi&diff=145569070&oldid=145283083]. [[User:Citicat|<b><font color="#FF0000">Citi</font><font color="#151B8D">Cat</font></b>]]<small><font color="#000000"><sup>[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]</sup></font></small> 03:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:SalvoCalcio]] reported by [[User:Bridgeplayer]] (Result:24 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Scarborough Athletic F.C.}}. {{3RRV|SalvoCalcio}}: Time reported: 20:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarborough_Athletic_F.C.&oldid=144915621 02:38, 16 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarborough_Athletic_F.C.&diff=145119503&oldid=144915621 00:20, 17 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarborough_Athletic_F.C.&diff=145279126&oldid=145278343 19:16, 17 July 200]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarborough_Athletic_F.C.&diff=145281252&oldid=145281032 19:27, 17 July 200]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarborough_Athletic_F.C.&diff=145281963&oldid=145281725 19:30, 17 July 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarborough_Athletic_F.C.&diff=145327654&oldid=145319564 23:41, 17 July 2007]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASalvoCalcio&diff=143742273&oldid=142893471 15:14, 10 July 2007]
There are numerous earlier reversions, contrary to the talk page consensus, but this is the first time he has actually done four in one day. He also calls edits vandalism and has something against Americans (see edit summary 3rd revert).
===[[User:DIREKTOR]] reported by [[User:151.33.88.197]] {Result: No violation)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|foibe massacres}}. {{3RRV|DIREKTOR}}: Time reported: 20:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: -17:24, 14 July 2007 151.33.91.112 (Talk) (22,437 bytes) (→Video) (undo)-
*1st revert: -18:03, 14 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Stop vandalising the article, you cannot speak english and aren't even registered fascist!) (undo)-
*2nd revert: -22:46, 14 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144656344 by 151.33.91.112 (talk)) (undo)-
*3rd revert: -08:35, 15 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144759834 by 87.8.235.141 (talk)) (undo)-
*4th revert: -08:45, 15 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144760730 by 87.8.235.141 (talk)) (undo)-
*5th revert: -13:08, 15 July 2007 DIREKTOR (Talk | contribs) m (21,816 bytes) (Undid revision 144781469 by 151.33.91.166 (talk)) (undo)-
:Blocking is not punitive; article has not been edited in days. While I agree that DIREKTOR's comments and reversions were not in keeping with our policies on dealing with new users, he hasn't edit warred any more than you have so I am not blocking for 3RR at this time. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 12:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Lear21]] reported by [[User:Polaron]] (Result:1 week)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|List of countries by population}}. {{3RRV|Lear21}}: Time reported: 22:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&oldid=145119220]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=145119220&oldid=145061518 2007-07-16 20:18:22]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=145196250&oldid=145183748 2007-07-17 06:35:23]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=145238063&oldid=145233121 2007-07-17 11:29:21]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_population&diff=145304815&oldid=145242159 2007-07-17 17:29:54]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
:Blocked for one week. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 12:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:BloodRunsCold1996 ]] reported by [[User:Strothra]] (Result:24 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Sean Morley}}. {{3RRV| }}: Time reported: 03:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Morley&diff=145222742&oldid=145128811 Revision as of 08:59, 17 July 2007].
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Morley&diff=145237204&oldid=145225111 10:24, 17 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Morley&oldid=145314906 17:26, 17 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Morley&oldid=145344666 20:23, 17 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Morley&oldid=145346966 20:38, 17 July 2007]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BloodRunsCold1996&oldid=145345639 20:30, 17 July 2007]
*Blocked for 24 hours. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 12:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Snowhite1985]] reported by [[User:Dúnadan]] (Result: Warned)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Argentina}}. {{3RRV|Snowhite1985}}: Time reported: 04:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina&oldid=144926204 03:50, 16 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
First, he reverted 7 times as 190.16.20.42 until the article was semi-protected. Then he logged in as [[User:Snowhite1985]] and reverted 4 additional times. The identity of 190.16.20.42 as Snowhite1985 was suspected by administrator [[User:Pablo-flores]] and confirmed by [[User:Tangerines]] after Snowhite1985, not logged in, [inadvertently] signed as himself at [[User_talk:190.16.20.42]]. While he might be violating [[WP:SOCK]], and his 11 reverts (all summed together) are a clear violation of [[WP:3RR]] (and were classified as [[WP:Vandalism]] by Tangerines), I will only present the 4 edits of Snowhite1985. It is up to the administrators to decide whether to take a more drastic measure given the clear evidence above, or to simply deal with this 3RR violations for the time being.
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina&diff=145335850&oldid=145334933 00:27, 18 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina&diff=145336524&oldid=145335996 00:32, 18 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina&diff=145338937&oldid=145338814 00:46, 18 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina&diff=next&oldid=145339416 03:03, 18 July 2007]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A190.16.20.42&diff=145333498&oldid=145033376 00:13, 18 July 2007] by Tangerines at anon's Talk page
* Diff or 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASnowhite1985&diff=145337177&oldid=141128752 00:36, 18 July 2007] at Snowhite1985 talk page.
:'''Comment''': Those diffs are not 3RR warnings. They are requests for the user to sign his posts. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 12:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
::First, Snowhite is ''not'' a new user. Secondly, the warnings advised him to ''stop'' his reiterated reversions (as well as asking him to sign). Please review the warnings thoroughly. I will quote what Tangerines wrote on the second warning:
::''"If you wish to mame [sic] major changes to the article, please provide and edit summary as any edits made without an edit summary are likely to be reverted as they appear to be vandalism. In this instance it is quite clear that this needs to be discussed on the talk page. Will you please therefore discuss this rather than keep adding the same edit as it will only be reverted again until this has been discussed on the articles talk page.''"
::--[[User:Dúnadan|<font color="blue">the</font> <font color="#339900">D</font><font color="blue">únadan</font>]] 01:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
:::And after Tangerines said that, SnowWhite stopped reverting. He ''is'' a new user (certainly new enough to still need a proper 3RR warning), and he hasn't touched the article since the first warning came in. I'm not saying he definitely shouldn't be blocked, but I do think he's new enough to need a warning and he didn't do anything wrong after he got one. I'll leave this report open and another admin can offer a second opinion. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 01:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
::::Please review the dates: he '''''did''''' revert after the first warning came in!
::::* The anon was warned at 00.13; Snowhite was warned at 00.36, The third and fourth reversions occurred at 00.46 and 03:03 respectively: ''both'' occurred '''''after''''' the second warning came in. More recently he reverted ''yet again'' at 06:49 ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina&action=history]), which would make the '''''5th''''' revert in less than 24 hours, and the '''''3rd''''' after being warned.
::::* Snowhite1985 registered on March 2007; he is been here almost 4 months; enough to know that he should not engage in [[WP:Vandalism]], enough to stop editing after being warned not to do so, and enough to have discussed the issue civilly at the Talk Page.
::::--[[User:Dúnadan|<font color="blue">the</font> <font color="#339900">D</font><font color="blue">únadan</font>]] 01:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
::I'm going to have to agree with Kafziel. The user was not warned of the 3-revert rule, but given a general caution about reverting. We need to be specific; it's best to use the <nowiki>{{subst:3rr}}</nowiki> template, because otherwise 3 reverts seems kind of arbitrary. I've placed the warning on his page. He has not edited for a couple of days; if the message has not gotten through, let me know or come back here and he will be blocked, but I'm not going to do it now. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 03:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:SoxrockProjects]] reported by [[User:Pats1]] (Result:24 Hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Garrett Mills}}. {{3RRV|SoxrockProjects}}: Time reported: 15:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garrett_Mills&oldid=145421229 11:56, 18 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garrett_Mills&diff=145443726&oldid=145442623 14:47, 18 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garrett_Mills&diff=145444136&oldid=145444076 14:49, 18 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garrett_Mills&diff=145446314&oldid=145445829 15:03, 18 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garrett_Mills&diff=145449607&oldid=145447310 15:21, 18 July 2007]
*'''Comment''': User ignoring discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League/archive5#Links in infoboxes]].
*'''WHAT ARE YOU DOING?''': YOU ARE TRYING TO RUIN MY FREAKING DAY! YOU KNOW THIS DOESN'T NEED CONSENSUS, AND NOW YOUR TRYING TO GET ME BLOCKED. THANKS A WHOLE FREAKING LOT! [[User:Soxrock|Soxrock]] 15:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Blocked for 24 hours [[User:Citicat|<b><font color="#FF0000">Citi</font><font color="#151B8D">Cat</font></b>]]<small><font color="#000000"><sup>[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]</sup></font></small> 16:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:*This user made no more reverts after the time that he was warned of 3RR. His last revert was at 15:21, the warning he received was at 15:30. He shouldn't be blocked because he was never warned fairly. '''[[User:Ksy92003|Ksy92003]]'''<small>[[User talk:Ksy92003|<font color="black">(talk)</font>]]</small> 17:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:BlueShrek]] reported by [[User:Sesshomaru]] (Result: Blocked, 24h)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Spider-Man: Friend or Foe}}. {{3RRV|Sesshomaru}}: Time reported: 15:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man:_Friend_or_Foe&diff=145452543&oldid=145452298 15:38, 18 July 2007]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man:_Friend_or_Foe&diff=145437702&oldid=145431441 14:07, 18 July 2007]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man:_Friend_or_Foe&diff=145446919&oldid=145445793 15:06, 18 July 2007]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man:_Friend_or_Foe&diff=145448395&oldid=145447781 15:14, 18 July 2007]
** 3rr warning given at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BlueShrek&diff=145449601&oldid=145382116 15:21, 18 July 2007]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man:_Friend_or_Foe&diff=next&oldid=145449282 15:28, 18 July 2007]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man:_Friend_or_Foe&diff=145452543&oldid=145452298 15:38, 18 July 2007]
* '''Comment''': User claims that sources (like GameSpot) aren't official, but the talk page of ''Spider-Man: Friend or Foe'' says otherwise. He is however likely a sockpuppet of [[User:Wrestlinglover420]] or [[User:TheManWhoLaughs]], as there is currently a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wrestlinglover420]] to confirm whether he really is this abusive disruptive user.
I just want to say that this user has been picking on me since yesterday and he is trying to get me banned for no real reason. Nobody can put a reliable source on the page and he kept reverting me. I was just following talk page consensus.[[User:BlueShrek|BlueShrek]] 16:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked BlueShrek and Sesshomaru for 24 hours. --[[User:ST47|ST47]]<small>[[User talk:ST47|Talk]]·[[User:ST47/Desk|Desk]]</small> 17:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Bremskraft]] reported by [[User:DickClarkMises]] (Result: No violation)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Hans-Hermann Hoppe}}. {{3RRV|Bremskraft}}: Time reported: 16:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hans-Hermann_Hoppe&oldid=145306379], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hans-Hermann_Hoppe&direction=next&oldid=145377515]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hans-Hermann_Hoppe&oldid=145341221 21:00, 17 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hans-Hermann_Hoppe&oldid=145351064 22:05, 17 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hans-Hermann_Hoppe&oldid=145377576 01:04, 18 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hans-Hermann_Hoppe&oldid=145458065 12:09, 18 July 2007]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bremskraft&diff=next&oldid=145354011]
:I see no reverts after the warning. --[[User:ST47|ST47]]<small>[[User talk:ST47|Talk]]·[[User:ST47/Desk|Desk]]</small> 17:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:206.47.252.66]] reported by [[User:Orangemarlin]] (Result:Blocked 24 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Naturopathic medicine}}. {{3RRV|206.47.252.66}}: Time reported: 18:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturopathic_medicine&oldid=145474396 09:40, July 18, 20]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturopathic_medicine&diff=145454215&oldid=145453885 07:48, July 18, 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturopathic_medicine&diff=145460706&oldid=145457286 08:23, July 18, 2007 ]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturopathic_medicine&diff=145471567&oldid=145470713 09:24, July 18, 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturopathic_medicine&diff=145478081&oldid=145476078 09:59, July 18, 2007]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A206.47.252.66&diff=145454082&oldid=133692101 7:47, July 18, 2007]
*Comment: See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/206.47.252.66 user's contributions to understand the full fervor of his <s>3</s> 10 RR. [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">•Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch•</font>]] 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*We're at 11 or 12 reverts with this anonymous, and I will call him what he is, VANDAL. Can someone please block this guy! [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 22:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*A semi-protect might help as well. [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">•Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch•</font>]] 22:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hours by [[User:Kafziel]] [[User:Citicat|<b><font color="#FF0000">Citi</font><font color="#151B8D">Cat</font></b>]]<small><font color="#000000"><sup>[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]</sup></font></small> 23:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:70.189.74.49]] reported by [[User:Qwerty7412369]] (Result:Article semi-protected and user blocked 24hr)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Thematic_motifs_of_Lost}}. {{3RRV|70.189.74.49}}: Time reported: 19:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&direction=next&oldid=145412055]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=144877811&oldid=143377002 18:39, July 15, 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=144896958 04:04, July 16, 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=144938171 03:40, July 16, 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=144967783 12:53, July 16, 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=145030009 12:54, July 16, 2007]
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=145030273 13:06, July 16, 2007]
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=next&oldid=145034896 13:39, July 16, 2007]
*8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145261219 13:38, July 17, 2007]
*9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145269814 14:26, July 17, 2007]
*10th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145291633 16:20, July 17, 2007]
*11th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145302260 17:16, July 17, 2007]
*12th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=145401420 04:39, July 18, 2007]
*13th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&curid=6844657&diff=145403301&oldid=145402094 05:03, July 18, 2007]
*14th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thematic_motifs_of_Lost&curid=6844657&diff=145413703&oldid=145412055 06:49, July 18, 2007
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.189.74.49&oldid=144965155 05:11, July 16, 2007]
*Diff of 3RR warning:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.189.74.49&direction=next&oldid=145159759]
*Diff of 3RR warning:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.189.74.49&direction=next&oldid=145271262]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.189.74.49&direction=next&oldid=145324763]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.189.74.49&direction=next&oldid=145404454]
'''COMMENT''' - As you can see, [[User:70.189.74.49]] has made 14 reverts to the [[Thematic motifs of Lost|same article]] in less than three days (at one point making 8 reverts in a single 24-hour period), delibertly disregarding the [[WP:3RR| Three Revert Rule]] and ignoring the numerous [[WP:3RR]] warnings posted by various editors on [[User_talk:70.189.74.49|User:70.189.74.49's Talk Page]]. However this is not the only problem I and other users have experienced with [[User:70.189.74.49]]. They have been quite obsessive over the past few days in their deletion of my and other user's entries despite the requests from numerous editors that they desist, and until a only few hours ago has refused to justify their position on either the [[Talk:Thematic_motifs_of_Lost|Discussion Page]] or to me directly on [[User_talk:Qwerty7412369|My Talk Page]], which has both initiated and inflamed an [[edit war]] over [[Thematic motifs of Lost|this article]]. Now that this user has finally entered the [[Talk:Thematic_motifs_of_Lost| the discussion]], they have been growing less [[WP:CIV|Civil]] with every post (See [[Talk:Thematic_motifs_of_Lost#Primary_research_is_NOT_original_research|Here]] as well as [[User_talk:Qwerty7412369#Thematic_motifs_of_Lost|Here]]) and does not seem to be interested in reaching any [[WP:CON|consensus]] with other editors, nor will they engage in any discussion beyond the most basic assertions that they alone are 100% correct and I and other users are 100% wrong. I would also like to note that this user appears to be a [[Wikipedia:Single_purpose_account|Single Purpose Account]] and I suspect it to be a [[WP:Sock|Sock Puppet]].
I simply ask that the Administrators take these chronic violations of Wikipedia's rules and policies by [[User:70.189.74.49]] into consideration when revewing this case.
Thank you,
--[[User:Qwerty7412369|Qwerty7412369]] 19:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:*Article semi-protected. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 19:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:*If the edit warring weren't so egregious, the protection would be sufficient, but I've added a 24hr block. This user has received ample warnings and disregarded them. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|Orwellian Cyber hell master]])</small> 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:::No argument here. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Talk]]</sup> 19:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:XAndreWx]] reported by [[User:Sprigot]] (Result: 48 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom}}. {{3RRV|XAndreWx}}: Time reported: 02:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145485684&oldid=145485310 18:34, 18 July 2007]<br>
*8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145485016&oldid=145479990 18:31, 18 July 2007]<br>
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145479466&oldid=145337797 18:06, 18 July 2007]<br>
*6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145337797&oldid=145333329 00:39, 18 July 2007]<br>
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145304234&oldid=145294551 21:26, 17 July 2007]<br>
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145288702&oldid=145141385 20:06, 17 July 2007]<br>
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=145018669&oldid=144947036 15:50, 16 July 2007]<br>
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=144785063&oldid=144752711 12:53, 15 July 2007]<br>
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_city_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=144252999&oldid=144242490 20:20, 12 July 2007]<br>
<br>
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
<br>
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:XAndreWx&oldid=144878264 22:41, 15 July 2007]
XAndreWx was originally blocked for the 3RR rule by [[User:Irishguy]] for this article over here:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:XAndreWx&oldid=144878264 22:41, 15 July 2007]
This block was overturned by [[User:Evilclown93]], also known as [[User:Maxim]], on the request of XAndreWx's adoptor [[User:Giggy]], with the comment of "Giggy has asked me to remove it, and I trust you've cooled off by now." here:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:XAndreWx&oldid=144908223 01:48, 16 July 2007]
Even though XAndreWx was unblocked he again repeatedly violated the 3RR rule - in fact violating it at least six times since he was unblocked just two days ago.<br>
I also believe that he then resorted to sock puppeteering to continue the revisions (three more identical revisions were made) - I have also created a sock puppet complaint which documents the evidence I have gathered in this matter.<br>
:Those diffs are not necessarily all reverts, but there are four clear reverts in a 24-hour span in there. To make matters worse, he was blocked recently for another 3RR-violation, and was released on a promise of good behavior. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Cgoodell]] reported by [[User:Ilya1166]] (Result: User warned)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Russia}}. {{3RRV|Cgoodell}}: Time reported: 04:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&diff=145591220&oldid=145573067 03:39, 19 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&diff=145598473&oldid=145598026 04:25, 19 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&diff=145599512&oldid=145599097 04:32, 19 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&diff=145600622&oldid=145600181 04:39, 19 July 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&diff=145600914&oldid=145600622 04:41, 19 July 2007]
:User has not been warned. I have done so. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Mmtrmm]] reported by [[User:Poindexter_Propellerhead]] (Result: Awaiting further diffs)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|IQ and the Wealth of Nations}}. {{3RRV|Mmtrmm}}: Time reported: 06:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Here are 7 reverts in a 27 hour period.
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&diff=prev&oldid=145373801 04:37, 18 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&diff=prev&oldid=145375247 04:46, 18 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&diff=145390208&oldid=145377933 06:48, 18 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&diff=145441811&oldid=145441144 14:35, 18 July 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&diff=145606933&oldid=145497745 05:31, 19 July 2007]
*6th revert:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&diff=145610994&oldid=145609851 06:06, 19 July 2007]
*7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations&curid=638066&diff=145619573&oldid=145618281 07:25, 19 July 2007]
Aargh, I'm such a noob. :-/ No 3RR warning until 08:04, 19 July 2007,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMmtrmm&diff=145624347&oldid=145620124] when I noticed the warning rule. Please leave this on hold for 12 hours if possible, and I'll add any new reverts by that time. If that's not possible, feel free to kill this request, and I'll resubmit it when the problem recurs. [[User:Poindexter Propellerhead|Poindexter Propellerhead]] 09:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to withdraw this report, as Mmtrmm seems to have taken the day off from editing. I have a sockpuppet case proceeding also, which is awaiting final Checkuser confirmation, so it's probably safe to just let that run its course. [[User:Poindexter Propellerhead|Poindexter Propellerhead]] 05:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Mehicdino]] reported by [[User:Boadrummer]] (Result: User warned)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Avenged Sevenfold}}. {{3RRV|Mehicdino }}: Time reported: 08:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
*Reverted to this version at least 5 tims in one day: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Avenged_Sevenfold&diff=145622192&oldid=145606194 07:46, 19 July 2007]
:: '''Non admin comment:''' Please provide diffs. [[User:Rlest|Rlest]] 16:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
:The user has not been warned. I issued a warning; any further reverts will result in a block. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:DIREKTOR]] reported by [[User:151.33.95.105]] (Result: User warned; see below)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Istrian exodus}}. {{3RRV|DIREKTOR}}: Time reported: 19:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: -02:13, 18 July 2007 (edit) 4.231.202.71 (Talk)-
*1st revert: -07:03, 18 July 2007 (hist) (diff) m Istrian exodus (You are the son of a refugee, and you call me a fanatic! :D ,hilarious, you are POV lay off or I'll have this article blocked as well)-
*2nd revert: -18:06, 18 July 2007 (hist) (diff) m Istrian exodus (Undid revision 145479162 by 151.33.88.157 (talk)-
*3rd revert: -18:15, 18 July 2007 (hist) (diff) m Istrian exodus (I sware... Stop this before I have to bother the Admins again)-
*4th revert: -18:28, 18 July 2007 (hist) (diff) m Istrian exodus (Undid revision 145482427 by 209.215.160.114 (talk)-
*5th revert: -18:45, 18 July 2007 (hist) (diff) m Istrian exodus (Undid revision 145485467 by 209.215.160.114 (talk)-
:[[User:Isotope23]] is on the case here as an admin, and he saw this as a case of IP disruption which DIREKTOR was responding to. Isotope semi-protected the page and blocked the IP edit-warring with DIREKTOR, so I'm going to leave things with a warning to DIREKTOR to seek admin assistance earlier in the course. I don't think a block is warranted for DIREKTOR, as it appears (in the judgement of Isotope23) that he was responding to disruption by IP's. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Discostu333]] reported by [[User:M0RHI]] (Result: 24 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|University of St Andrews Students' Association}}. {{3RRV|Discostu333}}: Time reported: 20:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_St_Andrews_Students%27_Association&oldid=145743982 19:39, 19 July 2007]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_St_Andrews_Students%27_Association&oldid=145744433 19:42, 19 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_St_Andrews_Students%27_Association&oldid=145744854 19:44, 19 July 2007]
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_St_Andrews_Students%27_Association&oldid=145745425 19:47, 19 July 2007]
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_St_Andrews_Students%27_Association&oldid=145745771 19:49, 19 July 2007]
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_St_Andrews_Students%27_Association&oldid=145747601 19:58, 19 July 2007]
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Discostu333&oldid=145746341 19:52, 19 July 2007]
:Blocked for 24 hours. I see 3 reverts in which he redirected the page, and one in which he removed fact tags restored by M0RHI, in 24 hours. In the future, please provide diffs in the report - instructions on how to do so are at [[WP:DIFF]]. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:Mghabmw]] reported by [[User:The Evil Spartan]] (Result: 31 hours)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Reggie Jackson}}. {{3RRV|Mghabmw}}: Time reported: 22:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&diff=141944613&oldid=141914771 00:39, July 2, 2007] (right before page protected)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*I hate to be lazy, but there are literally dozens of reversions. Just take a look at the page history and you will see exactly the problem: mass spa'ing, etc. I count '''21 reversions''' in the last 24 hours. [[User:The Evil Spartan|The Evil Spartan]] 22:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
This user's really pissing me off. I have a sneaking supcision he's a sock of [[User:Yankees10]] (apparently a sock of another user), and has socked elsewhere. He clearly knows the rules (he reported someone above), and is mass revert warring in order to get his version of the page before it's locked - and like I said, I think there's some mass sockpuppetry going on. He's at like 15RR. [[User:The Evil Spartan|The Evil Spartan]] 22:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
:Blocked for 31 hours by another admin. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
===[[User:NCdave]] reported by [[User:MastCell]] (Result:1 week) ===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Steven Milloy}}. {{3RRV|NCdave}}: Time reported: 02:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&oldid=145786454 Revision as of 23:16, 19 July 2007]
*1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145790027&oldid=145787682 23:38, 19 July 2007]
*2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145791304&oldid=145790429 23:45, 19 July 2007] (diff includes 2 consecutive edits by NCdave)
*3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145792921&oldid=145791684 23:55, 19 July 2007] (readds tag, undoing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145738887&oldid=144903197 this very recent edit])
*4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145797130&oldid=145793900 00:23, 20 July 2007] (tag-warring, reverts the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=prev&oldid=145793900 immediately preceding edit])
*5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=prev&oldid=145832619 04:04, 20 July 2007] (continued tag-warring, undoes the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=prev&oldid=145826571 immediately prior edit]).
*Multiple subsequent edits involve tagging each individual section and edit-warring over the tag at the top of the article ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145802076&oldid=145797609], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy&diff=145810090&oldid=145803221], etc).
*Diff of 3RR warning: User has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:NCdave previous 3RR block], also warned [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Steven_Milloy&diff=prev&oldid=145792192 here (23:51, 19 July 2007)].
This is aggravated by the fact that NCdave is well aware there is consensus against his proposed edits, as exemplified by reams of [[Talk:Steven Milloy|talk page discussion]]. He responded to the 3RR warning by describing everyone else as "revert-warriors" and voicing an intention to tag-bomb the article instead ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Steven_Milloy&diff=next&oldid=145792464]). '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 02:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
:Also, note that NCDave has a history of this kind of thing at [[Terry Schiavo]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:NCdave]]. A lengthy ban is in order here. [[User:John Quiggin|JQ]] 06:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
::1 week. [[User_talk:Yandman|<font color="red">'''yandman'''</font>]] 08:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
== Example ==
<pre>
<!-- copy from _below_ this line -->
===[[User:NAME_OF_USER]] reported by [[User:YOUR_NAME]] (Result:)===
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|ARTICLE_NAME}}. {{3RRV|NAME_OF_USER}}: Time reported: ~~~~~
*Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to -->
*1st revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*2nd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*3rd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.
Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.
*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
<!-- copy from _above_ this line -->
</pre>
[[ar:ويكيبيديا:سجل خرق قانون الثلاثة استرجاعات]]
| |||