Wikipedia:Requests for comment and Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links/Maintenance: Difference between pages

Revision as of 06:03, 13 January 2005

Revision as of 14:32, 14 July 2005

Line 1:

{{Active Wiki Fixup Projects}}

{{Shortcut|[[WP:RFC]]}}

[[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|Disambiguation]] pages exist to clarify confusion where two or more similarly named articles exist - for example if two famous people have the same name. Ideally, other articles should not link to disambiguation pages; links should go directly to the appropriate "real" article instead.

This page lists disambiguation pages that have had incoming links, which have been fixed. Perhaps they've been added from [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links]]. However, they need monitoring.

''Part of [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]]''

==How to help==

Ultimately, the content of Wikipedia is determined by making progress toward a community consensus. However, the size of Wikipedia prevents community members from actively following every development. As a result, sometimes it's useful to request broader opinions from the rest of the community.

# Pick a disambiguation page to check from the list below.

This page is a way that anyone can request other wiki-ists to help them resolve difficulties and disputes in articles or talk pages. Anyone may visit any of these articles, to help them reach agreement. A good quality RFC can help contributors resolve differences, add different insights, give comments and opinions how others might see some wording, and so on.

# Move it to the bottom of the list.

# Visit the target disambiguation page.

# Click on the [[Wikipedia:What links here|What links here]] link in the "toolbox" on the left-hand side of the page.

# For each of the pages you see there, visit that page and change the link that goes to the disambiguation page to a link to one of the articles listed on the disambiguation page. It is most important to fix articles in the main namespace; articles with "Talk:" and "User:" prefixes, as well as "Wikipedia:" administrative pages, don't necessarily need to be fixed.

#In order to help people find this project, consider using an edit summary like the following: '''<nowiki>disambiguation link repair ([[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages maintenance|You can help!]]</nowiki>)'''

==General lists==

It will help the RFC process if everyone who lists something on this page tries to help out at least one other page listed here.

== Overview ==

# [[Tudor]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Tudor|links]])

=== When to use RFC ===

# [[SAS]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/SAS|links]])

# [[Naxos]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Naxos|links]])

# [[Commodore]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Commodore|links]])

# [[Nike]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Nike|links]])

# [[Hebrew]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Hebrew|links]])

# [[Billboard]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Billboard|links]])

# [[Attu]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Attu|links]])

# [[Ani]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Ani|links]])

# [[Hui]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Hui|links]])

# [[Palestine]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Palestine|links]])

# [[Orlando]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Orlando|links]])

# [[MVP]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/MVP|links]])

# [[Arian]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Arian|links]])

# [[Hausa]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Hausa|links]])

# [[Fittipaldi]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Fittipaldi|links]])

# [[German]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/German|links]])

# [[Gotha]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Gotha|links]])

# [[Batavia]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Batavia|links]])

# [[Oakland]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Oakland|links]])

# [[Greek (disambiguation)|Greek]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Greek|links]])

# [[British (disambiguation)|British]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/British|links]])

# [[Disney (disambiguation)|Disney]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Disney|links]])

# [[America]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/America|links]])

# [[WBA]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/WBA|links]])

# [[Vietnamese]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Vietnamese|links]])

# [[Queen]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Queen|links]] )

# [[XX]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/XX|links]] )

# [[McLaren]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/McLaren|links]] )

# [[Hittite]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Hittite|links]] )

# [[Saul]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Saul|links]] )

# [[Isfahan]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Isfahan|links]] )

# [[Union]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Union|links]] )

# [[Gujarati]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Gujarati|links]] )

# [[Mercedes]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Mercedes|links]] )

# [[Dragnet]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Dragnet|links]] )

# [[Spring]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Spring|links]] )

# [[MEP]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/MEP|links]] )

# [[Caesar]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Caesar|links]] )

# [[Cleavage]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Cleavage|links]] )

# [[Rock]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Rock|links]] )

# [[Scandinavian]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Scandinavian|links]] )

# [[Vulcan]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Vulcan|links]] )

# [[BA]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/BA|links]] )

# [[Shannon]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Shannon|links]] )

# [[Ainu]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Ainu|links]] )

# [[Chelsea]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Chelsea|links]] )

# [[Kimberley]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Kimberley|links]] )

# [[Lancaster]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Lancaster|links]] )

# [[Arcade]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Arcade|links]] )

# [[Dieppe]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Dieppe|links]] )

# [[Champagne]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Champagne|links]] )

# [[James]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/James|links]] )

# [[Cooper]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Cooper|links]] )

# [[Fez]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Fez|links]] )

# [[Mach]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Mach|links]] )

# [[Pantheon]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Pantheon|links]])

# [[Kawasaki]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Kawasaki|links]])

# [[Augustine]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Augustine|links]] )

# [[King]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/King|links]] )

# [[Yamaha]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/Yamaha|links]] )

==Specific lists==

* RFC is appropriate when you want other wiki-ists to visit the page, to allow a consensus or a better quality of decision, to help resolve a dispute or break a deadlock.

* If you simply want [[peer review]] of an article, then list it at [[Wikipedia:Peer review]].

* If the dispute involves allegations that a user has engaged in serious violations of [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies and guidelines]], create a [[Wikipedia:Subpages|subpage]] for the dispute. Use the subpage to elaborate on the allegations.

For reference in disambiguating abbreviations in "Politics of" articles, see [[Abbreviations used in CIA World Factbook]].

=== How to use RFC ===

* To request other users to comment on an issue, add a link to the '''Talk''' page for the article, a brief '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral]]''' statement of the issue, and the date.

* ''Don't'' sign it, don't list the details, and don't submit arguments or assign blame.

* On the '''Talk''' page of the article, it can help to summarize the dispute.

The following disambiguation pages are linked to frequently, and need monitoring.

=== General hints for dispute resolution ===

#[[Roman]]

* Whatever the nature of the dispute, the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#First resort: talk to the other parties involved|first resort]] should always be to discuss the problem with the other user. Try to resolve the dispute on your own first.

#[[Finnish]]

* For disputes over user conduct, before requesting community comment, ''at least two people'' should have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and failed to resolve the problem.

#[[French]]

*Don't forget to follow [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette|Wikiquette]]. Wikiquette is <u>more</u> important in resolving a dispute, not less.

#[[German]]

#[[Irish]]

#[[Italian]]

#[[Japanese]]

#[[Mohawk]]

#[[Norwegian]]

#[[Turkish]]

Also note that, although not a disambiguation page, the page for [[American]] relates to the use of the word ''American'' and is not an article about the people of America; most articles linking to this page should probably be re-linked either to [[United States]] or to [[The Americas]].

==Article content disputes==

A few [[Wikipedia:Non-unique personal names|Non-unique personal names]]:

Please only list links to talk pages where two or more participants cannot reach [[consensus]] and are thus stalling progress on the article. Discussions with no new comments in over two weeks old may have dried up, in which case please talk to the people involved to determine whether the problem was resolved.

#[[Robert Bradford]]

#[[Rosemary Brown]]

#[[Thomas Henry Burke]]

#[[Lon Chaney]]

#[[Donald Davidson]]

#[[Glenn Davis]]

#[[Jim Davis]]

#[[Donald Wills Douglas]]

#[[William Fox]]

#[[John Hayes]]

#[[Tim Healy]]

#[[Grant Hill]]

#[[John Holmes]]

#[[George Jessel]]

#[[Paul Johnson]]

#[[Jenny Jones]]

#[[Randy Jones]]

#[[Steve Jones]]

#[[Henry Kaiser]]

#[[William Kennedy]]

#[[John Moores]]

#[[Don Murray]]

#[[Michael O'Leary]]

#[[Eddie Perez]]

#[[Charles Russell]]

#[[David Smith]]

#[[Carlos Valderrama]]

#[[Robert Walser]]

#[[Betty Williams]]

#[[Charles Pinckney]]

#[[John Stanley]]

#[[William Phillips]]

#[[John Bennett]]

#[[Richard Russell]]

#[[Stephen Bishop]]

<!-- ----------------------------- -->

[[Category:Wikipedia maintenance]]

'''Items listed on this page may be removed if you fail to try basic methods of [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].'''

[[Category:Disambiguation]]

:<!--***IMPORTANT***-->'''List newer entries on top''' &mdash; ''do not sign entries''.

*[[Talk:Intelligent design]] Two users have requested dispute resolution. One claims the page to be a "bad faith fraud." POV concerns, much reverting going on.

*[[Talk: Mestizo]]. Validity of statistics.

*[[Joshua A. Norton]]. Is referring to this gentleman as "Emperor of the United States" throughout his article misleading or appropriately deferential?

*[[Lyndon LaRouche]], [[Political views of Lyndon LaRouche]] (currently protected) and [[Schiller Institute]]. Help needed to make these pages NPOV.

*[[Talk:Christian views of homosexuality#User:Phiddipus.27 personal essay|Talk:Christian views of homosexuality]] - an extensive essay about the Eastern Orthodox views of sin and sexuality in general evades touching the subject of the actual [[Christian views of homosexuality#Eastern Orthodox Christianity|Eastern Orthodox views of homosexuality]].

*[[Talk:Perverted-Justice.com]] - dispute between two article versions.

*[[Talk:Israeli violence against Palestinian children]]: is this a NPOV title? Should the contents be moved into neutral [[Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict]] or perhaps [[Minors in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict]]? Also, should accusations be left without responses (both sides claim POV)?

*[[Talk:Elton John]]: should the article use hyphens instead of dashes?

*[[Talk:QuakeAID]] - is it a violation of the NPOV policy for the article to state that QuakeAID "fraudulently misrepresents themselves"?

*[[Talk:Global warming]] - Continuous complaints from new users about quality and readability of article and related articles. Continuous fighting on talk pages of all articles involved between self-proclaimed expert user acting as "owner" of the pages and new users wanting to contribute.

*[[Talk:Political views of Lyndon LaRouche]] - Neutrality dispute.

*[[Talk:Free-content#Bloating_of_the_article]] &#8211; Regarding the bloating of the article.

*[[Talk:Male circumcision]] - POV dispute.

*[[Talk:Republican Party (United States)]] and [[Talk:Democratic Party (United States) - A variety of controversial changes: Should articles repeatedly blame slavery on the Democratic Party? Should information about the history of the Republican Party be remove? etc.

*[[Talk:Tsunami]] Should there be a pronouciation guide for 'tsunami', and what form should it take?

*[[Category talk:Languages of Wikipedia Projects]] - Should the content of this category be changed from articles about languages to articles about wikipedia projects in that language? No real dispute, I'm listing this here because "category talk:" usually does not get much attention.

*[[Talk:International Socialists (Canada)]] - should the article include critical opinions of the IS?

*[[Talk:Little_Green_Footballs]] - Dispute over the inclusion and placement of a paragraph in the article text that specifically directs readers to a single external link containing highly critical comments about the article subject. Dispute seems to have waged for quite some time, all surrounding a single frequent editor of this article. Said editor has also begun attacking other editors in the discussion forum for additions made on completely unrelated articles elsewhere on wikipedia.

*[[Talk:Macedonian Slavs]] - Should we cite a population estimate that some people disagree with?

*[[Talk:Chess#Vote]] - Should we include a paragraph talking about computer chess events as being "Publicity stunts".

*[[Talk:Therianthropy]] - attempts to insert POV material

*[[Talk:Norway Scholarship]] - <!-- should perfectly valid information be removed? no. --> should the holders of the scholarship be listed?

*[[Talk:Polymath]] and [[Talk:List of polymaths]]-Disagreement wether [[Ken Jennings]] should be listed as a [[polymath]]

*[[Talk:Chip Berlet]] - The individual about whom the article is written, who is a journalist, has become a Wikipedia editor, and complained that the article was overly critical. The talk page is somewhat overly partisan on this issue, and neutral participants might help put things in perspective. The page was recently rewritten in an effort to make it more NPOV. Which version is more neutral? The new one from January 8 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chip_Berlet] or the old one from January 2 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chip_Berlet&oldid=9065380]?

*[[Talk:Sollog]] - an argument between critics and supporters of Sollog (members of the Temple of 'Hayah, accused of being Sollog's sock-puppets), mostly about the accuracy of quake predictions and the NPOV

*[[Talk:Main page]]; should there be a 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake donation box on the front page?

*[[Talk:Joe Scarborough]]; should death of an aide be mentioned in his article

*[[Talk:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2004]] - What should have been a plain list of names has suddenly turned into a full-out edit war with proselytizing that will end up as long as the list. Also, note that the article is to be transwikied.

*[[Talk:List of Quebec television series]] - The question has been raised whether [[List of Quebec television series]] should be merged into [[List of Canadian television series]]; the consensus was to keep them split, but one user insists on merging them.

*[[Talk:Frankfurt School]] - Should [[Kevin B. MacDonald]] be listed as a "notable critic" of the Frankfurt School in the absence of any evidence of his being cited or regarded as such?

*[[Talk:Main_Page/intro]] - New Main Page introduction text. Vote or comment.

*[[Talk:Abraham Lincoln]] - Should the section on Lincoln's sexuality be removed from the main page?

*[[Talk:Chess]] - Where did the game of Chess originate?

*[[Talk:Great Game]] or [[Talk:The Great Game]] - should the title of this article be [[Great Game]] or [[The Great Game]]?

*[[Talk:Laser]] - dispute over removals of incomprehensible convoluted sentences and mention of uncorroborated theory of "liquid light".

*[[Talk:List_of_music_videos_by_year]] Should the article be split imediately into the yearly lists or not until it's finished? The issue was [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/List_of_music_videos_by_year_1997|voted]] on, and the clear majority agreed to split it. Still, an anonymous user reverts the page, when some videos are moved to yearly lists.

*[[Talk:Patricia Heaton]] - Article is being reverted beyond the 3RR by all parties (one side being anon) between an attempted rewritten version and another which a user has claimed to have withdrawn their permission for after a previous dispute.

*[[Talk:2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities]] - This page has grown to nearly 130KB. What would be the best way to reduce the size while maintaining news and sources?

*[[Talk:Charles Darwin/Lincoln]] There is an ongoing dispute about the inclusion of a ten word sentence about Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin sharing a birthday. What would the best resolution of this dispute be?

*[[Talk:Bash.org]] - Does the fork of bash called "QDB.us" deserve mention in the article? What about open source clone "Rash QMS"?

*[[Talk:Free market#Trying to avoid a formal dispute]] - are there "free or ideal markets" in the underground economy?

*[[Talk:Kenneth Bigley#Providing links to the video]] - Should articles about the hostages in Iraq who have been beheaded include links to the videos showing their deaths?

*[[Talk:Historicity of Jesus]]. Dispute over whether the section entitled "The Pauline Epistles" is relevant to the [[Historicity of Jesus]].

*[[Talk:Tucson, Arizona]] - An RfC success story: A vote was held between two versions that differ on where the indigenous name for the city should be, twenty-two votes were cast, and one version prevailed. Thanks to everyone who voted. You can still come by to edit or propose something new. (This RfC item is now concluded and ready for archiving.)

*[[Talk:Empire of Atlantium]] - Discussion concerning the wording of a single sentence.

*[[Talk:List of words having different meanings in British and American English#Syrup]] - Discussion surrounding 'syrup'

*[[Talk:Red Ensign]] - should the article mention the use of the Canadian red ensign by neo-nazi groups?

*[[Talk:Comparison of web browsers]] - lack of consensus regarding data presentation and color coding

*[[Talk:Autobiography (album)]] - should this album article go into some detail and some of its content moved into singles articles when it grows too large, or should it simply be a brief summary without any breakout articles?

*[[Talk:Vojvodina#Disputed]] - One of the most multinational region's of Europe needs some input, so that its turbulent history can be described in an accurate and neutral way, instead from the exclusive point of view of one group of inhabitants.

[[/Article content disputes archive|'''Article dispute archive''']]

== Comment about individual users ==

This section is for discussing specific users who have allegedly violated [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies and guidelines]]. In order to request comment about a user, please follow the instructions to create a subpage in the appropriate section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|NPOV]] policy, belong in the '''Article content disputes''' section above.

Before listing any user conduct dispute here, at least two people should have tried to resolve the ''same'' issue by discussing it with the subject on his or her talk page or the talk pages involved in the dispute. This must involve the ''same'' dispute or concern the same disputed type(s) of activity, not different ones.

Once the request for comment is open, these two people must document their individual efforts, provide evidence that those efforts have failed to produce change, and sign the comment page. Requests for comment which do not meet these minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

=== General user conduct ===

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using the following sample listing as a template (anything within {...} are notes):

*[[/Example user]] - Allegations: {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts; ''do not sign entry''.}

'''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold'''<br/>

''List newer entries on top''

'''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''<br/>

''List newer entries on top''

*[[Wikipedia:Funny requests for comment/Silsor|/Silsor]] - Allegations: Robbed [[Wikipedia:WikiMoney accounts]].

*[[/Invalid user name specified]] - Allegations: Disruptive username, improper accusations of vandalism, disruptive talk page behavior.

*[[/Everyking]] - Allegations: Does not listen to community consensus, acts as owner of certain articles, unnecessarily assumes bad faith, games VfD and the 3 revert rule.

*[[/Libertas]] - Allegations: personal attacks, false accusations, POV editing, and other deliberately disruptive behavior

*[[/Antifinnugor]] - politically-motivated edits to [[Finno-Ugric languages]], personal attacks.

*[[/Chan Han Xiang]] - This user ignores the WP community. Practically: re-create pages after they have been vfd'ed.

*[[/Auto movil]] - personal attacks, threatening and harrassment on several editors

*[[/Robert the Bruce]] -- refusal to discuss changes, pushing non-NPOV on various pages. Problems with a variety of users.

*[[/Lysdexia]] - misrepresents other users in talk pages

*[[/Cheung1303]] Allegations: Persistent uploading of images that violate copyrights, failure to provide source information for images, attempts to defeat process for removal of images

*[[/Pumpie]] - Allegations: Insists on cutting and pasting bizarre little substubs from goodness-knows-where regarding geographical coordinates of individual municipalities in the Sao Paulo, Brazil area. Refuses to answer polite inquiries and seemingly refuses to do anything to these "articles" beyond their initial creation.

=== Use of administrator privileges ===

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by [[Wikipedia:Administrators]]. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the '''General user conduct''' section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

*[[/Example admin]] - Allegations: {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts; ''do not sign entry''.}

As with disputes over general user conduct, '''at least two people''' must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

'''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold'''<br/>

''List newer entries on top''

'''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''<br/>

=== Choice of username ===

If you believe someone has chosen an inappropriate username under Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Username|username policy]], you may create a subpage here to discuss whether the user should be forced to change usernames. However, before listing the user here, please first contact the user on his or her talk page and give them an opportunity to change usernames voluntarily.

''New listings here, please''

*[[/Joe Scarborough]] - user is obviously not the well-known talk show host and ex-congressman

*[[/Scott Peterson]] - Alleges that he is the convicted murder and former fertilizer salesman.

[[/User conduct disputes archive|'''User dispute archive''']]

==General convention and policy issues==

Some proposed conventions and policies can be found at [[:Category:Wikipedia policy thinktank]].

:''List newer entries on top''

*[[Wikipedia talk:Edit summary]]. Edit summary is now required. How do we inform editors? See also [[Template talk:Edit summary]]. [[User:Hyacinth|Hyacinth]] 04:57, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

*[[Wikipedia talk:Proposal to expand WP:CSD#Protection of the proposal page]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Proposal to expand WP:CSD#Netoholic's addition]] - dispute over expanding [[Wikipedia:Proposal to expand WP:CSD]]

*[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (government departments and ministers)]] - Putting out feelers on a naming convention for subunits of governments around the world.

*[[Wikipedia talk:Proposal to expand WP:CSD/General talk]] - disagreement about whether the [[Wikipedia:Proposal to expand WP:CSD]] should be postponed

*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs/General/Naming of drug pages]] - The question is whether All drug pages should be named according to their [[International Nonproprietary Name]]

*[[Wikipedia talk:Undeletion policy]] - Sysops now have the ability to undelete only selected revisions of a deleted page. When and why should we use this feature?

*[[Wikipedia:Ethics and law]] - I'd like to encourage ideas about possible guidelines or principles for questions of privacy and related issues.

*[[User_talk:Ram-Man#Spambot]] - Should [[User:Rambot|rambot]] be permitted to send messages regarding dual-licensing of contributions to thousands of user talk pages?

*[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment#Deleting_uncertified_RFCs]] - Should the manner of handling uncertified RFCs be altered?

*[[Wikipedia:Disabling edits by unregistered users and stricter registration requirement]]

*[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration policy/Proposed amendment ratification vote]] - Should the "Snowspinner Amendment" be removed and subjected to a separate vote?

*[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Abuse_of_speedy_deletion|A complaint about abuse of speedy deletion]]

*[[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28jguk%27s_changes%29]] The disagreements concern:

#The quote at the beginning of style guide.

#Fowler's "good" guidelines.

#The expressions "period" and "full stop."

#The serial comma.

#"U.S."

* [[Wikipedia:Divulging personal details]] - Discussion of when to include personal details of people who have chosen to remain anonymous.

* [[Wikipedia_talk:Avoid_weasel_terms]] should we use [[weasel word]]s?

*[[Wikipedia talk:Protection policy]] - Should we implement a software change so that pages in the user namespace are only editable by that particular user?

*[[Wikipedia:Preliminary Deletion]] - Not sure if this is the place, but comments on this proposal to add another type of deletion would be appreciated.

*[[Wikipedia talk:Cleanup/Leftovers#Leftovers_system]] - Not a dispute, but I would like more opinions from people in a discussion on a somewhat backwater talk page.

*[[Wikipedia talk:Categories for deletion phrases]]: content created by [[User:132.205.15.42]], as a jump-start to a discussion (this goes hand in hand with a rewrite of the content of the <nowiki>{{cfd}}</nowiki> template).

*[[Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_policy#Proposed_new_rule:_No_repeat_submission_of_articles|Proposed new VfD rule]]: No repeat submission of articles that have already passed the VfD process (w/ consensus to keep) within the next three months.

*[[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]] - 2nd version of integrated content.

*[[Wikipedia talk:Category schemes]] - Non-Wikipedia categorization systems

*[[Wikipedia_talk:Series_templates]] - This is a proposed policy on series boxes in the Template namespace. Please add comments about which format is suitable for these boxes, to gain some form of consensus, and make the policy enforceable.

'''[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Convention disputes|Resolved convention disputes]]'''

[[Category:Editorial validation]]

[[Category:Wikipedia dispute resolution|Requests for comment]]

[[eo:Vikipedio:Problemaj kontribuantoj]]

[[fr:Wikipédia:Éditeurs problématiques]]

[[ja:Wikipedia:&#12467;&#12513;&#12531;&#12488;&#20381;&#38972;]]

[[sv:Wikipedia:Begäran om kommentarer]]

[[zh:Wikipedia:&#35752;&#35770;&#28909;&#28857;]]