|
==Western Front==
I’m the pedantic side of a regular contributor, trying to find a good compromise style for quotes. I’m editing random pages to gauge reactions (mostly positive, so far – it seems to be only ‘computer people’ who think straight quotes are acceptable.
[[Battle of Liège]]
I shall put together a proposed guideline in due course, but for the moment, a good mid-Atlantic English style might be:
[[Battle of the Frontiers]]
* Use double quotes for a direct, attributed, quotation: “History will be kind to me for I intend to write it”, said Winston. In the Wiki source, these would be straight double-quotes and converted to readable ones on display
[[First Battle of the Marne]]
* Use single quotes for calling out phrases (Fowler’s ‘decorative quotation’), or for a nested quotation. In the Wiki source, these can be straight single quotes (ASCII apostrophes), rendered on display.
[[Siege of Antwerp]]
* Apostrophes should also be rendered by Wiki on display, except for leading ones, for which Wiki probably should provide an editing notation.
[[First Battle of Arras]]
To illustrate the last point, using straight quotes, the following is hard to read (and almost ambiguous):
[[First Battle of Ypres]]
: in '96, the editors' excuse was just as feeble
[[First Battle of Champagne]]
and needs to be displayed as:
[[Second Battle of Ypres]]
: in ’96, the editors’ excuse was just as feeble
[[Battle of Verdun]] or [[Siege of Verdun]]
where Wiki could automate the right-hand one but not the left. A possible editing shorthand for this might be:
[[Battle of the Somme]]
: in &a;96, the editors' excuse was just as feeble
[[Battle of Cantigny]]
[[Battle of Cambrai]]
[[User:Quota|quota]]
[[Second Battle of the Marne]]
[[Third Battle of Ypres]]
[[Meuse-Argonne Offensive]]
| 