Content deleted Content added
reality strikes back (linking to the bug where live objects were disappearing would be too harsh) |
|||
Line 1:
Speak up and be heard! (last blanked 7/26/05)
----
==Civitavecchia==
Thanks for the minor correction made to my additions to the Civitavecchia article. Normally I don't make that mistake, but I seem to have slipped up.
==Preservation of [[Fecalcore]]==
Hi! I am very glad you found my article funny, that is the main point, a serious, encyclopedic funny. I see you were talking of preserving it on [[BJAODN]], which I would greatly appreciate, as I have put considerable time in making it what it is. Would you mind discussing the BJAODN w/ me and how I could put it on there? Or should I just go RAMBO and put it on there myself? Thanks!
== Sango's RfA ==
[[Image:WikiThanks.png|right|Thanks!]]
Hi, Everyking. Thank you for supporting my RfA! I am honored to have your endoresment and hope to make good use of the mop. <font color="#3D9140">[[User:Sango123|Sango]]</font><font color="#006400">[[User talk:Sango123|123]]</font> 01:40, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
==AN/I==
I think some of your recent comments on AN/I have really been over the line. I hope you'll moderate yourself as discussed in our mediation and other times. [[User:Snowspinner|Snowspinner]] 17:37, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
/sigh. Arbitration will be requested against you shortly. [[User:Snowspinner|Snowspinner]] 18:11, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Everyking, I noticed the request for arbitration regarding you and [[User:Snowspinner]] where you mention [[User:David Gerard]]. David Gerard was involved in a dispute with me and a few others wherein they attempted to discredit me and my attributions. David correctly recused the arbitration, but mentioned he was going to be submitting evidence. David has still not provided any evidence in the case. However, I have evidence of him arbitrarily claiming an organizations affiliations with Scientology. He initially ignoring my questions about it and then he came back and corrected his claim of affiliation which turned out to not be Scientology. He is a critic of Scientology, yet he is a member of the Scientology project which claims to have the goal of NPOV'ing Scientology articles. I don't know if this mention helps you in anyway, but I thought it wouldn't hurt your case or mine to mention it. If you want the evidence, let me know. Also, Snowspinner blocked me for 24 hours last weekend as a result of a erroneous 3RR report by [[User:Jdforrester]]. I explained this to them, but they ignored me and this was right at the time of dispute I mentioned above. TINC is no longer true, IMHO there IS somewhat of a cabal. --[[User:AI|AI]] 21:30, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
== McDonald's fun facts ==
I rarely snort when I laugh, but "you can't call the massacre a "fun fact"" in your edit summary did it. [[User:Joy Stovall|Joyous ]] [[User_talk:Joy Stovall|(talk)]] 00:44, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
== Barnstar ==
Hi, EK. What was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Everyking&diff=19776272&oldid=19731224 this] for? My faith in your vandal-fighting is still as strong as ever! Cheers, [[User:smoddy|<nowiki>[[smoddy]]</nowiki>]] 11:55, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
:Oh dear me. I should ''not'' have said that. I did not read my comment through, as I was in a bit of a rush. I should know better by now... Comment removed. Would you accept my apology, and my continued faith in you? If it makes a difference, I think the RfAr against you is completely spurious, and borders on a personal attack... Cheers, and best wishes, [[User:smoddy|<nowiki>[[smoddy]]</nowiki>]] 12:00, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
::I'm glad to hear it. Cheers, [[User:smoddy|<nowiki>[[smoddy]]</nowiki>]] 12:41, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
==[[Tom Brinkman]]==
You were kind enough to support my nomination of [[Jean Schmidt]] as a featured article and I wonder if you would look at my newest FAC, Tom Brinkman. The voting page is at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tom Brinkman]]. [[User:PedanticallySpeaking|PedanticallySpeaking]] 15:04, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
== Arbitration Problems ==
I saw your troubles on the requests for arbitration pages, with respect to Raul654 and those other clowns. Don't let them get you down.
==Block them?==
69.118.219.88 has had all the warnings they need... -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 01:56, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
==Thanks==
for the userpage revert; quick to catch vandalism as usual. [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 05:37, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
==
Thanks for supporting my RFA. I'm honored! --[[User:Canderson7|Canderson]]'''[[User_talk:Canderson7|7]]''' 16:57, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
==Important VFD==
Please see the [[commons:Template:Deletion_requests#List_of_victims_of_the_1913_Great_Lakes_storm|VFD for commons:List of victims of the 1913 Great Lakes storm]]. This is of '''vital importance'''. This list and others like it are being pushed off of the entire Wikimedia project. It started at Wikipedia, where they were VFDd in favor of moving to Wikisource/Commons. Now they are being [http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium#Remove_Tables_and_Lists_from_Wikisource VFDd off Wikisource] (they don't really belong there, since they are not original source texts), with people there saying they should be on WP/Commons, and it is also being [[commons:Template:Deletion_requests#List_of_victims_of_the_1913_Great_Lakes_storm|VFDd on Commons]], where people don't realize that '''Commons accepts texts''' (says so right on the Main Page). This will set a precedent for any user-created lists. --{{User:Brian0918/sig}} 22:22, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
==
Hey EK - Why don't you come onto IRC tomorrow night (Wednesday night, US Eastern Time) so we can discuss your case. [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 08:25, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
:Well, several of us (myself, Fred, David Gerard, and Jimbo) waited up for you, but you never showed. [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 00:15, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
::Yes ''discuss the case outside of Wikipedia, in *IRC* of all places''. The idea of TINC is propaganda. I have a new term IRCCE (IRC CABAL EXISTS). :) Anyway, congratulations Everking, I am glad they did not impose any extreme restrictions upon you. If you have time, take a look at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/AI/Proposed decision]]. Aloha --[[User:AI|AI]] 00:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
==Admin nomination==
Jim, of all the support votes I've gotten, yours is the first I've directly responded to since it really means a lot. I know that you're very particular about who you support for adminship. I truly cannot thank you enough. - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 17:46, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
==WP:AN and arbitration talkback==
My fellow James...it's odd, but I can't recall the last time I posted on your talk page. We've both been around for so long, I feel certain I have before....but perhaps I haven't? If so....allow me to belatedly welcome you to Wikipedia! (Forgive my bizarre sense of humor this evening.)
Now, with my perhaps foolish attempt at humor aside, I hope you'll extend me the courtesy of hearing me out -- I'm tired of seeing you try to take on the AC on WP:AN. I said something about it before, apparently to no avail. Now you're talking back to them on AN about the agreement you made in EK3 or whatever the heck they called it. I almost unloaded on you right there, but I decided I should take this to you privately on talk first. You've been a fantastic contributor (better than I, by far) and a good admin (more active and probably more effective than I, again by far), and you deserve that courtesy. That said, I truly implore you, if you have any respect for my opinion whatsoever, stop doing this on AN. It only makes people like myself weary of your comments and frustrated at your desire to publically challenge and defy a group of people you clearly don't respect. And I like and value you as an editor (please don't misunderstand me on that point -- I'm very sincere about this).
I've served on the AC....longest 5 months of my wikicareer. I loathed every minute of it. Bearing responsibility for those decisions was agonizing -- no punishment seemed fair to anybody, no explanation was sufficient, no case moved quickly enough (or else we were over-hasty). That's not to say that there isn't legitimate room for criticizing arbitration here, or specific AC decisions. I know you feel shabbily treated by the AC. All I can say is, your public criticism of them is not being taken seriously, and only serves to further marginalize your opinion in the eyes of many (judging from the response of most editors to your comments). I think you have a valuable perspective -- you're an undeniably talented editor who has experienced the sanctions of the AC and has remained here as a contributor. I think that gives you an insight into arbitration that can be very helpful as we continue to explore how that process will be used by Wikipedia in the coming years. But I am continually frustrated by the fact that, as far as I can tell, you want to limit most of your criticism of arbitration to potshots and nit-picking, usually posted in a forum (AN) which is not traveled often enough by arbitrators (especially the arbitrators with whom you do not seem to have a "past"). I feel that, if you didn't do these things, you would be in a far better position to make some serious and well-thought-out suggestions for how arbitration can be improved here.
Yes, this is far too long -- if you've read it all, I thank you for that courtesy, and I hope I made it remotely worthwhile. If you want to discuss this with me, please drop me a note. Whether you do or not, please be fairly warned -- I respect you, I value your contributions, I hope to see some positive and constructive suggestions about arbitration from you in the future. But if I see you using the AN as a forum from which to criticize the AC (either explicitly, as you did in the Zivinbudas case a few weeks ago, or else implicitly, by challenging the lack of a time limit in an agreement that you voluntarily accepted and by then implying that you were coerced into that agreement), I'm not going to just leave a note here explaining my perspective. I'm going to be very clear about my objection on AN in response. I know you may take this as a threat, and I apologize if it reads as one. I just feel that my politeness in replying to you in the past was not taken seriously, and I want to be taken seriously by you -- I assure you, when you make serious criticisms of Wikipedia practice and policy, whether I agree with you or not, I always take you seriously. I wish you the best of luck in the future here, and I hope that my comments here did not offend you in any way -- I mean to be clear about how displeased I am, but not offensive or rude, and if you think I crossed the line, please know that I will fully apologize for doing so if I am informed. Best regards, [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosenzweig]] 09:40, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks for your response, James. I hope you know that I don't mean to silence you, and I can't imagine that you think I have a personal grudge against you (I certainly don't). All I mean to say is that I personally feel that any quibbles or challenges you mean to address to the AC should go directly to them, not onto AN. And that I think you will find more support and more people seriously attending to your perspective if, instead of challenging the AC on specific issues on AN, you instead put together some more general thoughts on arbitration and what could be done to improve it, then invite others to comment and discuss. If I'm tempting you to violate your new agreement, please forgive me -- I'm not intending that. I just feel frustrated, because (though this is probably not a fully accurate perception) it appears to me that everytime the AC announces a decision on AN, you want to turn it into an opportunity to start an argument. And I'm saying that I feel that's not productive. I really appreciate your talking about this with me in a calm and reasonable manner (heck, I didn't expect any less :-) and I hope you don't feel attacked by me. I'm headed for bed, but thanks once again for your reply, and I hope this somewhat briefer note helps clarify my position. Best regards, [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosenzweig]] 10:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
== Please understand my position ==
Why do you people want to block me? I'm trying to spread the message of Democracy to Cuban people (and also i'm active within Cuba), this is hardly extreme POV pushing--[[User:Comandante Gomez|Comandante Gomez]] 09:37, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
== Heya... ==
I am currently in discussions with Ozemail regarding persistent vandalism that has been occuring from the following IP addresses in their network:
*{{vandal|203.166.96.234}}
*{{vandal|203.166.96.235}}
*{{vandal|203.166.96.236}}
*{{vandal|203.166.96.237}}
*{{vandal|203.166.96.238}}
*{{vandal|203.166.96.239}}
*{{vandal|203.166.96.240}}
*{{vandal|203.166.99.246}}
*{{vandal|203.166.99.247}}
*{{vandal|203.166.99.252}}
Calton told me that you were hip-deep in fighting these vandals. I need assistance with all the specific items of vandalism. I have setup a page to gather this evidence at [[User:Ta bu shi da yu/Ozemail]].
Are you able to help? If so, please use the format:
* '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ta_bu_shi_da_yu&diff=20311223&oldid=20311029 13:30, 5 August 2005]
** Added abusive text to [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] user page
We'll see just how good their service is at responding to this sort of thing - we should be supporting any company that assists us. Therefore, I'm hoping that the Wikipedia spirit of cooperation and immense amount of volunteers will help with tracking down vandal edits.
If Ozemail gives a good response, we can use them as an example of a good ISP, and maybe even shame AOL into assisting us (we get lots of vandalism from them).
If nothing happens, I'll be taking the whole subnet to ArbCom as I can't think of any other way of dealing with the problem.
[[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 02:34, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
== Rollback ==
And once again I ask you why. To which policy or guideline are you referring? Why do you think that the information automatically created by rollback is inferior ro to the information I'd have placed in the edit summary anyway? When editors don't explain their edits, or engage in large numbers of vandalistic reversions, why do you think that rollback is inappropriate? Don't just issue commands to we lesser beings; have the courtesy to explain yourself. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 10:57, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Do you think it is OK to use rollback on a self-revert? [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 11:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
== vandalism to RCP page ==
An anon user has been adding zip file links to the [[Revolutionary Communist Party (USA)]] page repeatedly in the last 24 hours. This seems a pretty obvious violation of wiki protocol. The zip files could consist of anything and the relevance seems tenuous at best.
The contributor is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=24.19.62.186
And to a lesser extent from here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=69.145.21.94
Any help you could give to monitor the situation or block the user, if necessary, would be appreciated. [[User:DJ Silverfish|DJ Silverfish]] 07:50, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
==Schmidt and Hackett==
You worked on articles on the special election in Ohio on [[August 2]]. I have posted my articles on the nominees in that race, [[Jean Schmidt]] and [[Paul Hackett]], at [[Wikipedia:Peer review]] and would appreciate your comments. The individual pages are at [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Jean Schmidt]] and [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Paul Hackett]]. [[User:PedanticallySpeaking|PedanticallySpeaking]] 19:29, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
== Admin out of control ==
Under exactly what authority does [[User:UninvitedCompany|UninvitedCompany]] think he can unilaterally permanently ban users, and destroy their user pages, and protect their talk pages so that they can't respond? - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3A-Ril-&diff=21264723&oldid=21115048]
It should be noted that the alleged images were listed at [[User:Evil Monkey/Nudity]] as well as being considered entirely appropriate for articles, having, as far as I can tell, already survived IFD, and have been on Wikipedia for over a month.
Note that an arbcom case has only just opened and has by no means come down with even remotely any penalty such as a ban. UninvitedCompany seems to think he has greater authority than ArbCom, and can completely act outside it.
Does UninvitedCompany has infinite power and permission to unilaterally with impunity?
Particularly when the user/victim in question has challanged a prior abuse of adminship by UninvitedCompany in an RfC, and has diametrically opposed political opinions?
This seems to be a case of right wing evangelical Christian admin'''s''' thinking they have the right to dictate to everyone else.
It also seems in contempt of the arbitration committee's right to make the decision.
[[User:RonaldTaril|SomeAccountThatIWillListOn-Ril-'sUserPageWhenOrIfIEverGetItBack (-Ril-)]] 11:50, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
==Move Roxelana==
Hi, Everyking, You expressed your preliminary support to the move at [[Talk:Aleksandra Lisowska]]. Could you consider casting a vote there now regarding the official move proposal? Thanks! --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 20:42, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Aleksandra Lisowska
== On "polls are evil", and what it means and doesn't mean ==
While I'm generally loathe to spam people with requests for attention, "polls are evil" (in the sense I mean it) is something dear to me, and I want to make sure we understand were each of us is coming from. Just in case it slips off your radar: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency]]. I'm not asking for a response there, mind you; a private discussion is fine as well. [[User:JRM|JRM]] · [[User talk:JRM|Talk]] 00:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
== Wikiproject ==
The WikiProject for decency is a mess. I appreciate your understanding that at least some of those involved in it's protection never desired to commence a witch hunt for whatever was deemed obscene. I'm for renaming and considering something that deals more with encyclopedic merit...this would greatly transcend the original direction the project seemed to be headed, one I would ultimately not been a part of, which was to go around tagging certain things. The project could discuss the possible legal ramifications of hosting images of individuals without also ensuring that there are appropriate legal disclaimers proving age of consent of persons displayed in such images...something Jimbo has stated he is not interested in doing. The project could also address the need for encyclopedic merit or worth of questionable sourcing, article content, and related issues. Perhaps such a similar enterprise already exists that you may be more aware of. Your thoughts, if you feel so inclined, would be appreciated.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 08:43, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
==Thanks!==
Just to drop a line to thank you for reverting the vandalism in my user page. ;) --[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 10:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Same here, such cleanup is always appreciated. -- ([[User:Drini|☺drini♫]]|[[User talk:Drini|☎]]) 19:09, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
== what are extant cliques? ==
Is there possibly an established clique between Jtdirl and Slimvirgin? or how? [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR]] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] (recent items) show how there seems to emerge excuses etc. [[User:217.140.193.123|217.140.193.123]] 10:19, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
== Is anything being done? ==
Hi,
I notice you've reverted several edits by 203.144.21.77. I just reverted one more of the same sort of edits and started to trace back to his other edits, which you seem to be following up on. Is there anything else that needs to be done? [[User:Patrick0Moran|P0M]] 07:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
==[[Jean Schmidt]]==
Thanks for your support for my previous effort to get this featured. I've submitted the article as a FAC again and would appreciate your vote at [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Jean_Schmidt]]. [[User:PedanticallySpeaking|PedanticallySpeaking]] 17:08, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
==History of South Carolina==
Hello. [[History of South Carolina]] is on Featured Article Candidates for a third time due to recent controversy. Because you commented on one of its past nominations, you may be interested in commenting this time at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of South Carolina]]. [[User:Toothpaste|Toothpaste]] 19:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
== Userpage and Trollderella ==
Hi Everyking!
I have unblocked Trollderella, but left another warning that such a username might be asking for trouble. Anyway, I have also restored your userpage. I think it got hit by Willy on Wheels (we can block ''him'' on sight can't we?), and two admins tried moving it back at the same time, thus deleting it by accident. I liked your userpage with links to your subpages better though... [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 07:44, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks for fixing up my userpage and talkpage, I seem to have gotten at least one enemy on Wikipedia. This guy's been after my user and talkpage about a zillion times. Userpage protected again. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 08:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
==Vandal==
Hi. Can you please block [[User talk:202.74.164.3]] who is vandalising [[Jew]] and [[Jews in the Middle Ages]]. Has been warned several times. Cheers [[User:TigerShark|TigerShark]] 07:20, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Yes please block him if i had admin powers i would have done so a while ago. [[User:Jobe6|<font color="green">Jobe</font>]][[User talk:Jobe6|<font color="red">6</font>]] 07:21, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
:OK, if I see any more vandalism from that IP, I'll block it. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 07:23, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
== Motorola i930--Vandalism Lock Request ==
The recent Vandalism incident at the article [[Motorola i930]] has really redflagged the integrity of the article. I keep watch on that article, and realized that there has been some vandalism attempts lately. If you are an Administrator and/or a Sysop, can you lock the Motorola i930 article for me to deal with Vandalism by Vandals? Those who want to discuss about changes should direct all the feedback to me. I appreciate it if you temporarily lock the Motorola i930 article to deal with vandalism. Thanks. — [[User:Vesther|Vesther]] 12:55, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
==Head's up==
In case you hadn't already seen it, here's a heads up - [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 29, 2005]] [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 03:39, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
==Deletion==
Ah, burning midnight oil as well, I see. :) That "Jessica Stover" thing was little more than a single sentence and an external link. No notability established and I wiped it out as link spam. Sorry about brain fading on the summary. - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 07:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
*I get it right every so often, I guess. :)) Thanks for following up. - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 07:15, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
== [[Penda of Mercia]] ==
I'm at a loss - what do you call the British in the 6th Century? --[[User:BDAbramson|<font style="background: lightgreen"> ''BDAbramson''</font>]] [[User talk:BDAbramson|<sup><b>talk</b></sup>]] 02:59, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
Please ''don't'' censor me, Thank You.--[[User:Comandante Gomez|Comandante Gomez]] 04:15, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
I've been doing better if you look the Castro's page, I stopped calling him a "Dictator" (even though I REALLY think he is)...and agreed with the editor known as Speak Box, who has been editing the page recently.--[[User:Comandante Gomez|Comandante Gomez]] 04:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
== We Belong Together ==
James, I just noticed that you unprotected [[We Belong Together]] shortly after I'd protected it. Please don't do that again to articles I protect, and particularly not if you intend to edit them yourself. I protected because of the reverting between Omega and Mel, which both have discussed with me and which needs to be sorted out. In future, if you feel I've protected something inappropriately, I'd appreciate it if you'd leave a note on my talk page and give me time to respond. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 23:26, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
:As my request is denied, I'm therefore re-submitting it. If one admin protects a page, another admin shouldn't unprotect it just hours later, except in exceptional circumstances, where a mistake has been made or similar. This is a basic matter of courtesy, and so perhaps I should rephrase my request in those terms.
:As for the revert war, I agree that it's low level, but it's been going on for a long time and involves several articles, this one being the main bone of contention, it seems, and it needs to be sorted out, which is what I'm making an effort to do. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 03:45, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
::In that case, I owe you an apology. When I looked at the history, I misread it that the page was protected and unprotected on August 25, but now that I look properly, I see there were three days in between, which sheds a different light on it. I would still have appreciated a note in advance of unprotection, but three days is less of a deal than a few hours. I'm sorry for jumping the gun. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 03:59, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
== Vasco da Gama ==
An article that you've edited before ([[Vasco da Gama]]) is nominated for [[Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive|Article Improvement Drive]]. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. [[User:Joaopais|Gameiro]] 02:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
== thank you -Jimbo's post is covered ==
saw your post --and deletion --in re my post on Jimbo's page --yes, I got it wrong, but copied it to the "Real" page.
thanks again for your concern -- ps: we could use a few "affirmative" votes to encourage Terri Schiavo to kick butt. Thx in advance.--[[User:GordonWattsDotCom|GordonWattsDotCom]] 10:59, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
==[[JonBenét Ramsey]]==
Hi, I'm playing around with wiki tonight, mostly just vandal hunting (for the first time), and I saw a recent entry for JonBenét, and decided that it was just...um...wrong...if you know what I mean. So I reverted it. In between I noticed that you saw it and didn't revert it, but instead just corrected the spelling (which I do find quite humorous). So should I have left it alone? [[User:Hagie|Hagie]] 08:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
== Ashlee Simpson FAC ==
Hey Everyking :). The article is already on peer review now... any ideas on how to improve it before we send it to Featured Article Candidates? <small>[[User:RN|Ryan Norton]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 09:17, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
== [[Belarusian Republican Youth Union]] ==
Thanks a bunch for doing the minor grammar check there. [[User:Zscout370|Zscout370]] [[User_talk:Zscout370|(Sound Off)]] 08:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
== ... ==
I don't know how you do it... even with all the RfArs and whatnot you still tirelessly edit. Try to remember that words do matter though, and I think if you keep that in mind maybe it'll improve with some of the other admins, no? Take care! --RN
== [[SuperShadow]] VfD ==
Greetings: pawing through the SuperShadow edit history, I noticed you've edited the page in question before. I thought you'd want to know it is now the subject of a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Vote for Deletion]], at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperShadow]]. If you want, you could stop in there and cast a vote. --[[User:Marudubshinki|Maru]] 22:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
== Please could you comment on a peer review? ==
I was reading the ''[[Autobiography (Ashlee Simpson album)|Autobiography]]'' article, and was very impressed by it. I actually think it's one of the best Wikipedia articles on recent albums that I've seen. Anyway, after perusing the edit history, I noticed that you were responsible for most of the content of the article. This did not surprise me (due to your great contributions to [[Ashlee Simpson]]), but since the style of the ''Autobiography'' article influenced my expansion and rewrite of the article for ''[[Extraordinary Machine]]'' (which is a forthcoming album by [[Fiona Apple]]), I would be extremely grateful if you were to visit its peer review request [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Extraordinary Machine|here]], and comment and add suggestions on how the article could be improved. You don't have to, of course, but I want this article to be the best it can be, and I believe that your guidance may help me and the other editors of the article to achieve that goal. I even hope to submit it at [[WP:FAC]] some day after the album is released. Thanks in advance. [[User:Extraordinary Machine|Extraordinary Machine]] 23:34, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
== Winter War==
Re. "give me a break..how do you define "moral victory"?"
You're right, of course. But I put that in there as an attempt to give some ground to the "Finland won" POV revisionism, rather than just have a revert war with those guys.--[[User:67.101.67.73|67.101.67.73]] 14:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
== Autobiography on FAC again ==
I put Autobiography (Ashlee Simpson album) on FAC again... I think its pretty much ready. Maybe you might want to take one last pass at it when you get a chance :). Go to [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates|FAC]] and comment there if you'd like also :). <small>[[User:RN|Ryan Norton]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 00:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
== Museveni on peer review ==
Hey EK, just thought I'd let you know that [[Yoweri Museveni]] is now on [[Wikipedia:Peer review|peer review]] as you have contributed to it previously. I thought now was about the right time, as it would be good to get a feel for the kind of things people will say in [[WP:FAC]] now, rather than pressing ahead with expansion and then having to change a whole load of stuff later. [[User:TreveX|TreveX]]<sup>[[User talk:TreveX|talk]]</sup> 11:09, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
== Zoey 101 ==
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zoey_101&diff=22732808&oldid=22732624 this edit]. First of all, you made it look like [[January]] 9]]. Second, why even change it form [[January 9]] to [[January]] [[9]]? [[User:Howabout1|Howabout1]] [[user talk:howabout1|<sup><span style="color:red">Talk to me!</span></sup>]] 23:43, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
Huh? Are you sure? I'm looking and it now and it appears the other way around with EK fixing it after you reverted... <small>[[User:RN|Ryan Norton]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 23:46, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Stupid me! Sorry Everyking. :) [[User:Howabout1|Howabout1]] [[user talk:howabout1|<sup><span style="color:red">Talk to me!</span></sup>]] 23:48, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
Another question, what is the policy regarding a father and son with the same name and both should have wikipedia articles. Is it [[Paul Butcher (Actor)]] and [[Paul Butcher (NBL Palyer)]] or [[Paul Butcher Jr.]] and [[Paul Butcher Sr.]]? [[User:Howabout1|Howabout1]] [[user talk:howabout1|<sup><span style="color:red">Talk to me!</span></sup>]] 23:58, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
| |||