Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/WJBscribe/Full version: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m copyedit |
add links |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
;Extended statement
I confess
There is no denying that the role of an Arbitrator is a hard one. I gave long and serious thought to whether it was one that I was able to fulfil. I have a tremendous amount of respect for those who have taken on this difficult responsibility. To them it must often have felt like they were navigating a minefield without the help of a map. Often users are all to ready to declare that they have lost faith in an Arbitrator or the Committee as a whole when they find themselves disagreeing with a decision. Nevertheless the Committee’s work is important and it is essential that the best candidates are appointed to it. And whilst I do respect those who have served on ArbCom, a lot of mistakes have been made - especially in the past year - and there is often little sign of the Committee learning from those mistakes. I believe that the Wikipedia community would now like to see a real change of direction from the Arbitration Committee. In particular, there are several areas in particular where I believe it is a priority that ArbCom learn from past failures:
Line 18:
<strong style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:WJBscribe|WJBscribe]] [[User talk:WJBscribe|(talk)]]</strong> 00:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
<hr />
*{{usercheck-short|WJBscribe}}
*[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/WJBscribe/Questions for the candidate|Questions for the candidate]]
*[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/WJBscribe|Discuss the candidate]]
{{ #ifexpr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}}>20081201000000 | *'''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/WJBscribe|Support or Oppose this candidate]]''' | *Voting opens at 00:00 UTC on 1 December 2008. }}
|