Training modules/dashboard/slides/10904-evaluating-article-quality: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:21, 29 August 2017

Latest revision as of 15:18, 8 April 2024

(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 1:

<noinclude><languages /></noinclude>

<translate>== Evaluating Article Quality ==</translate>

<translate>

<translate>== Evaluating Article Quality == </translate!--T:1-->

<!--T:2-->

<translate>An important tool for evaluating a Wikipedia article is to look at its quality rating.

<!--T:3-->

Wikipedia articles are constantly being improved, and all at different rates. Some rival the best encyclopedias; others are out of date or incomplete.

<!--T:4-->

Volunteers will review articles and leave a rating on the Talk page. You can find this by clicking "Talk" at the top right of the article text.

<!--T:5-->

The best articles have been evaluated as "Good" or "Featured" articles. These are the best that Wikipedia has to offer, and the rating reflects a shared view of many Wikipedians.

<!--T:6-->

"Start" or "Stub" class articles aren't considered as reliable, or simply don't provide a very strong overview of the topic. These are great articles to work on, because there's lots you can do, and you can quickly make a dramatic impact.

</translate>