Template talk:Philosophy topics and Wikipedia:Peer review: Difference between pages

Revision as of 01:38, 4 November 2005

Revision as of 21:14, 19 November 2005

Line 1:

{{Shortcut|[[WP:PR]]}}

==Evolution==

Why is evolution on the list of philosophy topics? [[User:TheIncredibleEdibleOompaLoompa|TheIncredibleEdibleOompaLoompa]] 10:46, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

<small>''[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikipedia:Peer review|action=purge}} Purge server cache]''</small>

== I'd prefer a Portal ==

This page is for nearly Featured-standard articles that need the final checking by peers before being nominated as [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates|Featured article candidates]]. '''Requests for peer review''' are listed here to expose articles to closer scrutiny than they might otherwise receive. See [[:Category:Wikipedia style guidelines]] and [[:Category:Wikipedia how-to]] for advice on writing [[Wikipedia:How to write a great article|great articles]]. Or look at the discussion of [[Wikipedia:The perfect article|the perfect article]] and try to reach as many of those ideals as possible. If an article needs extensive work, please list it on [[Wikipedia:Pages needing attention|Pages needing attention]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for expansion|Requests for expansion]] or [[Wikipedia:Cleanup|Cleanup]]. Please list article content disputes on [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment|Requests for comment]] rather than here.

Why not take the template content as a starting point for [[Portal:Philosophy]]?

'''Note:''' [[Peer review]] is the process of review by peers and usually implies a group of authoritative reviewers who are equally familiar and expert in the subject. The process represented by this page is not formal peer review in that sense and articles that undergo this process cannot be assumed to have greater authority than any other.

With using template, either it gets ridiculously large, or it's an eternal fight who and what gets included.

{{FAPath}}

[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 11:05, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

{{PR-instructions}}

''See also [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games/Peer review|Peer reviews]] for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games]]''

__TOC__

== Too big? ==

==Requests==

I like this concept, but it seems to be too big. Should we make a template with just the different eras (i.e. Ancient, Medieval, Modern, etc.), and then provide detailed lists of philosophers on linked pages?

<!-- Please place new requests at the TOP of the page. Thanks! -->

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Castle of the Winds}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Logic}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Taekwondo}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Hapkido}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Sokol space suit}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Sense of community}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Indigenous Australians}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Waterfall model}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Portugal from the Restoration to the 1755 Earthquake}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Mariah Carey}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/William Tecumseh Sherman}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Civilian control of the military}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Objectivist poets}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr.}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Malwa}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Targeted therapy}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/New World Order (political)}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Bjørnøya}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Neurofibromatosis type II}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/FairTax}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Lloyd's of London}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Movie projector}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Soviet Union}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Bayreuth Festival}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Miyamoto Musashi}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Douglas Adams}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Voting system}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/We Belong Together}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Carl Johan Trygg}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Article 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/White's Tree Frog}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Tecmo Cup Football Game}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/The Star Wars Holiday Special}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/2005 Philippine electoral crisis}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Omnipotence paradox}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Solid State Lighting}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Providence, Rhode Island}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Potatau Te Wherowhero}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Legal status of Taiwan}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Cerritos, California}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/1997 Pacific hurricane season}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Dennis Berry}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Dawson Creek, British Columbia}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Psilocybe cubensis}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Albanian language}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Ceteris paribus}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/The Day After}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Neuropsychopharmacology}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Economics of the Iroquois}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Religious Society of Friends}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Texas State Highway 195}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/I Heard It Through the Grapevine}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Céline Dion}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Northern Ireland naming dispute}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Claudius}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/The Waterboys}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Eton College}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Constantine Maroulis}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Delrina}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Ubykh language}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/List of NFL champions}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/BASIC programming language}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Malta}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Marching band}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Palpatine}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Fabio Lione}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Irna Phillips}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/TGV}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/History of Ireland}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Guinness}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Imperialism in Asia}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/The West Wing (television)}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Game theory}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Unclean animals}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Prester John}}

{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Manifold}}

<!--

NOTICE:

PLEASE add new entries at the top, not the bottom. Thanks.

-->

==Archives==

An alternate idea is to code the box as it is now to be hidden. Then when you click on "expand" or whatever, it will unhide it. For example, this is how the table of contents boxes work.

*'''[[Wikipedia:Peer review/November 2005]] (current)'''

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/October 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/September 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/August 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/July 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/June 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/May 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/April 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/March 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/February 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/January 2005]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/December 2004]]

*[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Archive 3]], [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Archive 2]], [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Archive 1]]

[[Category:Editorial validation]]

[[User:FranksValli|FranksValli]] 20:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[[de:Wikipedia:Review]]

:If we create a portal, it is also hidden by default. When you click [[Portal:Philosophy]] it becomes visibles. Also for visitors with Javascript turned off. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 20:37, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[[fr:Wikipédia:Comité de lecture]]

[[simple:Wikipedia:Peer review]]

== Systematic POV deletion of [[Template:Spirituality]] ==

[[fi:Wikipedia:Vertaisarviointi]]

[[zh:Wikipedia:同行评审]]

An anonymous author ([[User:24.18.171.99]]) of [[Template:Philosophy (navigation)]] has systematically replaced [[Template:Spirituality]] with this philosophy template on common target pages. This form of POV steamrolling won’t be tolerated. Wikipedia categories and topics form a network, not mutually exclusive territories. Please refrain from this practice in the future. In addition, replacing those templates removed without any justification or consensus would be appreciated. [[User:Richard|<nowiki></nowiki>]] &mdash; [[User:Richard|Richard_RDF]]^{[[User_talk:Richard|talk]]} 21:48, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

:A philosophy template is more informing and objective than a spirituality template. Much of it has already been incorporated into this template anyways. [[User:Infinity0|Infinity0]] 20:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

== POV ==

This template does not include any significant non-Western philosophy. There's no Eastern, South Asian, or Middle Eastern philosophy included. Perhaps this template should be moved to [[Template:Western philosophy]]. [[User:Thames|<nowiki></nowiki>]]&mdash;[[User:Thames|thames]] 17:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Anyone is open to add the eastern stuff. BTW, the template has been streamlined, and the beginnings of Easternization has been added to it. [[User:24.18.171.99|24.18.171.99]] 01:12, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

== Link spam ==

Using a template to put the same external links into more than 50 articles is a severe case of [[link spam]]. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]]

:They aren't spam links. They are widely recognised, good, sources of extra information, especially stanford plato. [[User:Infinity0|Infinity0]] 18:29, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

::Good sources for all 200 pages this templates seems to go to? Then why aren't they included there now? Are there any precedents fpr external links in navigation templates? I'd consider them de facto against policy.

::Anyway. I've put the whole thing on [[WP:TFD]] fo reasons outlined there. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 18:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

:I agree with Infinity0. They are general resources on philosophy, created in the same spirit as the Wikipedia. [[User:24.18.171.99|24.18.171.99]] 18:49, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

:Infinity0, you'll have to fight him on TFD, as I don't have a member account yet. (Still getting my feet wet). [[User:24.18.171.99|24.18.171.99]] 18:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

::You don't need a user account to participate in [[WP:TFD]] discussions. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 19:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

:::Thanks. Found the instructions at the top of the TFD page too.

== Categories ==

Well, you will have to sort out the categories. "Doctrines and Schools of Philosophy" is way too big atm, and unorganised. Also, it's vague what you mean by "concepts". IMO, idealism and materialism are concepts, not doctrines. I would organise everything, but I don't know what half of those things are. How the hell did you get them all, anyways??? [[User:Infinity0|Infinity0]] 19:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

: I moved the "Doctrines and Schools of Philosophy" section to a list article or two, with links in the template to get there. "Concepts" is now all-encompassing and is not distinct from the aformentioned (quoted) category. Whichever ism terms you think should be included can easily be added to it. I cleaned up the title bar and internalized the other links that were up there. [[User:24.18.171.99|24.18.171.99]] 01:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

: BTW, I keyed-in every philosophy ism I could think of or find, and plugged them into the template as topic links (using Show preview)... almost all of them came up as live links! I couldn't believe my eyes. I removed the few that turned up red, like [[Randianism]], [[Socraticism]], etc. Wikipedia has definitely achieved critical mass. [[User:24.18.171.99|24.18.171.99]] 01:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)