Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OF/Blank and Talk:Baháʼís Under the Provisions of the Covenant: Difference between pages

Revision as of 09:41, 27 July 2005

Revision as of 04:30, 20 November 2005

Line 1:

==Acronym==

|-

|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"

Is it offenseive to use BUPC in the article instead of writing it out every time? Usually acronyms are defined at the beginning, then used throughout. It would make it a lot easier to read. [[User:Cunado19|<font color="#d14c04">'''Cuñado'''</font>]] [[image:Bahaitemplatestar.png|20px]] - [[User talk:Cunado19|<font size="-3">Talk</font>]] 20:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

!<b>NATO Code</b>||OF-10||OF-9||OF-8||OF-7||OF-6|| - ||OF-5||OF-4||OF-3||OF-2||colspan=2|OF-1||OF-D-||Student Officer

|-

:Thanks for fixing that, and for the rest of your work in the Garden. [[User:Jeffmichaud]]

==Removed==

Why was this removed?

:''The Bahá'ís Under the Provision of the Covenant regard an adopted relationship from 'Abdu'l Baha, to Mason Remey, to Pepe Remey, to Neal Chase. None of these are blood relationships, and the only legal adoption was Mason Remey adopting Pepe Remey. Leland Jensen is not seen as part of this line of Guardians, but still traces his lineage to [[David|King David]].''

If it is not accurate that is one thing, but if it is accurate, it is entirely relevant. [[User:Cunado19|<font color="#d14c04">'''Cuñado'''</font>]] [[image:Bahaitemplatestar.png|20px]] - [[User talk:Cunado19|<font size="-3">Talk</font>]] 18:18, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

:not accurate (the adoptions were all legal, and Jensen had nothing to do with Guardiaships or David) and was sort of hanging there relevent to nothing before or after it. I'll get to all that stuff;This page is still a WIP.

::*Abdu'l Baha to Remey --> not legal

::*Remey to Pepe --> legal

::*Pepe to Chase --> not legal

::These are not questionable facts. I don't know any details between Remey to Pepe, but if you're disputing the others then you need some serious references, like signed documents. Jensen also traces lineage to King David, you wrote it yourself in one of the pages. [[User:Cunado19|<font color="#d14c04">'''Cuñado'''</font>]] [[image:Bahaitemplatestar.png|20px]] - [[User talk:Cunado19|<font size="-3">Talk</font>]] 02:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

I never wrote anything about Doc's lineage from David. Others keep reverting what I write about his beliefs back to an obscure statement which is how it appears in its current version on the Baha'i Divisions page. Abdu'l-Baha's adoption of Mason was legal and so was Pepe's and Neal. Obviously you "don't know any details" on any of these things. If you don't you shouldn't be adding things to pages that you don't know about and can't reference. You know better. I'll reference all those things when I add them to the summary. [User:Jeffmichaud]