Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Naming conventions/Redraft1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) m →Current abbreviated subdivisional components: Typo fix. |
m moved Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Naming guidelines/Redraft1 to Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Naming conventions/Redraft1: per actual usage of the page |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2:
<!--{{shortcut|[[WP:WSS/NG]]}}-->
<!--{{WSS}}-->
{{Historical}}
In order to maintain some consistency in the naming of stub templates and their corresponding stub categories, several conventions for stub naming are used in [[Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion|stub deletion/merging/renaming]], for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals|new stub proposals]], and by ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting|WikiProject Stub sorting]]'' while cleaning up stub organization. The following is a list of the most important conventions to take into consideration when naming a stub template and its stub category.
Line 129:
===Stub template redirects===
Redirects are used far less frequently with stub templates, but still exist. Redirects follow the same guidelines as the templates they redirect to, and because the naming guidelines are fairly [[
==Stub categories==
|