Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Carbonite: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Request |
Merovingian (talk | contribs) m moved Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005/Candidate statements/Carbonite to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Carbonite |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 30:
Arbcom is overworked and no fun. Please review these discussions: [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-October/thread.html#29915][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/RFC] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2005/Proposed_modifications_to_rules] Come up with a short list of suggestions for ways you would endorse for improving the arbitration process. Bonus points for actually managing to create new policy. [[User:Dragons flight|Dragons flight]] 07:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
== Relevant experience==
What experience do you have that would be relevant? Have you dealt with the Arbcom or Mediation committee yourself? Have you been part of an RFC (involving either yourself or others)? A lot of arbcom tasks involve reading a lot of less-than-brilliant prose and writing concise opinions; do you have any experience in Wikipedia or in other venues that might relate?
| |||