Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Workshop/Proposed Principles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) |
m →Template: Noindexing Arbitration pages |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1,110:
:Comment by Arbitrators:
::Excellent, although still wordy. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 22:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
:Comment by parties:
Line 1,117:
:Comment by others:
:: One alternative--essentially says that it is permissible to politely say "that source is rubbish", without having to demonstrate exactly why, or find someone outside Wikipedia who has gone on record denouncing the source as rubbish. (As has been pointed out, much published rubbish is ignored by the academic literature on many subjects--if it were decided that "this is rubbish" criticisms were not permissible unless a published criticism saying so existed elsewhere, then many examples of rubbish would be immune from criticism due to being resoundingly ignored).
:::Again, best to avoid pithy summaries, low quality or very low quality is much better. (How did I get to be Miss Manners?) [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 22:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
===Template===
Line 1,189 ⟶ 1,190:
:Comment by others:
::
{{NOINDEX}}
| |||