Content deleted Content added
Starstriker7 (talk | contribs) →GA Review: Finishing review. |
Starstriker7 (talk | contribs) →Overall comments: Passing. |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 21:
*The article says that the episode was created because it aired on Valentine's Day. I'm not quite sure what that means.
*Are you able to specify which the TV series that had an episode that conflicted with this episode's name?
:Unfortunately, no. The name of the series is not mentioned in the commentary. [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 20:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
*"He does not believe that copyright issues will arise though:" --> However, he did not believe that copyright issues would arise:
Line 55 ⟶ 56:
===Overall comments===
Excellent work. This is already a high quality article, and after the tweaks, should be all set for GA. Good work, Queenieacoustic! This was actually quite an interesting read to me. :) --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 01:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
:Wow, thanks! And thanks for the review, I'm pretty sure I've fixed all of its problems now. Thanks again! [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 20:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
::Of course. :)
::Everything you addressed was done well, but you actually missed two of my comments. All that's left is to cite the viewer statistic in the lead, and to say that the reviews were generally positive (the reviews you listed were ''largely'' positive, but some had quite a few problems with the episode). Sorry for the inconvenience, but after those last two, this will be set to go. --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 23:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Agh, how could I miss those! I changed the reviews summation to largely positive, but I'm actually a bit concerned about your other suggestion. Why should I cite the viewers statistic in the Lead when it's already cited in Reception? Again, thanks for the review! [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 08:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
::::Hopefully I've addressed your concern with my reply at [[Talk:Lisa Gets an "A"/GA1]]. Let me know what you think. --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 22:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::Definitely! Thanks again for the review! [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 11:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::You're welcome. I'll pass the article momentarily. :) --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 11:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||