Content deleted Content added
Starstriker7 (talk | contribs) →Overall comments: Passing. |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 60:
::Everything you addressed was done well, but you actually missed two of my comments. All that's left is to cite the viewer statistic in the lead, and to say that the reviews were generally positive (the reviews you listed were ''largely'' positive, but some had quite a few problems with the episode). Sorry for the inconvenience, but after those last two, this will be set to go. --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 23:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Agh, how could I miss those! I changed the reviews summation to largely positive, but I'm actually a bit concerned about your other suggestion. Why should I cite the viewers statistic in the Lead when it's already cited in Reception? Again, thanks for the review! [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 08:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
::::Hopefully I've addressed your concern with my reply at [[Talk:Lisa Gets an "A"/GA1]]. Let me know what you think. --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 22:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::Definitely! Thanks again for the review! [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 11:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::You're welcome. I'll pass the article momentarily. :) --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 11:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||