Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 3: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Position #3: Draft policy is insufficient |
m Protected Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 3: The RfC !voting is closed, please use the dicussion page only if you have further comments\ ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 26:
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]
# The draft policy does not address preventing backlogs. If a backlog came about, good faith anons would be discouraged from being part of WP and good edits would be wrongfully blocked. Also, the draft policy does not provide clear guidance regarding when Pending Changes should be used instead of semi-protection. I believe Pending Changes has the potential to be a useful tool, but it has not lived up to that potential and the draft policy would not get it there. [[User:SMP0328.|SMP0328.]] ([[User talk:SMP0328.|talk]]) 03:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
# I can see the merits of this protection, but I also don't believed that usage guidance has been meaningful enough to ensure that it is not abused. This should include guidance for reviewers and for those placing PC on the page.The merits need to be discussed with the pitfalls and guidance needs to be gleamed from that discussion. [[User:WaitingForConnection|WFC]] seems to have a reasonable understanding of this. —[[User:Ost316|Ost]] ([[User talk:Ost316|talk]]) 20:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
| |||