Wikipedia talk:Graphics Lab/Resources/Tutorials: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:20, 25 August 2008

Latest revision as of 19:56, 18 October 2012

(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

== Comment ==

Hmmm... There is already a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps]]. This page is sort of redundant. --[[User:Seav|seav]] 12:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Line 4 ⟶ 7:

::Is there, in fact, any point to this page? Maybe it should Improve maps rather than create them (e.g. vectorise). --[[User:DTR|Dave the Rave (DTR)]]<small>[[User_talk:DTR|talk]]</small> 19:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

== Consolidation attempts concerning map projects, labs, etc. ==

:'''''Note:''' This info was copied from [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Resources/Maps]].''

See [[:Commons:Commons:Graphic Lab/Maps]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps]]

Note: this sub-Lab was not open because in 2007 because :

:# the English GLab was not enough active in 2007 to be divided in two specialised Lab, it's to the current graphits to think about open this sub-lab if need ;

:# the [[Project:Map]] , which was on en.wikipedia.org for years before the Graphic Lab (us) displayed resistance to be convert into a Graphic Lab's subpage or simply to change their usages. So, despite their [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps/Requested and orphan maps]] is a death page, and despite I think a forum shaped page (like the GLab) is better for cross help, teach/learn exchanges, and to harmonize maps style, I didn't insisted (they were here first after all). Also, from what I seen (10 or 6 months ago), the project:Map continue to work on an "anarchist way" : each volunteer mapmaker making maps on his side, and then using the Project talkpage to ask help and share knowledge.

:I now think the best thing to do should be to merge [WikiProject Maps/Requested and orphan maps] and [Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Project map].

Other thing to notice about maps on wikipedia :

: In summer 2007, the ~ten best mapmakers on wiki-en, wiki-fr, and commons were noticed about the project to set up new common map recommendations. The task is really HUGE (I means <big>'''HUGE'''</big>), and is just done at ~30% (first stage).<br />To avoid lost of time (by endless talks), the French graphist plan to lead the second stage alone : "set workable and complete recommendations".<br />The stage 3 will be to ask experts to harmonize and improvement the colors, icones, naming conventions according to the aim to communicate clearly ([[Chartjunk|Avoiding chartjunk]]) with graphical medium.

==Forum format==