Talk:Development of Duke Nukem Forever/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 15:04, 3 January 2013 edit Teancum (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 20,475 edits →GA Review: starting ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 17:34, 19 January 2013 edit undo Zanimum (talk \| contribs) Administrators 50,971 edits →Issues found
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 31: ===Issues found=== Most references seem reliable, but some need formatting with titles, author, etc. Additionally publishers should have correct titles and italics where necessary (for example, ''Game Informer'', not GameInformer). Right now there are multiple iterations of publishers, some spelled one way, some another, some wikilinked, some externally linked (and should be), some not wikilinked. Publishers should also be wikilinked where possible. : I believe that I've identified and modified them all. What makes the following sources reliable? :[http://talkinrealatyou.blogspot.com/ http://talkinrealatyou.blogspot.com/] (#44) :[http://www.squidcakes.blogspot.com/ http://www.squidcakes.blogspot.com/] (#45) :[http://liquidmesh3d.com/animation.html http://liquidmesh3d.com/animation.html] (#61) ::* Well, it seems the issue can be ignored entirely. #61 doesn't have the quote that was cited anymore, and neither #44 and #45 seemed to directly relate to the point, but I was able to find an alternate link that seems to relate to the prose. So far prose looks pretty good. No quick spot-check issues. : Hooray! Please update the descriptions of [[:File:Duke Nukem Screenshot2.jpg]] and [[:File:Dukenukemforever2007.jpg]] to explain why it's necessary for the reader to see these. The captions should also be updated with similar information. In other words, why are we showing these images to the reader? : Do those work? ~~{{Doing}}~~ [http://www.shacknews.com/docs/press/20090518_dnf_3dr_.x http://www.shacknews.com/docs/press/20090518_dnf_3dr_.x] is dead. Can you see if the URL has been adjusted by ShackNews or if it can be replaced? If [[Meqon]] is relatively unknown why does it need to be linked? (it's a redlink) :* Very astute. Whole numbers under 10 should be spelled out as words, except when in lists, tables or infoboxes ([[WP:NUMERAL]]). I found one, but there may be others. : As far as my Edit > Find searches are showing, that was the only one. Inline citations belong immediately after punctuation marks ([[WP:CITEFOOT]]). I know there's at least one in the '''Gearbox revival and release, 2010–2011''' section '''Reviewer:''' [[User:Teancum\|Teancum]] ([[User talk:Teancum\|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Teancum\|contribs]]) 14:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC) <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> : I've completed the review. Please correct the following issues to have it pass GAN ::* Have I caught all of the issues? Thanks! -- [[User:Zanimum\|Zanimum]] ([[User talk:Zanimum\|talk]]) 20:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC) :::Looks good now. I need a bit to have time to pass the GAN, but it's definitely GA quality now. --[[User:Teancum\|Teancum]] ([[User talk:Teancum\|talk]]) 18:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC) :::: Thank you in advance! -- [[User:Zanimum\|Zanimum]] ([[User talk:Zanimum\|talk]]) 17:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)