Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Workshop: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:41, 31 December 2011

Latest revision as of 06:21, 4 July 2013

Line 525:

:::'''Supplementary comment''' If Xxanthippe continues to suggest that I have been trolling, cherry-picking sources, POV-pushing a Marxist/New Left viewpoint or otherwise, she should provide diffs in her evidence to support those claims or withdraw them. Her comments, so far unsupported by diffs, verge on a sustained [[WP:NPA|personal attack]], possibly due to a grudge that she is harbouring. At the moment her statements read like empty rhetoric. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 08:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

::::::Editor [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] does not note my objection to his accusing a Jewish editor of being a [[holocaust denier]] nor my objection to [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] associating me with racist views. I don't know what grudge I am suspected of harbouring. There are plenty of diffs here.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence/Evidence&oldid=369070541#Evidence_presented_by_Xxanthippe] [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 04:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC).

::::'''Comment on Mathsci's digression:''' this is all patent nonsense. If Mathsci wants to expand this discussion into my interactions with [[User:brangiferBullRangifer|Brangifer]] (and brangifers mind-boggling misinterpretation of the NSF). as I have said multiple times, the NSF is a perfectly valid source, it's just that brangifer badly abused the rules of reliable sourcing in order to pursue his own rather pathetic) agenda with respect to pseudoscience. [[User:GwenGale]] spent a good deal of time trying to clarify to brangifer exactly where he went wrong with his logic, to no avail; Mathsci apparently missed that thread. --[[User_talk:Ludwigs2|<span style="color:darkblue;font-weight:bold">Ludwigs</span><span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">2</span>]] 19:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

::'''Comment on Proposal - Nope:''' I did nothing wrong in this mediation, and ther has been no evidence presented to the effect that I did. As I said before, if you want to open a detailed discussion of my actions, I'm willing; if not, where is the evidentiary grounding for this? --[[User_talk:Ludwigs2|<span style="color:darkblue;font-weight:bold">Ludwigs</span><span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">2</span>]] 19:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)