Content deleted Content added
Shearonink (talk | contribs) →GA Review: comments/review |
Shearonink (talk | contribs) GA |
||
Line 28:
#:A. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects]] of the topic: {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#:B. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style]]): {{GAList/check|
#:: I think so, but am reading through a few more times to make sure. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 16:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
#:::I think the article stays as focused as is possible and still make the subject as clear as an article in a non-technical encyclopedia can. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 07:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
#Is it '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]]'''?
#:It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: {{GAList/check|yes}}
Line 42 ⟶ 43:
#::
#'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|
#::Nicely-done. As I said below, I think, for future improvements, that explaining the usage of Nearest-neighbor chain algorithms in real-world terms (as in, what do they ''do''?) will help de-mystify the subject to Wikipedia's general readership. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 07:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
===A thought===
|