Dialectic process vs. dialogic process: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m See also: Remove unref category as article appears to have one or more refs or a tag. using AWB
m +{{Redirect category shell}} using AWB
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
#REDIRECT[[Dialogic]]
In a [[dialectic]] process describing the interaction and resolution between multiple [[paradigms]] or [[ideologies]], one putative solution establishes primacy over the others. The goal of a dialectic process is to merge point and counterpoint (thesis and antithesis) into a compromise or other state of agreement (synthesis). Examples of dialectic process can be found in [[Plato's Republic]].
 
{{Redirect category shell|1=
In a [[dialogic]] process, various approaches coexist and are comparatively [[existential]] and relativistic in their interaction. Here, each ideology can hold more salience in particular circumstances. Changes can be made within these ideologies if a strategy does not have the desired effect. An example of the dialogic process can be found in [[Robert Nozick|Nozick's]] [[Anarchy, State, and Utopia]].
{{R from subtopic}}
 
}}
These two distinctions are observed in studies of [[personal identity (philosophy)|personal identity]], [[national identity]] and [[group identity]].
 
[[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|G. W. F. Hegel]] (1770-1831) introduced the concept of dialectic process to explain the progression of ideas.
 
==See also==
*[[Dialogical self]]
*[[Internal discourse]]
*[[Relational dialectics]]
 
{{Unreferenced|date=October 2009}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dialectic Process Vs. Dialogic Process}}
[[Category:Philosophical terminology]]
 
 
{{philo-stub}}