|
#REDIRECT[[Dialogic]]
In a [[dialectic]] process but describing the interaction and resolution between multiple [[paradigms]] or [[ideologies]], one putative solution establishes primacy over the others. The goal of a dialectic process is to merge point and counterpoint (thesis and antithesis) into a compromise or other state of agreement via conflict and tension (synthesis). "Synthesis that evolves from the opposition between thesis and antithesis." (Eisenstein, "The Dramaturgy of Film Form" 23). Examples of dialectic process can be found in ''[[Plato's Republic]]''.
{{Redirect category shell|1=
In a [[dialogic]] process, various approaches coexist and are comparatively [[Existentialism|existential]] and relativistic in their interaction. Here, each ideology can hold more salience in particular circumstances. Changes can be made within these ideologies if a strategy does not have the desired effect. An example of the dialogic process can be found in [[Robert Nozick|Nozick's]], ''[[Anarchy, State, and Utopia]]''.
{{R from subtopic}}
}}
These two distinctions are observed in studies of [[personal identity (philosophy)|personal identity]], [[national identity]] and [[group identity]].
[[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|G. W. F. Hegel]] (1770-1831) introduced the concept of dialectic process to explain the progression of ideas.
[[M. M. Bakhtin]], a Russian philosopher and Literary Critic has been credited with introducing the Dialogical process in Philosophy.
==See also==
*[[Dialogical self]]
*[[Internal discourse]]
*[[Relational dialectics]]
{{Unreferenced|date=October 2009}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dialectic Process Vs. Dialogic Process}}
[[Category:Dialectic]]
[[Category:Philosophical methodology]]
{{philo-stub}}
Works cited
Eisenstein, Sergei. "The Dramaturgy of Film Form". ''Film Theory and Criticism, 6th Ed.'' Eds. Braudy, Leo and Marshall Cohen. New York: Blackwell, 2004. 23.
| 