Dialectic process vs. dialogic process: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Bluebot (talk | contribs)
tagging, added uncategorised tag
m +{{Redirect category shell}} using AWB
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1:
#REDIRECT[[Dialogic]]
In a [[dialectic]] process describing the interaction and resolution between multiple [[paradigms]] or [[ideologies]], one putative solution establishes primacy over the others. The goal of a dialectic process is to merge point and counterpoint (thesis and antithesis) into a compromise or other state of agreement (synthesis).
 
{{Redirect category shell|1=
In a [[dialogic]] process, various approaches coexist and are comparatively [[existential]] and [[relativistic]] in their interaction. Here, each ideology can hold more salience in particular circumstances. Changes can be made within these ideologies if a strategy does not have the desired effect. Thus, these entities do not necessarily merge (or become subjugated) into bigger entities as in the dialectic process, but nonetheless modify themselves (sometimes fundamentally) over the course of mutual interaction.
{{R from subtopic}}
 
}}
These two distinctions are observed in studies of [[personal identity]], [[national identity]] and [[group identity]].
 
[[Georg Hegel]] (1770-1831) introduced the concept of dialectic process to explain the progression of ideas.
 
{{Uncategorized|November 2006}}
 
 
{{philo-stub}}