Talk:Timeline of programming languages/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
archive
 
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA
 
Line 157:
:::: That's good to hear! (Just note that the article's recreation does not mean the entry here should be restored; see the proposed criteria below.) <span style="white-space:nowrap">—[[User:Piet Delport|Piet Delport]] <small>([[User talk:Piet Delport|talk]]) 2009-11-18 02:31</small></span>
 
::::: There are many languages in this list, which are so new that they can hardly be classified as ''historically important''. But I still consider all this languages important and they should be listed. Time flows by and [[Seed7]] now has an article and it is described in a book with: "Seed7 supports the introduction of new syntax and their semantics into the language and it allows new language constructs to be defined using the Seed7 language itself" (reference: Abrial, Jean-Raymond and Glässer, Uwe, "Rigorous Methods for Software Construction and Analysis", {{ISBN |978-3-642-11446-5}}, Springer, 2010, page 166). Because of this syntactic and semantic extendability I consider it ''pioneering''. The situation has changed and therefore I will add Seed7 back to the list. [[User:Hans Bauer|Hans Bauer]] ([[User talk:Hans Bauer|talk]]) 11:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 
== legend?? ==