Content deleted Content added
m Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16:
: From "Diagnosis", "Blood tests": "In the early stages, however, pressure on the liver cells may be the main feature and the tests will resemble those in hepatitis, with elevations in alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase." Is this really true? I'm reading "Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology" and there's no mention of this. Unfortunately my hospital library doesn't stock "Gastrointestinal clinics of North America". [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 18:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
::{{done}} Kinney sources it to {{PMID
: From "Diagnosis", "Medical imaging": "Compared to ERCP (see below), this modality may show dilation of the bile duct and identifies 38% of bile duct stones; it is relatively poor at identifying stones further down the bile duct." This sentence is rather awkward and should be split.The first part of the sentence: "Compared to ERCP, this modality may show dilation..." doesn't really make sense. [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 18:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Line 38:
::{{not done}} Could I leave this to you, Axl? I'm not sure what degree of emphasis you'd like. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 22:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
::: Yes, I'll work on it this evening. [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 07:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Line 52 ⟶ 53:
: The caption for the picture in "Medical imaging" mentions a "nasobiliary drain". I can guess what this means, although I've never heard of it before. [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 21:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
::Kinney mentions it, and several other sources (e.g. {{PMID
::: As a stand-alone picture, many non-medical readers would not understand the meaning. It is only later in the article that "nasobiliary drain" is properly described. I'm hoping for a wikilink (to a stub) to assist unfamiliar readers. [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 07:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
::::I'm not entirely sure if an article is needed for this. Couldn't the caption simply refer to the text? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 18:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
: From "Treatment", "Endoscopy": "PTC is not without complications" What complications? [Cholangitis is one.] [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 21:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Line 74 ⟶ 77:
::: Reference 2 (Schwartz) uses ''last'' and ''first''. The reference that I added (Sung) also has ''last'' and ''first'', but I would be happy to change this to the predominant style. I'm not insisting that ''last'' and ''first'' should be used. Rather the style should be consistent throughout the references. [[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 07:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
::{{Done}} Sorry, makes sense. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 16:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
=== GA pass ===
I have passed [[Ascending cholangitis]] for "Good article" status. It is well-written, accurate, neutral, stable and well-illustrated.
Notes for future improvement: -
: A wikilink from "nasobiliary drain" in the image at the top of the "Diagnosis", "Medical imaging" section.
: A couple of one-sentence paragraphs should be expanded: at the end of "Treatment" and "Endoscopy" sections.
: The main reference is "Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America". This has low impact factor and is not the most easily accessible source. I'm sure that many of those references could be changed to more reliable and accessible sources.
[[User:Axl|Axl]] ([[User talk:Axl|talk]]) 18:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks Axl. With regards to the source I was actually surprised that there were no good reviews available on cholangitis. Kinney's article is quite rigorous, and all other recent reviews have appeared in similar journals. Thankfully we had Tokyo2007 and the recent BSG guideline to supplement the content. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 21:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
| |||