Content deleted Content added
m Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion from Talk:Image sensor. (BOT) |
||
Line 87:
Pixel count <> resolution. Active pixel size ~ resolution, with caveats (such as fixed pattern noise, fill factor, etc.). See for example [[Optical resolution]]. Please stop confusing them. If you want raw pixel counts, please call them "pixel count" not "resolution". I believe that confusion on this point was originally caused by computer monitor manufacturers because old school photographers inherently avoided the issue by using lppmm when discussing resolution. [[User:Ehusman|Ehusman]] ([[User talk:Ehusman|talk]]) 03:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
== Companies ==
In the list of companies that manufacture image sensors - do all of the companied listed actually ''manufacture'' them? For instance I thought Nikon only designs their sensors (or modifies other designs) and then gets other companies to do the actual manufacturing. This needs clarifying. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.89.25.245|202.89.25.245]] ([[User talk:202.89.25.245|talk]]) 03:06, 26 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I don't think that the companies that manufacture image sensors should be included in the article at all, unless it has a strong relation with the actual description of an image sensor. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/194.98.70.135|194.98.70.135]] ([[User talk:194.98.70.135|talk]]) 14:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||