Recency principle: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Addbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Removing Orphan Tag (Nolonger an Orphan) (Report Errors)
AvicBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Fixing double redirect to Serial-position effect
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
*#REDIRECT [[Serial -position effect#Recency effect]]
The '''Recency Principle''' is described by the [[Roger Shuy]] in the journal [[Language Log]].<ref>http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002928.html</ref>
 
It is used by police interrogators to have a subject incriminate himself without realizing it, and more importantly, without speaking further about the topic. It exploits a known phenomenon where people focus on the most recent topic.<ref name="Leonard2002">{{cite book|author=David C. Leonard|title=Learning theories, A to Z|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=HBZMrbPyy74C&pg=PA160|accessdate=4 February 2012|year=2002|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-1-57356-413-7|page=160}}</ref> By quickly shifting to an unrelated topic after something incriminating was said, the interrogator can avoid having elaboration to elaborate on the statement, and to avoid protest from the subject.
 
It is noted that politicians are also aware of this technique. By creating a new topic of debate, focus can be shifted from a more incriminating one.
 
==See also==
*[[Primacy principle]]
*[[Serial position effect]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Cognitive biases]]
[[Category:Law enforcement]]
[[Category:Principles]]
 
{{cognitive-psych-stub}}