Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Trysha 2 and Talk:Bhojpuri language: Difference between pages

Revision as of 16:55, 5 October 2006

Revision as of 18:20, 1 November 2006

Line 1:

{{WP India|class=|importance=}}

===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Trysha 2|Trysha]]===

{{LanguageTalk}}

'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Trysha 2|action=edit}} Voice your opinion.]'''

'''(23/5/1) Ending 23:35, [[11 October]] [[2006]] (UTC)'''

The article [[Mauritius]] says that English is the consitutional language, and French, English, Hindustani and Creole are ''de facto'' languages. Bhojpuri is not mentioned. / [[User:Habj|Habj]] 00:05, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

{{User|Trysha}} – Many many many edits and a few months later I am here to give this another go. My [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Trysha|last RFA]] was unsuccessful, with everyone in opposition being virtually unanimous in saying "try again later". So here I am. In my previous RfA there some said they would like to see more janitorial duties and more participation in project talk spaces, and I don't feel that either of those areas are lacking any more and my edits should show that. I have been here since 2004, but I only became really active at the end of 2005. The majority of my work since has been vandal fighting and spam fighting, both with RC Patrol pages as well as within the many hundreds of pages in the Dog Project. - [[User:Trysha|Trysha]] ^{([[User_talk:Trysha|talk]])} 23:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'' self nom, but of course - [[User:Trysha|Trysha]] ^{([[User_talk:Trysha|talk]])} 23:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

<!--The candidate may make an optional statement here-->

;Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

:'''1.''' What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out [[:Category:Wikipedia backlog]] and [[:Category:Administrative backlog]], and read the page about [[Wikipedia:administrators|administrators]] and the [[Wikipedia:administrators' reading list|administrators' reading list]].

::'''A:''' More of the same, but with the mop. Many admins are overworked, and I often do not report vandals to be blocked because it is frequently many hours before they actually do get blocked. As a result I, and others, reclean the same guys vandalism until he gets bored and goes away (when a 15 minute or a couple hours long block would solved the issue quite nicely and with much less work). In addition to just dealing with vandals, I would initially branch out into taking care of speedy deletions, I know the CSD very well, although this could be hard to see as many tagged articles I have are gone, I would like to help there.

:'''2.''' Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

::'''A:''' On my last RFA I mentioned my infobox for the dog project. I am still very proud of that, as it standardized the many hundreds of dog related articles and made them much easier to maintain. I am, of course, proud of my efforts to keep the encylopedia vandal free.

:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

::'''A:''' Just look at my talk page, people hate those who remove spam and vandalism. As I said in my last RfA, I have not had many conflicts outside of the vandal fighting arena. In those times that I have had a conflict I think that I respond in a friendly and fair manner to people that disagree with me. I respect consensus, and try my best to assume good faith on the part of other editors, even when it seems glaringly obvious that they are not acting in good faith.

:'''4.''' Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an established user? --[[User:Mcginnly|Mcginnly]] | [[User talk:Mcginnly|Natter]] 10:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

:'''5.''' You seem to have been quite active in spam-fighting; what is your opinion of [[WP:CSD#G11]]? How do you interpret its current wording? --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 12:36, 5 October 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

;'''6.''' Aside from CSD, are there any other admin mediums that you would help out with? IfD seems to be perma-backlogged, and [[WP:PP]] needs to be monitored for pages that have been protected and forgotten about.'''[[User talk:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]''' 14:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

;General comments

*

----

<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "comments" and "questions" sections. -->

'''Discussion''' (for expressing views without numbering)

<!--Please consider using this space to express your opinion - in addition to the numbered sections below -->

*

'''Support'''

#'''Support''', no problems here. [[User:Naconkantari|<font color="red">Nacon</font><font color="gray">'''kantari'''</font>]] 23:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support'''. Nominee demonstrates need for tools and trustworthiness, seems to have taken advice from last RfA very seriously and went above and beyond to address those concerns. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 00:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' per nom. [[User:John254|John254]] 00:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' - per nom -- [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 00:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support'''. The user obviously needs admin tools and is a good editor, who helped with the dog project. --<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3,0" color="#FF0000">[[User:EstebanF|Esteban]]</font> <font face="Lucida Calligraphy" size="1,0" color="green">[[User talk:EstebanF|F.]]</font> <font color="blue" size="0,5">^{[[Special:Contributions/EstebanF|(con.)]]}</font> 00:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' per nom and above. [[User:Hello32020|Hello32020]] 00:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' per nom. [[User:Mike 7|Michael]] 01:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#Though I've never interacted with her, Trysha seems like a trustworthy editor who will not abuse the tools. --[[User:Mr. Lefty|'''Mr. Lefty''']] <small>([[User talk:Mr. Lefty|talk]])</small> 01:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' Passes My Criteria [[User:The Bread|<font color ="red">'''†he Bread'''</font>]] 01:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Yup'''. Needs the tools; has clean nose. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 01:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support.''' Meets my criteria as well. [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanG]][[User:RyanGerbil10/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:RyanGerbil10|rbil10]]<small>[[User_talk:RyanGerbil10|(Kick 'em in the dishpan!)]]</small> 01:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' per above. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</span> 02:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' meets my standards.-- [[User:danntm|danntm]] ^{[[user talk:danntm|T]]} _{[[Special:Contributions/Danntm|C]]} 02:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' needs the mop to block vandals, nuf said. [[User:Stubbleboy|Stubbleboy]] 02:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support.''' Shows need for tools, has sufficient history, and has learned from previous RFA. Good candidate. -- [[User:Merope|Merope]] <small>^{[[User talk:Merope|Talk]]}</small> 03:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' per nom. [[User:Rama's Arrow|<font color="blue">'''Rama's arrow'''</font>]] 05:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' Seems like a good candidate, plenty of vandalfighting in edit history, so tools would be useful. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 05:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#Low edit count, but adminship isn't a big deal, so '''Weak support.'''[[User:Jorcoga|<b><span style="color:#fd0;background:#000">&nbsp;J<span style="color:#f90">o<span style="color:#f50">r<span style="color:#f00">c</span>o</span>g</span>a&nbsp;</span></b>]] 06:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' - No reason so far demonstrated not to trust. - [[User:Triona|Stephanie Daugherty (Triona)]] - [[User_talk:Triona|Talk]] - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Triona&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new Comment] - 10:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' - go for it. [[User:SMC|SMC]] 12:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer&nbsp;]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo/D|D]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo|iablo]] 15:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support''' Seems like a good candidate. See no reason to believe would misuse the tools.[[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#009000"><span style="cursor: w-resize">'''Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim'''</span></font>]] 15:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Support'''. No reason not to. &mdash;[[User:Xezbeth|Xezbeth]] 16:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

'''Oppose'''

#'''Weak oppose''' - lack of experience with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=upload&user=Trysha images] --[[User:T-rex|T]]-[[User talk:T-rex|rex]] 06:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. I am sorry, I just don't see either the community involvement or a showing of familiarity with policy that would permit me to support. User participated in seven AfD discussions since February. Of those, apparently all were of user's own starting and all were dog-related. Of the 307 WP-space edits, very few are substantitive - most are to Wikiprojects Spam and Dog breeds, CVU, and WP:List of images. I could not trust the user with deletions or blocks (evidence of spamfighting notwithstanding). - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 06:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' I am in agreement with the CrazyRussian. [[User:Eusebeus|Eusebeus]] 13:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' per Crzrussian, I can't see the need for admin tools. I glanced over Trysha's contribs, and I don't see much there that sysop rights would help with. Removing spam certainly doesn't need sysop. Most RC patrolling doesn't need sysop either. An FA is only a nice-to-have, but I think any would-be admin should have experience at xfD/DRV. As for CSD, either Trysha is a great deal better than me at identifying valid speedy candidates (which is more than likely), or she's been very lucky. I'm not much of an AfD-opener, but I have opened a few when speedys were rejected, or prods removed, or neither appeared to be suitable. I applaud Trysha's war on spam, I just don't see that admin rights will help in it. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 15:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

#'''Weak oppose''' reasons pointed out by Crzrussian. As much as I love vandal fighters and spam fighters such as yourself, please get more experience at AfD and maybe other places related to admin chors.--<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 16:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

'''Neutral'''

#On the fence for now; I would prefer a candidate with some more experience with the various processes. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 16:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)