Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Raptor (programming language): Closed as speedy keep (XFDcloser) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Raptor (programming language)]]===▼
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''speedy keep'''. Copy-paste nomination by [[User:Charmk]] in response to his article being deleted. [[WP:POINT]] applies. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 09:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
▲===[[:Raptor (programming language)]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Raptor (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 July 6#{{anchorencode:Raptor (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Raptor_(programming_language) Stats]</span>)
Line 11 ⟶ 16:
** Sorry? Now not only ''topics'' have to be notable, but so do the publishers of any references? When did that happen? [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
** That's a misapplication of the primary notability criterion. [[User:Uncle G/On notability#The primary notability criterion|The criterion]] is whether there are multiple sources that are in-depth coverage by identifiable people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy that are independent of the subject. So how, exactly, is a 150-page book, written by {{plainlink|1=https://www.usafa.edu/facultyprofile/?smid=10695|2=Steve Hadfield}} et al., not in-depth coverage of the subject written by credentialled subject-matter experts that (at least according to the WWW site) are not the creators of the tool? Please explain. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 17:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
*** '''Steve Hadfield works in US Air Force Academy, and RAPTOR is hosted and maintained by US Air Force Academy, this is a primary source, Also the book is distributed using (self publishing tools - no publisher)''' [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:::* Here's a tip for free: If you're arguing with Uncle G; he's right, you're wrong. In the whole of geological time, he's probably got a few goofs stashed away somewhere. But on the whole, if you're ever disagreeing with him, check yourself. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 20:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:::** I respect all of Wikipedia editors and administrators, and I'm happy to learn new things every day. Yes he is right with respect to (significant coverage in the book) but I added more information that prove that '''This is a Primary Source''' so we can't use it for notability according to my knowledge, if I'm wrong, tell me? [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:::::* "Respect". Except when you stalk those who disagree with you at an AfD, to find articles they've created and then [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tox (Python testing wrapper)|nominate those too]]. Classy. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 20:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
* '''keep''' Nomination as "just not notable" still doesn't carry much weight, no matter how many articles you AfD. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
** Please list references for notability that are not (Primary Source) because these references doesn't exist and this article fail GNG [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|list of Education-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 11:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 11:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||