Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhysicsOverflow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
PhysicsOverflow: Closed as no consensus (XFDcloser)
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m Alter: issue. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Removed accessdate with no specified URL. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Chris Capoccia | Category:Pages with citations having bare URLs.
 
Line 14:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Ceethekreator|Ceethekreator]] ([[User talk:Ceethekreator|talk]]) 18:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)</small>
 
Has received coverage from at least two physics journals<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pallavi Sudhir |first1=Abhimanyu |last2=Knöpfel |first2=Rahel |title=PhysicsOverflow: A postgraduate-level physics Q&A site and open peer review system |journal=Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter |date=23 October 2015 |volume=04 |issue=011 |pages=53–55 |doi=10.1142/S2251158X15000193 |url=https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2251158X15000193?src=recsys&journalCode=appn |accessdate=5 June 2019 |issn=2251-158X}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.pro-physik.de/restricted-files/86776 |accessdate=5 June 2019}}</ref> and one independent website.<ref>{{cite web |title=A theoretical physics FAQ |url=https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physfaq/physics-faq.html |website=www.mat.univie.ac.at |accessdate=5 June 2019}}</ref> There are probably more sources like this out there. I don't think that Alexa rank is very relevant in this case: while PhysicsOverflow is quite notable among physicists, it is not used or known by laypeople. --[[User:Wikiman2718|Wikiman2718]] ([[User talk:Wikiman2718|talk]]) 01:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
{{reftalk}}