Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Fish and karate/Questions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:42, 11 November 2019

Latest revision as of 17:09, 15 November 2019

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 64:

|A=I would not, in this case; Arbcom do not officiate over content, and the existence of infoboxes is not for Arbcom to adjudicate. Arbcom exists to address behavioural issues from users who are unwilling or unable to deal with other people in a civil and collegiate way. I will provide a fuller response and address the full scope of your question if you do me the favour of rephrasing your question to avoid the unnecessary and uncivil terms you've used ("ham-fisted", "biased", and "not being impartial").

}}

*I guess you'll remain silent then. You won't be getting my vote. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Cassianto</span>]]^{[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Talk</span>]]}</span>''' 17:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

===Question from Leaky caldron===

Line 93 ⟶ 94:

::12 months later, the underlying dispute was still festering and I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&diff=prev&oldid=886700381 pinged you] to ask for a more detailed closure. You didn't respond. My take on this sequence of events is that you basically chose to put yourself in the role of dispute-resolver, but to ''not'' help to resolve anything. My question is: Did you think your actions in this RfC helped the community with its efforts to resolve a dispute, and if so why do you think they were helpful? |A=Just to note that to ping me you are better off using the {{tlx|ping}} template, not just put my name in a <nowiki>[[User:foo]]</nowiki> link, which only works intermittently); I did not get your ping but still I apologise for not responding. The RfC was far too complicated - RFCs work best for a binary choice - seven proposed options is five too many. But that is an aside. I did not address the options discussed because the issue had been resolved/withdrawn, and to do so would have been rather presumptuous - I know if I had withdrawn an RFC I would expect it to be treated as such. Your take - that I chose to put myself in the role of dispute-resolver but not to address the dispute - would not be one I agree with. Closing RFCs that have been withdrawn is a point of process; if you wanted a detailed addressing of the issues that you perceived still existed then there was nothing stopping you in the intervening 12 months from opening another RFC and doing so, nor is there now.}}

:::: I see you've withdrawn from the election, but just wanted to say thanks for letting me know about the ping issue - I had no idea! And thanks for running :) [[User:Clayoquot|Clayoquot]] ([[User_talk:Clayoquot|talk]] <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Clayoquot|contribs]]) 17:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

===Question from WereSpielChequers===

Line 104 ⟶ 106:

# {{ACE Question|Q= Ought the persons named in a case be given sufficient time to answer charges made by others, rather than have each be given the same time limits? |A=}}

# {{ACE Question|Q= When an arbitrator proffers specific evidence on their own, ought the accused be permitted to actually reply to such "new evidence" as though it were timely presented, with the same time allowed for such a response? |A=}}

===Questions from [[User:Caker18|Caker18]]===

#{{ACE Question

|Q=Can you provide an example of you mediating a conflict where both parties were mutually hostile?

|A=}}

===Question from [[User:SQL|SQL]]===

#{{ACE Question

|Q=Which recent unblock discussion (anywhere, AN/ANI/CAT:RFU/UTRS/etc) are you most proud of your contribution to, and why?

|A=}}