Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Lo Stato Sociale: nuova sezione
 
Valentini17 (discussione | contributi)
Nuova pagina: ==Avviso == {{Vandalismo|Tiziano Ferro}} --LittleWhites (msg) 15:13, 15 nov 2017 (CET) ==Tiziano Ferro== Ci...
 
Riga 1:
== Re:Avviso ==
<!--
{{Vandalismo|Tiziano Ferro}} --[[Utente:SkymenLittleWhites|SkymenLittleWhites]] ([[Discussioni utente:SkymenLittleWhites|msg]]) 1315:1413, 515 nov 20142017 (CET)
-->
{{Vacanze|[[Utente:Popop|Popop]]|il giorno che incomincerà a nevicare}}
{{Utente:Popop/template:altra attività di ricerca}}
 
==Tiziano Ferro==
 
Ciao! Scusa non ho capito, dove sarebbe la fonte che dice che Tiziano Ferro abbia vissuto/vive a Leicester? --[[Utente:LittleWhites|LittleWhites]] ([[Discussioni utente:LittleWhites|msg]]) 15:17, 15 nov 2017 (CET)
Le discussioni concluse sono archiviate [[Discussioni utente:Popop/vec|qui]] e [[Discussioni utente:Popop/vec2|qui]]!
:: Tu stai inserendo che vive a Leicester... --[[Utente:LittleWhites|LittleWhites]] ([[Discussioni utente:LittleWhites|msg]]) 15:19, 15 nov 2017 (CET)
 
::: Tranquillo, capita :) --[[Utente:LittleWhites|LittleWhites]] ([[Discussioni utente:LittleWhites|msg]]) 15:21, 15 nov 2017 (CET)
==Antonio Virgili==
 
Riguardo alla pagina "Antonio Virgili" sono state inserite numerose fonti bibliografiche, più di questo che andrebbe fatto?{{non firmato|A. Specter|10:19, 6 ago 2014‎}}
 
Va benissimo, aggiornerò a breve!
 
== Re: ==
 
Si, anche perché in quell'articolo c'è la foto e dunque si tratta certamente della stessa persona.--[[Utente:GiaKa|GiaKa]] ([[Discussioni utente:GiaKa|msg]]) 12:09, 16 ago 2014 (CEST)
 
==Nuovissimo Progetto!==
 
Cosa ne pensi del paragrafo "Storia" wiki/[[Utente:Skymen/Sandbox1#Storia]]
--[[Utente:Skymen|Skymen]] ([[Discussioni utente:Skymen|msg]]) 13:14, 5 nov 2014 (CET)
Ciao, se l'hai letto mi piacerebbe una opinione così da avere una idea più precisa. Grazie in anticipo.--[[Utente:Skymen|Skymen]] ([[Discussioni utente:Skymen|msg]]) 13:19, 6 nov 2014 (CET)
 
==Giudizi di altri ma in inglese==
 
grazie mille per le correzioni ed ecco alcuni
giudizi su libri presenti nel sito amazon ma non saprei proprio cosa estrarre, inoltre sono in inglese....
libro Abductive Cognition
cordialità Lorenzo
From the reviews:
 
“Lorenzo Magnani has produced a magnum opus on abduction that brilliantly spans its philosophical, neuropsychological, computational, and ecological dimensions. In this review I will briefly highlight some of the substantial contributions of Abductive Cognition … . anyone interested in mind and society needs to pay attention to abductive cognition. There is no better place to jump off from than Lorenzo Magnani’s new book.” (Paul Thagard, Mind & Society, April, 2010)
 
“The aim of the monograph series is to record new developments in cognitive systems research. … The appearance of Abductive Cognition is a major event in cognitive science and the philosophy of science. In its reach, complexity and detail, it outpaces everything in the field. In its originality and daring, it is the freshest thing around and a tour de force. It is a book to be reckoned with.” (John Woods, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2011)
 
“In Abductive Cognition Magnani pushes further his reflections on abduction … making of this concept as a key for understanding cognition. … To demonstrate the way the concept of abduction can be unfolded … in its many fields of application is the aim of the rest of the book. … Abductive Cognition does an impressive work in sketching some previously unexplored consequences of the concept of abduction in a cognitive framework … and in opening new ways of semiotically investigating cognitive phenomena.” (Riccardo Fusaroli, Versus, 2010)
 
“Lorenzo Magnani’s new book Abductive Cognition is an important addition … on the nature of abduction. … The book is full of ideas and approaches. … this is an essential reading for all who are interested in abduction, or (distributed) cognition, and especially those who are interested in both of them. Hopefully this is a growing group of people! There is also a large list of references as well as a short vocabulary on abductive cognition at the end of the book.” (Sami Paavola, Journal of General Philosophy of Science, March, 2011)
 
“Magnani’s book is an ambitious and ecumenical essay on that phenomenon, an attempt to collect and integrate research, old and new, regarding abductive thinking. … The audience of this volume is a readership already interested in the subject and acquainted with the basic issues surrounding it. … this review is to outline the thread of its development for the benefit of a broader audience, and to help readers perceive the overall thrust of the work in the midst of the many details recounted in it.” (Cameron Shelley, Minds and Machines, December, 2011)
 
Libro Morality in a technological World
 
 
 
Review
"Magnani provides a stimulating exploration of the ethical implications of the medicalization of life, cybernetic globalization and the commodification of our lives through globalization. He advances an original and controversial thesis that will re-orient philosophical discussion of ethical issues toward a new account of moral reasoning that recognizes the cognitive constraints of reasoning, the social and cultural context in which it takes place and the impact of technologies and changing economic circumstances. This book is essential reading for everyone interested in the impacts of social, economic and technological change on ethical and legal theory."
David Gooding, Director, Science Studies Centre, University of Bath, UK
 
"This book integrates several fields of ethics, philosophy of technology, epistemology, and cognitive science, developing a completely new and challenging perspective from which Magnani makes the case for knowledge-centered morality. From the interesting and counterintuitive premise - respecting people as things in favor of reconfiguring or saving human dignity in our technological world - the discourse moves towards extremely significant but controversial claims supporting the belief that changes of moral value mainly result from human acts of cognition. Magnani clearly contends that we should seriously adopt this thesis of knowledge if we concede that technology has entirely turned both nature and ourselves into the object of human responsibility.
-Li Ping, Sun Yat-sen University
 
"[Morality in a Technological World] is a masterpiece. It is completely innovative. It will change argumentation in several branches of cognitive science forever - and moreover in a way that is absolutely essential for the information age. It will change legal argumentation, because such argumentation, as Magnani shows must, in the information age, undergo a fundamental revolution if people are to be protected, and even defined, in such a way that preserves their coherence, integrity, and dignity."
Michael Leyton, Center for Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, Rutgers University
 
"Morality in a Technological World is a deftly argued and insightful exploration of the interconnections among morally significant kinds of change-technological, epistemic, and ontological. It is a highly valuable original contribution to agent-centered resource-based analyses of human behavior and to moral theory."
- John Woods, University of British Columbia, Journal of Value Inquiry
 
[Magnani] challenges us to think both cognitively and philosophically about moral and ethical dilemmas, in light of new approaches to technological development. In doing so he awakens important discussions around consciousness, humanity, free will and responsibility, and their interconnectedness; in fact, how do we treat people as things, rather than means? He opens up a space in which we can fruitfully discuss the balance between individual, corporate, national and supra-national needs and expectations, in terms of developing individual self-efficacy and agency. In a period of accelerating technological change, where both individually and collectively we are casting longer data shadows within expanding networks, this is an important and timely discussion."
-Richard Hall, De Montfort University, Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society
 
 
Libro Understading Violence
From the reviews:
 
“This book is an impressive sample of applied philosophy. … The book basically is a philosophical attempt to give the reader an almost ‘metamoral awareness about (the) inherent violent nature of the ‘human condition’ … . the central theme of this philosophical study points at a multitude of urgent, highly problematic contemporary issues, and since violence as a structural dimension of life is an understudied theme in (moral) philosophy, let’s read, study and discuss this important, thought provoking work!” (Anton van Harskamp, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 16, September, 2013)
 
“Magnani’s book is a broad and deep meditation on the theme of violence. … the theoretical and methodological problem lies … to raise this issue to the status of an independent, chiefly philosophical subject. This requires a strategic twofold move: on the one hand, one needs a strong and comprehensive philosophical hypothesis about violence; on the other, it is necessary to bring … the fragmentation of analyses consecrated to the issue of violence—and this result is achieved precisely thanks to a comprehensive philosophical hypothesis.” (Massimo Durante, Mind & Society, March, 2013)
 
“Understanding Violence is able to bring all of this home to the reader with such inspired clarity is certain testimony to its potential for everyday application. … Understanding Violence is a valuable contribution not only to the literature on the subject of violence, but to the possibility of a future with less of it, a shared future forged in mutual understanding rather than Hobbesian force. For anyone invested in engineering such a world, Understanding Violence is necessary reading.” (Jeffrey Benjamin White, Biosemiotics, April, 2012)
 
“The best word to describe this book is "evoking", a book that expressly aims at elevating violence, every kind of violence, to the status of a true philosophical and moral category ... . Magnani's book tackles several fronts with great intellectual determination, each of them as complex as fascinating. ... This book vindicates the intellectual importance of the topic of violence and claims it back into the feud of philosophy. This will surely lead us - at least in the mid-term - to unexplored ontological and epistemological grounds.” (Translated from Spanish: Valeria Isegoria in Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política N.º 46, enero-junio, 2012){{nf|82.50.65.144|15:55, 18 dic 2014‎}}
:Scusa, adesso davvero non ho tempo. Sarebbero molto meglio citazioni e giudizi critici veri e propri, non solo recensioni.--[[Utente:Popop|<span style="color:red">P<sub>o</sub>p</span>]] [[Discussioni utente:Popop|<span style="color:blue">O<sup>p</sup></span>]] 13:00, 21 dic 2014 (CET)
 
== Sarebbero molto meglio citazioni e giudizi critici veri e propri, non solo recensioni ==
 
chairo ho capito, vedo se trovo come fare, grazie
 
== Global account ==
 
Hi Popop! As a [[:m:Stewards|Steward]] I'm involved in the upcoming [[:m:Help:Unified login|unification]] of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see [[:m:Single User Login finalisation announcement]]). By looking at [[Special:CentralAuth/Popop|your account]], I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on [[Special:MergeAccount]] and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my [[User talk:DerHexer|talk page]]. Cheers, [[Utente:DerHexer|DerHexer]] ([[Discussioni utente:DerHexer|msg]]) 22:19, 18 gen 2015 (CET)
 
== MOOC ==
 
Ciao, ho annullato la tua ultima modifica sulla pagina MOOC perché il termine massivo esiste e sembra essere più adatto di massiccio. Se cerchi in un dizionario scoprirai che è un aggettivo. Ricercando su Google "Corsi massivi online aperti" si hanno 5200 risultati, cercando "Corsi online aperti massicci" solo 6. Per questo motivo mi sembra sia decisamente più adatto. --'''[[Utente:4ndr34|<span style='color:#CF142B'>4ndr34</span>]]''' [[Discussioni utente:4ndr34|<span style ='color:#00247D'>(msg)</span>]] 21:28, 6 feb 2015 (CET)
 
== Lo Stato Sociale ==
 
Ovviamente intendevo [https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lo_Stato_Sociale&diff=70772594&oldid=70772373 '''ir'''rilevante]. --[[User:Zack Tartufo|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS"><span style="color:black">'''T'''artufo</span>]] <span style="color:#60B0C0"><small>([[User talk:Zack Tartufo|<span style="color:#706070">msg</span>]])</small></span></span> 18:29, 9 feb 2015 (CET)