Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Durova and Uranus: Difference between pages

(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
Mirlen (talk | contribs)
 
 
Line 1:
{{Planet Infobox/Uranus}}
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Durova|Durova]]===
{{otheruses}}
'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Durova|action=edit}} Voice your opinion.]'''
'''Uranus''' ([[International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]]: {{IPA|/jəˈreɪnəs/}} or {{IPA|/ˈjurənəs/}}) is the seventh [[planet]] from the [[Sun]]. It is a [[gas giant]], the third largest by [[diameter]] and fourth largest by [[mass]]. It is named after [[Uranus (mythology)|Uranus]], the Greek god of the sky and progenitor of the other gods. Its symbol is either [[Image:Uranus's astrological symbol.svg|20px|]] ([[astrology|astrological]]) or [[Image:Uranus symbol.svg|20px|Astronomical symbol for Uranus]] ([[astronomy|astronomical]]). The first symbol derives from the name of its discoverer, [[William Herschel]]. The second symbol is a combination of the devices for the Sun and Mars, as Uranus was the personification of heaven in Greek mythology, dominated by the light of the Sun and the power of Mars. It is also the [[alchemy|alchemical]] symbol of [[platinum]].
'''(54/1/1) Ending 20:38, [[17 October]] [[2006]] (UTC)'''
 
[[NASA]]'s ''[[Voyager 2]]'' is the only spacecraft to have visited the planet and no other visits are currently planned. Launched in 1977, ''Voyager 2'' made its closest approach to Uranus on [[January 24]], [[1986]], before continuing its journey to [[Neptune]].
{{User|Durova}} – Durova has been here for about a year now, and has been a versatile and helpful user. In articles, Durova contributed a lot to [[Joan of Arc]], now a featured article, and on historical and military-historical articles in general. In maintenance work, Durova has helped out with [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation|Requests for Investigation]], [[WP:RFC]] and [[Wikipedia:Abuse reports|Abuse Reports]]. Overall, this good user should be mopified. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 15:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 
Uranus is the first planet discovered in modern times. Sir [[William Herschel]] formally discovered the planet on [[March 13]], [[1781]]; the other planets (from [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]] out to [[Saturn]]) have been known since ancient times, and Uranus' discovery expanded the boundaries of the [[solar system]] for the first time in modern human history. It was also the first planet discovered using [[technology]] (a [[telescope]]) rather than the [[naked eye]].
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''
Nomination accepted. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 16:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 
== Discovery and naming ==
<!--The candidate may make an optional statement here-->
Uranus is the first planet to be discovered that was not known in ancient times; although it had been observed on many previous occasions, it was often mistakenly identified as a star. The earliest recorded sighting was in 1690 when [[jesse and Aaron Flamsteed]] catalogued Uranus as 34 [[Taurus (constellation)|Tauri]]. Flamsteed observed Uranus at least six more times. The record belongs to a French astronomer, [[Pierre Lemonnier]], who observed Uranus at least twelve times between 1750 and 1771, including on four consecutive nights. (Lemonnier is often{{fact}} called careless or even "sloppy" for this, but it is important to know that he realized 9 of these within a short time of Herschel's discovery and most of his observations occurred at the [[stationary point]] in Uranus' orbit.)
STATEMENT: The edit counter reports over 7000 total edits with nearly 3000 main space edits and close to 2000 Wikipedia space edits. I belong to the [[Wikipedia:Forum for Encyclopedic Standards|Forum for Encyclopedic Standards]] and the [[Wikipedia:Harmonious Editing Club|Harmonious Editing Club]] as well as [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history]] where I started the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Middle Ages task force|Middle Ages task force]]. I was one of the core contributors to a proposal that achieved guideline status last month as [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]]. In addition to [[Joan of Arc]], two lists I started have become [[WP:FL|featured lists]] as [[Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc]] and [[List of notable brain tumor patients]]. Ten of my new articles have been highlighted at [[Wikipedia:Did you know|Did you know?]] '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 17:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 
Sir [[William Herschel]] discovered the planet on [[March 13]], [[1781]], but reported it on [[April 26]], [[1781]], as a "[[comet]]."<ref>''Account of a Comet, By Mr. Herschel, F. R. S.; Communicated by Dr. Watson, Jun. of Bath, F. R. S.'', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Volume 71, pp. 492-501.</ref>
;Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
:'''1.''' What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out [[:Category:Wikipedia backlog]] and [[:Category:Administrative backlog]], and read the page about [[Wikipedia:administrators|administrators]] and the [[Wikipedia:administrators' reading list|administrators' reading list]].
::'''A:''' I’d like to help two backlogged pages: [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation]] and [[Wikipedia:Personal attack intervention noticeboard]]. Complex vandalism and personal attacks are often interconnected so addressing these matters requires patience, sleuthing, and judgement. I’ve had experience dealing with similar situations as a regular participant at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]]. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 17:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 
''On the 13th of March, 1781, between ten and eleven o'clock at night, while Herschel was examining the small stars near H Geminorum with a seven-foot telescope, bearing a magnifying power of two hundred and twenty-seven times, one of these stars seemed to have an unusual diameter; and it was, therefore, thought to be a comet. It was under this denomination that it was discussed at the [[Royal Society]] of [[London]]. But the researches of Herschel and of Laplace showed later that the orbit of the new body was nearly circular, and Uranus was consequently elevated to the rank of a planet.'' <ref name=Arago>M. Arago (1871), ''Herschel'', Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, pp. 198-223</ref>
:'''2.''' Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
::'''A:''' My first and toughest accomplishment was raising [[Joan of Arc]] to [[WP:FA|featured article]] quality. Compare the version just before my first edit[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joan_of_Arc&oldid=26535630] to the current page. It's important to have a strong article for a famous historic figure and a high traffic page. After the English language article became an FA other editors translated it into Indonesian and Chinese so now Joan of Arc is a featured article on three different language editions of Wikipedia. In conjunction with that biography I seem to have become the first editor to raise an ''In popular culture'' section to [[WP:FL|featured list]] status. The French and German Wikipedias already had similar pages that focused on high culture such as paintings, sculptures, and operas. I translated material from these two Wikipedias, organized the potluck of information at the English language article, and sourced and expanded the information. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 16:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 
Herschel originally named it ''Georgium Sidus'' (George's Star) in honour of King [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]] of [[Kingdom of Great Britain|Great Britain]] (c.f. American poet Elizabeth Graeme Fergusson's "Upon the Discovery of the Planet..." about the event). When it was pointed out that ''sidus'' means star and not planet, Herschel rebaptised it the ''Georgian Planet''. This name was not acceptable outside of Britain. [[Joseph Jérôme Lefrançais de Lalande|Lalande]] proposed in 1784 to name it ''Herschel'', at the same time that he created the planet's (astrological) symbol ("a globe surmounted by your initial"); his proposal was readily adopted by French astronomers. [[Erik Prosperin|Prosperin]], of [[Uppsala]], proposed the names ''[[Astraea]]'', ''[[Cybele]]'', and [[Poseidon|''Neptune'']] (now borne by two [[asteroid]]s and another planet). [[Anders Johan Lexell|Lexell]], of [[St. Petersburg]], compromised with ''George III's Neptune'' and ''Great-Britain's Neptune''. [[Daniel Bernoulli|Bernoulli]], from [[Berlin]], suggested ''Hypercronius'' and ''Transaturnis''. [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg|Lichtenberg]], from [[Göttingen]], chimed in with ''Austräa'', a goddess mentioned by [[Ovid]] (but who is traditionally associated with [[Astraea|Virgo]]). The name [[Minerva]] was also proposed.<ref>{{cite journal
:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
|url=http://vesuvius.jsc.nasa.gov/er/seh/hersc.html
::'''A:''' Shortly after I became a Wikipedian another editor warned me that [[Joan of Arc]] was a battleground. That experience was – pardon the pun – a trial by fire. Several other good editors had quit the page or quit Wikipedia over that article before I joined the project. I was learning Wikipedia at the same time as I dealt with two disruptive editors. One refused to join the talk page and edited through an AOL IP range and the other changed usernames midway through our interactions. Mostly I did the right things: cited my edits, shared concerns on talk, opened article mediation, opened peer reviews, and opened RFCs. To see the opinions of seasoned editors who returned read [[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Shazaam|Shazaam!]]’s comment at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Joan of Arc]] and [[User:Wjbean|Wjbean]]’s message at [[Talk:Joan of Arc#New Visions section]]. The essay [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]] summarizes much of what I learned from that experience. Another positive outcome is the [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]] guideline, which I hope will improve resolutions for similar situations in the future.
|title= Voyager at Uranus
|year=1986
|journal=NASA JPL
|pages=400-268
|volume=7
|issue=85}}</ref> Finally, [[Johann Elert Bode|Bode]], as editor of the ''Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch'', opted for ''Uranus'',<ref name="planetsbeyond">{{Cite book | title=Planets Beyond: Discovering the Outer Solar System | id=ISBN 0-486-43602-0 | last=Littmann| first=Mark | publisher=Courier Dover Publications | year=2004 | pages=pp. 10-11}}</ref>
after Latinized version of the [[Greek mythology|Greek god]] of the sky, [[Uranus (mythology)|Ouranos]]; [[Maximilian Hell]] followed suit by using it in the first [[ephemeris]], published in [[Vienna]] and computed by the Benedictine priest [[Placido Fixlmillner]]. The earliest publication to include Uranus in its title, according to NASA's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-abs_connect?db_key=AST&qform=AST&sim_query=YES&ned_query=YES&aut_logic=OR&obj_logic=OR&author=&object=&start_mon=00&start_year=1787&end_mon=12&end_year=1900&ttl_req=YES&ttl_logic=OR&title=uranus&txt_logic=OR&text=&nr_to_return=100&start_nr=1&jou_pick=ALL&ref_stems=&data_and=ALL&group_and=ALL&start_entry_day=&start_entry_mon=&start_entry_year=&end_entry_day=&end_entry_mon=&end_entry_year=&min_score=&sort=SCORE&data_type=SHORT&aut_syn=YES&ttl_syn=YES&txt_syn=YES&aut_wt=1.0&obj_wt=1.0&ttl_wt=0.3&txt_wt=3.0&aut_wgt=YES&obj_wgt=YES&ttl_wgt=YES&txt_wgt=YES&ttl_sco=YES&txt_sco=YES&version=1&start_nr=101&start_cnt=101&start_nr=201&start_cnt=201 ADS], was in 1823 ([[Friedrich Magnus Schwerd|Schwerd]]<!--- (1792-1871) --->, '' Opposition des Uranus 1821'', Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol. 1, pp. 18-21). The name was in use in Germany at least as far back as 1791, however ([[Placido Fixlmillner|Fixlmillner]], [http://www.polybiblio.com/watbooks/2487.html ''Acta Astronomica Cremifanensia''], Steyr, AT: Franz Josef Medter, 1791). Examination of earliest issues of ''Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society'' from 1827 shows that the name ''Uranus'' was already the most common name used even by British astronomers by then, and probably earlier. The name ''Georgium Sidus'' or "the Georgian" was still used infrequently (by the British alone) thereafter. The final holdout was [[HM Nautical Almanac Office]], which did not switch to ''Uranus'' until 1850.<ref name="planetsbeyond"/>
 
The stressed syllable in the name is properly the first, antepenultimate syllable, since in Latin the penultimate vowel ''a'' is short ''(ūr'''ă'''nŭs)'' and in an open syllable, and such syllables are never stressed in Latin. The historically correct pronunciation of the name by English-speakers is therefore ''[ˈjurənəs]'' or ''[ˈjurənʌs]''. The historically incorrect pronunciations ''[juˈreɪnəs]'' or ''[jəˈreɪnəs]'', with stress on the second syllable and a "long a" ''(ūr'''ā'''nŭs)'' have become very common, however, perhaps through the influence of the related adjective "Uranian" (always pronounced ''[juˈreɪniən]'' or ''[jəˈreɪniən]'') or the similarly-pronounced name of the element [[uranium]].
::For a more recent example of how I've handled conflict, see [[Talk:Charun]], related user talk pages, and [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Glengordon01]]. I found the situation through [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]] after the dispute had already been through [[WP:3O]] and a request for formal moderation had been filed (but never picked up). I contacted both editors and attempted to find a common ground. When that failed I consulted the editor who had offered the third opinion and then opened a user conduct RfC on one of the disputants. That paved over most of the potholes: since the end of a four week page protection the article has grown to 23 footnotes and 13 sources.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charun&diff=78576675&oldid=76834065] The two editors in question will probably never be friends, but nobody got blocked or quit Wikipedia. The archives on these conflicts demonstrate how I've matured in an editor, which I hope merits trust as an administrator. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 16:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 
In the [[Chinese language|Chinese]], [[Japanese language|Japanese]], [[Korean language|Korean]], and [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]] languages, the planet's name is literally translated as the ''sky king star'' (天王星)<ref>{{cite web
:'''4.''' Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an established user? --[[User:Mcginnly|Mcginnly]] | [[User talk:Mcginnly|Natter]] 12:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
|url=http://www.eternalsailormoon.org/help.html#myth
::May I rephrase that? I prefer to think of the question as ''Under what circumstances would I consider blocking a user?'' While I'd certainly rather encourage productive contributions than use admin powers, I'd like to extend everyone an assumption of good faith. Some situations are fairly simple: repeated vandalism after block warnings, violation of 3RR. In more complex instances where someone appears to be gaming the system, Wikistalking, or disruptive editing I'd look at past precedents and possibly - in unfamiliar circumstances - consult with a more experienced admin. If I'd attempted to mediate enough that an editor could question my objectivity I'd probably recuse myself from actually performing the block. In conjunction with that I'd be open to requests for review and block from other admins in similar circumstances. Editors should be reasonably confident that blocks are based on rules and not personalities. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 15:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
|title=Sailormoon Terms and Information
|publisher=The Sailor Senshi Page
|accessdate=2006-03-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
|url=http://amateurastronomy.org/EH/Oct97.txt
|title=Asian Astronomy 101
|journal=Hamilton Amateur Astronomers
|month=October
|year=1997
|volume=4
|issue=11}}</ref>, while in India it is named Aruna ([[Devanāgarī]] अरुण), the charioteer of the sun god [[Surya]] in Hindu mythology.
 
== Physical characteristics ==
'''Question from {{user|Malber}}''' <!-- To use this, see /User:Malber/rfaq -->
=== Composition ===
:'''5.''' What do the policy of [[WP:IAR]] and the essay [[WP:SNOW]] mean to you and how would you apply them?
Uranus is composed primarily of gas and various ices. The atmosphere is about 83 percent [[hydrogen]], 15 percent [[helium]], 2 percent [[methane]] and traces of [[acetylene]]. The interior is richer in heavier elements, most likely compounds of oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen, as well as rocky materials. This is in contrast to [[Jupiter]] and [[Saturn]] which are mostly hydrogen and helium. Uranus (like [[Neptune]]) is very much similar to the cores of Jupiter and Saturn without the massive fluid [[metallic hydrogen]] envelope. Uranus' [[cyan]] color is due to the absorption of [[red]] light by atmospheric [[methane]]. Surface temperature on Uranus' cloud cover is approximately 55&nbsp;[[Kelvin|K]] (−218&nbsp;[[Celsius|°C]] or −360&nbsp;[[Fahrenheit|°F]]).<ref>{{cite journal|journal = Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics|volume = 31|pages= 217-263|year= 1993|doi=10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.001245|title=The Atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune|author= Lunine J. I.}}</ref>
::'''A:''' [[Wikipedia:Suggestions on how to ignore all rules]] summarizes things pretty well. It's better for people with sysop powers to ignore rules by handing out a judicious warning sometimes in place of a block. Basically I view the policy and essay as reminders not to become blindly process-driven. Common sense counts for a lot at Wikipedia. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 16:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 
===Axial tilt===
;General comments
One of the most distinctive features of Uranus is its axial tilt of ninety-eight degrees. Consequently, for part of its orbit one pole faces the [[Sun]] continually while the other pole faces away. At the other side of Uranus orbit the orientation of the poles towards the Sun is reversed. This gives each pole 42-years of continuous sunlight, followed by 42 years of darkness. Between these two extremes of its orbit, the Sun rises and sets around the equator normally.
<!-- begin editcount box-->
*See [[User:Durova|Durova]]'s edit summary usage with [http://www.math.ucla.edu/~aoleg/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=Durova&lang=en mathbot's tool].
*[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Durova|Edit summary as of 22:42, October 10 2006]], using [[User:Interiot/Tool2|Interiot's tool]]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
*A couple of responses have speculated on this: yes I'm female. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 17:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
<!-- end edit count box -->
*
----
<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "comments" and "questions" sections. -->
 
At the time of ''[[Voyager 2]]'''s passage in 1986, Uranus' south pole was pointed almost directly at the Sun. The labelling of this pole as "south" uses the coordinate definitions currently endorsed by the [[International Astronomical Union]], namely that the north pole of a planet or satellite shall be the pole which points above the invariable plane of the solar system (regardless of the direction the planet is spinning) [http://www.hnsky.org/iau-iag.htm] [http://pds.jpl.nasa.gov/documents/sr/stdref_021015/Chapter02.pdf]. A different system is sometimes used, defining a body's north and south poles according to the right-hand rule in relation to the direction of rotation [http://roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~masl/documents/masl/coords.html]. In terms of this latter coordinate system it was Uranus' ''north'' pole which was in sunlight in 1986. On page 47 of the September 2006 issue of the Sky at Night magazine, [[Patrick Moore]], commenting on the issue, sums it up with "take your pick!"
'''Discussion''' (for expressing views without numbering)
<!--Please consider using this space to express your opinion - in addition to the numbered sections below -->
*I'm going to make a general remark here about the Gundagai editor. I don't feel Durova's response to that situation is sufficient reason to oppose her RFA. Let's assume for the sake of argument that this proves she is too easy on unredeemably disruptive editors. While one disruptive editor might drive away several good contributors, there are plenty of other admins, so having a few with a light touch is probably a good thing. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 20:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 
One result of this orientation is that the polar regions of Uranus receive a greater energy input from the Sun than its equatorial regions. Uranus is nevertheless hotter at its equator than at its poles, although the underlying mechanism which causes this is unknown. The reason for Uranus' extreme axial tilt is also not known. It is speculated{{fact}} that during the formation of the Solar System, an Earth sized [[protoplanet]] collided with Uranus, causing the skewed orientation.
'''Support'''
#Nominate and support. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 15:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' per my experience [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 17:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' the user has contributed to the wikipedia community, not only with a strong editing history, but also with contribtions to essays such as [[Wikipedia:Light one candle|Light one candle]] and [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons|No angry mastodons]]--[[User:Golden Wattle|Golden Wattle ]] <sup>[[User_talk:Golden Wattle|talk]]</sup> 19:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Grue|<font style="background: black" face="Courier" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;Grue&nbsp;'''</font>]] 20:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Excellent editor. No worries at all. --[[User:FloNight|FloNight]] 20:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- I have encountered Durova in several places here and have been impressed with her understanding of Wikipedia. [[User:Andrew Levine|Andrew Levine]] 20:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 20:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Always seen thoughtful comments from this editor. Seems very well versed in editing articles as well as actively involved in wikipedia space. Will be an asset with respect to building this encyclopedia. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 20:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Suppport'''. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 20:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Great editor already, would be even better with the tools. [[User:Hello32020|Hello32020]] 20:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' per above --<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3,0" color="#FF0000">[[User:EstebanF|Esteban]]</font> <font face="Lucida Calligraphy" size="1,0" color="green">[[User talk:EstebanF|F.]]</font> <font color="blue" size="0,5"><sup>[[Special:Contributions/EstebanF|(con.)]]</sup></font> 21:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#Sure. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 21:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' of course. -- [[User:Grafikm_fr|<font color="Blue">'''Grafikm'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Grafikm_fr|'''<font color="red">(AutoGRAF)</font>''']]</sup> 21:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per nom and others. [[User:Rama's Arrow|<font color="blue">'''Rama's arrow'''</font>]] 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Exactly the kind of person we want with the tools. She could use them and she has an excellent record. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 22:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' 7,000 edits in the time span of one year shows not only experience but a strong commitment to Wikipedia. Would make a great sysop! -- <font color="dark pink">[[User:P.B. Pilhet|'''P.B. Pilh''']]</font>[[User:P.B. Pilhet/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]][[User:P.B. Pilhet|<font color="dark pink">'''t'''</font>]] <font color="dark pink">'''/'''</font> <font color="dark pink">[[User talk:P.B. Pilhet|'''Talk''']]</font> 23:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong support'''. Excellent editor, measured, neutral. Helpful to call in to the talk page when the dispute seems deadlocked. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 23:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Mike 7|Michael]] 23:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - great editor. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</span> 00:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanG]][[User:RyanGerbil10/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:RyanGerbil10|rbil10]]<small>[[User_talk:RyanGerbil10|(Kick 'em in the dishpan!)]]</small> 00:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Irrationally Strong Support.'''&mdash;After carefully reading (twice) [[Talk:Ich bin ein Berliner]], I am convinced that Durova is adequately thoughtful and reasonable in response (or in lack thereof). I fully respect [[User:ProhibitOnions|Prohibit Onions]] viewpoint; I admire a Brit’s defense of America's JFK; but I don’t share Prohibit Onions’ concern about Durova’s sense of humor. I’m far more concerned that she (anyone whose Wikipedia name is borrowed from [[Nadezhda Durova]], the first female officer of the [[Russian]] army, can surely be referred to as she) initiated and earned the bronze star for [[List of notable brain tumor patients]]. The more I read, the more I liked. She is admin material. Give her the button/unbutton powers. Skål - [[User talk:Williamborg|Williamborg]] ([[User talk:Williamborg|Bill]]) 02:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#:But hey, an edit summary usage for Durova of 92% for major edits and 85% for minor edits. Let's bring that up; editors have to set a standard. [[User talk:Williamborg|Williamborg]] ([[User talk:Williamborg|Bill]]) 02:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''uncharacteristically strong support''' nothing but positive interactions, observed plenty of creditable behaviour under adverse field conditions. trust with tools, glad to have as admin. [[User:Pete.Hurd|Pete.Hurd]] 02:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support,''' excellent editor in every respect. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 03:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Passes my criteria [[User:The Bread|<font color ="red">'''†he Bread'''</font>]] 04:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a good editor who will make good use of the admin tools, <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 04:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' excellent devoted editor [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 05:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' excellent all round editor. Good communicator and explainer. '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[User talk:Blnguyen|BLabberiNg]] 05:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - I believe that she'd make a great admin. ←[[User:Humus sapiens|Humus sapiens]] <sup>[[User talk:Humus sapiens|ну?]]</sup> 05:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Durova has contributed excellent material to articles and maintained a level head in some very exasperating situations. Will be a great admin. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 05:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - And glad to do so, now that Durova has responded to my one concern. [[User:ProhibitOnions|<span style="color:white;background:#700">&nbsp;<span style="background:#800">Pr<span style="background:#900">oh<span style="background:#a00">ib<span style="background:#b00">it<span style="background:#c00"><b>O</b></span><b>ni</b></span><b>o</b></span><b>n</b></span><b>s</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:ProhibitOnions|(T)]]</font></sup> 07:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Wishing to be the first to support Durova, I added this page to my watchlist as soon as it was created three days ago. What a pity I was asleep when the voting started :) --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 07:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Doesn't seem to like AfD's, but in light of the sheer breadth of experience in WP namespace I won't hold it against her. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 08:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#[[User:Merovingian|Merovingian]] ※ [[User talk:Merovingian|Talk]] 09:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' without any hesitation whatsoever. [[User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me|Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me]] 10:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong support'''. Extremely polite, excellent contributions and generally a pleasure to work with. -- [[User:Rune.welsh|Run]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="#339900">e</font>]] [[User:Rune.welsh|Welsh]] | [[User_talk:Rune.welsh|&tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;]] 11:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' experienced and dedicated Wikipedian. I was impressed by his answer to question three, as it illustrates an honesty and ability for self-actualisation. I also like that he's willing to tackle some of the more complex vandalism problems. [[User:Hoopydink/Esperanza|<font color="#008000"><span style="cursor: w-resize">'''hoopydink'''</span></font>]][[User talk:Hoopydink|<sup>Conas tá tú?</sup>]] 11:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Errabee|Errabee]] 14:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Terence Ong|nce Ong]] <sub>([[User talk:Terence Ong|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Terence Ong|C]])</sub> 14:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' good WP:space work.-- [[User:danntm|danntm]] <sup>[[user talk:danntm|T]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Danntm|C]]</sub> 14:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''- great articles, and I think this user really needs the admin tools. [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 16:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' In my opinion, this user would be a great admin. --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:EA|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 17:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Looks like an honest, hard working user. Nice work on Joan Of Arc. '''''[[User:Nauticashades|Nautica]]''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Nauticashades|Shad]]</font><font color="black">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/User:Nauticashades|s]]</font>''' 18:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Impressive article writing and a good attitude. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 20:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Khukri|'''Khukri''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">talk</font>''']] . [[Special:Contributions/Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">contribs</font>''']])</sup> 21:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Per nom, questions and interactions. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 01:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Familiar face on the PAIN board.[[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 01:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Everything looks good to me. I remember you from many months ago when a real amusing gem of an accusation was made against us. ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavid_Cruise&diff=42413020&oldid=42410317 Your response].) [[User:Grandmasterka|<font color="red">Grand</font>]][[User talk:Grandmasterka|<font color="blue">master</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Grandmasterka|<font color="green">ka</font>]] 03:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per all above.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 04:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per above and the nom. [[User:1ne|1ne]] 05:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per above,for efforts for neutrality.Can bring a different point of view.[[User:Mustafa Akalp | <span style="color:#fff;background:#a00">Mustafa Akalp</span>]] 14:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer&nbsp;]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo/D|D]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo|iablo]] 15:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. An impressive resume. [[User:Themindset|Themindset]] 16:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. - [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 16:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Answer to question 4 displays competent understanding of the policy and application. &mdash;[[User:Malber|{{{2|Malber}}}]] ([[User talk:Malber|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Malber|contribs]]) 18:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' &ndash; solid editor, calm user when in conflicts, and seems to have good grasp on Wikipedia...why not? —'''[[User:Mirlen|<font color="coral">Mir</font>]][[User talk:Mirlen|<font color="darkorange"><span style="cursor:help">l</span></font>]][[User:Mirlen/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User talk:Mirlen|<font color="darkorange"><span style="cursor:help">n</span></font>]]''' 21:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 
It appears that Uranus' extreme axial tilt also results in extreme seasonal variations in its weather. During the Voyager 2 flyby, Uranus' banded cloud patterns were extremely bland and faint. Recent [[Hubble Space Telescope]] observations, however, show a more strongly banded appearance now that the Sun is approaching Uranus' equator. By 2007 the Sun will be directly over Uranus' equator.
'''Oppose'''
 
===Magnetic field===
:#<s>'''Oppose''', sorry. Despite some good edits, Durova has shown what appears to be an unwillingness to engage in discussion. She added what was in essence a "my professors said so" argument to [[Talk:Ich bin ein Berliner]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIch_bin_ein_Berliner&diff=35114212&oldid=34542434], suggesting strongly she hadn't read either the discussion — as the positions she brought up had all been raised on the same page, in some cases several times ("I am a Danish", etc.) — or [[Ich bin ein Berliner|the article itself]] (it did not state, as evidently thought, that there was unexpected laughter, which she explained "was almost certainly apocryphal"). Durova did not reply to any of the responses to her comments. After nine months without contributing to the article she added a disputed flag to it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ich_bin_ein_Berliner&diff=72817428&oldid=72687651], and once again added essentially the same argument-from-authority to the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ich_bin_ein_Berliner&action=history], along with other remarks that suggested she still didn't get it ("And the question of whether the donut in question is sold in Berlin is moot"); again these were replied to, and again Durova did not respond. [[User:ProhibitOnions|<span style="color:white;background:#700">&nbsp;<span style="background:#800">Pr<span style="background:#900">oh<span style="background:#a00">ib<span style="background:#b00">it<span style="background:#c00"><b>O</b></span><b>ni</b></span><b>o</b></span><b>n</b></span><b>s</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:ProhibitOnions|(T)]]</font></sup> 21:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)</s> Changed to '''Support'''
Uranus' [[magnetic field]] is peculiar since it is not originating from the geometric center of the planet and is tilted almost 60° from the axis of rotation. It is probably generated by motion at relatively shallow depths within Uranus. Neptune has a similarly displaced magnetic field, which suggests the magnetic field is not necessarily a consequence of Uranus' axial tilt. The [[magnetosphere|magnetotail]] is twisted by the planet's rotation into a long corkscrew shape behind the planet. The magnetic field's source is unknown.
:::In that circumstance it was actually rather difficult to source my information (which was why I kept it to the talk page rather than the main article). I was concerned by references that claimed the rumor originated in an article that was published several years ''after'' I first heard this from German language instructors. What can I say, other than that every professor of the language I ever had made a point of raising that example in class? Considering that most of them were native German speakers on the faculty of Columbia University, it seemed reasonable to raise the point on the talk page. The example wasn't mentioned in our textbooks so I can't actually cite it. Mea culpa: I neglected to check back the page after my last post. I would certainly have responded if I had received a request at my user talk page. Please accept my apologies if this caused disruption. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 04:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 
::::I'll accept that. Just remember that this was a page with a long history of vandalism and the like, so it always helps to check the talk history to see if something has already been proposed; if you come back and discuss a little more, you might even win everyone else over. [[User:ProhibitOnions|<span style="color:white;background:#700">&nbsp;<span style="background:#800">Pr<span style="background:#900">oh<span style="background:#a00">ib<span style="background:#b00">it<span style="background:#c00"><b>O</b></span><b>ni</b></span><b>o</b></span><b>n</b></span><b>s</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:ProhibitOnions|(T)]]</font></sup> 07:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
===Explanation for bland atmosphere===
#'''Oppose''' sorry. Your comments regarding the "Gundagai editor" make me doubt your judgement. Sorry. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 11:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 
#:There's a tough call and I'm not surprised to see someone come down against me, especially since the dispute is ongoing. I would have come on board if this editor's posts had been refactored rather than blanked. As it is - since even the IP's reply to RfC got blanked - I do think this person deserves a fair shot at reconciliation before ArbCom. If this person declines mentorship and mediation or [[WP:3O]] fail, then you'll have my wholehearted support. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 15:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The internal heat of Uranus is lower than that of [[Jupiter]] and [[Saturn]]. Both Jupiter and Saturn radiate more energy than they receive from the Sun.
#::I don't think we have much of a realistic shot at reforming the Gundagai anon, but I don't see what was out of line about Durova's suggestion. There is a big difference between not showing good judgement and disagreeing over which established procedure should be used to handle a problem user. [[User:Andrew Levine|Andrew Levine]] 15:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
This causes many powerful convection currents to form in the atmosphere. On Uranus that heat source is much lower due to its lower mass, with the temperature of its core roughly 7000 K compared to 30 000 K at Jupiter's core and 18 000 K at Saturn. The convection currents formed in the Uranian atmosphere are not as strong and hence it lacks the atmosphere banding of the larger gas giants. However, as stated above, the weather patterns of Uranus do vary with season, being more pronounced at the [[equinoxes]] than at the [[solstices]].
#:::I think the concern is that she responded favorably to the editor's claims of being mistreated without also asking the editor to be accountable for the behavior that led up to the events of October 4. In addition, the blanking is more complex than it appears because the editor had been blocked for 24 hours for incivility, and was evading the block, and so blanking the edits was arguably permitted under [[WP:BLOCK#Evasion of blocks]]. If I thought this was an indicator that Durova would generally be lax with problem editors, I would be concerned. I haven't analyzed her history and I am not expressing an opinion at this time, just a little explanation. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 16:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 
#::::There are several points here so I'll do my best to break them down briefly.
===Cloud Features===
#::::#I'm concerned about the extent of the blanking - that it included Village Pump, an uninvolved editor's user talk page, and RfC.
 
#::::#I'm concerned that this sets an exploitable precedent.
For a short period in Autumn 2004, a number of large clouds appeared in the Uranian atmosphere, giving it a [[Neptune]]-like appearance{{citation needed}}.
#::::#I'm concerned about selective enforcement: uncivil behavior on the other side of this dispute has not resulted in warnings or anything else.
 
#::::I don't necessarily think of this as an instance of railroading, yet I could see this becoming a precedent for an actual railroading with a different set of people. It doesn't seem like too much to ask to give one wholehearted try at reconciliation before ArbCom. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 19:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
==Planetary rings==
#:::::Well, I think the conduct of the other editors will get scrutinized as well if the case is accepted. I'm looking for a remedy along the lines of the Kven user case, personally. I have no problem with anyone trying a light touch with the editor one more time but given the difficulty of contacting her, and her recent response to Sarah Ewart (who had nothing to do with the blanking incident) I am dubious. Regarding your RFA, I don't think a light touch is the same thing as an error in judgement. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 21:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
{{main|Rings of Uranus}}
#::::Thanks for your response Durova (and thanks to Thatcher for clarifying some points). I will give what you have said further thought, look through some of your edits again and review my !vote before the close of your RfA. I really dislike opposing good people and I honestly didn't mean to sound like I was "coming down against [you]". But I do find some of your comments concerning and I think I have to be honest about that.
[[Image:Uranus with rings PIA01280.jpg|150px|right|thumb|Uranus with its rings in false color]]
#::::I understand your concern for what (I think) you perceive to be the "under-dog" (that is a very Aussie quality which I appreciate and value :-)) in this dispute. However, I'm very concerned that we now have two excellent administrators and a very valued long term editor who feel they have been banging their heads against a brick wall for the last six months with no support or backup, despite asking for it several times, to the degree that they feel they cannot continue on. I understand your fear that rolling back her edits may set a precedent, but I don't share it. I do not agree with reverting edits simply because someone has not signed, but I think it was okay for them to do this during the times that the anon was meant to be under a block. As Thatcher notes above, this is arguably acceptable within the blocking policy. In addition, I think the actions you have objected to are merely reflective of the extreme stress and frustration they were under for a sustained period of time. Golden Wattle did ask a number of times for help, but it seems little was forthcoming. My personal opinion is that yes, they have made mistakes, but the outcome and the situation that you have been critical of is really a manifestation of the fact that we, as a community, failed to adequately support and assist these people when they asked for it.
Uranus has a faint [[planetary ring]] system, composed of dark particulate matter up to ten meters in diameter. This ring system was discovered in March 1977 by [[James L. Elliot]], [[Edward W. Dunham]], and [[Douglas J. Mink]] using the [[Kuiper Airborne Observatory]]. The discovery was [[Serendipity|serendipitous]]; they planned to use the [[occultation]] of a star by Uranus to study the planet's [[Celestial body atmosphere|atmosphere]]. However, when their observations were analyzed, they found that the star had disappeared briefly from view five times both before and after it disappeared behind the planet. They concluded that there must be a ring system around the planet; it was directly detected when ''[[Voyager 2]]'' passed Uranus in 1986. [[As of 2005]], 13 rings had been identified. In December 2005, the [[Hubble Space Telescope]] photographed a pair of previously unknown rings. The largest is twice the diameter of the planet's previously known rings. The new rings are so far from the planet that they are being called Uranus' "second ring system." Hubble also spotted two small satellites. One shares its orbit with one of the newly discovered rings. The new data reveals that the orbits of Uranus' family of inner moons have changed significantly in the last decade.
#::::Thanks again for your comments and for clarifying your opinion. I will take it all under consideration. Cheers, [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 12:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 
#:::::As far as administrator involvement goes, it did make me uneasy to see one of the administrators deny being an involved party when I suggested recusal at Village Pump, then later state at my talk page that he or she was considering leaving Wikipedia over this affair. In an ideal world that would be the point where I'd recuse myself (if not sooner) yet I can understand the dilemma if no other administrator filled the gap. Most of this developed before [[WP:DE]] became guideline, so if I faced a similar dilemma I'd put the most affected page up for an article [[WP:RFC|RFC]] and probably seek a community topic ban before things degenerated this much. I've been willing to extend the benefit of the doubt here because the waters got muddied. There's a flexible limit on that good faith and I've cautioned the IP at my user talk page that if he or she doesn't show more willingness to cooperate and compromise soon I'll strikethrough my statement at the ArbCom request and change my position. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 16:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
In April 2006, information about the color of the outer rings was published, one of them appearing spectrally blue and the other red.<ref>{{Cite press release | title=Blue ring discovered around Uranus | publisher=UC Berkeley News | url=http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2006/04/06_bluering.shtml | date=[[2006-04-06]] | accessdate=2006-10-03}}</ref>
#:<s>'''Oppose''' E-mail is not enabled. While I read some old comments on your talk page about privacy and transparency, I feel an admin should have e-mail enabled, for example in the case of blocked users who do not realize they can post to their talk page or who want to contact your privately. You can maintain your privacy by using a service such as gmail, which can be accessed through a web browser and is untraceable. You can only get on gmail right now if someone invites you, so if you would like to e-mail ''me'' at thatcher131 at gmail.com I will send you an invitation. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 19:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)</s>
The rest of the planet's rings appear grey. The blue ring is thought to get its color from being swept by a moon, which may draw away all large debris, leaving only fine dust which refracts light in much the same way the Earth's atmosphere does.
:::I've enabled the e-mail. Wikipedia hasn't sent me the confirmation e-mail yet so it might be a few hours before I can receive messages. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 19:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 
::::E-mail is now confirmed and operational. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 19:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
==Natural satellites==
'''Neutral'''
{{main|Uranus' natural satellites}}
#<strike>'''Neutral''' until an answer to question 4 is given. &mdash;[[User:Malber|{{{2|Malber}}}]] ([[User talk:Malber|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Malber|contribs]]) 14:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)</strike>
[[Image:Uranian moon montage.jpg|400px|right|thumb|Uranian moon montage]]
#:In fairness, it ''is'' one o'clock in the morning in Australia right now. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 14:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Uranus has 27 known [[natural satellites]]. The names for these satellites are chosen from characters from the works of [[Shakespeare]] and [[Alexander Pope]]. The five main satellites are [[Miranda (moon)|Miranda]], [[Ariel (moon)|Ariel]], [[Umbriel (moon)|Umbriel]], [[Titania (moon)|Titania]] and [[Oberon (moon)|Oberon]].
#::I'm patient. ;-) &mdash;[[User:Malber|{{{2|Malber}}}]] ([[User talk:Malber|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Malber|contribs]]) 15:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 
#:::I've answered all questions now. And although I'd love to see Australia I've never had the chance. When I was on deployment in the Navy we almost went to Darwin, but plans changed and we visited Palau instead. Regards, '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 17:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
{| class="wikitable"
#::::My bad. I thought I saw an Aussie flag on your user page. I was obviously confused. :-\ [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 18:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
|- style="background:#efefef;"
! colspan="6" | The main Uranian moons<br />(compared to Earth's [[Moon]])
|-
|- style="background:#efefef;"
! colspan="2" | Name<br />
([[Help:Pronunciation respelling key|Pronunciation key]])
! Diameter<br />(km)
! Mass<br />(kg)
! Orbital radius<br />(km)
! Orbital period<br />(d)
|- style="background:#eeeeff" align="center"
| '''[[Miranda (moon)|Miranda]]''' || ''mə-ran'-də''<br />{{IPA|/mɪˈrændə/}} || 470<br />(14%) || 7.0{{e|19}}<br />(0.1%) || 129,000<br />(35%) || 1.4<br />(5%)
|- style="background:#eeeeff" align="center"
| '''[[Ariel (moon)|Ariel]]''' || ''arr'-ee-əl''<br />{{IPA|/ˈɛəriəl/}} || 1160<br />(33%) || 14{{e|20}}<br />(1.8%) || 191,000<br />(50%) || 2.5<br />(10%)
|- style="background:#eeeeff" align="center"
| '''[[Umbriel (moon)|Umbriel]]''' || ''um'-bree-əl''<br />{{IPA|/ˈʌmbriəl/}} || 1170<br />(34%) || 12{{e|20}}<br />(1.6%) || 266,000<br />(70%) || 4.1<br />(15%)
|- style="background:#eeeeff" align="center"
| '''[[Titania (moon)|Titania]]''' || ''tə-taan'-yə''<br />{{IPA|/tɪˈtɑ:njə/}} or {{IPA|/tɪˈteɪnjə/}}|| 1580<br />(45%) || 35{{e|20}}<br />(4.8%) || 436,000<br />(115%) || 8.7<br />(30%)
|- style="background:#eeeeff" align="center"
| '''[[Oberon (moon)|Oberon]]''' || ''oe'-bər-on''<br />{{IPA|/ˈoʊbərɒn/}} || 1520<br />(44%) || 30{{e|20}}<br />(4.1%) || 584,000<br />(150%) || 13.5<br />(50%)
|}
 
:''For a timeline of discovery dates, see [[Timeline of discovery of Solar System planets and their natural satellites]]''
 
==Visibility==
[[Image:Uranus, Earth size comparison.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Size comparison of Earth and Uranus]]
The brightness of Uranus is between magnitude +5.5 and +6.0, so it can be seen with the naked eye as a faint star under dark sky conditions. It can be easily found with binoculars. From Earth, it has a diameter of four arc-seconds. In larger amateur telescopes with an objective diameter greater than 12" (30cm) the planet appears as a pale blue disc with distinct [[limb shading]], and two of the larger satellites, [[Titania]] and [[Oberon]], may be visible. Even in large professional instruments no details can be seen on its disc. However, [[infrared]] studies of its atmosphere using [[adaptive optics]] have yielded interesting data in the years since the Voyager flyby.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/uranus_images_041110.html
|title=New Images Reveal Clouds on Planet Uranus
|year=2004
|publisher=Space.com
|accessdate=2006-03-05}}</ref>
 
:''For more details, see [[Aspects of Uranus]]''
 
==See also==
*[[Colonization of the outer solar system#Uranus|Colonization of Uranus]]
*[[Uranus in fiction]]
*[[Solar system in astrology#Uranus|Uranus in astrology]]
 
==References==
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a
discussion of different citation methods and how to generate
footnotes using the <ref>, </ref> and <reference /> tags
----------------------------------------------------------- -->
<div class="references-small">
<references />
</div>
 
==External links==
{{sisterlinks|Uranus}}
* [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/uranusfact.html NASA's Uranus fact sheet]
* [http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/news/science/uranus/ Keck pictures of Uranus show best view from the ground] - Press release with some photographs showing rings, satellites and clouds
* News reports of [[22 December]] [[2005]] rings and moons discovery
** ''[http://space.com/scienceastronomy/051222_uranus.html New Moons and Rings found at Uranus]'', [[SPACE.com]]
** ''[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10574903/ Two more rings discovered around Uranus]'', [[MSNBC]]
* [http://www.projectshum.org/Planets/uranus.html Planets - Uranus] A kid's guide to Uranus.
* [http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Uranus Uranus] at [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]]'s planetary photojournal.
* [http://skytonight.com/news/4435217.html Spring Has Sprung on Uranus]
 
{{Uranus_Footer}}
{{Footer_SolarSystem}}
 
{{Featured topic}}
 
==Special characters==
{{SpecialChars}}
 
[[Category:Uranus|*]]
[[Category:Planets of the Solar System]]
 
[[ang:Uranus]]
[[ar:أورانوس]]
[[ast:Uranu (planeta)]]
[[bs:Uran]]
[[br:Ouran (planedenn)]]
[[bg:Уран (планета)]]
[[ca:Urà (planeta)]]
[[cs:Uran (planeta)]]
[[cy:Wranws]]
[[da:Uranus (planet)]]
[[de:Uranus (Planet)]]
[[et:Uraan (planeet)]]
[[el:Ουρανός (πλανήτης)]]
[[es:Urano (planeta)]]
[[eo:Urano]]
[[eu:Urano (planeta)]]
[[fa:اورانوس (سیاره)]]
[[fr:Uranus (planète)]]
[[ga:Úránas (pláinéad)]]
[[gd:Urànus (planaid)]]
[[gl:Urano (planeta)]]
[[gu:યુરેનસ (ગ્રહ)]]
[[ko:천왕성]]
[[hr:Uran (planet)]]
[[io:Urano]]
[[id:Uranus]]
[[is:Úranus (reikistjarna)]]
[[it:Urano (astronomia)]]
[[he:אורנוס]]
[[kn:ಯುರೇನಸ್]]
[[ka:ურანი (პლანეტა)]]
[[kw:Ouran (planet)]]
[[ku:Ûranûs (gerstêrk)]]
[[la:Uranus (planeta)]]
[[lv:Urāns (planēta)]]
[[lb:Uranus (Planéit)]]
[[lt:Uranas (planeta)]]
[[hu:Uránusz (bolygó)]]
[[ms:Uranus]]
[[nl:Uranus (planeet)]]
[[ja:天王星]]
[[no:Uranus]]
[[nn:Planeten Uranus]]
[[ug:ئۇران (ئاسترونومىيە)]]
[[pam:Uranus]]
[[pl:Uran]]
[[pt:Urano (planeta)]]
[[ksh:Urranuß (Planneet)]]
[[ro:Uranus (planetă)]]
[[ru:Уран (планета)]]
[[sq:Urani]]
[[scn:Uranu (pianeta)]]
[[simple:Uranus (planet)]]
[[sk:Urán (planéta)]]
[[sl:Uran (planet)]]
[[sr:Уран (планета)]]
[[sh:Uran (planeta)]]
[[fi:Uranus]]
[[sv:Uranus]]
[[th:ดาวยูเรนัส]]
[[vi:Sao Thiên Vương]]
[[tr:Uranüs (gezegen)]]
[[uk:Уран (планета)]]
[[zh-yue:天王星]]
[[zh:天王星]]