Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/April: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 11:44, 25 April 2015 edit Waacstats (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 1,502,454 edits →NEW PROPOSALS: baronets ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 20:09, 18 November 2020 edit undo Pegship (talk \| contribs) Administrators 142,684 edits m Moving from Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals to Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2015 using Cat-a-lot
(32 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: {{archive}} ==Proposals, April 2015== ~~Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.~~ ~~=== NEW PROPOSALS ===~~ ==={{Cl\|Indian actor stubs}} === <!--Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub ARTICLE you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to [[WP:AFC]] for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{tl\|Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub TEMPLATES and CATEGORIES; we cannot help you with creating articles. --> {{sfp create}} <!--PLEASE READ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Proposing_new_stub_types_-_procedure]] BEFORE PROPOSING A STUB TYPE. THE NUMBER OF ARTICLES THAT QUALIFY HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE RESULT OF YOUR PROPOSAL.--> Oversized but thankfully two upmerged templates have over 60 articles ~~<!--Please add any new proposals for new stub templates / categories immediately after this line using header level 3-->~~ {{tl\|India-tv-actor-stub}} - {{Cl\|Indian television actor stubs}} * {{tl\|India-film-actor-stub}} - {{Cl\|Indian film actor stubs}} should reduce the parent category. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 19:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC) :'''Speedy support''' [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 12:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} === {{Cl\|Baronet stubs}} === {{sfp create}} Category is oversized looks like splitting out the Baronetcy should bring it down to size. * {{Tl\|Baronetcy-stub}} - {{Cl\|Baronetcy stubs}} this of for articles like [[Bagot baronets]] rather than the actual people who held the title. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 11:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ===Speedy cats=== {{sfp create}} The following templates have all reached 60, propse creating relevant categories for them. {{Tl\|Cuba-footy-bio-stub}} – {{Cl\|Cuban football biography stubs}} Line 18 ⟶ 27: {{Tl\|SanMarino-footy-bio-stub}} – {{Cl\|Sammarinese football biography stubs}} [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ==={{CL\|British Christian clergy stubs}}=== {{sfp top\|create upmerged templates for UK-RC-clergy and UK-Anglican-clergy}} Category is oversized, no existing split other than for bishops, I propose the following (categories only if the templates reach 60, split looks odd on catscan) {{tl\|UK-RC-clergy-stub}} – {{Cl\|British Roman Catholic clergy stubs}} Line 27 ⟶ 39: not sure which one to go for on the last two, clergy matches stub parent while minister matched perm cat. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC) :Maybe it's oversized because it contains [[WP:PEOPLE\|non-notable people]]? I see a lot of priests in there below the level of bishop (or equivalent); do they all warrant articles? I was under the impression that regular parish priests needed to be notable in some other way to warrant an article (see [[WP:CLERGY]]) - in which case some other (non-religious) stub template would be more suitable. We didn't create an article for [[Libby Lane]] until her appointment as Bishop of Stockport was announced: as a parish priest, she was probably not notable; as a bishop, she's automatically notable (even if she hadn't been the first female C of E bishop). --[[User:Redrose64\|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64\|talk]]) 13:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Tentatively '''support UK-RC and UK-Anglican''' templates, until it looks like a category is viable. [[User:Pegship\|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship\|talk]]) 20:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ==={{Cl\|French cycling biography stubs}}=== {{sfp create}} Oversized and we have already split out the Olympic medalists, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of permcat splitting by road, track, mountain bike etc so the only thing I can come up with is either French Tour de France stage winners, which I don't like or by decade of birth similar to US basketball or leave as is. My prefered choice would be {{Tl\|1990s-France-cycling-bio-stub}} – {{Cl\|French cycling biography, 1990s birth stubs}} Line 42 ⟶ 58: and further back if deemed necessary, categories only for templates that pass 60. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC) :'''Speedy support''' [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 23:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ==={{Cl\|Year stubs}}=== {{sfp nocreate}} Another oversized category, the following appear viable {{Tl\|Europe-year-stub}} – {{Cl\|Europe year stubs}} Line 49 ⟶ 68: unless we want upmerged by country templates. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC) :'''Oppose'''. Personally, I haven't understood the concept behind tagging these year articles as "stubs". The overwhelming majority of these articles, is simply a list of events that happened during that year. And lists, as I understand it, are a different classification from stubs. Thus -- my preference would be to remove the stubs off of all year articles that amount to nothing more than an event list. I expect this would make {{cl\|Year stubs}} a barely occupied, underpopulated category. [[User:Dawynn\|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn\|talk]]) 12:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ==={{Cl\|Khyber Pakhtunkhwa geography stubs}}=== {{sfp create}} Oversized, most articles appear to have the district in them so propose a split based on districts seems viable. {{tl\|Abbottabad-geo-stub}} – {{Cl\|Abbottabad district geography stubs}} Line 79 ⟶ 101: I have added PK to templates where I have found places outside of Pakistan with the same name and added Pakistan to categories where I found districts elsewhere, do we need district in the template to distinguish the district from the capital of the district? Obviously categories only for those that reach 60. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC) :'''Comment''' Can you please say how many stubs there will be in each category? [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 13:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC) ::Not easily, but I suggest the templates be created and populated and only those templates that pass the 60 mark get a category. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 19:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC) :::OK. I suggest that is done. I will '''support'''. [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 21:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ===Split of {{cl\|Lamiinae stubs}}=== {{sfp create}} Uhhh! It's happening again! Lamiinae is skyrocketing upwards. I will also create the permanent categories too. To combat this, I propose the following: {{tl\|Astathini-stub}}/ {{cl\|Astathini stubs}} - ~~~20~~99 pages, not including the following: :{{tl\|Bacchisa-stub}}/ {{cl\|Bacchisa stubs}} - 80 pages ~~:{{tl\|Astathes-stub}}/ {{cl\|Astathes stubs}} - 46 pages~~ {{tl\|Batocerini-stub}}/ {{cl\|Batocerini stub}} - ~~50+~~141 pages [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 22:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ===1920s silent Western film stubs=== {{sfp other}} {{cl\|1920s Western (genre) film stubs}} currently has 227 articles. However, 183 of those ''also'' have the stub tab {{tl\|silent-film-stub}}: [http://tools.wmflabs.org/catscan2/catscan2.php?categories=Silent+film+stubs%0D%0A1920s+Western+%28genre%29+film+stubs&templates_yes=asbox&sortby=title&doit=1]. I think that there should probably be a new stub tag that covers both, such as {{tl\|1920s-silent-Western-film-stub}}, since {{cl\|Silent film stubs}} is in danger of becoming overpopulated again. There used to be a {{tl\|silent-Western-film-stub}}, but it was deleted in favor of the decade stub tags for Westerns. And most of the other silent film stub tags have retained the decade when being split, such as {{tl\|1910s-short-drama-film-stub}} and {{tl\|1920s-silent-drama-film-stub}}. Thoughts? [[User:Fortdj33\|Fortdj33]] ([[User talk:Fortdj33\|talk]]) 20:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC) :There are several upmerged decade stub templates under {{cl\|Western (genre) film stubs}}, some of which once had their own categories. Perhaps it would make sense to ensure the pages in the parent category are tagged according to decade first, at which point we can see what sub-cats can be made and whether {{cl\|1920s Western (genre) film stubs}} is truly oversized. [[User:Pegship\|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship\|talk]]) 23:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} === Split of [[:Category:Asia transport stubs]] by region ===▼ ▲=== Split of [[:Category:Asia transport stubs]] by region === {{sfp create}} {{cl\|Asia transport stubs}} has over 200 stubs, excluding subcats. I recommend splitting it by region (as defined by {{cl\|Asia stubs}}, with the possible exception of the Caucasus region - we do have a transport stub category for at least one country in each region ([[:Category:Kazakhstan transport stubs\|Kazakhstan]] in Cerntral Asia, [[:Category:Japan transport stubs\|Japan]] in East Asia, [[:Category:Iran transport stubs\|Iran]] in the Middle East, [[:Category:India transport stubs\|India]] in South Asia‎, [[:Category:Vietnam transport stubs\|Vietnam]] in Southeast Asia). [[User:Od Mishehu\|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu\|Od Mishehu]] 10:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ===Propose {{tl\|Ommatidae stubs}}=== Line 106 ⟶ 139: === Some Lamiinae subcategory splits=== {{sfp top\|create Nealcidion and Jordanoleiopus only}} I propose the following: Line 134 ⟶ 168: '''Oppose''' the remaining categories. No others close to the 60 threshold, and we don't need more underpopulated categories. [[User:Dawynn\|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn\|talk]]) 10:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC) :OK. I'll just create the Nealcidion and Jordanoleiopus templates/categories for now. [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 13:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} === Religious structures === {{sfp create}} I propose creating a category tree for {{cl\|Religious building and structure stubs}}/{{tl\|reli-struct-stub}}, which would cover (among other things) churches, mosques and synagogues - which would include stub tags for any geographical region (e.g city, U.S. state) which has at least one of {{tl\|church-stub}}, {{tl\|mosque-stub}} and {{tl\|synagogue-stub}}, as well as any country with at least a dozen stubs where such a tag would be appropriate; and a category for any such area with at least 60 stubs for it (including any region with a Foo church stubs category). [[User:Od Mishehu\|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu\|Od Mishehu]] 12:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} ===Category:Medical biography stubs=== Line 144 ⟶ 180: :'''Support''' [[User:Gug01\|Gug01]] ([[User talk:Gug01\|talk]]) 14:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC) {{sfp bottom}} [[Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2015\|Proposals 2015 04]]