Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2016/December: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:58, 24 December 2016

Latest revision as of 20:11, 18 November 2020

(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{archive}}

==Proposals, December 2016==

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

=== NEW PROPOSALS ===

<!--Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub ARTICLE you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to [[WP:AFC]] for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add *{{tl|Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub TEMPLATES and CATEGORIES; we cannot help you with creating articles. -->

=== Geographic breakup of [[:Category:Mexico radio station stubs|Mexico radio station stubs]] ===

<!--PLEASE READ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Proposing_new_stub_types_-_procedure]] BEFORE PROPOSING A STUB TYPE. THE NUMBER OF ARTICLES THAT QUALIFY HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE RESULT OF YOUR PROPOSAL.-->

{{sfp top}}

* Recent efforts (mostly by myself) to add more Mexican radio station articles to the encyclopedia have left this category bloated, at 1300 articles/7 pages, and with an impending auction of 250 new stations and the continuing award of new community services, this number will keep going up. I'd like to suggest breaking this up into stubs by state, so 32 new categories, potentially with a regional grouping as is used at [[:Category:United States radio station stubs]]. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 23:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

:Holy moly, you're right about the size of the category! How about 32 templates with regional categories, upmerged, until each template gets its 60+ ?? [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 23:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

::'''Upmerged stub tags''', creating first the regional categories (as defined by {{cl|Mexico geography stubs}}), and subsequently individual state categories, when each category would reach 60 stubs. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד&nbsp;מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od&nbsp;Mishehu]] 06:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Od Mishehu}} I've created the regional cats. These states have 60 or more separate radio stations/xmtrs (though not necessarily as many articles) and may be in the running for their own: Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Mexico City, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Sinaloa, Sonora and Veracruz. Veracruz has some 100 stations and so it will need to be a priority. All but a handful of articles can be sorted based on the navbox they contain. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 08:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

<!--Please add any new proposals for new stub templates / categories immediately after this line using header level 3-->

=== Gaelic Football stub ===

{{sfp nocreate}}

*{{tl|Gaelicfootball-stub}} / [[:Category:Gaelic Football]]

Line 13 ⟶ 19:

:How many is "several"? Can you find 60+? --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 00:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

::For the record, the permcat is {{cl|Gaelic football}}, and the bio stub type is {{tl|gaelic-football-bio-stub}} / {{cl|Gaelic football biography stubs}} (and it has 4 well-populated sub-types). The rest of the sub-cats of {{cl|Gaelic football}} are host to fewer than a dozen articles in most cases; even the category for Gaelic football clubs is pretty thin. If ever there's a sufficient # of articles under Gaelic football, I will support a stub template, but I think today is not that day. [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 01:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

:::But wouldn't the bios be a subcat, justifying the stub category for Gaelic Football? I'd support this. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|<b>Rob</b><small>₁₃</small>]]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 20:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

::::The bios would be a subcat, but I don't think that justifies creating a parent cat, though it appeals to my sense of order. Any other opinions, folks? [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 17:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

=== 2010 singles genres ===

{{sfp create}}

Propose creating:

Line 22 ⟶ 31:

To break out the overpopulated [[:Category:2010s single stubs]]. I haven't run hard numbers on this, since such sorting usually needs to be done semi-automatically or manually, but the 2000s categories are so well-populated (>300 stubs each) that there's no doubt we can reach 60 stubs on each of these. Probably many more. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|<b>Rob</b><small>₁₃</small>]]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 23:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

=== Moths again ===

{{sfp create}}

* {{tl|Calamotropha-stub}} / [[:Category:Calamotropha stubs]] ([https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?language=en&project=wikipedia&categories=Crambinae%7C10%0D%0ACrambinae%20stubs&ns%5B0%5D=1&links_to_all=Calamotropha&interface_language=en&active_tab=tab_templates_n_links&doit= 109])

Line 33 ⟶ 43:

Breaks out [[:Category:Bombycoidea stubs]]. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|<b>Rob</b><small>₁₃</small>]]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 23:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

[[Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2016|Proposals 2016 12]]