Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2011/December: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 02:25, 30 December 2011 edit Dawynn (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 259,894 edits →December 2011 ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 04:59, 19 November 2020 edit undo Pegship (talk \| contribs) Administrators 142,684 edits m Adding Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Discoveries using Cat-a-lot
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 41: ==={{tl\|Gloucestershire-geo-stub}} / {{tl\|GloucesterShire-geo-stub}} === Yes, these two are identically named, with the exception of the capital 'S'. While Wikipedia can handle this just fine, I would think this could easily cause confusion for editors. Propose renaming the second one to {{tl\|GloucesterShireAU-geo-stub}}. [[User:Dawynn\|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn\|talk]]) 11:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC) :Since I'm requesting a rename, I'm moving this to the Delete log for discussion. [[User:Dawynn\|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn\|talk]]) 02:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC) ===Siege-stub=== Line 46 ⟶ 47: I had no idea that there was a process of getting permission to create a stub group. I created a stub today called [[Siege of Newcastle]] and as a siege is either not a battle or a type of battle (depends on ones PoV) I decided to create a {{tl\|siege-stub}} and a [[:category:Siege stubs]] as sub category to [[:category:battle stubs]]. I have since moved all the articles that start with the word Siege and had a {{tl\|battle-stub}} template into the category. If there is a consensus not to keep the stub or the category, let me know and I'll move the score of articles back into the battle-stub category. -- [[User:Philip Baird Shearer\|PBS]] ([[User talk:Philip Baird Shearer\|talk]]) 03:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC) :Doesn't seem a bad idea. Quite small at the moment (24 articles) but a look at how many siege articles are already stub-tagged ([http://toolserver.org/~magnus/catscan_rewrite.php?depth=3&categories=Sieges&templates_yes=asbox&doit=1]) suggests that with a bit of sorting there shouldn't be a problem in taking it through threshold. [[User:Severo\|Severo]]<sup>''[[User talk:Severo\|T]][[Special:Contributions/Severo\|C]]''</sup> 11:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC) [[Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Discoveries]]