Wikipedia:Content policies and guidelines in a nutshell: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cundiff26 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{infopage|WP:NUTSHELL}}
{{Content policy list}}
Articles [[WP:NOT|appropriate]] for this [[WP:ENC|encyclopedia]], [[WP:CITE|cite]] [[WP:V|verifiable]] claims from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] ([[WP:NPOV|in proportion]]), without presenting [[WP:NOR|our own claims]].
 
Line 12 ⟶ 13:
 
==[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]==
Wikipedia articles should present the claims and opinions appearing in the published body of reliable sources, infairly, proportionproportionately, toand theiras prominencefar as possible without editorial bias.
 
==[[Wikipedia:No original research]]==
Claims must be verifiable in reliable references; consequently, editors may not insert their opinion or analysis of a subject into Wikipedia articles, explicitly or through presentation.
 
==[[Wikipedia:Notability]]==
Wikipedia articles require enough reliable independent sources to justify a complete article. There are subjects that possess enough sources to build some kind of article, but [[WP:NOT|what Wikipedia is not]] still applies.
 
==See also==
*[[Wikipedia:List of policies#Content]]
*[[Wikipedia:Core content policies|Core content policies]] - discusses the origins of Wikipedia's content policies.
*[[Wikipedia:Verifiability and notability|Verifiability and notability]] - discuses how they are distinct, both in principle and practice.
 
[[Category:Wikipedia quick introductions]]