Content deleted Content added
Eric Rowland (talk | contribs) consistent hyphenation |
No edit summary |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
In [[
:<math>Z(V, s) = \exp\left(\sum_{
where {{
| last=Silverman
| first=Joseph H.
| author-link=Joseph H. Silverman
| title=The arithmetic of elliptic curves
| publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]]
| ___location=New York
| series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]]
| isbn=978-0-387-96203-0
| mr=1329092
| year=1992
| volume=106
}}</ref>
Making the variable transformation {{math|''t'' {{=}} ''q''<sup>−''s''</sup>,}} gives
:<math>
\mathit{Z} (V,
\left( \sum_{
</math>
as the [[formal power series]] in the variable <math>
Equivalently, the local zeta function is sometimes defined as follows:
Line 15 ⟶ 29:
</math>
:<math>
(2)\ \ \frac{d}{
In other words, the local zeta function {{math|''Z''(''V'', ''
<!--In [[number theory]], a '''local zeta function'''
Line 32 ⟶ 46:
:<math>[ F_k : F ] = k \,</math>,
for ''k'' = 1, 2, ... . When ''F'' is the unique field with ''q'' elements, ''F<sub>k</sub>'' is the unique field with <math>q^k</math> elements. Given a set of polynomial equations — or an [[algebraic variety]] ''V'' — defined over ''F'', we can count the number
:<math>N_k \,</math>
Line 64 ⟶ 78:
:<math>Z(t) = \frac{1}{(1 - t)}\ .</math>
To take something more interesting, let ''V'' be the [[projective line]] over ''F''. If ''F'' has ''q'' elements, then this has ''q'' + 1 points, including
:<math>N_k = q^k + 1</math>
Line 82 ⟶ 96:
==Motivations==
The relationship between the definitions of ''G'' and ''Z'' can be explained in a number of ways. (See for example the infinite product formula for ''Z'' below.) In practice it makes ''Z'' a [[rational function]] of ''t'', something that is interesting even in the case of ''V'' an [[elliptic curve]] over a finite field.
The local ''Z'' zeta functions are multiplied to get global ''<math>\zeta</math>'' zeta functions,
<math>\zeta = \prod Z</math>
With that understanding, the products of the ''Z'' in the two cases used as examples come out as <math>\zeta(s)</math> and <math>\zeta(s)\zeta(s-1)</math>.▼
These generally involve different finite fields (for example the whole family of fields '''Z'''/''p'''''Z''' as ''p'' runs over all [[prime number]]s).
In these fields, the variable ''t'' is substituted by ''p<sup>−s</sup>'', where ''s'' is the complex variable traditionally used in [[Dirichlet series]]. (For details see [[Hasse–Weil zeta function]].)
▲
==Riemann hypothesis for curves over finite fields==
For projective curves ''C'' over ''F'' that are [[Algebraic curve#Singularities|non-singular]], it can be shown that
:<math>Z(t) = \frac{P(t)}{(1 - t)(1 - qt)}\ ,</math>
Line 104 ⟶ 124:
For example, for the elliptic curve case there are two roots, and it is easy to show the absolute values of the roots are ''q''<sup>1/2</sup>. [[Hasse's theorem on elliptic curves|Hasse's theorem]] is that they have the same absolute value; and this has immediate consequences for the number of points.
[[André Weil]] proved this for the general case, around 1940 (''Comptes Rendus'' note, April 1940): he spent much time in the years after that [[Foundations of Algebraic Geometry|writing]] up the [[algebraic geometry]] involved. This led him to the general [[Weil conjectures]]. [[Alexander Grothendieck]] developed [[scheme (mathematics)|scheme]] theory for the purpose of resolving these.
A generation later [[Pierre Deligne]] completed the proof.
(See [[étale cohomology]] for the basic formulae of the general theory.)
Line 137 ⟶ 157:
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Bernhard Riemann}}
[[Category:Algebraic varieties]]
|